Evaluation the Yield and Intercropping Indices of Millet (Panicum miliaceaum L.) and Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under Effect of Plant Density and Cultivation Ratios in Birjand Region

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 7, Volume 13, Issue 3 - Serial Number 49, September 2021, Pages 471-488   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v13i3.83543

Authors

Hamid Vahidi; Sohrab Mahmoodi^* ; Soheil Parsa; Hamid Reza Fallahi

Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Introduction                   
Intercropping is one of the main strategies to obtain more stability in agro-ecosystems. The possibility of yield improvement in intercropping systems depends on various factors such as plant combination, cultivar type, plant density, planting pattern, and contribution of each species. Introducing new crops or forgotten plants to agro-ecosystems are other methods for sustainable crop production. Quinoa as a potential new crop to be introduced to Iran’s farming systems, is well-adapted to different environmental conditions. This plant has high nutritional values and produces acceptable yield to areas affected by environmental stresses like drought and salinity stresses. Millet, as a forgotten crop in Iran’s agro-ecosystems, is a drought-tolerant grain, with appropriate growth and yield in arid and semi-arid regions. This C₄ plant has vertical leaf distribution, rapid and short growth period which make it tolerant to adverse environmental conditions compared to other cereals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of quinoa and millet intercropping under arid and semi-arid climate of Birjand, Iran.
Materials and Methods                  
A factorial experiment based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was conducted in research field of University of Birjand, Iran, in 2018. The experimental factors were planting density at three levels (20, 40, and 60 plants m^-2 for both quinoa and millet) and planting ratio at five levels (pure stand of millet (100 %), three rows of millet and one row of quinoa (75%-25%), the equal ratio of millet and quinoa (50%-50%), one row of millet and three rows of quinoa (25%-75%) and monoculture of quinoa (100%). Experimental plots area was 24 m² (6 m×4 m), with eight planting rows per each. The distances between planting rows in all treatments were 50 cm, while the distances along the single rows were 10, 5, and 3.3 cm for 20, 40, and 60 planting densities, respectively. The grain and biological yields of both plants were determined, finally, various indices including land equivalent ratio (LER), relative yield (RY), competitive ratio index and aggressively index were calculated. Data analyses were done using SAS 9.2 and means were compared by FLSD test at 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion
The simple and interaction effects of planting density and ratio had a significant effect on grain and biological yield of quinoa and grain yield of millet (P < 0.01). In addition, planting ratio had a significant effect on the biological yield of millet (P < 0.01). Based on data obtained from monoculture system, the optimum plant density to obtain the highest grain yield of millet (4100 kg.ha^-1) and quinoa (2340 kg.ha^-1), were 60 and 40 plants per m², respectively. Considering the different ratios of planting, the participation and positive effect of both millet and quinoa plants in an increasing the land equality ratio has been equal. By increasing the density, the advantage of mixed cultivation has been reduced. The best intercropping systems in terms of LER (1.32) were the density of 40 plants per m² (for both crops), and planting ratio of 25% millet and 75% quinoa, which had 26.98% actual grain yield incensement. In addition, the results of interaction effect showed that this treatment increased the biological yield of quinoa (6935 kg ha^-1) by 9.26%, based on anticipated yield. In this density, it seems that the result of optimal use of existing inputs and reduction of internal and external competition in order to achieve maximum yield has been achieved. The results of the relative yield indicated that the millet is better utilized from environmental resources and conditions due to its predominance and competitiveness. In general, the results of evaluating mixed culture indicators based on the principles of assistance and competition were complementary and confirming each other.
Conclusions
The results showed that millet and quinoa had significant effects on each other when intercropped at different planting densities and ratios due to difference of morphological and physiological characteristics. So according to the goals of intercropping recommended the intercropping systems of millet and quinoa for Birjand region.
 

Keywords

Competitive ratio index; Land equivalent ratio; New crop; Replacement series technique

References

Ahmadvand, G., and Hajinia, S., 2016. Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of soybean (Glycine max L.) and millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Journal of Agroecology 7(4): 485-498. (In Persian with English Summary)

Akintoye, H.A., Lucas, E.O., and King, J.G., 1997. Effects of density of planting and time of nitrogen application on maize varieties in different ecological zones of West Africa. Communications in Science and Plant Analysis 28: 1163-1175.

Atri, A., and Zand, A., 2004. Studying competition ability six cultivar canola (Brassica napus L.) with Avena fatua. Journal of Plant Pests and Diseases 72(2): 95-112. (In Persian with English Summary)

Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B.K., and Ghose, S.S., 2006. Barley and pea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 325-332.

Chapagain, T., and Riseman, A., 2014. Barley–pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, karbon and nitrogen transformations. Field Crops Research 166: 18-25.

Crabtree, R.J., Prater, J.D., and Mbolda, P., 2000. Long-term wheat soybean and grain sorghum double-cropping under rainfed conditions. Agronomy Journal 82: 683-686.

Darbaghshahi, M.N., Banitaba, A., and Bahari, B., 2012. Evaluating the possibility of saffron and chamomile mixed culture. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(20): 3060-3065.

Dhima, K.V., Lithourgidis, A.S., Vasilakoglou, I.B., and Doras, C.A., 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research 100: 249-256.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2011. Quinoa; an ancient crop to contribute to world food security. 63 p.

FAO, and ICRISAT, 1996. The world sorghum and millet economies, facts, trends and outlook. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Via delle Teme di Caracalla, Rome, and International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. 68 p.

Ghorbani, R., Tabrizi, L., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M., 2010. Field and Laboratory Investigations in Agroecology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Iran. 372 p. (In Persian)

Gonzalez, S.E., and Christiansen, J., 2016. Some agronomic strategies for organic quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 202(6): 454-463.

Hassanzadeh Aval, F., Koocheki, A., Khazaie, H.R., and Nassiri Mahallati, M., 2010. Effect of plant density on growth characteristics and yield of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.) and Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.) Intercropping. Field Crops Research 8: 920-929. (In Persian with English Summary)

Jacobsen, S.E., Liu, F., and Jensen, C.R., 2009. Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Science Hortical 122: 281-287.

Jamali, S., Sharifan, H., Hezarjaribi, A., and Sepahvand, N.A., 2016. The effect of different levels of salinity on germination and growth indices of two cultivars of quinoa. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 6: 98-110. (In Persian)

Kamkar, B., and Mahdavi Damghani, A., 2008. Principles of Sustainable Agriculture. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Iran. 315 p. (In Persian)

Khamari, M., 2017. Evaluation of grain sorghum and common millet intercropping in Birjand region. M.Sc. Thesis of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)

Koocheki, A.R., and Khajeh Hosseini, M., 2008. Modern Agronomy. Jihad-e Danneshgahi of Mashhad Press, Iran. 704 p. (In Persian)

Lilian, E.A.J., 2009. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) composition, chemistry, nutritional and functional properties. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 58: 10-31.

Lithourgidis, A.S., Vlachostergios, D.N., Dordas, C.A., and Damalas, C.A., 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy 34: 287-294.

Maffei, M., and Mucciarelli, A., 2003. Essential oil yield in peppermint _/ soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research 84: 229-240.

Mahmoodi, G., Ghanbari, A., and Hossein Panahi, F., 2014. Investigation of multiple competitions of weeds at different corn (Zea mays L.) densities. Iranian Journal of Crops Research 12(1): 118-126. (In Persian with English Summary)

Mostafaee, M., 2018. Determining the optimum plant density of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Under different irrigation levels. M.Sc. Thesis of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)

Mushagalusa, G.N., Ledent, J.F., and Draye, X., 2008. Shoot and root competition in potato_/maize intercropping: Effects on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany 64: 180-188.

Raei, Y., Bolandnazar, S.A., and Dameghsi, N., 2011. Evaluation of common bean and potato densities effects on potato tuber yield in mono-cropping and intercropping systems. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 21(2): 131-142. (In Persian with English Summary)

Ren, Y., Liuc, J., Wangd, Z., and Zhanga, S., 2016. Planting density and sowing proportions of maize-soybean intercrop affected competitive interactions and water-use efficiencies on the Loess Plateau, China. European Journal of Agronomy 72: 70-79.

Ruhlemann, L., and Schmidtke, K., 2015. Evaluation of mono-cropped and intercropped grain legumes for cover cropping in no-tillage and reduced tillage organic agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy 65: 83-94.

Safari, F., 2007. Effect of planting date and plant density on yield of millet. M.Sc. dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Gorgan, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)

Samadzadeh, A.R., Fallahi, H.R., Zamani, G.R., 2019. Possibility of quinoa production under South-Khorasan climatic condition as affected by planting densities and sowing dates. In Press, Applied Field Crops Research (In Persian with English Summary)

Sepahvand, N.A., Tavazoa, M., and Kahbazi, M., 2011. Adaptation and evaluation of quinoa, a valuable new crop in Iran. In: Proceedings of 2^nd International Symposium on Underutilized Plant Species. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Shahbazian, N., Allah-Moradi, E., and Kamkar, B., 2007. Introduction of Amaranth and Quinoa for stabilization of marginal lands in Iran. First National Conference on Ecology of Iran. 23 p. (In Persian)

Torabi, M., 2016. Millet suitable for planting under drought and dehydration. Isfahan Agricultural Jihad Organization. 32 p. (In Persian)

Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Mukhala, E., 2001. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono _/ intercropping system with different row orientation. Field Crops Research 71:17-29.

Zand, S., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., Kochaki, A., Khalghani, J., Mosavi, S.K., and Rmazani, K., 2010. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Iran. 558 p. (In Persian)