Structural Analysis of Drivers affecting the Livelihood Sustainability of Villagers, with an Emphasis on Future Studies (Case Study: Marivan County)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

دوره 10، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 35، اسفند 2021، صفحه 1-19   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/JRRP.V10I4.86356

نویسندگان

Saadi Mohammadi^{* 1}؛ Bahram Nasrolahizadah²

¹Payame Noor University

²Management & Planning Organization

چکیده

Purpose- The main purpose of this study was to identify the drivers responsible for instability of livelihood and to investigate the extent and manner of their influences on each other and on the future livelihood status of villagers in Marivan County.
Design/methodology/approach - Applying a descriptive-analytical method and Delphi Technique, the present applied research identifies first, the most important drivers of the current situation of livelihood instability and their eliminating impact on the future livelihood of the deprived villagers in Marivan County. Moreover, applying cross-impact method in Mick Mac software, it analyzes the effect and direct influence of these drivers on each other.
Findings- The most important drivers of livelihood instability of rural people in the county are a total of 36 drivers in five categories as follows: Economic failures with the influence (346) and dependence (371), social failures with the influence (290) and dependence (315), environmental-physical failures with the influence (172) and dependence (176), institutional-managerial failures with the influence (351) and dependence (287) and trans-regional failures with the influence (23) and dependence (12). Among them the institutional-managerial failures have the most direct influence (315) and the economic failures have the most direct dependence (371) on the other drivers. The regulatory and two-dimensional drivers and their situation on the graph shows the continuing instability of the villagers’ livelihood in future, thus, this will increase deserted villages and wasted water and soil resources in the region.
Research Limitations/Implications- The dispersion of a large number of villages, their small sizes in addition to their lack of accessibility, and the lack of cooperation of some experts to conduct interviews were among the main limitations of the present study.
Practical implications - It is suggested to teach villagers about the basic principles of entrepreneurship and taking risks and identifying opportunities. In this regard, making use of entrepreneurial villagers with successful experiences and non-governmental organizations in the region can be effective. Ultimately, plans and programs should be designed and implemented for the regulatory drivers such as fatalism, lack of crisis management policies, recognizing rural development as equal to the traditional agriculture development.
Originality/Value- The outcome of this study can be an introduction for subsequent studies for formulating scenarios, executive strategies, policies and planning in order to move towards sustainable livelihoods and the realization of a favorable livelihood for the villagers.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Sustainable livelihood؛ Future studies؛ Cross-impact analysis؛ Villages of Marivan County

مراجع

1. Ambrosio Albalá, M., & Lozano, M. (2009). Prospective structural analysis: An application to rural development strategies. Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, Dublin. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46471491
2. Ambrosio-Albalá, M., & Amador, F. (2015). Exploring prospective structural analysis to assess the relevance of rural territorial development in Spain and Nicaragua. Cuad. Desarro. Rural, Bogotá (Colombia), 2(76), 35-56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336721641
3. Anderson, J. (2001). Risk management in rural development. The World Bank Rural Development Family, Rutgers, the state university of New Jersey.
4. Assan, (2014). Livelihood diversification and sustainability of rural non-farm enterprises in Ghana. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 4(4), 1-12. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/42688
5. Beheshti, M., & Zali, N. (2010). Identifying the key factors of regional development with a scenario-based planning approach (A case study of East Azerbaijan province). Journal of Planning & Spatial Planning, 15(1), 41-63. [In Persian] https://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-5418-fa.html
6. Conway, M. (2002). A thinking futures reference guide foresight: an introduction. Paper presented at International Conference on Probing the Future. University of Strathclyde Graduate School of Business in Glasgow. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255652912
7. DFID. (2008). Sustainable livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London. Retrieved from http:// files. ennonline. net/ attachments/871/dfid-sustainable-livelihoods-guidance-sheet-section1.pdf
8. Ellis, F. (1999). Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: evidence and policy implications. Natural Resource Perspectives, 40(2), 2-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42765249
9. Ellis, F., & & Allison, E. (2004). Livelihood diversification and natural resource access, food and agriculture organization of the United Nations Lvelihood Support Programme (LSP). Overseas Development Group University of East Anglia UK. https:// www.google.com/ url?sa=t&rct=j&q= &esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ah
10. Fouracre, P. (2001). Transport and sustainable rural livelihood, rural transport knowledge base, rural travel and transport program. Washington DC: World Bank. CiteSeerX — Transport and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods 5:3: a Rural Transport Knowledge Base Rural Travel and Transport Program 2001 1 Transport and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods (psu.edu)
11. Gavigan, J. (2001). Foresight for regional development network a practical guide to regional foresight. European Commission – Joint Research Centre– Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, The University of Manchester. https:// www.google.com/ url?sa= t&rct=j&q= &esrc =s&source= web&cd= &ved =2ahUKEwjm6IrN0Jnw
12. Ghişa, M., Goux-Baudiment, F., Dator, J. A., & Cole, S. (2011). Designing a foresight exercise for the future of rural communities in Romania. Futures, 43(9), 996-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.06.009
13. Godet, M., Durance, P., & Gerber, A. (2008). Strategic Foresight La Prospective Use and Misuse of Scenario Building, Paris, France. http://www.laprospective.fr/dyn/francais/actualites/SR10vEng.pdf.
14. Goharifar, M., Azar, A., & Moshabaki, A. (2015). Future studies: Presenting the organization's future image using a scenario planning approach. Management Quarterly, 38(10), 36-65. [In Persian] https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=303009
15. Provincial Government of Kurdistan. (2015). The latest divisions of the country in the Marivan County. Sanandaj: Provincial Government of Kurdistan.
16. Griffiths, M. P. (2016). Resilience and Community Social Organizations in Rural Myanmar, (Research Summary). Social Policy & Poverty Research Group, Countrywide, Partner Publications, Retrieved from: https://www.lift-fund.org/sites/lift-fund.org/files/publication/
17. Havas, A. (2006). Socio-economic and Developmental Needs: Focus of Foresight Programmes. Institute of Economics Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest: SSRN-id1634074 (1).pdf
18. Luke, G., Harper, J., & Keenan, M. (2009). Technology foresight: Concepts and practice (Pime Series on research and innovation policy). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Technology-Foresight-Concepts-Innovation/dp/1848448104
19. Mafzali, A., Jahangiri, K., & Aivazi, M. (2015). Comparative study foresight patterns used in crisis management in the world. Management Future Quarterly, 26(105), 69-78. [In Persian] pdf
20. Mahmoud, M., Liu. Y., Hartmann, H., Stewart, S., Wagner, T., Semmens, D., … Winter, L. (2009). A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environmental Modelling and Software, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp798–808. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364815208002211
21. Maynooth, N. (2005). Rural Ireland 2025 Foresight Perspectives. University College Dublin and Teagasc. http://www.coford.ie/media/coford/content/publications/projectreports/Foresight.pdf
22. Miguel, J., & Güell, F. (2012). Foresight as an Innovative Tool for Designing Tourist Destinations. Journal of Tourism Research/Revista De Invesigaacion en Tourism, 3(2), 161-170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317122331
23. Moradimasihi, V., & Talebi, M. (2017). Structural analysis of sustainable rural development indicators (Case study: Villages of Saomeah Sara County). Journal of space Economics and Rural Development, 6(3), 165-180. serd-v6n21p165-fa.pdf
24. Morse, S. (2013). The theory behind the sustainable livelihood approach. Dublin: The Theory Behind the Sustainable Livelihood Approach | SpringerLink
25. Mphande, F. A. (2016). Infectious diseases and rural livelihood systems in an ecuadorian Agro socio ecosystem. Workshop 2, The Sustainability of Small-Scale Farming, pp 195-201. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422510/
26. Naimi, K., & Poormohammadi, M. (2016). Identify key factors affecting the future of Sanandaj's Lower Urban Settlements with Emphasis on the Application of Futurology. Urban Studies Quarterly, 20(3), 52-62. [In Persian] https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_40902.html
27. Parizadi, T., Mostafavisaheb, S., & Shah Mohammadnezhad, S. (2017). Future of the settlement system in scenario planning, Improvement of planning and regional planning (Case study: Isfahan province). Journal of Land Use Planning, 9(1), 81-102. [In Persian] https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=303111
28. Pisano, U. (2012). Resilience and sustainable development: Theory of resilience, systems thinking and adaptive governance, ESDN Quarterly Report N°26, Research Institute for Managing Sustainability, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Franz Klein Gasse 1, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312495658
29. Plieninger, T., Draux, H., Fagerholm, N., Bieling, C., Burgi, M., Kizos, T., … & Verburg, P. (2016). The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: A systematic review of the evidenc Journal of Land Use Policy, 57, 204-214. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303905985
30. Poormohammadi, M., & Toorani, A. (2017). Identifying and analyzing effective factors in integrated development with emphasis on rural-urban linkages (Case study: Minoodasht Township). Journal of Spatial Planning, 21(2), 82-99. [In Persian] https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=463214
31. Reed, M.S., Kenter, J., Bonn, A., Broad, K., Burt, T.P., Fazey, I.R., … & Ravera, F. (2013). Participatory scenario development for environmental management: A methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. Journal of Environmental Management, 128(4), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016
32. Sirius, A., Cnam, G., Cnam, M.R., & Cnam, F.R. (2003). Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & Actors' strategy with MACTOR method. American Council for the United Nations University: The Millennium Project (2003). Retrieved from https://millennium-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/11-Structural-Analysis.pdf
33. Small, B. (2017). Digital technology and agriculture: Foresight for rural enterprises and rural lives in New Zealand. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 6(2), 54-77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328150110
34. Sobczyk, W. (2014). Sustainable development of rural areas, problemy ekorozwoju – problems of sustainable development, 9(1), 119-126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228320368
35. Taghiloo, A. (2014). Future scenarios of rural settlements in Iran. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 5(3), 86-96. [In Persian] https://jrrp.um.ac.ir/article_24695.html
36. Taghiloo, , Soltani, N., & Aftab, A. (2016). Rural development propellants of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Spatial Planning and Planning, 20(4), 1-28. [In Persian] https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=464197
37. Vaisi, M. (2018). Identification and structural analysis of the status of drivers affecting sustainable rural development with emphasis on the use of futures research (Case study: villages of Marivan county). Master Thesis in Geography and Rural Planning. Payam Noor university of Marivan. [In Persian] marivan.kurdistan.pnu.ac.ir
38. World Future Society. (2005). The art of foresight preparing for a changing world, a special report from the world future society. Retrieved from: https://thesystemsthinker.com/the-art-of-foresight-preparing-for-a-changing-world/
39. Zareian, A., & Sattarzadeh, M. (2011). The approach about how and nature of future study. Journal of the Army Nursing Faculty of the Iran, 11(1), 1-10. [In Persian]  http://eprints.ajaums.ac.ir/1681/1/