1. Abdullatif, M., and Al-Khadash, H. A. (2010). Putting Audit Approaches in Context: The Case ofBusiness Risk Audits in Jordan. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), pp. 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00400.x
2. AL-Qudah, L.A. (2021). The Impact of Business Risk-Based Audit Approach on ReducingUnsystematic Risks: Evidence from Jordanian Banks. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), pp. 343–352. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.343
3. Azinfar, K., Ghodrati Zovarm, A., and Noroozi, M. (2019). The Effect of Risk Dimensions on Audit Pricing. Financial accounting and auditing research, 11(44), pp. 155-174. (in Persian).
4. Bell, T. B., Marrs, F., Solomon, I., and Thomas, H. (1997). Auditing Organizations Through a StrategicSystems Lens: The KPMG Business Measurement Process. KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Montvale, New Jersey.
5. Bell, T. B., Peecher, M., and Solomon, I. (2005). The 21st Century Public Company Audit: Conceptual Elements of KPMG’s Global Audit Methodology. KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Montvale, New Jersey.
6. Chang, H., Kao, Y-C., Mashruwala, R., and Sorensen, S.M. (2018). Technical Inefficiency, Allocative Inefficiency, and Audit Pricing. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 33(4), pp. 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17696760
7. Curtis E., Humphrey, C., and Turley, W. S. (2016). Standards of Innovation in Auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35(3), pp. 75–98. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51462
8. De Martinis, M., and Houghton, K. (2019). The Business Risk Audit Approach and Audit Production Efficiency. Abacus: A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, 55(4), pp. 734-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12178
9. DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 63-82.
10. Durocher, S., and Gendron, Y. (2014). Epistemic commitment and cognitive disunity toward fair-value accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 44(6), pp. 630–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.938012
11. European Confederation Institutes of Internal Audit (ECIIA) (2020). Risk in Focus 2020: Hot topics for internal auditors. Brussels, Belgium.
12. Fukukawa, H., and Mock, T. J. (2011). Audit Risk Assessments Using Belief versus Probability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(1), pp. 75–99. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2011.30.1.75
13. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., and Hinings, C. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), pp. 58–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069285
14. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2019). International Auditing Standards (ISA 315), Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatements through Understanding the Entity and its Environment, available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/isa-315-revised-2019-identifying-and-assessing-risks-
material-misstatement.
15. Malsch, B., and Gendron, Y. (2013). Re-theorizing change: Institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), pp. 870–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12006
16. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. America, United States.
17. Power, M. K., and Gendron, Y. (2015). Qualitative research in auditing: A methodological roadmap. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10423
18. Samsonova-Taddei, A. (2013). Social relations and the differential local impact of global standards: The case of international standards on auditing. Abacus, 49(4), 506–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12017
19. Schultz, J. J., Bierstaker, J. L., and O’Donnell, E. (2010). Integrating Business Risk into Auditor Judgment About the Risk of Material Misstatement: The Influence of a Strategic-systems-audit Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), pp. 238–51.
20. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp. 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
21. Tolbert, P. S., and Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 175–190. SAGE, London, U.K.
22. Van Buuren, J., Koch, C., Van Nieuw Amerongen, N., and Wright, A. (2014). The use of business risk audit perspectives by non-Big 4 audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(3), pp. 105–128. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50760
23. Van Buuren, J., Koch, C., Van Nieuw Amerongen, N., and Wright, A. (2018). Evaluating the Change Process for Business Risk Auditing: Legitimacy Experiences of non-Big 4 Auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), pp. 249–269. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51748
24. Wright, W. F. (2016). Client business models, process business risks and the risk of material misstatement of revenue. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 48(4), pp. 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.11.005
