Implementing Expected Credit Loss in the Iranian Banking Industry

Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

مقاله 7، دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 23، مرداد 2023، صفحه 111-124   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijaaf.2022.42978

نویسندگان

Samine Feyzollah^{* 1}؛ Ahmad Badri²

¹Monetary and banking research institute central bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran

²Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

IFRS 9 changes the bank’s impairment accounting for debt instruments by replacing the incurred credit loss model with a forward-looking expected credit loss (ECL) model. This study examines the challenges of switching to the ECL model in the Iranian banking industry. We designed a questionnaire with 46 questions and sent them to four groups include: "banks", "bank auditors", "regulatory bodies" and "academic experts and researchers". The questionnaire’s rate of return was 90% and data were analyzed using fuzzy logic. We find that factors such as the prolonged judicial process of receiving receivables, related parties or political cronies, obligations imposed by the government, inefficiency of risk management and etcetera have caused banks to have a large volume of non-performing loans (NPLs). Failure to solve these problems will cause the ECL model not to be implemented properly. Also, according to our findings implementing this model will majorly change how Iranian banks manage and report their credit risks and reserves. The successful implementation of an ECL approach for impairment accounting will heavily depend on providing the necessary infrastructures at the macro level, supervision, and banks. It seems to require a relatively long time and careful planning to implement the ECL approach according to the current situation and infrastructures.

کلیدواژه‌ها

IFRS 9؛ Expected Credit Loss (ECL)؛ Challenges and obstacles؛ Iranian banking industry

مراجع

1. Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., and Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), pp. 13051-13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
2. Deloitte. (2016). Sixth global IFRS banking survey, no time like the present. Beirut, Lebanon
3. Ernst and Young. (2018). EY IFRS 9 Impairment Banking Survey, IFRS 9 Financial Instruments: Impairment challenges remain, EY Global CRS, London, England
4. Corrado, A. Giuditta, B., and Gianmarco, V. (2022). IFRS 9: Impairment of Loans Under the New EU Expected Loss Model. Greenberg Traurig, LLP. United States
5. KPMG (2017). Demystifying expected credit loss. Municipality, Netherlands. https://kpmg.com/
6. Money and Credit Council. (2006). Classification of assets of credit institutions and How to calculate the reserve of receivables of credit institutions. Circular MB / 2823. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/mfsmcg/c4.pdf
7. MOODY’S. (2016). Risk perspectives, The Convergence of Risk, Finance, and Accounting. 7. https://www.moodysanalytics.com/risk-perspectives-magazine
8. ORACLE (2016). Impairment Principles and Approach: Building an Expected Loss Model. https://go.oracle.com/ifrs9-impairment-expected-loss-model?elqCampaignId=61047&src1
9. Seresht, N. G., and Fayek, A. R. (2019). Computational method for fuzzy arithmetic operations on triangular fuzzy numbers by extension principle. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 106(10), pp. 172-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.01.005
10. Shyamal, A. K., and Pal, M. (2007). Triangular fuzzy matrices. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 4(1), pp. 75-87. https://doi.10.22111/IJFS.2007.359
11. Caruso, E., D’Hulster, K., Kliatskova, T. and Ortiz, J. (2021). Accounting Provisioning Under the Expected Credit Loss Framework: IFRS 9 in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies - A Set of Policy Recommendations. World Bank. H Street NW, Washington