Application of fractal modeling for processing and analysis of geoelectrical components in the Kushk-e-Bahram copper deposit (Central Iran)

زمین شناسی اقتصادی

Volume 13, Issue 3 - Serial Number 30, 2021, Pages 645-664   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/econg.v13i3.88147

Authors

Marjan Jebeli^{* 1}; Seyed Reza Mehrnia²; Peyman Afzal³

¹Young Researchers and Elite Club, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

²Department of Geology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

³Department of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The Kushk-e-Bahram Manto type copper deposit is located in the central Iran zone and   is Uremia-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA) belt which includes copper porphyry deposits and related mineralization types, including the Manto type copper deposits (Jebeli et al., 2018a, b). Based on the type of mineralization and the presence of sulfides, high electrical conductivity (low electrical resistivity) can be detect in this deposit such as the Manto type deposits (Mehrnia, 2013., Mehrnia, 2016., Teymoorian Motlagh et al., 2012). On the other hand, Induced Polarization (IP) and electrical resistivity (RS) were used in the Kushk-e-Bahram deposit.
 
Material and Methods
The relationship between geoelectrical parameters and the mineralization process were recognized in geophysical assessments of the Kushk-e-Bahram de posit. It is necessary to obtain information about the shape and distribution of the orebody. According to exploratory data of the Kushk-e-Bahram deposit (Jebeli et al., 2018a, b), Cu mineralization has been extended. Therefore, the location and number of geoelectrical profiles were selected, based on previous studies which was generated in the ArcGIS software. The exchanges in the RS and IP values were measured, along three profiles (P1, P2, P3) and Dipole-Dipole arrangement with electrode distance of 10 meters. The device type used is WDJD-3 and 1620 harvest points were surveyed. IP–RS profiles with azimuth 30 to 40 degrees were used in order to identify mineralization areas based on the highest variability of conductivity and load-bearing properties.  Moreover, they were designed and surveyed perpendicular to the mineralization process of the area. Considerations were taken into account based on the location of trenches and the mineralization sequence of this area. The P1 and P2 profiles with an approximate length of one kilometer and P3 profile with an approximate length of 370 m were designed and harvested under a 30 degree azimuth.
 
Results and Discussion
In this research study, a number of geoelectrical sections were selected and their surface changes in a two-dimensional environment were refined and internalized by the algorithm used in the diffraction-distance distribution function. According to the position of P1 and P2 profiles, all three quantities of RS, IP and self-Potential have been interpolated to match the alteration zones and faults of the study area in the P3. The quantity of Spontaneous Potential (SP) is not measured and it just suffices to internalize specific electrical changes and IP and their conformity with the effects of alteration and faults in the region. Interpolation of geo-electrical data by the inverse distance weighting estimation method and nearest neighborhood algorithms were carried out (Mehrnia, 2016; Teymoorian Motlagh et al., 2012).
Based on the fractal dimension, four targets around the P1 and P2 profiles and eight priorities have been identified around the P3 profile. Based on the results, geo-electrical data distribution pattern was obtained using diffraction-distance model and changes in the fractal dimension of electrical resistivity, induced polarization and self-generating electric potential according to the differences of the fractal dimensions for IP, RS and SP in the Kushk-e-Bahram deposit. It is necessary to interpret geo-electrical sections based on fractal dimension exchanges to avoid the oblique error caused by the fitting of disproportionate quantities as much as possible. Consequently, exchanges in the level of electrical resistivity and induced polarization were calculated. There is no corresponding trend along P1 and P2 profiles. Thus, the results of the diffraction-distance model were correlated with mineralization potential in the depth of the deposit. Continuation of exploration activities (detailed phase) along the P1, P2 and P3 profiles are suggested. Based on inferring from the  Brownian mechanism distribution of electrical resistivity quantities and inductive polarization, priority of P1 and P2 profiles with vein and disseminated mineralization in P3 profile is obtained.
 
References
Jebeli, M., Afzal, P., Pourkermani, M. and Jafarirad, A., 2018a. Correlation between rock types and Copper mineralization using fractal modeling in Kushk-e-Bahram deposit, Central Iran. Geopersia, 8(1): 131–141. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/geope.2017.237332.648334
Jebeli, M., Kheyrollahi, H. and Afzal, P., 2018b. Exploration and Interpretation Geophysical using of IP and RS Data in Kushk-e-Bahram Manto Copper deposit, NE Saveh. The 21 Symposium of Geological Society of iran, Geological society of iran, Ghom. Iran.
Mehrnia, S.R., 2013. Application of fractal geometry for recognizing the pattern of textural zoning in epithermal deposits: (case study: Shikhdarabad Au-Cu indices EastAzerbaijan province). Journal of Economic Geology, 5(1): 23–36. (in Persian with English abstract) https://dx.doi.org/10.22067/econg.v5i1.22885
Mehrnia, S.‌R., 2016. Application of Fractal Technique for Analysis of Geophysical - Geochemical Databases in Tekieh Pb-Zn Ore Deposit (SE of Arak), Journal of Economic Geology, 8(2): 325–342. (in Persian with English abstract) https://dx.doi.org/10.22067/econg.v8i2.42454
Teymoorian Motlagh, A., Ebrahimzadeh Ardestani, V., Mehrnia, S.‌R., 2012. Fractal method for determining the density of the stone tablet in Charak region (southern Iran). Life Science Journal, 9(4): 1913–1923. Retrieved April 01, 2021 from http://www.lifesciencesite.com

Keywords

Variance-Distance (V-D) fractal model; Fractal Dimension; Kushk-e-Bahram copper deposit

References

Afzal, P., Adib, A. and Ebadati, N., 2018. Delineation of seismic zonation using fractal modeling in West Yazd province, Central Iran. Journal of Seismology, 22(6):1377–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9770-9

Afzal, P., Yusefi, M., Mirzaie, M., Ghadiri-Sufi, E., Ghasemzadeh, S. and Daneshvar Saein, L., 2019. Delineation of podiform-type chromite mineralization using geochemical mineralization prospectivity index and staged factor analysis in Balvard area (SE Iran). Journal of Mining and Environment, 10(3): 705–715. https://dx.doi.org/10.22044/jme.2019.8107.1678

Amidi, M.A., Shahrabi, M. and Navaei, Y., 2006. Geological Map of Zavieh, Scale 1: 100,000, Geological Survey of Iran.

Bayram, I. and Selesnick. I.‌W., 2009. Frequency-Domain Design of Overcomplete Rational-Dilation Wavelet Transforms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57(8): 2957‌–‌2972. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2009.2020756

Boomeri, M., Nakashima, K. and Lentz, D.R., 2010. The Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper deposit, Kerman, Iran: a mineralogical analysis of the igneous rocks and alteration zones including halogen element systematics related to cu mineralization processes. Ore Geology Reviews, 38‌(4): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2010.09.001

Jebeli, M., Afzal, P., Pourkermani, M. and Jafarirad, A., 2018a. Correlation between rock types and Copper mineralization using fractal modeling in Kushk-e-Bahram deposit, Central Iran. Geopersia, 8(1): 131–141. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/geope.2017.237332.648334

Jebeli, M., Kheyrollahi, H. and Afzal, P., 2018b. Exploration and Interpretation Geophysical using of IP and RS Data in Kushk-e-Bahram Manto Copper deposit, NE Saveh. The 21 Symposium of Geological Society of iran, Geological society of iran, Ghom. Iran.

Mandelbrot, B.B., 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. Wh Freeman, San Fransisco, 460 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290080415

Mandelbrot, B., 2002. Gaussian self-affinity and fractals: globality, the earth, 1/f noise, and R/S., Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 637 pp.

Mark, D. and Aronson, P., 1984. Scale-dependent fractal dimension of topographic surfaces: An empirical investigation, with application in geomorphology and computer mapping. Mathematical Geology, 16(7): 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01033029

Mehrnia, S.R., 2013. Application of fractal geometry for recognizing the pattern of textural zoning in epithermal deposits: (case study: Shikhdarabad Au-Cu indices EastAzerbaijan province). Journal of Economic Geology, 5(1): 23–36. (in Persian with English abstract) https://dx.doi.org/10.22067/econg.v5i1.22885

Mehrnia, S.‌R., 2016. Application of Fractal Technique for Analysis of Geophysical - Geochemical Databases in Tekieh Pb-Zn Ore Deposit (SE of Arak), Journal of Economic Geology, 8(2): 325–342. (in Persian with English abstract) https://dx.doi.org/10.22067/econg.v8i2.42454

Mehrnia, S.R. and Jelvegar Filband, A., 2019. Geostatistics Applications for Modeling Description of Reservoirs. Setayesh Press, Tehran, 286 pp.

Shahabpour, J. and Kramers, J.D., 1987. Lead isotope data from the sarcheshmeh porphyry copper deposit, iran. Mineralium Deposita, 22‌(4): 278–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204520

Teymoorian Motlagh, A., Ebrahimzadeh Ardestani, V., Mehrnia, S.‌R., 2012. Fractal method for determining the density of the stone tablet in Charak region (southern Iran). Life Science Journal, 9(4): 1913–1923. Retrieved April 01, 2021 from http://www.lifesciencesite.com

Thorarinsson, F and Magnusson, G., 1990. Bouguer density determination by fractal analysis. Geophysics, 55(7): 932–935. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442909

Turcotte, D., 1997. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 398 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174695

WHitney, D.L and Evans, B.‌W., 2010. Abbreviations for Names of Rock-Forming Minerals. American Mineralogist, 95(1):185–187. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2010.3371