Privation as a Cause in Aristotle's Physics

جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام

Article 12, Volume 51, Issue 2 - Serial Number 103, November 2019, Pages 253-273   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/philosophy.v51i2.76178

Authors

zolfgar hemmati¹; Somayeh Rafiqi²

¹tabriz university

²University of Tabriz

Abstract

One of the issues that occupied the minds of many thinkers in ancient times was the issue of change, generation and corruption, and the role of principles in these processes. The positions of some early philosophers led to contradictions such as the denial of motion and any stability in existents. Aristotle, however, considers nature to be subject to motion, and although he considers matter and form as the source and main cause of any creation and change, he also considers a third element called "privation" necessary for change and generation and corruption in nature. In this way, he solves the old puzzle above. As it is well known, matter and form are among Aristotle's four causes; but in spite of the explicit statements about privation, it is not considered as a cause, while the study of its role shows that it can also be considered as a kind of cause, because it provides the basis for the creation and change of objects. In this article, by examining the role of privation in nature, we try to show that without it, creation and change in existents is not possible and in fact it is a kind of cause.

Keywords

Principles; Cause; Privation; Matter and Form; Potentia and Actus

References

1 - ارسطو، (1385)، فیزیک، ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی تبریزی، تهران طرح نو.

2-ارسطو، (1385)، مابعدالطبیعه، ترجمه محمد حسن لطفی تبریزی، تهران طرح نو.

3- ارسطو، (1384)، مابعدالطبیعه، ترجمه شرف الدین خراسانی، چاپ سوم، تهران، حکمت.

4- افلاطون، (1395) مجموعه آثار، ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی، انتشارات خوارزمی

5- راس، دیوید، (1377)، ارسطو، ترجمه مهدی قوام صفری، تهران، فکر روز.

6- علامه طباطبایی، (1374)، بدایه الحکمه، ترجمه و شرح شیروانی، جلد دو، قم، مرکز انتشارات حوزه علمیه.

7- قوام صفری، مهدی (1382)، صورت در فلسفه ارسطو، تهران، حکمت.

8- Aquinas, T. (1995), Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Trans.P.Rown, J., Dumb Ox Books

9- ………….. (1999), Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, Trans. Blackwell R.J, and others, Dumb Ox Books

10- Aristotle, (1995), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Ed: Barnes, J., Two Volumes, Six Printing, Prinston University Press

11- Bechler, Z. (1995), Aristotle’s Theory of Actuality, State University of New York Press

12- Bunnin, N. and Jiyuan Yu (2004), The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy, Blackwell Publishing

13- Charlton, W. (2006), Aristotle Physics: Book I and II, Oxford University Press

14- Code, A. (1999), ‘The Persistence of Aristotelian Matter’, in Aristotle Critical Assessments, Ed. P.Gerson, L., Vol 2, Routledge University Press

15- Guthrie, w.k.c (1981), A History of Greek Philosophy: Aristotle, an encounter, Volume VI, Cambridge University Press

16- Leth Fink,J. (2015), Suarez on Aristotelian Causality, Brill,Boston

17- Mortley, R. (1986), From Word to Silence: The rise and fall of logos, (Theophaneia Bd 30) Bonn: Hanstein

18- Philoloponus, (2014), On Aristotle Physics1.4-9, Trans. Osborne, C., Bloomsbury Academic

19- Ross, D. (1979), Aristotle’s Physics, Revised Text, With Introduction and Commentary, Oxford University Press

20- Simplicius (2014), On Aristotle Physics 1. 5-9, Trans. Baltussen, H. and others, Bloomsbury Academic