Complex and Chaotic International Systems and a New Theory of Network Defence Diplomacy

پژوهش نامه ایرانی سیاست بین الملل

Article 10, Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 19, December 2021, Pages 263-295   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/irlip.2021.68320.1017

Author

farhad ghasemi^*

Associate Professor of International Relations ,Department of International Relations , Faculty of Law and Political science , University of Tehran,Tehran ,Iran,

Abstract

Defense diplomacy has bourn with military power, which must use it in diplomacy in times of war and peace. Due to the international system's turn into a complex and chaotic pattern, power as the central dynamic of defense diplomacy has changed to a networked model. Structural, process, construction, and algorithmic complexity are the main defining features of it. With the emergence of nonlinear international systems and related theoretical debates, the International Relations literature has severe backwardness in explaining defense diplomacy's analytical apparatus. Therefore this fundamental question has been raised as the present study's direct engagement: how the defense diplomacy analytical apparatus conceptually will be reconstructed based on the Principles and foundations of complex and chaotic systems theory. In response to this question, and using the abduction method, which emphasizes the emerging facts and finding the best explanation for them, this article presents multi-layered network defense diplomacy as an innovative concept in the international relations literature. This concept envisions it as a multi-layered network with a core consisting of unit-based control systems. Other control systems that will deploy on these are support systems. All these form a single control system with a functional linkage between its layers, which operates in a hybrid model.

Keywords

Power; Defense diplomacy; Complex and chaotic international systems; Military power; Networked defense diplomacy

References

Amerstorfer, C. M. (2020). The dynamism of strategic learning: Complexity theory in
strategic L2 development. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1),
21-44.
Arquilla, J. (1995). Bound to fail: Regional deterrence after the cold war. Comparative
Strategy, 14(2), 123-135.
Art, R. J. (1980). To what ends military power? International Security, 4(4), 3-35.
Berglund, C., & Souleimanov, E. A. (2020). What is (not) asymmetric conflict? From
conceptual stretching to conceptual structuring. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 13(1),
87-98.
Biddle, T. D. (2020). Coercion Theory: A Basic Introduction for Practitioners (Spring 2020).
Texas National Security Review.
Charillon, F., Balzacq, T., & Ramel, F. (2020). Defense Diplomacy. In Global Diplomacy
(pp. 267-278): Springer.
Cheyre, J. E. (2013). Defence diplomacy. In The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy.
Cottey, A. (2013). Reshaping defence diplomacy: new roles for military cooperation and
assistance: Routledge.
Dodd, T. (1997). The Strategic Defence Review: Great Britain, Parliament, House of
Commons, Library.
Drab, L. (2018). Defence diplomacy–an important tool for the implementation of foreign
policy and security of the state. Security and Defence Quarterly, 20(3), 57-71.
Du Plessis, A. (2008). Defence diplomacy: conceptual and practical dimensions with specific
reference to South Africa.
Erol, M. S. (2015). Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea. Gazi Akademik
Bakış, 9(17), 261-277.
Filippidou, A. (2020). Deterrence: Concepts and Approaches for Current and Emerging
Threats. In Deterrence (pp. 1-18): Springer.
Fromm, J. (2004). The emergence of complexity: Kassel university press Kassel.
Ghasemi, F. Conceptual Reconstruction of Regional Deterrence Theory and Designing Its
Patterns on the Basis of the Theories of Power Cycles and Networks.”. Defensive
Strategy, 38, 103-146. [ In persian]
Ghasemi, F. (2011). Theories of International Relations and regional studies. Tehran: Mizan
Legal Foundation.[In persian]
Ghasemi, F. (2013). Theories of international relations: Theoretical foundations of
international order and regimes. Tehran: Mizan. [ In persian]

Ghasemi, F. (2020). A Step Toward the Theoretical Model of Dissipative and Bifurcated
Order in the New International Politics. Geopolitics Quarterly. [ In persian]
Harkavy, R. E. (1998). Triangular or indirect deterrence/compellence: Something new in
deterrence theory? Comparative Strategy, 17(1), 63-81.
Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars (Arlington.
VA: Potomac.
Huth, P., & Russett, B. (1993). General deterrence between enduring rivals: Testing three
competing models. American Political Science Review, 61-73.
Johnson, J. C., & Joiner, S. (2019). Power changes, alliance credibility, and extended
deterrence. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 0738894218824735.
Kasemsap, K. (2020). Utilizing complexity theory and complex adaptive systems in global
business. In Foreign Direct Investments: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and
Applications (pp. 474-500): IGI Global.
Kavalski, E. (2007). The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations
theory: notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life.
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(3), 435-454.
Lartey, F. M. (2020). Chaos, Complexity, and Contingency Theories: A Comparative
Analysis and Application to the 21st Century Organization. Journal of Business
Administration Research, 9(1), 44-51.
Lebow, R. N. (2020). Deterrence and Compellence. In A Democratic Foreign Policy (pp. 75-
102): Springer.
Mahmoud, M. S. (1977). Multilevel systems control and applications: a survey. IEEE
transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(3), 125-143.
Manson, S. M. (2001). Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum,
32(3), 405-414.
Mir, N. A. (2020). Power and Diplomacy: India’s Foreign Policies during. Journal of Defence
Studies, 14(1-2), 119-123.
Morgan, P. M. (2003). Deterrence now (Vol. 89): Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, P. M. (2005). Taking the long view of deterrence. Journal of Strategic Studies,
28(5), 751-763.
Mumford, A. (2020). Understanding hybrid warfare. Cambridge Review of International
Affairs, 1-4.
Powell, R. (1990). Nuclear deterrence theory: The search for credibility: Cambridge
University Press.
Quackenbush, S. (2011). Understanding general deterrence: Theory and application:
Springer.

Smith, A. (1998). Extended deterrence and alliance formation. International Interactions,
24(4), 315-343.
Smith Jr, E. A. (2001). Network-centric Warfare: What’s the Point? Naval War College
Review, 54(1), 59-75.
Snyder, G. H. (1991). Alliances, balance, and stability. In: JSTOR.
Sperandei, M. (2006). Bridging deterrence and compellence: an alternative approach to the
study of coercive diplomacy. International Studies Review, 8(2), 253-280.
Tan, S. S. (2012). ‘Talking Their Walk’? The Evolution of Defense Regionalism in Southeast
Asia. Asian Security, 8(3), 232-250.
Tarasenko, F. (2020). Elements of Complexity Theory. In Applied Systems Analysis (pp. 233-
240): CRC Press.
Walt, S. M. (1985). Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International
Security, 9(4), 3-43.
Walt, S. M. (1990). The origins of alliance: Cornell University Press.
Zagare, F. C., & Kilgour, D. M. (2000). Perfect deterrence (Vol. 72): Cambridge University
Press.