Effect of Sulfonylurea Herbicides and Crop Residues on Weed Control and Wheat Hrain Yield

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 3, Volume 32, Issue 1 - Serial Number 39, March 2018, Pages 29-38   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v32i1.56428

Authors

sobhe ghafarpour¹; Seyed Abdolreza kazemeini^{* 1}; H. Hamzehzarghani²; Zynab alsadat Hashemi²

¹shiraz university

²Shiraz University

Abstract

Introduction: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important crops among cereals. Many factors could be responsible for low yield in wheat, but one of the major causes is weed infestation. The efficacy of any herbicide primarily depends on selectivity and the dose of application. Use of herbicides is an effective and efficient means of weed management. In many cases, there are no practical alternatives to chemical weed control methods. However, not only all kinds of weeds do not control by one type of herbicide and continuous use of that, but also lead to increase weed resistance to herbicides over the time (Hall et al. 1999). Of the many weeds that infest wheat fields across southern Iran, wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum L.), foxtail (Setaria viridis L.) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) are the major weeds causing economic losses .Baghestani et al. (2007) reported that sulfosulfuron at 19.95 and 24.90 g a.i. ha-1 were proper application rates for broadleaf and grass weed control in wheat fields. Sij et al. (2016) reported that sulfonylurea herbicides were more efficient in terms of weed control. Lair and Redente (2004) reported that sulfonylurea herbicide application increased stability and biomass of crop as much as 43% over auxin herbicide and simultaneously reduced the grass weeds up to 71%. Golparvar et al. (2012) reported that limited doses of herbicides provided the same yield as weed free plots, therefore, this could be recommended to the farmers. The present study initiated to investigate the effect of some sulfonylurea herbicides on weed control and grain and biological yield of winter wheat under with/without wheat residue treatments.
Materials and Methods: A field experiment was carried out in split-plot arrangement based on randomized complete block design with four replicates at College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, in 2014 growing season. Treatments included wheat residue at two levels (0 and 1850 kg/ha) as main plot in combination with each of the three of herbicides (Total, Apyrus and Atlantis) in two concentrations (recommended dose and 30% over the recommended dose) as Subplots. A weed infest plot (no herbicide application) was used as control. Wheat (Shiraz cultivar) planted on 5th November 2014, by Pneumatic planter at the rate of 200 kg ha-1 and maintaining 20 cm distance between crop rows. The plot size was 5m × 5m. Measurement of the effects included weed dry weight, weed density, wheat height, grain yield and its components. The data were subjected to the analysis of variance using SAS statistical software and means were compared by Duncan multiple range test (DMRT) at the 0.05 level of significance.
Results and Discussion: Investigation on the effects of different application doses of Total, Apyrus and Atlantis to control weeds in wheat fields under applied wheat residue showed that the wheat residue had negative effect on the efficiency of three types of herbicides and increased weed dry weight by 41.4 percent, as compared to without wheat residue. Wheat residue incorporated to soil, reduced biological yield (from 14865.60 to 12340.40 kg ha-1) in comparison to without residue treatment. Three herbicides reduced weed biomass and the highest (43.56%) and lowest (18.7%) weed control recorded compared to weedy check. In comparison to weed infest control, Total increased wheat grain yield (from 3329.88 to 5283.19 kg ha-1), followed by Apyrus and Atlantis with 46 and 21 % increase in wheat grain yield, respectively. Application of Total, Apyrus and Atlantis herbicides, had increased wheat biological yield in comparison with weed infest control by 30.7, 26.8 and 13.6 %, respectively. Additive dose of herbicides application had better effect on weeds control and increased wheat grain and biological yield more than the recommended dose. Baghestani et al. (2007) reported that the wheat yield increased with increasing application dose of herbicide without any crop injury. Wheat grain yield for Total applied at the recommended dose was 5090.99 kg ha-1 but no significant effect was observed when an additive dose of the Apyrus herbicide was applied. This could be due to strong weed control effect of the Total herbicide at this dose. Interaction effect of herbicides and application dose indicated that Total at additive dose resulted in highest seed yield and weed control. Wheat residue had negative effect on weed control and the highest weed dry weight (~48.5%) observed when Total was applied under no residue conditions.
Conclusions: All herbicide treatments increased wheat biological and grain yield as compared with the weed infested control. Application of Atlantis did not provide acceptable weed control in wheat. It is concluded that the most effective herbicide treatment was Total that provided maximum reduction in overall weed dry matter and obtained maximum grain yield. Atlantis had the lowest effect on weed control compared with the other herbicides (Total and Apyrus) and this could be due to poor weed control of the herbicide at both doses.

Keywords

Dose; Mesosulfuronm metsulfuron; Sulfosulfuron; Weed dry weight

References

1- Anderson R.L. 1997 .Cultural systems can reduce reproductive potential of winter annual grasses. Weed Technology, 11: 608-613.

2- Anonymous. 2000. Farm Chemical Handbook. Biesterfield US Inc. New York, USA. Company.

3- Ashiq M., Muhammad N., and Ahmad N. 2006. Comparative efficacy of different herbicides to control grassy weeds in wheat. Pakistan journal of Weed Science Research, 12: 157- 161.

4- Baghestani M.A., Zand E., Soufizadeh S., Jamali M., and Maighany F. 2007. Evaluation of sulfosulfuron for broadleaved and grass weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Iran. Crop protection, 26(9): 1385-1389.

5- Bazyar S., Vazan S., Oveisi M., and Paknejad F. 2010. Optimization herbicides of Mesosulforunmethyl (Atlantis) and Clodinafop propargyl (Tapic) for control of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) in competition with wheat. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 41(4): 755-761. (In Persian)

6- Curran W.S., Hoffman L.D., and Werner E.L. 1994. The Influence of a hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) cover crop on weed control and corn (Zea mays L) Growth and Yield. Weed Technology, 8:777-784.

7- Dastgheib F., and Field R.J. 1998. Acetolactate a synthase activity and chlorosulfuron sensitivity of wheat cultivates. Weed Research, 38: 63- 68.

8- Ebrahimpour F., Mosaviyan N., Mosavi H., Chaab A., and Anafjeh Z. 2010. Efficacy evaluation of managemental dual purpose herbicides Metsulforun methyl+Sulfosulforun (Total) and mixed herbicides Tribenorun methyl (Granestar) and Pinoxaden (Acsiyal) in growth difference stage of wheat. P. 485. The 3rd Iranian Weed Science Congress. Babolsar.

9- Emam Y., Kheradnam M., Bahrani M.G., Asad M.T., and Ghadiri H. 2000. The effects of residue management on the grain yield and its components of winter wheat in continuous irrigated wheat cropping. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 31(4): 830-850. (In Persian with English abstract)

10- F. A. O. 2017. Statistical database. Available at http//www.FAO.Org.

11- Golparvar P., Mirshekari B., and Borhani P. 2012. Application of herbicides with limited dose can play a major role in suitable weed control in saffron fields. World Applied Sciences Journal, 9: 1266-1269.

12- Hollaway K.I., Kookana R.S., Noy D.M., Smith J.G., and Wilhelm N. 2006. Crop damage caused by residual Acetolactate synthase herbicide in the soils of South-eastern Australia, 46: 1323- 1331.

13- Hall L., Bechie H., and Wolf T.M. 1999. How Herbicides Work- Biology to Aplication. Alberta Agriculture, Food & Rural Development Publishing Branch, Canada.

14- Lair K., and Redente E.F. 2004. Influence of auxin and sulfonylurea herbicides on seeded native communities. Journal of Range Management, 57(2): 211-218.

15- Locke M.A., and Bryson C.T. 1997. Herbicide-soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Weed Science, 45:307–320

16- Mirvakili S.M., Baghestani M.A., and Fallah H. 2010. Study on effect of Sulfosulfuron (Apyrus) and Metsulfuron methyl+sulfosulfuron (Total) on morphological characters of Wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). P. 93.19th Iranian Plant Protection Congress.

17- Mojab M., Zamani GH., and Eslami S.V. 2010. The effect of Trifluralin herbicide doses and wheat residue on weed species composition in birjand. Journal of Plant Protection, 24(3): 294-302. (In Persian)

18- Mohler C.L., and Teasdale J.R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Research, 33: 487-499.

19- Monaco T.J., Ashton F.M., and Weller S.C. 1991. Weed Science: principles and practices. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

20- Mousavi S.K., Zand E., and Saremi H. 2011. Physiological Function and Application. Zanjan university publisher.

21- Sabeti P., Zand E., and Veisi M. 2010. Efficacy evaluation of sulfonylurea to control weeds in wheat fields of Kermanshah. P. 85.19th Iranian Plant Protection Congress.

22- Secor J. 1994. Inhibition of barnyardgrass 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by sulcotrione. Plant Phisiology, 106:1429-1433.

23- Shilling D.G., Brecke B.J., Hiebsch C., and Macdonald G. 1995. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) cultivar, tillage and rye (Secale cereale) mulch on sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Technology, 9:339-342.

24- Sij J.W., Olson B.L.S., Ott J.P., and Malinowski D.P. 2016. Tolerance of three wheatgrass cultivars to sulfosulfuron herbicide. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 20: 32-41.

25- Teasdale J.R., Pillai P., and Collins R.T. 2005. Synergism between cover crop residue and herbicide activity on emergence and early growth of weeds. Weed Science, 53: 521-527.

26- Teasdal J.R., Sheltone D.R., Sadeghi A.M., and Isensee A. 2003. Influence of hairy vetch residue on atrazine and metolachlor soil solution concentration and weed emergence. Weed Science, 51:628–634.

27- Yaghoubi S.R., Ebrahimi M., and Haghani S. Total effective herbicide against of wild barly weed (Hordeum Spontaneum C.Koch). Third Millennium Agricultural Development Co.

28- Yasin M., Tanveer A., Iqbal Z., and Ali A. 2010. Effect of herbicides on narrow leaved weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). World Academi of Science, Engines and Technology, 68(2): 1280-1282.

29- Young F.L., and Ogg A.G. 1994. Tillage and weed management effects on winter wheat yield in an integrated pest management system. Agronomy Journal, 86:147-154.

30- Zadpour M.H., Baghestani M.A., and Zand E. 2007. Wheat injuries oriented from herbicide Mixturs. 1: 451- 454. 2nd National Weed Sci Con. Yasin M., Tanveer A., Iqbal Z., and Ali A. 2010. Effect of herbicides on narrow leaved weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). World Academi of Science, Engines and Technology. 44.

31- Zand E., Baghestani M.A., AghaAlikhani M., Soufizadeh S., Khayami. M.M., Pourazar R., Sabeti P., Jamali M., Bagherani N., and Foroozesh S. 2010. Chemical control of weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Iran. Crop Protection, 29: 1223-1231.

32- Zimdahl R.L. 1999. Fundamentals of weed science. 2nd ed. Academic press, San diego, CA. 556pp.