اثر روش‌های مختلف پیوند بر رشد رویشی و عملکرد میوه گوجه‌فرنگی رقم "اس‌وی 8320"

علوم باغبانی

مقاله 2، دوره 34، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 46، شهریور 1399، صفحه 207-219   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jhorts4.v34i2.76358

نویسندگان

حمدیه عینی گرصدفی؛ بهمن زاهدی^* ؛ فاطمه مرادی پور

گروه باغبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

چکیده

گوجه­فرنگی یکی از محصولات مهم گلخانه­ای است. امروزه با بکارگیری روش‌های پیوند به‌ منظور ایجاد سبزی­های میوه‌ای متحمل در برابر شرایط نامساعد محیطی و افزایش رشد، عملکرد و کیفیت میوه تکنیک نوینی را برای تولید سبزی­های میوه­ای به وجود آورده است. در این راستا به منظور ارزیابی اثر نوع پیوند بر رشد رویشی و عملکرد بوته گوجه فرنگی رقم "اس­وی 8320" روی توده­ی"Rimac" با سه روش پیوند مرسوم شامل نیمانیم، اسکنه و مجاورتی مورد آزمایش قرار گرفت. گیرایی پیوند بین روش‌ها مختلف متفاوت بود و روش نیمانیم نسبت به روش‌های اسکنه و مجاورتی برتر بود. اثر پیوند در طول بوته، تعداد و طول میانگره، وزن تر و خشک ریشه، تعداد خوشه‌های میوه، طول و قطر میوه، وزن تک میوه، وزن تر و خشک میوه، طول دم میوه، سفتی بافت میوه، pH، عملکرد پیش‌رس، میان دوره و کل، نسبت میوه بازار پسند به درجه دو باعث ایجاد تفاوت معنی‌دار در سطح احتمال 5 درصد گردید. گیاهان پیوندی در صفات رویشی و عملکرد بر گیاهان غیر پیوندی برتری داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پیوند نیمانیم؛ پیوند مجاورتی؛ پیوند اسکنه؛ پیوندک؛ افزایش رشد

مراجع

1- Abdemishani S., and Shahnejat-booshehri E. 1992. Plant breeding suplymentary. First cover, second edition. Tehran Uniersity Publication center. PP: 384

2- Akbari Cheshme-Manesh A., Kashi A., and Memar-Moshrefi M. 2003. Effect of grafting two-greenhouse cucumber cv. Royal24198 & Vilmorian onto fig leaf squash rootstock. Journal of Seed and Seedling Researches 19(4): 435- 456.

3- Albacete A., Martinez-Andujar C., and Perez-Alfocea F. 2014. "Hormonal and metabolic regulation of source–sink relations under salinity and drought: From plant survival to crop yield stability", Biotechnology Advances 32: 12-30.

4- Cohen R., Burger Y., Horev C., Porat A., and Edelstein M. 2005. Performance of Galia-type melons grafted on to cucurbita rootstock in Monosporscus cannoballus infested and non-infested soils. Annual of Applied Biology 146: 381-387.

5- Edelstein M. 2004. Grafting vegetables – crop plants: pros and cons. Acta Horticulturae 659: 235-237.

6- Food and Agriculture Organization (2010) http://faostat.fao.org.

7- Garigourian V. 2002. Graftinh physiologr and grafting methods. Publication of Iranian Horticulture Science Society 290-351.

8- Hee-Don C., Youn S.J., and Choi Y.J. 1997. Effect of rootstocks on yield, quality and components of tomato fruits. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 38: 603-607.

9- Heidary Zofreh A., Kashi A., Safari Z., Kalateh Jary S., and Farhadi A. 2013. Effect of Rootstocks and different grafting methods on vegetative growth, yield and some qualitative characteristics of greenhouse cucumber. Journal of Horticultural Science 44(2): 137-147.

10- Henareh M., Dursum A., and Abdoullahi Mandoulakani B. 2015. Genetic diversity in tomato landraces collected from Turkey and Iran revealed by morphological characters. Acta Scientiarumpolonorum-Hortorumcultus 14(2): 87-96. (In Persian)

11- Hi Y., Zhu Z., Yang J., Ni X., and Zhu B. 2009. Grafting increases the salt tolerance of tomato by improvement of photosynthesis and enhancement of antioxidant enzymes activity. Environmental and Experimental, Botany 66: 270–278.

12- Huang H., Tang R., Cao Q., and Bie Z. 2009. Improving the fruit yield and quality of cucumber by grafting onto the salt tolerant rootstock under NaCl stress. Scientia Horticulturae 122: 26-31.

13- Huang Y., Bie Z., HE S., Hua B., Zhen A., and Liu Z. 2010. Improving cucumber tolerance to major nutrients induced salinity by grafting onto Cucurbita ficifolia. Environmental and Experimental Botany 69: 32–38

14- Kacjan Marsic N., and Osvald J. 2004. The influence of grafting on yield of two tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in a plastic house. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 83-2: 243-249.

15- Kashi A., Salehi R., and Javanpour R. 2009. The grafting technique in training and produce vegetable. Principles of Publishing Center Agricultural Education 190-212.

16- Khosh-khui M. 2012. Plants propagation, Principles and methods. Shiraz Uniersity Publication center. PP: 850-904.

17- Khosh-khui M., Shaybany B., Rouhani I., and Tafazoli E. 1997. Principles of Horticulture Science. Shiraz University Press. PP: 100-200.

18- Kubota C. 2008. One cotyledon grafting method. The University of Arizona.

19- Lee J.M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. status, grafting methods, and benefits. Hort Science 29: 235-239.

20- Lee J.M., and Oda M. 2003. "Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops" Hort. Rev. 28: 61-124.

21- Lee J.M., Kubota C., Tsao S.J., Bie Z., Hoyos Echevarria P., Morra L., and Oda M. 2010. "Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation", Scientia Horticulturae 127: 93–105.

22- Lee J.M. 2011. Cultivation of grafted vegetables I.Current status, grafting methods, and benefits. HortScience 29: 235-239

23- Lee J.M., and Oda M. 2003. Advances in vegetable grafting. Chron. Hort. 43: 13-19.

24- Lee S.G., Choi J.U., Kim K.Y., Chung J.H., and Lee Y.B. 1997. Effect of rootstocks and grafting methods on the growth and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). RDA. J. Hort. Sci. 39: 15-20.

25- Marota J.V., Pascual B., Miguel A., Bautista A.B., Lopez-Galarza S., Baixauli C., and Aguilar J.M. 2004. Influence of different rootstocks and Cycles on Serpent Melon (Cucumis melo var flexueses) Productin in Soiless Cultivation. Acta Horticulture 614: 319-322.

26- Miguel A., Morato J.V., San-Bautsita A., Biagxauli C., Cebplla V., Pascual B., Lopez S., and Guardiola J.L. 2004. The grafting of triploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soil fumigation by methyl bromide for control of fusarium wilt. Scientica Horticulturae 103(1): 9-17.

27- Miller Y.C., and Tanksley S. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenic relationship and genetic variation the genus lycopersicum, Theor Appl Genet 80: 437-310.

28- Mohamed H., El-Hamed K.E., Elwan Abd M.W.M., M.N.E H. 2014. Evaluation of different grafting methods and rootstocks in watermelon grown in Egypt. Scientia Horticulturae 168: 145–150

29- Perez-Alfocea F. 2014. "why should we investigate vegetable grafting.Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Vegetables Grafting, Wuhan, China, 17-21 March 2014.

30- Salehi R., Kashi A., and Lesani H. 2004. Study of the effects of different cucurbit rootstocks on vegetative and control of soil-borne diseases and physiological disorders in cucumber, watermelon and muskmelon. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 5(1): 59-69.

31- Salehi, R., Kashi, A., Babalar, M. & Delshad, M. (2009). Identification of cytokinins in xylem sap of grafted and ungrafted melon under different train treatments. Proccedings of the 6th Iranian Horticultural Science Congress. Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.

32- Salehi R., Kashi A., Lee J., M., Bablar M., Delshad M., Lee S.G., and Huh Y.C. 2010. "Leaf gas exchanges and mineral ion composition in xylem sap of iranian melon affected by rootstocks and training methods", Journal of Horticultural Science 45(5): 766-770.

33- Salehi-Mohammadi R., Kashi A., Lee S.G., Hou Y.C., Lee J.M., Babalar M., and Delshad M. 2009. Assessing the survival and growth performance of Iranian Melon to Grafting onto Cucurbita Rootstocks.Korean Journal of Horticulture Science and Technology 27(1): 1-6.

34- Tanksley, S.D. and S.R. Mc couch, (1997). Seed banks and molecular maps; unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066.

35- Traka-Mavrona E., Koutsika-Sotiriou M. and Pritsa T. 2000. Response of squash (Cucurbita spp.) as rootstock for melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sci. Hort. 83: 353-362.

36- Turhan A., Ozmen N., Serbeci M.S., Seniz V. 2011. Effect of grafting on different rootstocks on tomatoe fruit yield and quality. Sci (Prague) 38: 142-149.

37- Yamakata B. 1983. Grafting vegetable handbook. Yokendo book co Tokyo. PP: 141-153.

38- Zhou Y., Zhou J., Huang L., Ding X., Shi K., and Yu J. 2009. Grafting of Cucumis sativus onto Cucurbita ficifolia leads to improved plant growth, increased light utilization and reduced accumulation of reactive oxygen species in chilled plants. Journal of plants Research 122: 529-540.

39- Zi-kun Z., Shi-qi L., Shu-qin H., and Su-hui L. 2010. Grafting increases the copper tolerance of cucumber seedlings by improvement of polyamine contents and enhancement of antioxidant enzymes activity. Agricultural Sciences in China 9(7): 985-994.