Effects of Silicon Application at Nano and Micro Scales on the Growth and Production of Potato Minitubers (Solanum tuberosum Var. Agria) under Three Soil Texture

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 1, Volume 19, Issue 2 - Serial Number 62, July 2021, Pages 107-120   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jcesc.2020.67434

Authors

M Soltani¹; M Kafi²; A Nezami^{* 1}; H. R Taghiyari³

¹Department of Agrotechnology, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

²Department of Agrotechnology, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

³Faculty of Civil Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Many experiments have shown that Silicon (Si) can reduce the effect of both biotic and abiotic stresses in plants caused by plant diseases, pest damage, salinity, drought, heavy metal toxicity, nutrient imbalance, water logging, high radiation, high temperature, wounding, and freezing. It has been indicated that silicon has a beneficial role in plant nutrition such as enhancement in absorbing nitrogen, phosphor, potassium and zinc. Beneficial results of silicon application on plant growth and physiology made farmers and researches to use silicon as a fertilizer. Silicon fertilizers are applied as slag, compost, rice straw, calcium and sodium silicates in both foliar and soil applications. Potato is not considered as a Si-accumulating but studies have implied that Si supply may alleviate damaging effects that result from drought and also reduce stem lodging and increase tuber yield  increased leaf area, specific leaf area, and pigment concentration (chlorophyll a and carotenoids) as well as photosynthesis and transpiration rates of well watered potato plants.
Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted as factorial based on completely randomized design with three replications, in department of agronomy, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Iran, in 2015. In this research, the effects of four different silicon compounds (Nano-silica, sodium silicate, hydrophilic Bentonite (Nano-clay), and Bentonite), in two concentrations (1000 ppm and 2000 ppm) on the growth characteristics of potato Minitubers (Solanum tuberosum Var. Agria) plants and production under three different soil texture (clay loam, loam and sandy loam), were investigated. In order to determine the best treatment in each soil, variance analysis was done along with cluster analysis, stepwise multi regression analysis and path analysis, and the results of all analysis were compared.
Resultsand Discussion: Due to the lack of development of plants in clay loam soil, the comparison between treatments was done only in loam soils and sandy loam soils. The results showed that despite the lack of leaf and stem development in silicon treated plants, the Minituber characteristics improved compared to the control, which resulted in an increase in the ratio of Minituber dry weight to shoot dry weight.
based on plant performance, Cluster analysis for loam soil categorized silicate treatments in 3 groups: first (control, Bentonite (2000 ppm), Nano-silica (2000 ppm)), second (Nano-clay (1000 ppm), Bentonite (1000 ppm), Nano-silica (1000 ppm)) and third (Nano-clay (1000 ppm), Sodium Silicate (1000 ppm), Sodium Silicate (2000 ppm)). In loam sand soil this grouping was in four groups: first (control, Bentonite (1000 ppm), Nano-clay (1000 ppm)), second (Nano-clay (2000 ppm), Nano-silica (2000 ppm), Nano-silica (1000 ppm)), third (Bentonite (2000 ppm), Sodium Silicate (2000 ppm)) and forth (Sodium Silicate (1000 ppm)).
Path analysis showed in loam soil three traits (leaf dry weight, total plant Minituber volume, total plant Minituber dry weight) have the most direct and indirect effect on Minituber fresh weight (as potato yield. In loam sand soil four traits (mean Minituber diameter, leaf area, total plant Minituber volume, total plant Minituber dry weight) were indicated to have the most direct and indirect effect on Minituber fresh weight (as potato yield).
Conclusions: Investigating the effect of applying silicate treatments in different concentrations on Minituber wet weight (as Minituber yield) by cluster analysis and path analysis showed that in both soils, Bentonite (2000 ppm) had the most effect on traits responsible for Minituber wet weight changes.

Keywords

Bentonite; Mintubers; Nanoclay; Nanosilica; Silicon

References

1. Aghdak, P., Mobli, M., Khoshgoftarmanesh, A. H., and Shakeri, F. 2010. Effects of adding Bentonite to different substrates on vegetative growth and yield of snap beans (Phaseulus vulgaris L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture 1: 31-41.
2. Ahmadi, S., Andersen, M. N., Lærke, P. E., Plauborg, F., Sepaskhah, A., Jensen, C. R., and Hansen, S. 2011a. Interaction of different irrigation strategies and soil textures on the nitrogen uptake of field grown potatoes.International Journal of Plant Production 5: 263-274.
3. Ahmadi, S. H., Andersen, M. N., and Plauborg, F. 2008. Potato root growth and distribution under three soil types and full, deficit and partial root zone drying irrigations. Plant and Soil 206: 123-136.
4. Ahmadi, S. H., Plauborg, F., Andersen, M. N., Sepaskhah, A. R., Jensen, C. R., and Hansen, S. 2011b. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: Root distribution. Agricultural Water Management 98: 1280-1290.
5. Asgarzadeh, H., Mosaddeghi, M. R., Mahboubi, A. A., Nosrati, A., and Dexter, A. R. 2010.Soil water availability for plants as quantified by conventional available water, least limiting water range and integral water capacity. Plant and Soil 335: 229-244.
6. Crusciol, C. A. C., Pulz, A. L., Lemos, L. B., Soratto, R. P., and Lima, G. P. P. 2009. Effects of Silicon and Drought Stress on Tuber Yield and Leaf Biochemical Characteristics in Potato. Crop Science 49.
7. Dexter, A. 2004. Soil physical quality: Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120: 201-214.
8. Karunakaran, G., Suriyaprabha, R., Manivasakan, P., Yuvakkumar, R., Rajendran, V., Prabu, P., and Kannan, N. 2013. Effect of Nanosilica and silicon sources on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, soil nutrients and maize seed germination. IET Nanobiotechnology 7: 70-77.
9. Kawakami, J., Iwama, K., and Jitsuyama, Y. 2006. Soil water stress and the growth and yield of potato plants grown from microtubers and conventional seed tubers. Field Crops Research 95: 89-96.
10. Kowalski, B., Terry, F., Herrera, L., and Peñalver, D. 2006. Application of Soluble Chitosan in vitro and in the Greenhouse to Increase Yield and Seed Quality of Potato Minitubers. Potato Research 49: 167-176.
11. Lebot, V. 2009."Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: Cassava, Sweet Potato, Yams and Aroids," CABI, No.17.
12. Lemoine, R., La Camera, S., Atanassova, R., Dédaldéchamp, F., Allario, T., Pourtau, N., Bonnemain, J.-L., Laloi, M., Coutos-Thévenot, P., and Maurousset, L. 2013. Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors.Frontiers in Plant Science 4: 2.
13. Mura, S., Seddaiu, G., Bacchini, F., Roggero, P. P., and Greppi, G. F. 2013. Advances of Nanotechnology in agro-environmental studies.Italian Journal of Agronomy 8: 18.
14. Pilon, C., Soratto, R. P., and Moreno, L. A. 2013. Effects of Soil and Foliar Application of Soluble Silicon on Mineral Nutrition, Gas Exchange, and Growth of Potato Plants. Crop Science 53: 1605-1614.
15. Samuels, A., Glass, A., Ehret, D., and Menzies, J. 1993. The effects of silicon supplementation on cucumber fruit: changes in surface characteristics. Annals of Botany 72: 433-440.
16. Satje, A., and Nelson, P. 2009. Bentonite treatments can improve the nutrient and water holding capacity of sugarcane soils in the wet tropics. Proc. Australian Soc. Sugar Cane Technol 31: 166-176.
17. Sieczka, J. B., Thornton, R. E., and Chase, R. 1992. Commercial potato production in North America. Potato Association of America handbook (USA).
18. Singh, P. R., Valkonen, T. J. P., Gray, M. S., Boonham, N., Jones, C. R. A., Kerlan, C., and Schubert, J. 2008. Discussion paper: The naming of Potato virus Y strains infecting potato. Archives of Virology 153: 1-13.
19. Smit, A. L., and Groenwold, J. 2005. Root characteristics of selected field crops: Data from the Wageningen Rhizolab (1990-2002). Plant and Soil 272: 365-384.
20. Soltani, M. 2018. Potato mini tuber production improvement by enhancing the different greenhouse sowing bed conditions and soil with Nano-clay, clay and silicon, PhD thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Agriculture department.
21. Tierno, R., Carrasco, A., Ritter, E., and de Galarreta, J. I. R. 2014. Differential Growth Response and Minituber Production of Three Potato Cultivars under Aeroponics and Greenhouse Bed Culture. American Journal of Potato Research 91: 346-353.
22. Vreugdenhil, D., Bradshaw, J., Gebhardt, C., Govers, F., Taylor, M. A., MacKerron, D. K., and Ross, H. A. 2011. "Potato Biology and Biotechnology: Advances and Perspectives: Advances and Perspectives," Elsevier, ISBN: 0080525059.
23. Wang, F.-X., Kang, Y., and Liu, S.-P. 2006. Effects of drip irrigation frequency on soil wetting pattern and potato growth in North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management 79: 248-264.
24. White, A. C., Rogers, A., Rees, M., and Osborne, C. P. 2015. How can we make plants grow faster? A source–sink perspective on growth rate. Journal of Experimental Botany.
25. Wilson, M. J. 2007. Handbook of Clay Science, F. Bergaya, B. K.G. Theng, G. Lagaly (Eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam. 2006, ISBN: 978-0-08-044183-2 (book review). Geoderma 139: 420-421.