Determination of Chemical Composition and Protein Quality of Different Commercial Samples of Soybean Meals and Corn Gluten Meal Using Biological and Chemical Assays

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

Article 6, Volume 10, Issue 3 - Serial Number 35, September 2019, Pages 381-391   

Document Type: Poultry Nutrition

DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.v10i3.63177

Authors

Rogaye Jabari; Hossein janmohammadi^* ; Seyed Ali Mirghelenj; Ruhollah Kianfar

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction Plant protein sources have important role in supplying crude protein and amino acids in poultry diets and soybean meal (SBM) and are used widely in the world, including Iran. Domestic production of SBM is relatively low and most of the meal is imported from abroad. Although protein content of SBM is measured at local labs but evaluation of its protein quality is less considered and is necessary to be monitored by chemical and biological assays. Corn gluten meal (CGM) is a co-product of corn and obtained during production of starch and glucose from corn. This meal is frequently contained more than 50 percent crude protein as such is compared with the animal proteins during diet formulation.
The aim of this study was to determine of chemical composition and protein quality of some commercial samples of soybean and corn gluten meal.
Material and methods Three commercial samples of soybean meal including Brazilian, Argentinean, Iranian and one sample of corn gluten meal were provided from poultry feed plants in East Azerbaijan province. The samples were subjected to chemical analysis by standard methods and protein quality was evaluated by in vitro and in vivo assays. Urease activity index and protein solubility in KOH was used as in vitro assays. For biological evaluation of protein quality of soybean and corn gluten meal samples, 100 Ross-308 male broiler chicks fed in a completely randomized design with 5 experimented diets each 4 replicates from age 8 to 17 d with nitrogen –free basal diet and 4 semi-purified diets each of test protein samples. Feed intake and weight gain of chick after 6 h fasting was recorded and Protein efficiency ratio (PER) and Net protein ratio (NPR) was calculated according to the corresponding formulas. At end of 17 of age, two chicks in each replication was killed, blood serum collected for uric acid, total protein and glucose assessments. Breast muscles was also separated and weighted. The data was subjected to normality tests and statistically analyzed with GLM procedure of SAS.     
Results and Discussion The results of chemical analysis showed that average value of moisture, CP,EE and ash were 7.5, 7.4, 7.4, 4.7 and 46.3, 47.4, 46.4 , 65.5 and 8.6, 9.05, 12.4, 7.55 and 6.5, 6.5, 6.5, 2.15 percent in Argentinian, Brazilian, Iranian soybean and corn gluten meals, respectively. Generally, our finding on CP content was in range of CP content of soybean meal from United States, Brazil, Argentina and India (47.3, 46.9, 48.2, and 46.4% (as-fed basis), respectively). Average values of NDF and ADF were 10.93, 12, 10.43, 11.12 and 8.3, 10.9, 9.4, 10.34 percent in Argentinian, Brazilian, Iranian soybean meals and corn gluten meal, respectively.  Our data on NDF values of soy bean meal in samples of Argentina and Brazilian was higher than those values in the corresponding samples. Gross energy value for soybean meals from Brazil, Argentina, Iran and corn gluten meals were found to be 5095, 4677, 4985 and 5924 Kcal/Kg. Urease index and protein solubility in KOH for Brazilian, Argentinian and Iranian soybean meals was 0.05, 0.05, 0.07 and 88.39, 85.51, 86.82 percent, receptivity. The published acceptable data for urease index are inconsistent and generally the recommended value is less than 0.1 pH change. At present study, all value of urease index is lower than 0.1 values. KOH solubility values at this study on soy bean samples are higher than those, however, these values are acceptable from view of Araba et al and non-acceptable. The values of  PER and NPR for soybean meals from Brazil, Argentina, Iran and corn gluten meal in 17 d assay were 2.89, 3.13, 2.57, 0.36 and 3.48, 3.74, 3.14, 1.37, respectively. These biological values were comparable with PER and NPR values of different origin soybean meals. Breast muscle growth and serum blood uric acid level did not show significant difference in the meals.
Conclusion It was concluded that protein quantity and quality of domestic soybean meal was comparable with two imported samples. NDF value of domestic soybean meal, like foreign ones, is high and this can decrease its available energy and AA. CGM was rich in protein content but poor in view of protein quality.

Keywords

KOH solubility; Male broiler chicks; Protein efficiency ratio; Urease activity

References

1. Anderson, J. S., S. P. Lall, D. M. Anderson, and M. A. McNiven. 1993. Evaluation of protein quality in fish meals by chemical and biological assays. Aquaculture, 115(3-4):305-325.

2. AOAC International. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC International, Washington, DC.

3. Araba, M. and N. Dale. 1990. Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of over processing soybean meal. Poultry Science, 69(1):76-83.

4. Baker, D. H. 2009. Advances in protein–amino acid nutrition of poultry. Amino acids, 37(1):29-41.

5. Boling frankenbach, S., J. Snow, C. Parsons, and D. Baker. 2001. The effect of citric acid on the calcium and phosphorus requirements of chicks fed corn-soybean meal diets. Poultry Science, 80(6):783-788.

6. Chee, K. M., Jae, Y. H., Hin, H.C., Min, W. K., Kee, D. K., Yung Sim, U. J., Choi, I. S and Y.K. Ahn Sung. 2001. Evaluation of comparative feeding values of soybean meals of foreign origin in broilers. Pages 54-68 in proceeding 4rd scientific symposium for animal, poultry and fish nutrition. University of Seoul., South Korea.

7. Douglas, M. W., M. L. Johnson, and C. M. Parsons. 1997. Evaluation of protein and energy quality of rendered spent hen meals. Poultry science, 76(10):1387-1391.

8. Escalona, R., G. Pesti, and P. Vaughters. 1986. Nutritive Value of Poultry By-Product Meal 2. Comparisons of Methods of Determining Protein Quality. Poultry science, 65(12):2268-2280.

9. Farshadian, H. Janmohamadi, and R. Kianfar. 2014. Determination of chemical composition and true metabolizable energy content of some corn by-product in cecectomized and intact adult roosters. Department of Animal Science. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Tabriz. MSc. Thesis. (In Persian).

10. Hall, L., R. Shirley, R. Bakalli, S. Aggrey, G. Pesti, and H. Edwards. 2003. Power of two methods for the estimation of bone ash of broilers. Poultry Science, 82(3):414-418.

11. Janmohammadi.H, H. N. M. J. P. M. D. M. 2005. Nutrient composition and protein quality in meat and bone meal. Agriculture Science & Technology Journal, 19(2):183-195.

12. Jansen, G. 1978. Biological evaluation of protein quality. Food Technology (USA).

13. Johnson, M. and C. Parsons. 1997. Effects of raw material source, ash content, and assay length on protein efficiency ratio and net protein ratio values for animal protein meals. Poultry science, 76(12):1722-1727.

14. Kalvandi. O. 2011. Prove quality, amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy in poultry by product meal from east Azerbaijan Department of Animal Science. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Kurdistan. MSc. Thesis. (In Persian).

15. Leeson, S. and J. Summers. 2001. Nutrition of the chicken 4th Ed. Published by University Book, PO Box 1326:591.

16. Liang, D. 2000. Effect of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of canola meal for broiler chickens.

17. Mateo, C. D. and J. R. V. Conejos. 2009. Evaluation of the Protein Quality of Soybean Meals from Different Sources in Broiler Chicks Fed with Semi-Purified Diets. Philippine Journal of Science, 138(2):153-159.

18. Mateos, G. G., M. Gonzalez, S. Sueiro, M. Hermida, J. Fickler, P. G. Rebollar, M. P. Serrano, and R. P. L. Garcia. 2011. Differences among origins on nutritional and quality parameters of soybean meal.

19. Mirghelenj, S., A. Golian, and H. Kermanshahi. 2012. Determination of processing quality tests of full fat soybean extruded at three temperatures and correlation with growth performance of broiler chickens.

20. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Natl. Academic Press, Washington, DC.

21. Parsons, C., F. Castanon, and Y. Han. 1997. Protein and amino acid quality of meat and bone meal. Poultry Science 76(2):361-368.

22. Pereira, T. and A. Oliva‐Teles. 2003. Evaluation of corn gluten meal as a protein source in diets for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) juveniles. Aquaculture Research, 34(13):1111-1117.

23. Ravindran, V., M. Abdollahi, and S. Bootwalla. 2014. Nutrient analysis, metabolizable energy, and digestible amino acids of soybean meals of different origins for broilers. Poultry science, 93(10):2567-2577.

24. Rochell, S., B. Kerr, and W. Dozier. 2011. Energy determination of corn co-products fed to broiler chicks from 15 to 24 days of age, and use of composition analysis to predict nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy. Poultry science, 90(9):1999-2007.

25. Sahraei, M., H. Janmohammadi, S. Lashkari, M. D. Torkamani, and A. Gituee. 2012. Evaluation of protein quality in hydrolyzed protein meals by biological assay methods in broiler chickens. International Journal of Agriculture: Research and Review, 2(4):352-356.

26. SAS, S. and S. U. s. Guide. 2003. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

27. Sauvant, D. and G. Tran. 2004. Corn distillers. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials. D. Sauvant, J.-M. Perez, and G. Tran, ed. Wageningen Academic Publishers, the Netherlands: 118.

28. Shivazad, M. and H. Janmohamadi. 2002. Evaluation of Protein Quality in Iranian Kilka Fish Meal Using the Total Protein Efficiency Method. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology, 6(1):257-265.

29. Tidwell, J. H., S. D. Coyle, L. A. Bright, and D. Yasharian. 2005. Evaluation of plant and animal source proteins for replacement of fish meal in practical diets for the largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 36(4):454-463.

30. Van Eys, J., A. Offner, and A. Bach. 2004. Manual of quality analyses for soybean products in the feed industry. American Soybean Association, Brussels, Belgium.

31. Wiryawan, K. and J. Dingle. 1999. Recent research on improving the quality of grain legumes for chicken growth. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 76(3):185-193.

32. Wright, K. 1981. Soybean meal processing and quality control. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 58(3):294-300.

33. Yigit, M., M. Bulut, S. Ergün, D. Güroy, M. Karga, O. S. Kesbiç, S. Yilmaz, Ü. Acar, and B. Güroy. 2012. Utilization of corn gluten meal as a protein source in diets for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) juveniles. Journal of Fisheries Sciences. Com, 6(1):63.