Effects of soil residues of some wheat sulfonylurea and aryloxy phenoxy propionate herbicides on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth, nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 6, Volume 7, Issue 2, December 2017, Pages 95-108   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v7i2.44877

Authors

Rahim bakhsh mohammadnezhad^* ; Ibrahim Izadi Darbandi; Mehdi Rastgoo; Amir Lakzian

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction
Soil herbicides residue in agroecosystems is one of the important problems due to herbicides application. However herbicides residue in soil extend the period of weed control. Nevertheless, it may persist longer than desired and injure subsequent crops in rotation. Herbicides vary in their potential to persist in the soil. Some herbicides such as sulfonylurea herbicides are very persistent. Among registered herbicides for weed control in wheat fields in Iran, Sulfonylurea (e.g. sulfosulfuron and metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon) and aryloxy phenoxy propionate (e.g. Diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl) are more important groups. With regard to the persistence of mentioned herbicides in soil, sulfonylurea herbicides may create problems in crop rotation. Since chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of important crops in rotation with wheat in Iran and the effect of sulfosulfuron, metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon, diclofop-methyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl on its growth, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation have not been studied yet. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of mentioned herbicides residue in soilon growth, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation of chickpea genotypes in controlled conditions.

Material and Methods
In order to study the effects of soil residue of some sulfonylurea and aryloxy phenoxy propionate herbicides on growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), a pot experiment was conducted using factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design with three replications. Factors included herbicide type in four levels (diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, sulfosulfuron and metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon), herbicides residue in soil in eight levels (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 percent of recommended dose for each herbicide) and chickpea genotypes in three levels (Hashem, ILC 482, and KaKa). After mixing the herbicide solution with prepared soil and planting, plants were maintained until the beginning of reproductive stage. In the early stage of reproductive, shoot biomass and root biomass, number of root node and total nitrogen content of plants were measured. The data were statistically analyzed using variance analysis, and differences among mean values of treatments were compared by Duncan test (p≤0.05) in SAS. For determination the dose of herbicides required to reduce 50% of plants response (ED50), the dose response curves were fitted simultaneously using the following three-parameter logistic model.
f(x,(b,d,e))= d/(1+exp⁡〖{b(log⁡(x)-log⁡〖(e))}〗 〗 )
Where f is the response (above ground dry weight, root dry weight and node dry weight), d is the upper limit, b is the curve slope, e denotes the dose required to give a response halfway between the upper and lower limits (ED50); and x is the herbicide concentration in soil. The validity of the above model and the comparison between the parameters were made using F-test for lack-of-fit with a 5% level of significance.

Results and Discussion
Results showed that sulfonylurea (sulfosulfuron and metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon) and aryloxy phenoxy propionate (diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl) had the highest and the lowest effect on mentioned traits of plants, respectively. By increasing of sulfonylurea herbicides residue in soil, all measured traits decreased significantly (p≤0.01). However, soil residue of aryloxy phenoxy propionates herbicides did not significantly affect on chickpea genotypes. The lowest ED50 (0.0025 mg kg-1 soil) and the highest ED50 (0.0047 mg kg-1 soil) of sulfosulfuron herbicide soil residue for shoot biomass, were observed in Hashem and ILC482 genotypes, respectively and the lowest ED50 (0.0057 mg kg-1 soil) and the highest ED50 (0.0837 mg kg-1 soil) of metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon herbicide soil residue, were observed in ILC482 and KaKa genotypes, respectively. Considering the results of the study, it can be noted that Hashem genotype showed more sensitivity to sulfosulfuron and metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon herbicides soil residue compared to the other genotypes. Generally, results of this experiment showed that soil residue of sulfosulfuron and metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon herbicides had significant and negative impact on chickpea growth. On the other hand, chickpea genotypes had different sensitivity to soil residue herbicides.

Conclusion
Results indicated that it is necessary to look the interval time in chickpea planting in rotation of wheat-chickpea. Moreover, selection of less sensitive chickpea genotypes to soil residue of sulfosulfuron and metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon herbicides could be useful in their residue management.

Key words: Chickpea genotypes, Diclofop-methyl, Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, Metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon, Sulfosulfuron

Keywords

Chickpea genotypes; Diclofop-methyl; Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl; Metsulforon-methyl+sulfosulforon; Sulfosulfuron

References

1. Alonso-prados, J.L., Hernadez-Sevillano, E., Llanos, S., Villarroya, M., and Garcia-Baudin, J.M. 2002. Effects ofsulfosulfuron soil residues on barley (Hordeum vulgare), sunflower (Helianthus annus) and common vetch (Vicia sativa). Crop Protection 21: 1061-1066.

2. Anderson, A. 2001. The effect of acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides on the growth, yield and nitrogen fixation of select legumes. Ph.D. Thesis. Adelaide University, South Australia.

3. Anderson, A., Baldock, J.A., Rogers, S.L., Bellotti, W., and Gill, G. 2004. Influence of chlorsulfuron on Rhizobial growth, nodulationformation, and nitrogen fixation with chickpea. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55: 1059-1070.

4. Diao, J., Xu, P., Wang, P., Lu, Y., Lu, D., and Zhou, Z. 2010. Environmental behavior of the chiral aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicide diclofop-methyl and diclofop: enantiomerization and enantioselective degradation in soil. Environmental Science and Technology 44(6): 2042-2047.

5. Drew, E., Vadakattua, G., and Lawrence, l. 2006. Herbicide limit nitrogen fixation ability farming ahead, Cropping Pulses 28-30.

6. Fox, J.E., Gulledge, J., Engelhaupt, E., Burow, M.E., and McLachlan, J.A. 2007. Pesticides reduce symbiotic efficiency of nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and host plants. Plant National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS) 104: 10282-10287.

7. Friesen, G.H., and Wall, D.A.1991. Residual effect of CGA-131036 and chlorsulfuron on spring-snow rotational crops. Weed Science 39:280-283.

8. Global Agricultural Information Network. 2013. Report of assessments of commodity and trade issues made by USDA.

9. Guo, Z., Huang, F., and Xu, Z. 2008. Residue dynamics of 10% fenoxaprop-Pethyl + cyhalofop-butyl EC in rice. Journal of Ecological Rural Environment 24: 51-54.

10. Halloway, K.L., Kookana, R.S., Noy, D.M., Smith, J.G., and Wilhelm N. 2006. Crop damage caused by residual Acetolactate synthase herbicides in the soils of south-eastern Australia.Weed Research 46: 1323-1331.

11. Han, S., Ahn, B., and Moon, Y. 1998. Adsorption and movement of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in soils. Korean Journal of Weed Science 18: 325-332.

12. Iswaran, V., andMarwah, T.S. 1980. Amodified rapid Kjeldahl method for determination of total nitrogen in agriculture and biological materials. Geobios 7: 281-282.

13. Izadi, E., RashedMohassel, M.H. Dehghan, M., and Mahmoodi, G. 2011. Evaluation of crops susceptibility to mesosulfuron+iodosolfuron (total) residual in soil. Journal of Plant Protection (Agricultural Science and Technology) 25: 194-202. (In Persian).

14. Izadi, E., RashedMohassel, M.H., Dehghan, V., and Mahmoodi, V. 2012. Evaluation of some of crops tolerance to herbicide residual of tribenuron methyl in soil. Journal of Plant Protection (Agricultural Science and Technology) 26: 362-369. (In Persian).

15. Jukanti, A.K., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L.L. , and Chibbar, R.N. 2012. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.): a review. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) 108: S11-S26.

16. Moyer, J.R., and Hamman, V. 2001. Factors affecting the toxicity of MON 37500 residues to following crop. Weed Technology 15: 42-47.

17. Peyvastegan, A., and Farahbakhsh, A. 2011. The residual effects of different doses of Atrazine, Alachlor and Foramsulfuron on the growth and physiology of rape seed (Brassica napus L.). World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology 5: 02-20.

18. Pour Azar, R., Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Mansoori, H., and Deihimfard, R. 2009. Response of some crops grown in rotation with wheat to the residues of sulfonylurea herbicides in Khuzestan province. Journal of Agroecology 1: 29-35. (In Persian).

19. Rogers, S., and Baldock, J. 2003. Herbicide link to low legume nitrogen fixation. Farming Ahead 134: 39-40.

20. Russel, M.H., Saladin, J.L., and Lichtner, I. 2002. Sulfonyrea herbicide. Pesticide Outlook. Royal Society of Chemistry 166-173.

21. Sanntin-montanya, I., Alonso-pradose, L., Villarroya, M., and Garcia-Baudin, J.M. 2006. Bioassay for determining sensitivity to sulfosulfuron on seven plant species. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 41: 781-793.

22. Singh, G., and Wright, D. 2002. In vitro studies on the effects of herbicides on the growth of rhizobia. Letters in Applied Microbiology 35: 12-16.

23. Smith, A.E., Grover, R., Cessna, A.J., Shewchuk, S.R., and Hunter, J.H. 1986. Fate of diclofop-methyl after application to a wheat field. Journal of Environmental Quality 15: 234-238.

24. Soleimanpoor Naghibi, Z. 2013. Study the effect of soil residues of sulfonylurea herbicides on growth, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). MSc. Thesis. University of Mashhad, Iran. PP. 98.

25. Strek, H.J. 2005. The science of DuPont’s soil residual herbicides in Canada. In: R.C. Van Acker (Ed.). Soil Residual Herbicides: Science and Management, Volume 3, Sainte Anne-ed Bellevue, Quebec, Canada. PP. 31-44.

26. Zand, E., Mousavi, S.K., and Heidari, A. 2009. Herbicides and Their Application. Mashhad Jehad-e-Daneshghahi Publication,

27. Zhou, Q., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., and Liu, K. 2007. Review action mechanisms of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 89: 89-96.