Investigating the manner of drawing the identity-based foundations in Joe Biden’s presidential inaugural speech through conceptual metaphors

زبانشناسی و گویش های خراسان

Article 8, Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 26, April 2022, Pages 209-232   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/jlkd.2022.76029.1094

Authors

Somaye Shokati Moqarab^{* 1}; Jalal Rahimian²

¹PhD candidate in Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

²Professor, Department of Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

This study is about to find how conceptual metaphors help in drawing identity borders and attaining legitimacy. So, the semantic system of conceptual metaphor (Kováces, 2010) and the components of myth and social imagination (derived from Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, 2001) make the theoretical framework of the research to find how the semantic system affect reaching general legitimation. To answer the research question, Joe Biden’s speech in his inaugural ceremony in 20 Jan. 2021 is used as the case study. Based on the findings, metaphor provides a cognitive framework for expressing ideological ideas. Each metaphor in this discourse foregrounds a concept and backgrounds the alternative ones. The president conceptualizes the USA as “America is human” metaphor to accompany the nation, and avoid the party-based views. As a result, metaphor is a tool for avoiding clear border-makings, foregrounding concepts, and representing different views according to conceptual domains. Though using metaphor, discourses can turn to a discourse having the least out groups and the most in groups in a country. Therefore, conceptual metaphor provides a base for creating an ideal space for myth-making. Through such tools, Biden tried to capture a discourse trying to attract the attention of the most and avoid rejecting the potential groups.

Keywords

Discourse analysis; articulation; legitimacy; conceptual metaphors; Joe Biden; Inauguration

References

1. افخمی، علی و کامران شکیبا (1396). بازنمایی ایدئولوژیک مطبوعات انگلستان و ایران با نگاه تحلیل انتقادی استعاره. جستارهای زبانی، ۸(۷).
2. رضاپور، ابراهیم (1390). تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی: نقش استعاره در بازنمایی و بازتولید ایدئولوژی در رسانه‌ها. رسالة دکتری تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
3. رضاپور، ابراهیم. و شیوا احمدی (1395). کارکردهای استعاره دستوری اسم‌سازی در گفتمان سیاسی فارسی و انگلیسی: رویکرد ون‌دایک. علم زبان، 4(6).
4. رضائی‌پناه، امیر و سمیه شوکتی مقرب (1397). تحلیل مدارهای هویت و دیگری در اظهارات باراک اوباما و دونالد ترامپ پیرامون برجام. دهمین همایش بین‌المللی زبان‌شناسی ایران. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
5. شوکتی مقرب، سمیه و جلال رحیمیان (1399). بازنمایی هویت و غیریت در نخستین سخنرانی رؤسای جمهور پس از انتخابات: مطالعه موردی انتخابات ایران، آمریکا، فرانسه. زبان‌پژوهی، 12(34).
6. نیک‌ملکی، محمد و سیدنورالدین رضوی‌زاده (1399). بازنمایی چرخش گفتمانی قدرت در ایران، تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی مراسم تنفیذ و تحلیف هفتمین رئیس جمهور منتخب ایران در شبکه‌های خبری بین‌المللی. فصلنامة علوم خبری، 9 (24)، صص. 13-78.
7. Afkhami A, and Shakiba K. 2018. Ideological representation of Iran & England's newspapers: A Critical Metaphor Analysis. LRR. 8 (7), 209-231, [In Persian].
8. Barnard-Wills, D. (2012). Surveillance and Identity Discourse, Subjectivity and the State. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.
9. Charteris-Black, J. 2013. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Evans, V. and Green, M. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics; An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
11. Fairclough, N. (1996). Language and Power. 10^th (1^st. 1989), Essex: Longman Group UK Limited.
12. Hart, C. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Hernández Vila, D. 2015. Discourse and Identity in Barack Obama’s First Inaugural Speech. Undergraduate Dissertation 2014-2015. University of Alicante.
14. Howarth, D., and Stavrakakis, Y. 2000. Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis, in Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. edited by David Howarth et al., Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
15. Jørgensen, M. W., and Phillips, L. J. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
16. Kövecses, Z. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kovecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Laclau, E. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, London and New York: Verso.
19. Laclau, E., and Mouffe, Ch. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso.
20. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
21. Montessori, Nicolina Montesano 2011. The Design of a Theoretical, Methodological, Analytical Framework to Analyse Hegemony in Discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 8 (3).
22. Musolff, A. 2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical discourse studies, 9(3), 301-310.
23. Núñez-Perucha, B. 2011. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Linguistics as tools for ideological research; A diachronic analysis of feminism. in Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Edited by Christopher Hart. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
24. Sahragard, R. and Moghadam, M. 2015. Moving in a Gyre: A Discourse Analysis of President Rouhani’s De Facto Inaugural Speech. Studies in English Language Teaching, Vol. 3, No. 3, PP: 237-251.
25. Sandor, C. 2002. A few aspects of cold war presidential inaugural discourse from a corpus linguistic point of view. Modern filologiai Kozlemenyek, IV, evofolyam, 2. szam.