[1] Brooke, A., Kendrick K. and Meeraus, A. GAMS: A Users Guide, The Scientific Press: CA. 1988.
[2] Dayanand, N. and Padman, R. Payments in projects: a contractor’s model. Technical Report, The Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1993.
[3] Dayanand, N. and Padman, R. On modeling payments in project networks. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48 (1997), 906-918.
[4] Dayanand, N. and Padman, R. A two stage search heuristic for scheduling payments in projects. Annals of Operations Research, 102 (2001), 197-220.
[5] Dayanand, N. and Padman, R. Project contracts and payment schedules: the clients problem. Management Science, 47(12) (2001), 1654-1667.
[6] Elmaghraby, S.E. and Herroelen, W.S. The scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 49 (1990), 35-49.
[7] Grinold, R.C. The payment scheduling problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 19(1) (1972), 123-136.
[8] He, Z. and Xu, Y. Multi-mode project payment scheduling problems with bonus-penalty structure. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3) (2008), 1191-1207.
[9] He, Z., Wang, N., Jia, T. and Xu, Y. Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(3) (2009), 688-696.
[10] He, Z., Liu, R. and Jia, T. Metaheuristics for multi-mode capitalconstrained project payment scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 223 (2012), 605-613.
[11] Herroelen, W.S., VAN Dommelen P. and Demeulemeester, E.L. Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments. European Journal of Operational Research, 100 (1997), 97-121.
[12] Kavlak, N., Ulusoy, G., Serifoglu, F.S. and Birbil, S.I. Client-contractor bargaining on net present value in project scheduling with limited resources. Naval Research Logistics, 56(2) (2009), 93-112.
[13] Kazaz, B. and Sepil, C.B. Project scheduling with discounted cash flows and progress payments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(1996), 1262-1272.
[14] Mika, M., Waligora, G. and Weglarz, J. Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode resourceconstrained project scheduling with positive discounted cash flows and different payment models. European Journal of Operational Research, 164 (2005), 639-668.
[15] Russell, A.H. Cash Flows in networks. Management Science, 16(5) (1970), 357-373.
[16] Sepil, C. and Ortac, N. Performance of the heuristic procedures for constrained projects with progress payments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48 (1997), 1123-1130.
[17] Szmereskovsky, J.G. The impact of contractor behaviour on the client’s payment scheduling problem. Management Science, 51(4) (2005), 629-640.
[18] Talbot, F.B. Resource-constrained project scheduling with time-resource trade offs: the nonpreemptive case. Management Science, 28(10) (1982), 1197-1210.
[19] Tantisuvanichkul, V. and Kidd, M. Maximizing net present value a review through literature. 2ndInternational Conference on Construction and Project Management, Singapore, 2011.
[20] Ulusoy, G. and Cebelli, S. An equitable approach to the payment scheduling problem in project management. European Journal of Operational Research, 127 (2000), 262-278.
21] Ulusoy G., Sivrikaya-Serifoglu, F. and Sahin, S. Four payment models for the multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows. Annals of Operations Research, 102 (2001), 237-261.
[22] Vanhoucke, M., Demeulemeester, E. and Herroelen, W. Progress payments in project scheduling problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 148 ( 2003), 604-620.
[23] Vanhoucke, M. and Debels, D. The discrete time cost trade-off problem under various assumptions exact and heuristic procedures. Journal of Scheduling, 10 (2007), 311-326.
