Evaluating the Situation of Environmental Culture’s Reproduction in Rural Areas (Case Study: A Pilot of Carbon Sequestration Project in Jazmourian)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 2، دوره 6، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 18، دی 2017، صفحه 21-37   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.55710

نویسندگان

Javad Bazrafshan؛ Abuzar Paidar^*

University of Sistan & Baluchestan

چکیده

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Implementation of carbon sequestration projects (CSPs) in rural areas is one of the international measures of achieving a sustainable environment, with a regional cooperative and logistical approach, and recently is being implemented in rural areas in Iran, including Jazmourian in southern Kerman. After two years of implementation of the project, the present study aims to investigate the role of CSP in changing the environmental culture and correcting practical behavior of the rural beneficiaries in Jazmourian. The research questions are as follows: what are the manifestations of changes in and reproduction of rural beneficiary's environmental culture, pursuant implementation of CSP in Jazmourian? And whether the changes in villagers’ behavior and practice regarding exploitation of the environment in areas where CSP is being implemented, is the same.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Reproduction means regeneration and recreation of beings and places that are endangered and face extinction. Renovation and reconstruction approaches lack the required attention to environmental values while reproduction is a comprehensive approach with a monolithic, strategic outlook for sustainable development. Reproduction is a unified attitude and a measure which results in the solution of the problems and seeks a sustainable situation in terms of environment, economy, society and the physical aspect of the region.
Major views and approaches related to the present study are those of culture building approach, theoretical model of adjusted behavior, and human ecology, all of which are subsumed under the category of sustainable development (the new environmental paradigm). According to the paradigm, cultural capacity building is in fact fostering several beliefs in human beings:
 Belief in innovation
 Belief in science (scientism)
 Belief in future
 Belief in humans’ ability in solving varied problems (self-confidence)
 Belief in and respect for the environment (environmentalism)
Contrary to the discourse of classical environmental theories, the new ecological paradigm is prevalent today.
According to “theoretical model of adjusted behavior”, beneficiaries’ behavior is influenced by their values and attitudes and an environmentally-friendly behavior will not be displayed, unless beneficiaries change their norms and values. Those with views adhering to the human ecological school believe that beneficiaries should adapt and conform to their habitat.
3. METHODOLOGY
The present study is a descriptive-analytical one and the data were gathered through library and field methods, using a questionnaire and observation. Research population consists of the 8 villages were CSP pilot is being implemented in Jazmourian, (68 of the development team leaders who are also members of CSP) were enumerated completely and make up the sample population, for only team leaders, as village residents and CSP members, have the necessary knowledge and eligibility for the purpose of data gathering. The measurement used in the study was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity was established by academic experts and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.868 confirmed its reliability. The data was analyzed using weight propagation (WP).
4. DISCUSSION
As for the first hypothesis, the findings of the WP model indicate that members of the development teams in Ziarat Mirmeghdad and Heydarabad villages had the lowest rate of reproduction and those of Boohang, Grouchan, and Chahdasht had the highest rates of reproduction of environmental culture. The findings of Fisher's ANOVA test show that there is a statistically significant (sig=0.000) difference among the eight villages under study, in terms of reproduction environmental culture. As for the second hypothesis, the findings reveal that , except for the two villages of Ziarat Mirmeghdad and Heydarabad, implementation of CSP in Jazmourian district has improved the degree of reproduction of environmental culture, whose manifestations can be seen in the raised awareness of people regarding the environment and its resources, implementation of seedling production projects, seedling planting, creation of biological windbreaks, reduction of the pressure on pastures, and creation of technical and artistic jobs, etc.
5. Conclusion
The present study aims to investigate the degree of reproduction of environmental culture in the rural areas of the CSP pilot study in Jazmourian. A review of previous studies and theories leading to the present research revealed that nowadays, capacity building and cultural reproduction are major needs in rural communities in their quest to achieve sustainability. Improving environmental performance of villagers and reproduction of rural culture necessitates creation and implementation of comprehensive plans which, in an orderly process, address such issues as sensitization, orientation, mobilization of masses, institutionalization, along with empowering locals and winning their trust and cooperation.
The best approach to improve the environmental culture of Jazmourian villagers is to emphasize a knowledge-based approach and the best strategy for the villagers of the region is that of industrialization (small, workshop-based, artistic industries and jobs that are not dependent on water) together with the strategy of expansion of environmental measures with the help of villagers, both of which can be proper substitutes of conventional agricultural methods.
The value of the findings of the study lies in their ability to detect and assess the effects of collaborative programs in improving villagers’ degree of environmental reproduction, manifest in three ideological, behavioral and practical aspects.
Considering the weakness and vulnerability of the region's environmental system, along with deficiencies in the villagers’ environmental culture and the opportunities presented by CSP to rectify the situation, following practical suggestions are made:
 Offering hands-on courses to introduce the environment and the capacity of its resources, along with effective exploitation methods and protection of environmental resources.
 Offering orientation classes to remove the remaining livestock from Jazmourian pastures and developing man-made grasslands for them.
 Encouraging and introducing top stockbreeders, in terms of reducing the dependence of livestock to the pasture, and supporting industrial animal husbandries which are highly efficient.
 Continuing and developing environmental projects in villages, to the best of ability, specifically implementation of windbreakers around farms, home gardens and extending verdant courtyards in homes, creating and protecting rural parks in collaboration with the rural municipality, people and the office of natural resources.
 Continuing technical courses and supporting the newly created jobs for men and women
 Creating model farms which are environmentally friendly, together with encouraging and introducing top farmers in terms of their protective performance of water and soil resources.
 And etc.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Environmental knowledge؛ Environmental behavior؛ Sustainable development؛ Carbon Sequestration Project (CSP)؛ Jazmourian

مراجع

1. Abedi Sarvestani, A., & Shahvaly, M. (1388/2009). Promote the role of farmers in the promotion of environmental ethics. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 4(1&2), 130-120. [In Persian]

2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ‏

3. Aykaç, P., Rifaiolu, M.N., Alt nz AGB., & Güçhan N. (2009). Design Interventions as Regenerators in Historic Towns: Proposal for Ayval k Historicdepots Region. In the International Conference on the Urban Projects, Architectural Intervention in Urban Areas, TU, Delft, The Netherlands.

4. Bahraini, S.A., Izadi, M.S. & Mofidi, M. (1393/2014). The approaches and policies of urban renewal from" urban reconstruction" to "sustainable urban regeneration. Journal of Urban Studies, 3(9), 17-31. [In Persian]

5. Bird, J., Curtis, B., Putnam, T., Robertson, G., & Tickner, L. (Eds.). (1993). Making the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Changes. London and New York: Routledge.

6. Department of Natural Resources and Watershed south of Kerman. (1394/2015). Report CSP Jazmurian. Kerman: Department of Natural Resources. [In Persian]

7. Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. (2012). A MOORA based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for supply chain strategy selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3(4), 649-662. ‏

8. Fal‌Soliman, M., & Chakoshi, B. (1390/2011). South Khorasan Sarbisheh- Hosseinabad plain CSP monitoring and socio-economic. Journal of Geographic Arid Regions, 1(3), 101-118. [In Persian]

9. Fal-Suleiman, M., & Hajipoor, M. (1390/2011). Analysis of the sustainability of NGOs in rural areas, the experiences of CSP projects in South Khorasan. Journal of Applied Research Geographical Sciences, 20(23), 128-108. [In Persian]

10. FalSuleiman, M., Sadeghi, H., & Muhadipoor, M. (1391/2012). Analysis of the role of carbon sequestration project in the empowerment of rural women Hosseinabad Sarbisheh Birjand. Journal of Regional Planning, 2(8), 27-13. [In Persian]

11. Hajinejhad, A., Fattahi, A., & Paidar, A. (1394/2015). The application of models and techniques of decision making in geography. Tehran: Tehran University Jihad. [In Persian]

12. Hasannejad, M., kohansal, M.R., & Ghorbani, M. (1389/2010). Incentive feasibility of implementing carbon sequestration project in order to empower local communities. Journal of Economy & Agricultural Development, 24(3), 323-334. [In Persian]

13. Hasannejad, M., kohansal, M.R., & Ghorbani, M. (1390/2011). Factors influencing participation of groups of villagers in rural development. Journal of Rural and Development, 14(2), 73-91. [In Persian]

14. Heidari Sarban, V. (1392/2013). The factors affecting the empowerment of farmers in rural areas of Ahar city. Quarterly Geographical Space, 13(41), 157-170. [In Persian]

15. Hess, P., & Siciliano, J. (1995). Management: Responsibility for performance. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. ‏

16. Kaiser, F. G. (2006). A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 71-81. ‏

17. Lankford, B., & Beale, T. (2007). Equilibrium and non-equilibrium theories of sustainable water resources management: Dynamic river basin and irrigation behavior in Tanzania. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 168-180. ‏

18. Loh, J. (2002). Living planet report 2002. World Wide Fund for Nature International (WWF), UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Redefining Progress. Center for Sustainability Studies, Gland, Switzerland. ‏

19. Manstead, A.S.R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior, In Stroebe W & Hewstone M (Eds.). European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 69-95. Chichester: Wiley.

20. Paidar, A. (1392/2013). Design an optimal policy exploitation of groundwater resources in Jiroft. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

21. Pourdeyhimi, Sh. (1390/2011). Culture and Housing. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 134, 18-3. [In Persian]

22. Pourjafar, M.R., & Dehghani, F. (1390/2011). Recreating the role of cultural sights on improving the quality of life of citizens. Journal of the Role of World, 1(1), 81-100. [In Persian]

23. Rashidpour, A., & Aghasi, S. (1390/2011). A key factor in the development of cultural capacity building cultural – political. International Journal of Political Research, 3(9), 139-131. [In Persian]

24. Roberts P., & Sykes H. (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: Thousand Oaks, Calif, Sage.

25. Roknoddin-e-Eftekhari, A., & Badri, A. (1391/2012). Sustainability evaluation: concept and method. Geographical Research Quarterly, 18(2), 9-34. [In Persian]

26. Sabrifar, R., Falsoliman, M., & Qaisary, M. (1391/2012). Local sustainable development and the maximum absorption of the carbon sequestration project experiences. Journal of Geography and Development, 10(28), 41-54. [In Persian]

27. Seyyedalipour, S.A., Paidar, A., & Sadeghi, Kh. (1395/2016). Providing spatial planning strategies to achieve sustainable economic model with an emphasis on sustainable security in rural areas (CSP implementation of Jazmurian in southern Kerman). Journal of Geography & Development, 14(44), 45-64. [In Persian]

28. Shakouie, H. (1387/2008). Environmental philosophy and geographical. Tehran: Gitashenasi Press. [In Persian]

29. Sutton, P. W. (2007). The environment: a sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity. ‏

30. Triantaphyllou, E., & Baig, K. (2005). The impact of aggregating benefit and cost criteria in four MCDA methods. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(2), 213-226.

31. UNCCD (2009), the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought, Particularly in Africa.

32. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (No. 9). Gabriola Island, B. C., Canada: New Society Publishers. ‏

33. Williamson, I. P., Rajabifard, A. & Feeney, M. E. F. (Eds.). (2004). developing spatial data infrastructures: from concept to reality. CRC Press. ‏

34. Yaghobi, A., Vahdat, H., & Latifi, S. (1392/2013). Identify inhibited the tendency of women to household jobs. Journal of Women in Development and Policy, 11 (4), 574-559. [In Persian]