Yield Monitoring for Wheat and Sugar beet in Khorasan Province: 1- Analysis of Methods for Estimating Potential Yield

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 2, Volume 16, Issue 4 - Serial Number 52, January 2019, Pages 723-741   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v16i4.62556

Authors

M Nasiri mahalati^* ; A Koocheki

Abstract

Introduction
Potential production condition is defined as situation where water and nutrients are supplied in ample with no damage from weeds, pests and diseases. Under this situation potential yield (Yp) which is defined by solar radiation, temperature, CO2 concentration and genotypic characteristics of the crop species could be achieved. Closing the gap between Yp and actual yield (Ya) harvested by farmers is considered as the main challenge of agronomic sciences all around the world. Crop simulation models provide a powerful tool for prediction of Yp at regional and national scales. However, the accuracy of these models is highly dependent on the quality of input data which are usually not fully available even in developed countries. Simplified models designed based on few simple equations may be considered as an alternative where accurate data sets are lacking. In this research, Yp of wheat and sugar beet were estimated using some simple methods and the results were compared with those of complex simulation models under the same climatic and management conditions in Khorasan province, north east of Iran.

Materials and Methods
Potential yields of wheat and sugar beet were estimated by three simple calculation methods including FAO method (FAO, 1981), modified FAO, FAO-M (Versteeg and van Keulen, 1986) and RUE-based method (Nonhebel, 1997) at three different regions (Torbat, Mashhad and Neishabor) in Khorasan province. In these methods total above ground dry matter (DM) is calculated using two equations and Yp is estimated as the product of DM and harvest index with minimum weather data requirements. In addition, Yp for both crops and at the same locations was predicted using LINTUL and SUCROS simulation models which were previously calibrated for yield estimation of wheat and sugar beet at regional level. The accuracy of predicted potential yields by five methods was compared statistically against the measured yields obtained from the field experiments and high yielding farms at the studied regions.

Results and Discussion
Mean observed yield of wheat over the three studied regions was 7.18 t ha-1 and the estimated potential yield in the same regions using two simulation models and three simplified models was ranged between 6.92 and 7.63 t ha-1. Prediction error for the simulation models was 1.39 and for simple methods less than 5% (4.64%). Relative root mean squared error (RMSEn) for the simple methods was higher than that of complex models. However, it was between 7.11 and 10.16 % of the mean measured wheat yield which could be statistically considered as reasonable. Calculated values of modeling efficiency (ME) were positive and higher than 0.60 except for FAO-M method (ME=0.48). Measured sugar beet yield averaged over regions was 82.5 t ha-1 and estimated potential yield by different methods was between 89 and 91 t ha-1. Simple calculation methods had lower accuracy in predicting sugar beet yield compared to simulation models but RMSEnof simple methods never exceeded 11.5% showing statistically acceptable prediction. Cross validation indicated significant correlation between the results of three simple methods and that of complex simulation models.

Conclusions
Results of this study showed that potential yields of different crops can be estimated accurately using simple calculation methods with minimum weather data requirements. Such methods may be used as an alternative for agroecological zoning and yield gap analysis at regional level where calibrated simulation models and complete daily weather data sets are not available.

Keywords

Modeling efficiency; Simulation models; Summary models; Yield prediction

References

1. Batchelor, W. D., Basso, B., and Paz, J. O. 2002. Examples of strategies to analyze spatial and temporal yield variability using crop models. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 141-158.

2. Bell, M. A., and Fischer, R. A. 1994. Using yield prediction models to assess yield gains: a case study for wheat. Field Crops Research 36: 161-166.

3. Bhatia, V. S., Singh, P., Wani, S. P, Chauhan, G. S., Kesava Rao, A. V. R., Mishra, A. K., and Srinivas, K. 2008. Analysis of potential yields and yield gaps of rain fed soybean in India using CROPGRO-Soybean model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148: 1252-1265.

4. Boogaard, H. L., Van Diepen, C. A., Rouitter, R. P., Cabrera, J. C. M. A., and Van Laar, H. H. 1998. WOFOST 7.1 User guidefor the WOFOST 7.1 crop growth simulation model and WOFOST Control Center 5.1. Techn. Doc. 52, Alterra, WUR, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 144.

5. Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., and Pickering, N. G. 1996. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agronomy Journal 88: 704-716.

6. Brooks, R. J., Semenov, M. A., and Jamieson, P. D. 2001. Simplifying Sirius: sensitivity analysis and development of a meta-model for wheat yield prediction. European Journal of Agronomy 14: 43-60.

7. Brooks, R. J., and Tobias, A. M. 1996. Choosing the best model: Level of detail, complexity and model performance. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 24 (4): 1-14.

8. Brooks, R. J., and Tobias, A. M. 1999. Methods and benefits of simplification in simulation. In: Al-Dabass, D., Cheng, R.C.H. (Eds.), UK Sim 99 Fourth National Conference of the U.K. Simulation Society, 7-9 April 1999. UK Simulation Society, St Catharines College, Cambridge, pp. 88-92.

9. Caldiz, D. O., Haverkort, A. J., and Struik, P. C. 2002. Analysis of a complex crop production system in interdependent agro-ecological zones: a methodological approach for potatoes in Argentina. Agricultural Systems 73: 297-311.

10. Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A., Walters, D. T., and Yang, H. S. 2003. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annal Review of Environmental Resources 28: 315-358.

11. Deryng, D., Sacks, W. J., Barford, C. C., and Ramankutty, N. 2011. Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield. Global Biogeochemical Cycling, 25: 18.

12. De Wit, A. J. W., Boogaard, H. L., and van Deipen, C. A. 2005. Spatial resolution of precipitation and radiation: the effect on regional crop yield forecasts. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 135: 156-168.

13. Efron, B., and Gong. G. 1983. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross‐validation. The American Statistician 37 (1): 36-48.

14. FAO, 1978. Report on the Agro ecological Zones Project. Vol. 1.Methodology and results for Africa. World Soil Resources Report 48/1. FAO, Rome, 158cpp.

15. FAO, 1981. Report on the Agro ecological Zones Project. Vol. 3.Methodology and results for South and Central America. World Soil Resources Report 48/3. FAO, Rome, 251 pp.

16. Gardner, R. H. 1998. Pattern, process and analysis of spatial scales. In: Peterson, D.L., Parker, V.T. (eds.). Ecological Scale: Theory and applications. Columbia State University Press, New York.

17. Gommez, R. 2000. Crop-yield weather modeling. FAO-WMO Roving Seminar, Lecture notes and exercises, FAO, Rome.

18. Goudiraan, J., and van Laar, H. H. 1993. Modeling Crop Growth Processes. Kluwer Academic Press, The Netherlands.

19. Goudriaan, J. 1996. Predicting crop yields under global change. In: Walker, B.H., Steffen, W.L. (Eds.), Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Book Series 2.CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 260-274.

20. Hoogenboom, G. 2000. Contribution of agro meteorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 103: 137-157.

21. Jagtap, S. S., and Jones, J. W. 2002. Adaptation and evaluation of the CROPGRO-soybean model to predict regional yield and production. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 93: 73-85.

22. Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R., and Wilson, D. R. 1991. A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Fields Crops Research 27: 337-350.

23. Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R., Goudriaan, J., Ritchie, J. T., Keulen, H., and van Stol, W. 1998. A comparison of the models AFRCWHEAT2, CERES-Wheat, Sirius, SUCROS2 and SWHEAT with measurements from wheat grown under drought. Field Crops Research 55: 23-44.

24. Kravchenko, A. N., and Bullock, D. G. 2000.Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil. Agronomy Journal, 92: 73-85.

25. Kiniry, J. R., Bean, B., Xie, Y., and Chen, P. 2004. Maize yield potential: critical processes and simulation modeling in a high-yielding environment. Agricultural Systems 82: 45-56.

26. Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Soltani, A., Sharifi, H., and Ghorbani, R. 2006. Effects of climate change on growth criteria and yield of sunflower and chickpea crops in Iran. Climate Research 30: 247-253.

27. Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2016. Effects of climate change on agricultural production of Iran: II. Predicting productivity of field crops and adaptation strategies. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 14: 1-20. (in Persian with English abstract).

28. Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2007. Impacts of climate change and CO2 concentration on wheat yield in Iran and adaptation strategies. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 6 (1): 139-153. (in Persian with English abstract).

29. Kropff, M. J. Bouma, J., and Jones, J. W. 2001. Systems approaches for the design of sustainable agro-ecosystems. Agricultural Systems 70: 369-393.

30. Licker, R., Johnston, M., Foley, J. A., Barford, C., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., and Ramankutty, N. 2010. Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Global Ecological Biogeography 19: 769-782.

31. Loague, K., and Green, R. E. 1991. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. Journal Contaminant Hydrology 7: 51-73.

32. Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G., and Field, C. B. 2009. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 34: 179-204.

33. Mondani, F. 2012. Simulating the effect of climate change on wild oat and sunn pest damage on wheat under Mashhad weather conditions. PhD thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

34. Muchow, R. C., and Kropff, M. J. 1997. Assessing the potential yield of tropical crops: role of field experimentation and simulation. In: Kropff, M. J., Teng, P. S., Aggarwal, P. K., Bouma, J., Bouman, B. A. M., Jones, J. W., Van Laar, H.H. (Eds.), Applications of Systems Approaches at the Field Level. Vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 101-112.

35. Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A., and Jahan, M. 2011 .Radiation absorption and use efficiency in relay intercropping and double cropping of winter wheat and maize. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8 (6): 878-890. (in Persian with English abstract).

36. Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A. Kamali, G. A., and Shahandeh, H. 2006. Potential impact of climate change on rainfed wheat production in Iran. Archives in Agronomy and Soil Science 52: 113-124.

37. Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Koocheki, A. 2017.Trend analysis of nitrogen use and productivity in cereal production systems of Iran. Journal of Agroecology 9: 360-378. (in Persian with English abstract).

38. Neumann, K., Verberg, P. H., Stehfest, E., and Muller, C. 2010. The yield gap of global grain production: a spatial analysis. Agricultural Systems 103: 316-326.

39. Nonhebel, S. 1997. Harvesting the sun’s energy using agro ecosystems. DLO Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 96 pp.

40. Nonhebel, S. 1994. The effects of use of average instead of daily weather data in crop growth simulation-models. Agricultural Systems 44: 377-396.

41. O’Connell, M. G., O’Leary, G. J., Whitfield, D. M., and Connor, D. J. 2004. Interception of photo synthetically active radiation and radiation use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Research 85: 111-124.

42. Parsa, S. 2008. Modeling spatial and temporal variation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield in Khorasan province. PhD thesis. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

43. Priya, S., and Shibasaki, R. 2001.National spatial crop yield simulation using GIS-based crop production model. Ecological Modeling 135: 113-129.

44. Richter, G. M., Jaggard, K. W., and Mitchell, R. A. C. 2001. Modeling radiation interception and radiation use efficiency for sugar beet under variable climatic stress. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 109: 13-25

45. Soltani, A., Khooie, F. R., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., and Moghaddam, M. 2001.A simulation study of chickpea crop response to limited irrigation in a semiarid environment. Agricultural Water Management 49: 225-237.

46. Soltani, A., Meinke, H., De Voil, P. 2004. Assessing linear interpolation to generate daily radiation and temperature data for use in crop simulations. European Journal of Agronomy 21: 133-148.

47. Stehfest, E., Heistermann, M., Priess, J. A., Ojima, D. S., and Alcamo, J. 2007. Simulation of global crop production with the ecosystem model Day Cent. Ecological Modeling 204: 345-361.

48. van Bussel, L. G. J., Müller, C., Van Keulen, H., Ewert, F., and Leffelaar, P. A. 2011. The effect of temporal aggregation of weather input data on crop growth models’ results. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151: 607-619.

49. van Delden, A. 2001 Yielding ability and weed suppression of potato and wheat under organic nitrogen management. PhD Thesis, WageningenUniversity, TheNetherlands, ISBN 90 5808 519_/8, pp. 197.

50. van Ittersum, M. K., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., and Hochman, Z. 2013. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance-A review. Field Crops Research 143: 4-17.

51. van Ittersum, M. K., Leffelaar, P. A., van Keulen, H., Kropff, M. J., Bastiaans, L., and Goudriaan, J. 2003. On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 201-234.

52. van Laar, H. H., Goudriaan, J., and Van Keulen, H. 1997. SUCROS97: Simulation of crop growth for potential andwater-limited production situations. C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 52.

53. van Wart, J., Kersebaum, Ch., Peng, Sh., Milner, M., and Cassman, K. G. 2013. Estimating crop yield potential at regional to national scales. Field Crops Research 143: 34-43.

54. Viglizzo, E. F., Podomingo, A. J., Castro, M. G., Lertora, F. A., and Bernardos, J. N. 2004. Scale-dependent controls on ecological functions in agroecosystems of Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 101: 39:51.

55. Versteeg, M. N., and van Keulen, H. 1986. Potential crop production prediction by some simple calculation methods, as compared with computer simulations. Agricultural Systems 19: 249-272.

56. Wilmot, C. J. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 64: 1309-1313.

57. Wit, A. J. W., Boogaard, H. L., and Diepen, C. A. 2005. Spatial resolution of precipitation and radiation: the effect on regional crop yield forecasts. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 135: 156-168.