اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات56
تعداد شماره‌ها2,153
تعداد مقالات22,468
تعداد مشاهده مقاله103,289,173
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله48,828,896
Jalalian, Hamid, Naimabadi, Nazanin, Brunori, GianLuca. (1399). An Overview on Success of the LEADER Approach in European Countries. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(1), 63-79. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I1.88362
Hamid Jalalian; Nazanin Naimabadi; GianLuca Brunori. "An Overview on Success of the LEADER Approach in European Countries". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10, 1, 1399, 63-79. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I1.88362
Jalalian, Hamid, Naimabadi, Nazanin, Brunori, GianLuca. (1399). 'An Overview on Success of the LEADER Approach in European Countries', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(1), pp. 63-79. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I1.88362
Jalalian, Hamid, Naimabadi, Nazanin, Brunori, GianLuca. An Overview on Success of the LEADER Approach in European Countries. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 10(1): 63-79. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I1.88362

An Overview on Success of the LEADER Approach in European Countries

Journal of Research and Rural Planning
مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 32، خرداد 2021، صفحه 63-79    اصل مقاله (549.6 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/JRRP.V10I1.88362
نویسندگان
Hamid Jalalian* 1؛ Nazanin Naimabadi1؛ GianLuca Brunori2
1Kharazmi University
2University of Pisa
چکیده
Purpose- This study aimed at identifying the successful aspects of the LEADER Approach in European countries.
Design/methodology/approach- The methodology in this study is a systematic overview. The statistical population of the present research consisted of 30 scientific articles on the LEADER Approach published in different journals during 2000-2017.
Findings- The results showed the success cases (items) of the LEADER Approach in European countries can be defined in four general categories contains: economic, social, environmental, and management dimensions. Moreover, among the successes of the LEADER Approach, the economic dimension with a rate of 38.4% has the highest percentage relative to the other dimensions. One factor behind the success of the LEADER to European countries, which is an important guide for rural development programs in Asian countries including Iran, is a very important issue of networking in the rural development process, which has recently been intensely debated in the discussions of academic and executive development spheres in the EU countries. However, the effects of LEADER vary from region to region, so any generalizations between regions are likely to be unreliable. Therefore, it is still difficult to judge its true impact on rural development.
Originality/Value- The LEADER Program is one of the performed programs being implemented by European Union countries in the new vision of rural development planning. When the European Union started its new program with a completely new approach, there were a lot of skeptics against the initiative based on local development. LEADER has often been praised as a successful approach to rural development, although its implementation is not without scholarly critiques.
کلیدواژه‌ها
European Union؛ Rural development؛ Rural areas؛ Socio-economic development؛ LEADER Program
مراجع
  1. Agarwal, S., Rahman, S., & Errington, A. (2009). Measuring the determinants of relative economic performance of rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 309-321. https://www.sciencedirect.com
  2. Arabatzis, G., Aggelopoulos, S., & Tsiantikoudis, S. (2010). Rural development and LEADER + in Greece: Evaluation of local action groups. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1), 302-307. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267381720.
  3. Barke, M., & Newton, M. (1997). The EU LEADER initiative and endogenous rural development: the application of the Program in two rural areas of Andalusia, southern Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(3), 319-341. DOI:10.1016/SO743-016 (97)00027-2.
  4. Berriet-Solliec, M., Laidin, C., Lépicier, D., Vu Pham, H., Pollermann, K., Raue, P., & Schnaut, G. (2016). The LEADER process as a European policy for local development: A comparison of the implementation in three European member states. Congress Towards Rural Synergies and Trade –Offs between Economic Development and Ecosystem Servises.25-28 August 2016.  http://www.trustee-project.eu.
  5. Bitáné Bíró, B., & Koponicsné Györke, D. (2009). LEADER activity in the South Transdanubian Region. Journal of European Agriculture, 10(2), 123-132.   https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q= 7000153216&tip=sid.
  6. Bosworth, G., Price, L., Anniba, I., Sellick, J., Carroll, T., & Shepherd, J. (2013). LEADER as a vehicle for neo-endogenous rural development in England. In: European Society for Rural Sociology (Eds.) Rural resilience and vulnerability: the rural as locus of solidarity and conflict in times of crisis (pp. 229-230). XXVth Congress of the European Society for Rural Sociology. https://www.academia.edu.
  7. Bruckmeier, K. (2002). LEADER in Germany and the discourses of autonomous regional development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 219-227. DOI:10.1111/1467-9523.00144.
  8. Brunori, G., & Rossi, A. (2006). Differentiating countryside: Social representa­tions and governance in rural areas with high social density: The case of Chianti, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2), 183-205.  https://www.sciencedirect.com
  9. Buller, H. (2000). Re-creating rural territories: leader in France. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 190-199. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9523.00141
  10. Bullmann, U. (1996). The politics of third level. Regional and Federal studies. 6(2), 3-19. DOI:10.1111/1467-9523.00141.
  11. Cazorla-Montero, A., Rios-Carmenado, I., & Díaz-Puente, J. M. (2005). LEADER community initiative as rural development model: application in the capital region of Spain. Agrociencia 39(6), 697-708. http://agris.fao.org
  12. Chatzitheodoridis, F., Michailidis, A., Tsilochristos, D., & Kazaki, S. (2006). Integrated Rural Development Programmes in Greece: An Empirical Approach to their Management, Practice and Results. Aeihoros 5(1), 58-90. (In Greek with English summary). https://sbagis.farm.teithe.gr.
  13. Chevalier, P., & Dedeire, M. (2014). Application du Program LEADER selon les principles De base du dévelopment rural. Economie Rurale, 34(23), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.4000/ecomierurale.4382.
  14. Cloke, P. J. (2006). Conceptualizing Rurality. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P Mooney (Eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: Sage. DOI:10.4135/9781848608016.n2
  15. Cunder, T., & Bedrac, M., (2010). The LEADER Approach – New development opportunity for rural areas in Slovania. Journal for Geography, 5(2), 55-65. https://www.econstor.eu.
  16. Dalma Polgar, K., & Duguleana, L. (2015). Characteristics of LEADER Programme for rural development in Romania. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series V: Economic Sciences, 8(57. 250-256.  http://www.doaj.org/openurl?genre=journal&issn=20652194.
  17. Dargan, L., & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis 48(3), 274-291. https://onlinebrary.wiley.com
  18. ECA - European Court of Auditors. (2010) Implementation of the LEADER Approach for rural development. Luxembourg: Official Publ EC, ECA / Spec Rep 5. https://www.eca.europa.eu.
  19. Esparcia Perez, J. (2000). The LEADER Program and the rise of rural development in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2), 200-207. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  20. Eszter, B. (2011). The LEADER Program in Hungary and in Europe. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 12 (3): 486-497. https://jcea.agr.hr
  21. EU-COM, Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Rural Development 2007-2013 Handbook on common monitoring and evaluation framework, guidance document. September 2006. Brussels. Concli Reguulation (EC) N 1698/2006 OF 20 September 2006. http://www.men-d.de
  22. European Commission. (2007). the LEADER Approach: A Basic Guide, European Commission. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu.
  23. European Union, (2013). Establishing a common organization of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC), No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007. https://www.ecolex.org.
  24. Farrell, G., & Thirion, S. (2005). Social capital and rural development: from win-lose to win-win with the LEADER initiative. In D. Schmied (Ed.), Winning and losing: The changing geography of Europe's rural areas (pp. 281-298). Ashgate: Aldershot. https://www.cabdirect.org
  25. Gitta, S., Pollermann, K., & Petra Schnaut, R. (2012). LEADER - an approach to innovative and suitable solutions in rural areas? Paper prepared for presentation at the 131st EAAE Seminar ‘Innovation for Agricultural Competitiveness and Sustainability of Rural Areas’, Prague, Czech Republic. https://ideas.repec.org 10.22004/ag.econ.135779
  26. Grieve, J., Lukesch, R., Weinspach, U., Fernandes, P. A., Brakalova, M., Cristiano, S., ... & Slee, W. (2011). Capturing impacts of Leader and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas (No. 705-2016-48296). Paper prepared for the 122nd EAAE seminar "Evidence-based agricultural and rural policy making: methodological and empirical challenges of policy evaluation", Ancona.  http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/evaluation.
  27. Halfacree, K. (2006). Rural space: constructing a three-fold architecture. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.). Handbook of rural studies. P.24-29. London: Sage. DOI:10.4135/9781848608016.n4
  28. High, C., & Nemes, G. (2007). Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development. Sociologia ruralis, 47(2), 103-119. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.
  29. Katona-Kovács, J., High, C., & Nemes, G. (2011). Importance of animation actions in the operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups. European Countryside, 3(4), 227-240. DOI:10.2478/v10091-012-0006-7
  30. Khorasani, M. A., Yazdan Panah, K. & Maghfeli, Z. 2015. Review of the developments of the European Union's rural development planning in the 21st century, lessons for Iran. Journal of Village and Development, 19(4), 49-76. [In Persian] http://rvt.agri-peri.ac.ir
  31. Loizou, E., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Michailidis, A., Kontogeorgos, A., & Mattas, K. (2014). LEADER Approach Performance Assessment in a Greek Rural Region. Paper Presented at the EAAE 2014 Congress Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies. Ljubljana, Slovenia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265139727
  32. Lukić, A., & Obad, O. (2016). New Actors in Rural Development - The LEADER Approach and Projectification in Rural Croatia. DOI: 10.5673/sip.54.1.4 UDK 911.373:316.334.55 (497.5) Prethodno priopćenje.
  33. Marquardt, D., Möllers, J., & Buchenrieder, G. (2012). Social networks and rural development: LEADER in Romania. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(4), 398-431. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  34. Marquardt, D., Wegener, S., & Möllers, J. (2010). Does the EU LEADER in­strument support endogenous development and new modes of governance in Romania? Experiences from elaborating an MCDA based regional development concept. International Journal of Rural Management, 6(2), 193-241. https://www.econstor.eu
  35. Nardone, G., Sisto, R., & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social Capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 63-72. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001
  36. Navarro F. A., Woods, M., & Cejudo, E. (2015) The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of Its Own Success. The Decline of the Bottom-Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis. 56(2), 270-288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.
  37. OECD. (2006). OECD rural policy reviews: The new rural paradigm, policies and governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.amazon.com
  38. Oedl-Wieser, T., Strahl, W., & Dax, T. (2010). The LEADER Program 2007-2013: Refocusing towards agriculture-oriented activities as a consequence of ‘mainstreaming’ innovative rural action in Austria. Paper presented at 118th EAAE Seminar of Rural development: Governance, Policy Design and Delivery, Ljubljana (Slovenia). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254386661
  39. Oostindie, H., & van Broekhuizen, R. (2010).  Thesis RDP and performance contract based rural policy delivery in the Netherlands: Assessing the Impact of Rural Development Policies (incl. LEADER). Wageningen, University and Research Centre. https://edeopt.wur.nl/157490.
  40. Osti, G. (2000). LEADER and partnerships: the case of Italy. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 172-180. DOI:10.1111/1467-9523.00139.
  41. Papadopoulou, E., Hasanagas, N., & Harvey, D. (2011). Analysis of rural development policy networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? Land Use Policy, 28(4), 663-673. htttps://www.scienedirect.com
  42. Papageorgiou, F. (2011). Economic change and community planning. An example of social Innovation in declining rural areas. In R. Rvans, V. Tsipidis, & A. Aldea-Partanen (eds.), Thematic guide nine. Social innovation and sustainable rural development (pp. 38-43). Athens, available online at http://www.euracademy.org.
  43. Pollermann, K. (2014). Processes of cooperation in rural areas: obstacles, driving forces and options for encouragement. In E. Kasabov (ed.), Cooperation in rural, peripheral areas of Europe: Challenges and solutions (210- 227). Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. https://link.spriner.com
  44. Pollermann, K., Raue, P., & Schnat, G. (2014). Multi-level Governance in rural de: Analysing experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) 54th congress of the European Regional Science Association. Regional development and globalization: Best practices. 26-29 August. https://www.econstor.eu.
  45. Pollermann, K., Raue, P., & Schnaut, G. (2013). Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER. Studies in Agricultural Economics 115, 111-117.https://core.ac.uk.
  46. Pollermann, K., Raue, P., & Schnaut, G. (2014). Opportunities for a participative approach in rural development: Findings from LEADER in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and the requirements for Community Led Local Development. Landbauforsch Appl Agric Forestry Res. Vol 3/4. (64)127-138. DOI: 10.3220/LBF_2014_127-138.
  47. Saraceno, E. (1999). The evaluation of local policy making in Europe learning from the LEADER Community Initiative. Evaluation 5(4), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/135638999400830101.
  48. Teilmann, K. A., & Thuesen, A. (2014). Important types of LAG–municipality interaction when collaborating on rural development lessons from Danish LEADER LAGs. International Journal of Rural Management 10(1), 21-45. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x
  49. Tolić, S., & Markotić Krstinić, B. (2015). Implementation of leader measures of rural development in Croatia. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design. (1857-8489) 10, 41-48.  http://www.jhed.mk/filemanager/JHED%2...
  50. Turek Rahoveanu, A. (2012, October 11-13). LEADER Approach - an opportunity for rural development. Paper presented at the 3rd International Symposium of Agrarian Economy and Rural Development – realities and perspectives for Romania. Bucharest, Romania.  www.iosrjournals.org
  51. Turek Rahoveanu, A. (2012, October). Leader approach: An opportunity for rural development, In Agrarian economy and rural development - realities and perspectives for Romania. 3rd edition of the international symposium (pp. 355-362). The Research Institute for Agricultural Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR), Bucharest. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/76827
  52. Woods, M. (2005). Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. London: Sage.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5,167
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,280


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب