Investigation of one-dimensional heat flow in a solarflat plate collector with sun tracing system

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 16, Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 12, 2016, Pages 451-462   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v6i2.42071

Authors

H. Samimi Akhijahani; A. Arabhosseini^* ; M. H. Kianmehr

Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery Department, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drying is one of the most common methods for storing food and agricultural products. During drying process, free water that causes the growth of microorganisms and spoilage of products is removed from the product. There are several methods for drying of agricultural products. one of the most important methods of investment is drying by using sunlight. Iran is situated at 25- 43oE longitude and mean solar radiation is about 4.9 kwh.m-2.d-1. Because of the proper solar radiations in 95% of the agricultural areas in Iran, solar drying is widely used for drying of fruits and vegetables. The use of solar dryer causes saving in energy consumption and processing costs for drying of products in farms and gardens. Several researchers investigated heat transfer and heat flow in dryers. Selection of appropriate method was carried out for drying of agricultural products using heat pump. Experiments were done and mathematical relationships were estimated to obtain correlation parameters between Reynolds number and Nusselt number for the three cases of solar dryer (cabinet, indirect and combination).The best working conditions were determined for three types of solar collectors (flat, finned and corrugated). In this study, the process of heat transfer and heat transfer coefficient of a solar dryer with and without rotation of absorber plate was compared.
Materials and Methods
The experiments were conducted in Azarshahr, East Azarbayjan province, Iran in September 2014. Newton's law of thermodynamic was used to analyze the working condition of solar absorber. For this purpose the absorber plate was divided into four equal parts. According to the thermal equations and related boundary conditions as well as the relationship between heat transfer coefficient and the temperature gradient, equation 1 for the Nusselet number obtained:
1
Beside the relationship between Nusselt number and heat transfer coefficient is defined as equation 2:
2
Finally variation of total heat flow over the time at different surfaces of the collector is determined by using equation 3:
3
Two cases (solar panel with rotation and without rotation) were considered for testing. Data measuring was carried out for 9 hours from 8 to 17. The fluid flow rate was 0.0185m3.s-1. The dryer was installed in an environment with air temperature of 31.6 oC and 31.8 oC, with the air velocity of 0.58 m.s-1 and 0.54 m.s-1 and with the relative air humidity of about 21%and 21.5% at the first and second days, respectively. The dryer had an automatic temperature controller to fix the air temperature with an accuracy of ±0.1 oC. An anemometer Yk-2005AM model was used to regulate the required air velocity. The output data of the thermocouples was recorded by a digital thermometer (DL-9601A, Lutron) that was connected to a computer using RS232 cable and recorded the temperature at required point every an hour. The relative humidity of the ambient was measured every hour with a digital hygrometer (HT.3600, Taiwan), accuracy of 3%. By assembling controlling system with a DC motor, a precious photocell and a proper mechanism, the frame would rotate by the sun and followed solar radiation, therefore more solar energy produced in solar panel.
Results and Discussion
The results of the experiments showed that the heat transfer process increased in both cases from the early morning and reached to its maximum value around 12 to 14 o’clock. The trend was more homogeneous in the dryer by absorber plate without rotation due to the decline of the heat accumulation. The mean temperature rise in the solar dryer without rotation was 37oC and in the solar dryer with rotation was 54oC. Because of the rotation of solar plate, variations of solar radiation were low. Therefore, by rotation of the solar dryer panel the temperature rise was 27oC. The values of heat transfer coefficient in the solar dryer with rotation were decreased by the time. This reduction in the hours before noon is more than after noon. This is due to the reduction of the temperature gradient in the solar absorber plate. Also the results showed that heat transfer coefficient in the lower levels (S1 and S2) is more than higher levels (S3 and S4). Variations of the heat flow for the solar dryer with rotation is more than the other. Because in the first one, the absorber plate was followed the solar radiation and generated heat in the plate increases and the fan does not have the ability to discharge the generated heat. The total amount of heat transfer in absorber plate with rotation was 36.1% higher than the absorber plate without rotation. To increase the heat transfer from the dryer, design of the system to change air flow rate by increasing temperature, can increase the efficiency of the dryer.
Conclusions
In this study the performance of the absorber plate in a solar dryer in two cases with rotation and without rotation were compared. The results showed that by rotation of the solar absorber plate the output temperature of the collector rises about 27oC. Thermal fluctuation in the rotation solar plate is lower than the solar plate without rotation.

Keywords

Absorber plate; Heat flow; Heat transfer coefficient; Solar dryer

References

1. Aghanajafi, S., and A. Dehghani. 2007. Advanced solar radiation and industrial applications. Khaje Nasir Toosi University press, Tehran.

2. Amer, B. M. A., M. A. Hossain, and K. Gottschalk. 2010. Design and performance evaluation of a new hybrid solar dryer for banana. Energy Conversion and Management 51: 813-820.

3. Bagheri, H. 2008. Design, construction and evaluation of a experimental vegetable solar dryer. M.Sc. thesis of mechanics of agricultural machinery, Abouraihan campus, University of Tehran.

4. Bennamoun, L., and A. Belhamri. 2003. Design and simulation of a solar dryer for agriculture products. Journal of Food Engineering 59: 259-266.

5. Bulemtafes-Boukadoum, A., and A. Benzaoui. 2011. Energy and energy analysis of solar drying process of Mint. Energy Procedia 6: 583-591.

6. Chandrakumar, B. P., and L. B. Jivwanlal. 2013. Development and performance evaluation of mixed-mode solar dryer with forced convection. International journal of energy and environmental engineering 423: 1-8.

7. Delgado, E. A., H. E. Martinez Flores, M. G. GarnicaRomo, J. I. Arand Sanchez, C. S. Aguirre, C. C. Penagos, and J. L. Fernandez-Munoz. 2012. Optimization of solar dryer for the dehydration of fruits and vegetables. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 11 (2): 2546-2558.

8. Holman, J. P. 2002. Heat transfer. Published by Mc-Grow Hill, Southern Methodist University, New York. Tenth edition.

9. Huff, R. G. 1969. Variation of convective heat-transfer coefficient around a simulated rocket cooling tube section. National aeronautics and space administration. NASA TN, D-5168.

10. Incropera, F., D. Dewitt, T. Bergman, and A. Lavine. 2006. Fundamental of heat and mass transfer. Published by John Wiley and Sons, sixth edition.

11. Ivanova, D., and K. Andonov. 2001. Analytical and experimental study of combined fruit and vegetable drier. Energy and Conversion Management 42 (7): 975.

12. Jokar, A., A. Zomorodian, N. Mafton Azad, and L. Jokar. 2007. Determination of optimized drying condition of pomegranate seeds using response surface methodology. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 1: 57.

13. Karim, M. A., and M. N. A. Hawlader. 2005. Drying characteristics of banana: theoretical modeling and experimental validation. Journal of Food Engineering 70: 35-45.

14. Khodaei, J., and H. Samimi. 2013. Investigation of specific heat and thermal conductivity of Rasa grape (Vitisvinifera L.). Journal of Agricultural Machinery 3 (2): 123-132.

15. Madhlopa, A., and G. Ngwalo. 2006. Solar dryer with thermal storage and biomass-backup heater. Solar energy 11 (3): 1252-1263.

16. Mujumdar, A. S. 2000. Drying technology in agriculture and food sciences. Enfield NH, USA: Science Publishers, Inc.

17. Roncati, D. 2013. Iterative calculation of the heat transfer coefficient. A project in Lisa finite element software analysis site.

18. Singh, S., and S. Kumar. 2012. Development of convective heat transfer correlations for common designs of solar dryer. Energy and conversion management 64: 403-414.

19. Soheilimehdizadeh, A. 2004. Design of a solar forced convection dryer for leaf vegetables. Msc thesis of mechanics of agricultural machinery, College of Biosystem Engineering, University of Tehran.

20. Soheilimehdizadeh, A., A. Keyhani, K. Abaspoursani, and A. Akram. 2006. Design of a solar forced convection dryer for leaf vegetables and evaluation of its performance. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 27: 164-167.

21. Sreekumar, A., P. E. Manikantan, and K. P. Vijayakumar. 2008. Performance of indirect solar cabinet dryer. Energy Conversion and Management 49: 1388-1395.

22. Zare, D., A. Zomorodian, and H. Ghasemkhani. 2005. Effect of mass flow rate of air and moisture to reduce the drain on the rice crop in a semi-continuous solar dryer. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 9 (4): 251-264.