تحلیل روابط چندگانه ساختاری نقش چشم انداز زمان آینده در نحوه شکل گیری قرارداد روان‌شناختی کارکنان

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

مقاله 7، دوره 12، پائیز و زمستان1399 - شماره پیاپی 24، اسفند 1399، صفحه 161-188   

نوع مقاله: مقالات

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/pmt.v12i2.76546

نویسندگان

سعید آیباغی اصفهانی¹؛ امیر غفوریان شاگردی^{* 2}؛ سیدمجتبی میرلوحی¹؛ محمد مهدی مهدوی³؛ امید بهبودی⁴

¹استادیار دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود

²استادیار دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام رضا (ع)

³کارشناس ارشد مدیریت، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود

⁴دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، موسسه آموزش عالی عطار

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش تحلیل روابط ساختاری نقش چشم‌انداز زمان آینده بر قرارداد روان‌شناختی است و چشم‌انداز زمان آینده (FTP) اشاره به تفاوت‌های فردی در تمایل به تفکر در مورد شرایط آینده دارد و غیر از توانایی، تفاوت‌های فردی را می‌سازد که در طول دهه‌های گذشته علاقه به دست آوردن آن را افزایش‌ داده است و هنگامی‌که قضاوت کارکنان از توفیق قرارداد کارفرما بالا باشد، آن‌ها به‌احتمال‌زیاد احساس تعهد برای جبران می‌کنند، ازاین‌رو حس خود را از تعهد نسبت به سازمان افزایش می‌دهند. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کارکنان رسمی و قراردادی دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود هستند و کل جامعه 261 نفر بوده‌اند، جهت جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از روش کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی و تحلیل مقالات پژوهشی استفاده‌شده است. برای گردآوری داده‌ها و اندازه‌گیری متغیرها، پرسشنامه­های استاندارد استفاده شد، همچنین برای بررسی روایی پرسشنامه‌ها از روایی محتوایی CVR و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و برای بررسی پایایی از آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد که همگی مورد تائید قرار گرفتند. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها به روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری به کمک نرم‌افزار لیزرل صورت گرفته است و نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که توفیق اقتصادی، اجتماعی-احساسی و توسعه‌ای کارفرما بر تعهدات کارکنان تأثیر مستقیم و معناداری دارد و همچنین چشم‌انداز زمان آینده بر توفیق توسعه‌ای کارفرما تأثیر مستقیم و معناداری دارد و رابطۀ بین توفیق اقتصادی کارفرما با تعهدات کارکنان را تعدیل می‌نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

چشم‌انداز زمان آینده؛ قرارداد روان‌شناختی؛ تعهدات کارکنان؛ توفیق کارفرما

مراجع

Afjahi, S., & Alizadeh far, Z. (2017). The relationship of perception from employer brand with job attitudes of employees. Management Studies in Development and Evolution,26(84), 73-96. (in Persian)

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The Measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.

Bal, P. M.; De Lange, A. H.; Jansen, P. G. W., & Van der Velde, M. E. G. (2008). Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 143–158.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brierley, J. A. (1996). The Measurement of organizational commitment and professional commitment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(2), 265-267.

Cate, R. A., & John, O. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middleage. Psychology and Aging, 22, 186–201.

Chen, L-H.; Liaw, S. Y.; & Lee, T. Z. (2003). Using an HRM pattern approach to examine the productivity of manufacturing firms – an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 24 (3).

Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work. a critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Kessler, I. (2002). Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and employer perceptions.

Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Neuman, J. H. (2004). The psychological contract and individual differences: the role of exchange and creditor ideologies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 150–164.

Cropanzano, R.; Anthony, E. L.; Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516.

Dabos, G. E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 52–72.

De Vos, A.; Buyens, D., & Schalk, R. (2003). Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: adapting to reality andthe role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 537–559.

Fasbendera, Ulrike.; Wohrmannb, A.; Wangc, M., & Klehea, U. (2019). Is the future still open? the mediating role of occupational future time perspective in the effects of career adaptability and aging experience on late career planning. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 111, 24–38.

Fung, H. H.; Lai, P., & Ng, R. (2001). Age differences in social preferences among taiwanese and mainland chinese: the role of perceived time. Psychology and Aging, 16, 351–356.

Ghayour, S.; Behboodi, O., & Karimpour, A. (2016). The Relationship between quality of work life and organizational commitment: the mediating role of staff members' empowerment in police+10 centers in South Khorasan. Development of human resources management and support, 42, 57-82. (in Persian)

Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2018). Self-estrangement’s toll on job performance: The pivotal role of social exchange relationships with coworkers. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1573–1597.

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

Guest, D. E. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: an analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 541–555.

Hemmat Panah, A.; Mehdad., A., & Farsi, Z. (2018). The effect of perceived adherence to psychological contract on citizenship performance among employees of a industrial company: mediating role of organizational loyalty. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 19(1), 15-25. (in Persian)

Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: a measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 166–175.

Jafari, T., & Shafeiabadi, A. (2007). The Study of the group counciling effectiveness, with the aspect of job compatablity, on increasing the employees job motivation in tehran inspecting organization headquarter. Scientific Journal of Education Research, 3(12), 1-18. (in Persian)

Kastenbaum, R. (1961). The dimensions of future time perspective: an experimental an alysis. Journal of General Psychology, 65, 203 – 218

Lambert, L. S.; Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract: a comparison of traditional and expanded views.

Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 7, 125-139.

Lazear, E. P. (1979). Why is there mandatory retirement? The Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1261–1284.

Lazear, E. P. (1981). Agency, earnings profiles, productivity, and hours restrictions. The American Economic Review, 71, 606–620.

McInnis, K. J.; M eyer, J. P., & F Eldman, S. (2009). P sychological C ontracts and their implications for commitment: a feature-based approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74 (2), 165-180.

Mello, Z. R.; Finan, L. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2013). Introducing an instrument to assess time orientation and time relation in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 551-563.

Montes, S. D., & Zweig, D. (2009). do promises matter? an exploration of the role of promises in psychological contract breach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1243–1260.

Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226-256.

Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Age, work experience, and the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1053-1075.

O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 492.

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Oyinlade, A. O. (2018). Relations of job structure to affective organizational commitment. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies, 6(1), 13-32.

1. Matthijs Bal.; Paul G. W.; Jansen., Mandy E. G.; van der Velde, Annet H., de Lange., & Denise M. (2010). Rousseau, The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: a study among older workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 474-486,

Paré, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007). The Influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals' turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32(3), 326-357.

Pathak, R. D.; Budhwar, P. S.; Singh, V., & Hannas, P. (2005). Best HRM practices and employees’ psychological outcomes: a study of shipping companies in cyprus. South Asian Journal of Management, 12(4), 7-24.

Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Seginer, R., & Lens, W. (2015). The motivational properties of future time perspective future orientation: Different approaches, different cultures. in time perspective theory; review, research and application (pp. 287-304). springer international publishing.

Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 154–168.

Seyed Naghavi, M., & Arab Almori, M. (2012). Internal career orientations: a case study of banking industry. Iranian journal of management sciences (IAMS), 6(24), 25-40. (in Persian)

Shell, D., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self - regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26 (4), 481 – 506

Shi, X., & Gordon, S. (2020). Organizational support versus supervisor support: The impact on hospitality managers’ psychological contract and work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102374.

Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.

Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24, 487–493.

Zacher, H.; Heusner, S.; Schmitz, M.; Zwierzanksa, M. M., & Frese, M. (2009). Focus on opportunities as a mediator of the relationships between age, job complexity, and work performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 374–386.

Zhao, H.; Wayne, S. J.; Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.