بررسی تأثیر کیفیت مقررات‌گذاری بر توسعه صنعت بیمه

اقتصاد پولی مالی

مقاله 8، دوره 23، شماره 11، آبان 1395، صفحه 167-191   

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/pm.v23i11.38277

نویسندگان

محمد کریمی¹؛ علی چشمی^{* 2}؛ مجتبی چشمی³

¹دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، واحد نیشابور

²فردوسی مشهد

³دانشگاه مفید قم

چکیده

طبق اقتصاد نهادی جدید یکی از نهادهای رسمی که می‌تواند عملکرد یک صنعت را متأثر سازد کیفیت مقررات‌حاکم بر آن صنعت است. فرایند اصلاح مقررات‌گذاری بیمه در جهان نشان می‌دهد که نظام نظارت مالی با نهاد مقررات‌گذار مستقل از دولت با نظارت مناسب‌تر بر بازار و در عین حال تضمین کیفیت خدمات بیمه‌ای می‌تواند منافع بیشتری برای جامعه داشته باشد و صنعت بیمه را توسعه دهد. بنابراین مسئله اصلی مقاله، این است که کیفیت تنظیم مقررات در صنعت بیمه بر توسعه این صنعت تأثیر دارد. این مسئله، با یک تحلیل مقایسه‌ای و برآورد مدل اقتصادسنجی با داده‌های تابلویی در کشورهای منتخب بررسی شده است. نمونه مطالعه از دو گروه شامل کشورهای توسعه‌یافته و کشورهای با سطح توسعه متوسط طی دوره 1989 تا 2012 تشکیل شده است. داده‌های کیفیت مقررات‌گذاری بیمه بر اساس اصول اصلی بیمه (ICP) و گزارش‌های کشوری برنامه ارزیابی بخش مالی (FSAP) صندوق بین‌المللی پول و نیز اصلاحات در مقررات‌گذاری کشوری طی دوره زمانی مطالعه و داده‌های توسعه صنعت بیمه بر اساس ضریب نفوذ بیمه تهیه شد. نتایج برآورد مدل نشان می‌دهد که بهبود مقررات‌گذاری بیمه در کشورهای توسعه‌یافته بیش از کشورهای با توسعه متوسط بر توسعه بیمه تأثیر دارد؛ هرچند این تأثیرگذاری در همه کشورهای نمونه اندک بوده و حاکی از آن است که تأثیر این متغیر نهادی، تدریجی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مقرراتگذاری بیمه؛ نهاد مقرراتگذار؛ عملکرد صنعت بیمه؛ ضریب نفوذ بیمه؛ اصول اصلی بیمه؛ کیفیت مقرراتگذاری بیمه

مراجع

[1] Bahador, Azadeh, Shahin Taiar and Rahele Nouri. (2009). The need for change in the Iran's insurance supervision systems with the entry in privatization and liberalization space, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference of Insurance and Development, Insurance Research Center, Tehran. (in Persian)

[2] Boylaud, Olivier, and Giuseppe Nicoletti, regulation, market structure and performance in telecommunications, economics department working papers N0.237, 2000.

[3] Central Insuranceof Iran, Statistical Yearbook.

[4] Čihak, Martin and Alexander Tieman. (2008). Quality of Financial Sector Regulation and Supervision around the World, IMF Working Paper, WP/08/190, International Monetary Fund.

[5] Dawson, john. W. (2006). “Regulation, Investment, and Growth across Countries”, Cato Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 489-509.

[6] Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Luc Laeven, and Ross Levine. (2003). Regulations, Market Structure, Institutions, and the Cost of Financial Intermediation, NBER Working Paper No. 9890.

[7] Djanko, Simeon, McLiesh, Caralee and Ramalho, Rita Maria. (2006). “Regulation and Growth”, Economics Letters, vol. 92, pp. 395–401

[8] Eling, M., Schmeiser, H. and Schmit, J. (2007). ‘The Solvency II process: Overview and critical analyses, Risk Management and Insurance Review 10(1): 69–85.

[9] Farshbaf Maherian, Javad and Parviz Khosroshahi. (2009). Necessary conditions for the deployment of intelligent, institutionalization and self-regulated insurance monitoring system, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference of Insurance and Development, Insurance Research Center, Tehran. (in Persian)

[10] Hassanzadeh, Ali, Kazemnejad, Mahdi. (2009). Evaluation of financial supervision in the insurance industry, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference of Insurance and Development, Insurance Research Center, Tehran. (in Persian)

[11] International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). (2003). ”Insurance core principles and methodology” Principles No. 1.

[12] International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). (2011). Insurance Core Principles, Standards, Guidance and Assessment Methodology, As Amended 12 October 2012 (with new ICP 9).

[13] International Monetary Fund. (2010). United States: Publication of Financial Sector Assessment Program Documentation Detailed Assessment of Observance of IAIS Insurance Core Principles, IMF Country Report No. 10/126

[14] International Monetary Fund. (2011). Germany: Financial Sector Assessment Program Detailed Assessment of Observance on Insurance Core Principles, IMF Country Report No. 11/272.

[15] International Monetary Fund, 2011, United Kingdom: Insurance Core Principles Detailed Assessment of Observance, IMF Country Report No. 11/234.

[16] International Monetary Fund. (2012). Japan: Insurance Core Principles—Detailed Assessment of Observance, IMF Country Report No. 12/228.

[17] International Monetary Fund. (2012). Mexico: Detailed Assessment of Observance of International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Insurance Core Principles, IMF Country Report No. 12/67.

[18] International Monetary Fund. (2012). Turkey: Financial System Stability Assessment IMF Country Report No. 12/261.

[19] International Monetary Fund. (2013). Malaysia: Publication of Financial Sector Assessment Program Documentation Detailed Assessment of Observance of Insurance Core Principles, IMF Country Report No. 13/57.

[20] International Monetary Fund. (2013). Singapore Detailed Assessment of Observance on Insurance Core Principles, IMF Country Report No. 13/343

[21] International Monetary Fund. (2014). Republic of Korea: Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes, IMF Country Report No. 14/127.

[22] Jalilian, Hossein, Colin Kirkpatrick and David Parker. (2007). The Impact of Regulation on Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Cross-Country Analysis, World Development, Volume 35, Issue 1, January, Pages 87-103.

[23] Kane, Edward J. (1988). “Interaction of Financial and Regulatory Innovation,” American Economic Review, 78, 328-334.

[24] Loayza, Norman, Ana Maria Oviedo, and Luis Serven. (2005a). “Regulation and Macroeconomic Performance,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3469.

[25] Loayza, Norman, Ana Maria Oviedo, and Luis Serven. (2005b). The Impact of Regulation on Growth and Informality: Cross-Country Evidence, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series, May, no. 3623.

[26] Markazmalmiri, Ahmad. (2011). The Impact of Regulations on the Quantity and Quality of Business Environment, Islamic Parliament Research Center of Iran, Working paper, no. 12313. (in Persian)

[27] Mazlomi, Nader and Marzieh keshvari. (2009). Favorable insurance supervisory Institution From viewpoint of firms, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference of Insurance and Development, Insurance Research Center, Tehran. (in Persian)

[28] Mehrabani, vahid. (2010). Regulations inthe labor marketand its impacton productivity; evidence ofIranian Industries, Journal of Iraneconomicresearch, no. 45. (in Persian)

[29] North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[30] Organisation for Economic Co-opration and Development (OECD). (2002). “Insurance Solvency Supervision.

[31] Organisation for Economic Co-opration and Development (OECD). (2006). “in Insurance Rgulation and Supervision in OECD Countries”.

[32] Organisation for Economic Co-opration and Development (OECD). (2006). “Insurance Rgulation and Supervision in Latin America”.

[33] Steiner, Faye. (2001). Regulation, Market Structure and Performance in the Electricity Supply Industry, OECD Economic Studies No. 32, 2001/I.

[34] Zare, Mohamad Sadegh. (2009). Study of optimal monitoring Establishment method in the insurance industry: preconditions, requirements and supervision measures, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference of Insurance and Development, Insurance Research Center, Tehran. (in Persian).