Calibration and Evaluation of APSIM Model for Simulation of Growth and Development of KSC 704 and Maxima Maize Hybrids under Different Amounts of Nitrogen

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 1, Volume 20, Issue 4 - Serial Number 68, January 2023, Pages 363-379   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jcesc.2022.71744.1071

Authors

M Madadizadeh^{* 1}; S. R Amiri²; J Kambouzia¹; S Soufizadeh¹

¹Department of Agroecology, Environmental Science Research Institute, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran

²Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Higher Education Complex of Saravan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important cereals after wheat and rice in the tropical and temperate regions of the world. Also, its mean production is 8 ton ha^-1. Moreover, the total area of under cultivation is 132572 hectares in Iran. Crop simulation models can play an important role in improving agricultural production systems in many developing countries. Crop models can simulate plant growth processes and grain yield instead of conducting several years of field experiments. On the other hands, crop simulation models should be calibrated and evaluated with independent data sets under different climatic conditions. Therefore, the purpose of this research was evaluation of the APSIM model for simulation of growth, development and yield of maize hybrids in Kerman province under different amounts of nitrogen.
Materials and Methods
The APSIM model was calibrated and validated using measured data from a two-year field experiment conducted in the 2014 and 2015 growing seasons. The experiment was a factorial arrangement based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications conducted at Kerman province in Iran. Four nitrogen rates (0 (control), 92, 220 and 368 kg ha^-1) and two maize hybrids (KSC 704 and Maxima) were included in the study. Moreover, inputs of APSIM model were climatic, soil, plant and management data. In order to calibrate the APSIM model, the data of field experiment in the first year (2014) (including flowering date, physiological maturity date, leaf area index, biological yield and grain yield) were included. Moreover, Data from the second experiment (2015) were used to validate the model.
Results and Discussion
Our results showed that APSIM model accurately predicted phenology (nRMSE=4.5%). But the APSIM model did not capture the effect of nitrogen stress on phenology. At the evaluation step, the model couldn’t accurately predict the maximum leaf area index (nRMSE=26 and 18% for SC 704 and Maxima hybrids, respectively) which led to overestimate of the results. The nRMSE values for the biological yield of SC 704 and Maxima hybrids were 13.9% and 5.7%, respectively. Furthermore, the values of Wilmot agreement index (d) for these SC 704 (0.95) and Maxima (0.99) indicated a close agreement between the field-measured and simulated values. Furthermore, the nRMSE for grain yield simulation of SC 704 and Maxima hybrids were 13.2 and 11.9 percentage, respectively, revealed that the model accurately simulated the grain yield of maize hybrids.
Conclusion
The evaluation of the APSIM model with the experimental data revealed that the model predicted grain yield, biological yield, days to flowering and maturity of maize hybrids reasonably well. This indicates that the model could be applied for assessing various management practices in maize agro-ecosystems under all parts of the semi-arid regions which has the similar characteristics to the study location. On the other hands, the APSIM model couldn’t predict the effect of different nitrogen levels on phenology.

Keywords

Biomass; Evaluation; Flowering; Grain yield

References

1. Abera, K. (2013). Growth, productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of maize (Zea mays ) as influenced by rate and time of nitrogen fertilizer application in Haramaya District. Eastern Ethiopia. Haramaya University. MSc Thesis.
2. Afzali, M., Taei Semiromi, J., & Amirinezhad, M. (2018). Evaluation of WOFOST model for growth and development simulation of maize under summer cropping system conditions in sub-tropical region of Southern Kerman. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 49, 57-64. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2017.205678.654112
3. Ahmed, M., & Hassan, F. (2011). APSIM and DSSAT models as decision support tools. 19^th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Perth, Australia.
4. Alley, M., Martz Jr, M. E., Davis, P., & Hammons, J. (2009). Nitrogen and Phosphorous Fertilization of Corn. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University. Publ. 424-027.
5. Amjed, A., Sanjani, S., Hoogenboom, G., Ahmad, A., Khaliq, T., Wajid, S., Noorka, I., & Ahmad, S. (2012). Application of crop growth models in agriculture of developing countries: a review. New Horizons Science Technology, 1, 95-99.
6. Anonymous. (2020). Agricultural Statistics. Iranian Ministry of Agricultural Jihad. Department of Planning and Economic Affairs. Center of Statistics and Information Technology. Iran. p. 158. (in Persian)
7. Antonietta, M., Acciaresi, H., & Guiamet, J. (2015). Responses to N deficiency in stay green and non-stay green argentinean hybrids of maize. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 202(3), 231-242. http://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12136
8. Archontoulis, S. V., Miguez, F. E., & Moore, K. J. (2014). Evaluating APSIM maize, soil water, soil nitrogen, manure, and soil temperature modules in the Midwestern United States. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1025-1040. doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0421
9. Choukan, R. (2013). Final Report of Yield Trial and Adaptability of Late and Medium Maturing promising Hybrids of Maize (Final Stage). In: Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (Ed.), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran, pp. 50 (in Persian with English abstract).
10. Delve, R. J., Probert, M. E., Cobo, J., Ricaurte, J., Rivera, M., Barrios, E., & Rao, I. M. (2009). Simulating phosphorus responses in annual crops using APSIM: model evaluation on contrasting soil types. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 84, 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9243-6
11. Ebrahimi, M., Rezaverdinejad, V., & Majnoni Haris, A. (2015). Simulation of corn growth under different water and nitrogen management with AquaCrop model. Iranian Soil and Water Research, 46, 207-220. (in Persian with English abstract).
12. FAO Statistical Database. Agriculture statistics. 2008. Retrived on 27 March 2008 from: http://URL: faostat,fao.org/faostat.
13. FAO Statistical Database. Agriculture statistics. 2015. Retrived on 13 May 2015 from: http://URL: faostat,fao.org/faostat.
14. Gungula, D., Kling, J., & Togun, A. (2003). CERES-Maize predictions of maize phenology under nitrogen-stressed conditions in Nigeria. Agronomy Journal, 95, 892-899.
15. Heng, L., Asseng, S., Mejahed, K., & Rusan, M. (2007). Optimizing wheat productivity in two rain-fed environments of the West Asia–North Africa region using a simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy, 26, 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.09.001
16. Hoogenboom, G., Jones, J. W., Porter, C. H., Wilkens, P. W., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., & Tsuji G. Y. (2021). Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Version, 10(6), 117-124.
17. Hopkins, B., Rosen, C., Shiffler, A., & Taysom, T. (2008). Enhanced efficiency fertilizers for improved nutrient management: potato (Solanum tuberosum). Crop Management, 7(1), 1-16.
18. Kaur, H., Jalota, S., Kanwar, R., & Bhushan, B. (2012). Climate change impacts on yield, evapotranspiration and nitrogen uptake in irrigated maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system: A simulation analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82, 213.
19. Keating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N., Meinke, H., & Hochman, Z. (2003). An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 267-288.
20. Kpongor, D. S. (2007). Spatially explicit modeling of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) production on complex terrain of a semi-arid region in Ghana using APSIM. Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Bonn. PhD Thesis.
21. Liu, H.,Yang, J., Drury, C. A., Reynolds, W., Tan, C., Bai, Y., He, P., Jin, J., & Hoogenboom, G. (2011). Using the DSSAT-CERES-Maize model to simulate crop yield and nitrogen cycling in fields under long-term continuous maize production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 89, 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9396-y.
22. McCown, R., Hammer, G., Hargreaves, J., Holzworth, D., & Freebairn, D. (1996). APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agricultural Systems, 50, 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(94)00055-V
23. Mendenhall, W., Sincich, T., & Boudreau, N. S. (1996). A second course in statistics: regression analysis. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
24. Miao, Y., Mulla, D. J., Batchelor, W. D., Paz, J. O., Robert, P. C., & Wiebers, M. (2006). Evaluating management zone optimal nitrogen rates with a crop growth model. Agronomy Journal, 98, 545-553.
25. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M.W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 885-900.
26. Paknejad, F., Moayeri por, S., Aghayari, F., & Nabi Ilkaei, M. (2017). Simulation of maize yield with different levels of nitrogen by using DSSAT model. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 43, 503-518. (in Persian with English abstract).
27. Prescott, J. A. (1940). Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 64, 114-118.
28. Rafiee Manesh, S., Aynehband, A., & Nabati Ahmadi, D. (2010). Investigating the effect of irrigation water amount and irrigation depletion time in different stages of growth on yield and yield components of the SC704 maize hybrid under Ahwaz climatic conditions. Crop Physiology Journal, 7, 93-105. (in Persian).
29. Rahimi-Moghaddam, S., Kambouzia, J., & Deihimfard, R. (2019). Optimal genotype× environment× management as a strategy to increase grain maize productivity and water use efficiency in water-limited environments and rising temperature. Ecological Indicator, 107, 1-17.
30. Rahimi-Moghaddam, S., Kambouzia, J., & Deihimfard, R. (2018). Adaptation strategies to lessen negative impact of climate change on grain maize under hot climatic conditions: a model-based assessment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 253, 1-14.
31. Seyoum, S., Rachaputi, R., Chauhan, Y., Prassana, B., & Fekybelu, S. (2017). Application of the APSIM model to exploit G×E×M interactions for maize improvement in Ethiopia. Field Crops Research, 217, 113-124.
32. Shamudzarira, Z., & Robertson, M. (2002). Simulating response of maize to nitrogen fertilizer in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Experimental Agriculture, 38, 79-96.
33. Soler, C. M. T., Sentelhas, P. C., & Hoogenboom, G. (2007). Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 27, 165-177.
34. Soltani, A. (2012). Modeling physiology of crop development, growth and yield. CABI. Wallingford.
35. Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T. C., Jackson, L., Motzke, I., Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J., & Whitbread, A. (2012). Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 151, 53-59.
36. Wilks, D. S. (2011). Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Elsevier. Amsterdam.
37. Willmott, C., Robesonb, S., & Matsuuraa, K. (2012). Short Communication: A Refined Index of Model Performance. International Journal of Climatology, 32, 2088-2094.
38. Wu, Y., Liu, W., Li, X., Li, M., Zhang, D., Hao, Z., Weng, J., Xu, Y., Bai, L., & Zhang, S. (2011). Low-nitrogen stress tolerance and nitrogen agronomic efficiency among maize inbreds: comparison of multiple indices and evaluation of genetic variation. Euphytica, 180, 281-290.
39. Zsubori, Z. T., Pinter, J., Spitko, T., Hegyi, Z., & Marton, C. L. (2013). Yield and chemical composition of plant parts of silage maize (Zea mays) hybrids and their interest for biogas production. Maydica, 58, 34-41.