The Requirements of Rural Residents for Achieving Sustainable Livelihood (Case Study: Sarfariab District of Charam County)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 5، دوره 6، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 20، فروردین 2018، صفحه 183-203   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v6i4.62522

نویسندگان

Ahmad Roumiyani¹؛ Hamdollah Sojasi Qeidari^{* 2}؛ Hamid Shayan²؛ Soroush Sanaiee Moghaddam³

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad

³University of Zanjan

چکیده

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Development is a multi-dimensional process which is investigated through a variety of perspectives. In many definitions, development includes themes such as the intellectual maturity of rural residents in identifying and solving problems related to themselves and their society. As a result, meeting the essential needs of development with the aim of achieving a better quality of life as well as healthcare is regarded as equal for everyone and it is based on the public participation of people, the orientation of which is determined by themselves with focus on intersectional cooperation. Given the sustainable life approach as a strategy for rural development, it has become a desirable pattern for the empowerment and capacity building in rural regions parallel to changing lifestyle in development theories and it is considered as a significant means to achieve sustainable development.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Livelihood is considered sustainable when it is capable of resisting against unexpected pressures and damages along with restoring itself without harming natural resources as well as improving its assets and capabilities in the future. Hence, the major topic of LTEC is providing for rural entrepreneurs who are interested in development and present their entrepreneurial theories to the market and attempt to realize them; consequently, rural communities have requirements similar to those of urban societies which need to be addressed and analyzed. In this case, “requirement” is considered as a situation in which the status quo is far from the desired condition. In essential requirements approach, it is attempted to specify an absolute minimum of the required resources aimed at long-term physical welfare. The notion of poverty line is derived from this very idea and includes the amount of income required for meeting the essential needs. This approach is particularly useful in the area of developmental cooperation and indicates what a society needs in order to survive and maintain their existence. Furthermore, it determines the actions that should be taken in order to help the poor reach above the poverty line. The theory of essential requirements does not emphasize on investing in effective economic activities, whereas the sole survival of the society is emphasized exclusively. In this regard, in Maslows’ hierarchy of needs theory, the notion of “fulfillment” is considered synonymous to “fulfilling, providing, and meeting the needs”. Fulfilling the needs involves a set of states such as strength, agility, pleasure, and reward. Following the fulfillment of a single level of requirements, the needs in other levels become important which may dominate one’s behavior until the lowest hierarchy is reached.
3. METHODOLOGY
The present inquiry is an applied, descriptive-analytical study which is conducted using the survey method as well as questionnaires. The population of the study includes the rural communities in Charam city; according to a 2011 census, there are 81 populated and 21 unpopulated villages which entail more than 8076 people (1966 families). In this study, 10 villages were selected through spot sampling as this method is majorly used for studying the phenomena and features of geographical locations and regions. In these chosen regions, villages have been formed mostly due to the natural geographical environment (such as the type of land, vegetation species, minor climates, the quantity and quality of water, and so on) as well as human phenomena (population, economic activities, etc.). The total population of these 10 villages included more than 1725 families which according to the Cochran formula and 0.5 margin of error, 272 questionnaires were provided and distributed randomly among the people. Accordingly, in order to examine the needs of rural residents in line with sustainable livelihood, simple random sampling was used. Following data collection and their processing in software settings such as SPSS, data were analyzed at the regional level. Additionally, for this investigation, 19 indices and 60 variables were provided for the questionnaire according to the Likert scale; descriptive and inferential statistics was used for analyzing the data. In general, the reliability and validity of all the indices were obtained as 0.852 which denotes the satisfaction and sustainability of the index among the rural areas of the study.



4. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
Given the significance of livelihood approach in human development activities particularly in underdeveloped areas, the present study was conducted with the purpose of analyzing the needs of rural residents as well as explaining the effective factors in line with achieving sustainable livelihood in Sarfariab region, Charam city. The results of the study showed that through factor analysis of the views given by 272 rural residents, 14 factors were extracted and nominated as the effective factors in rural requirements corresponding to sustainable livelihood. The first factor, rural infrastructural needs (facilities and equipment) was introduced as the most important one involving more than 13% of the whole variance. Factors including the needs for healthcare, housing, passages, rural residents’ credits, income generation and employment, cooperatives, industrial and manufacturing factories, dispute resolution centers and associations, leisure time, sociocultural, technology, sports, business, and environmental education described 4.81, 3.78, 3.36, 2.94, 2.89, 2.80, 2.68, 2.56, 2.43, 2.38, 2.31, and 2.17% of the whole variance for the effective variables on the requirements in line with rural sustainable livelihood, respectively; in total, these factors describe 52.433% of the variance for all variables.

کلیدواژه‌ها

LTEC Model؛ sustainable livelihoods؛ livelihood development؛ Charam County

مراجع

1. Ali Biki, A. H., & Mousavi Matloob, S. S. (1392/2013). The role of agriculture in poverty reduction and sustainable livelihoods of rural development. Capital management and talent for a national conference on agriculture in the light of commerce and industry in the Zanjan province (pp. 666-645), Zanjan, Iran. [In Persian]

2. Anabestani, A. & Javanshiri, M. (1393/2014). Factors affecting the location of land use in the rural areas. Quarterly Journal of Economics space and Rural Development, 1(7), 35-54. [In Persian]

3. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies (UK). ‏

4. Fadayi, A.M., & Zahedi, M. R. (1385/2006). Compare health indicators in a village design Paplvt basic development needs (BDN) Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari. Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, 8(1), 13-19. [In Persian]

5. FAO, & ILO. (2009). The Live hood assessment tool-kit. Rome and Geneva: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. International Labour Organization.

6. Hezarjaribi, J., & Safari Shali, R. (1388/2009). Satisfaction with life and feel secure in its position, Study among citizens. Journal of Social Security, 1(3), 8-28. [In Persian]

7. IFAD (2012). Private-Sector Strategy: Deepening IFAD’s engagement with the private sector, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Enabling poor rural people to overcome poverty.

8. Jomepour, M., Kiyoumars, N. (1383/2005). Investigation of tourism impact on the livelihood activities and assets of rural households, (case study: Zeeyarat village in Gorgan County). Tourism Management Studies, 2(7), 87-120. [In Persian]

9. Joumepour, M. (1384/2005). Introduction to rural development planning perspectives and methods (1nd ed.). Tehran: SAMT publication. [In Persian]

10. Joumepour, M. (1391/2012). The third kind settlements for achieving an appropriate pattern of settlement in the area of sustainable development. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 2(2), 1-27. [In Persian]

11. Joumepour, M., & Kiyoumars, N. (1391/2012). The effects of tourism on assets and livelihoods in the context of sustainable livelihoods tourism activities, case study: Village Pilgrimage. Journal ofTourism Management Studies, 17(17), 87-119. [In Persian]

12. Karamidehkordi, A., & Ansari, A. (1391/2012). Range management plans and watershed impact on sustainable livelihoods of rural households in the city of Zanjan. Modern Technology in Agriculture, 5(2), 107-136. [In Persian]

13. Mahdavi, M., Shamasodini, A. (1392/2013). An analysis on the role of environmental capabilities on sustainable development of rural regions (Case study: Central District of Rostam County). Territory, 10(39), 21-38. [In Persian]

14. Mukherjee, S. (2007). Total rural development-A new paradigm for sustainability introducing object orientation for the development of reusable models for rural development. Sankalpa Research Center, Ref SRC/SLD/TRD07, Revision, 3. ‏

15. Mukherjee, S. (2009). Livelihoods Training & Education Center (LTEC) to showcase village-based sustainable livelihoods programs, Sankalpa Research Center, Appropriate Techno Logy, SRC/ATD/LTEC.01 Revision 3, and 24th November 2009.

16. Shahrakie, M., Sharifzadeh, M. (1394/2015). Investigating the role of fish farming in sustainable rural livelihood of Zahedan County farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(1), 97-116. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2015.54233. [In Persian]

17. Sojasi Qeydari, H., Sadqlou, T., & Palouch, M. (1392/2013). Prioritize sustainable rural livelihood development strategies with TOPSIS- SWOT- Fuzzy hybrid model: a case study Khodabande County. Journal of Village and Development, 16(2), 85-110. [In Persian]

18. Statistical Center of Iran. (1390/2011). Cultural identity of the country, the charam county in 2011. Tehran: Iran Statistics Center. [In Persian]

19. Tavakoli, J. (1388/2009, December). Sustainable livelihoods approach to poverty reduction and environmental protection, agriculture and natural resources in the consumption pattern of reform National Congress, Kermanshah, Razi University. [In Persian]