Agroclimatic Suitability Assessment for Rain Fed Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Based on Growth Period and Precipitation Indices in Kurdistan Province

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 11, Volume 15, Issue 3 - Serial Number 57, September 2023, Pages 625-642   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/agry.2022.75791.1103

Authors

Hamid Cheraghi¹; Ahmad GHanbari^{* 2}; Mohammad Reza Asgharipour²; Javad Taie Semiromi³; Ali Hesami⁴

¹Expert of Agricultural Research Center

²Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran

³Technical and Vocational University

⁴Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center

Abstract

Introduction
Rainfall is a predominant climatic element that affects the density and location of agricultural systems as well as the choice of farming operations. The distribution, intensity, duration, and type of rainfall are very important at different stages such as cultivation, emergence, tillering, stem formation, and flowering. Kurdistan province has regular rainfall with an average rainfall of more than 500 mm per year. Therefore, Kurdistan province is one of the most prone rain-fed areas in Iran. As well his province with an area under cultivation of 120,000 hectares is one of the most important areas of chickpea growing in the country. However, the distribution of rainfall is not the same in all regions of this province, and therefore it is necessary to study the potential risk of chickpea production in Kurdistan province.
 
Materials and Methods
Long-term climatic data were collected from 15 stations for a period of 20 years from 1991 to 2011. The results of spatial and temporal analysis determined the climatic-agronomic indices of the suitable region and the amount of dryland chickpea production. Kurdistan province was divided into three climatic regions; High-risk or unsuitable climatic-agro-area (0.23% of the total area), medium-risk area or with relative proportion for production (59.71% of the total area), low-risk or suitable climatic-agro-area (37.96%) From the whole area).
 
Results and Discussion
The results of spatial and temporal analysis determined the climatic-agronomic indices of the suitable region and the amount of dryland chickpea production. Kurdistan province was divided into three climatic regions; High-risk or unsuitable climatic-agro-area (0.23% of the total area), medium-risk area or with relative proportion for production (59.71% of the total area), low-risk or suitable climate-agro-area (37.96%) From the whole area). The results of the study on the relationship between rainfall of vegetative stage and the potential of cultivation of dryland chickpeas in the region show except for a small part of Qorveh, Bijar, and Sarvabad cities which are in a weak degree. The whole region is in a very good degree in terms of supplying the required moisture, which is also due to the necessary rainfall at this time and the humidity of the storage capacity stored from the winter rains. The occurrence of suitable precipitations for the vegetative period in the whole region had the highest value compared to other developmental stages. The results of the study between the relationship between reproductive stage rainfall and cultivation potential of rainfed chickpeas in the region showed that Zarrineh station in the north of the region is weak due to unfavorable weather conditions at the beginning of the growing season and the developmental stages of the growing season in this region are delayed. At Zarrineh station, the critical reproductive stage occurs at a time of year when the probability of precipitation in Kurdistan has actually decreased and a part of the southeast of Qorveh city is one of the weak and critical areas. The rest of the province in terms of moisture supply for this stage of dryland chickpea development is in a suitable degree, which is due to the necessary rainfall in this period of development.
 
Conclusion
The results of the study show the relationship between rainfall of vegetative stage and cultivation potential of dryland chickpeas in the region, except for a small part of Qorveh, Bijar and Sarvabad counties, which are in a weak degree. The whole region is in a very good degree in terms of supplying the required moisture, which is also due to the necessary rainfall at this time and the humidity of the storage capacity stored from the winter rains. Occurrence of suitable precipitations for the vegetative period in the whole region had the highest value compared to other developmental stages.
 

Keywords

Biological day; GIS; Growth period; Rainfall parameters

References

Al-Mashreki, M. H., Akhir, J. B. M., Rahim, S. A., Kadderi, D. M., Tukimat, L., & Haider, A. R. )2011(. Land suitability evaluation for sorghum crop in the Ibb Governorate, republic of Yemen using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 5, 359–368.

2. Araya, A., Keesstra, S. D., & Stroosnijder, L.( 2010). A new agro-climatic classification for crop suitability zoning in northern semi-arid Ethiopia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150, 1057–1064.
3. Baniaghil, A. S., Rahemi karizki, A., Biabani, A., & faramarzi, H. (2017). Potential Climatic Zoning of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Golestan Province. Journal Of Agroecology,(9)3, 821-833. doi: 10.22067/jag.v9i3.52027
4. Bhagat, R.M., Singh, S., Sood, C., Rana, R.S., Kalia, V., Pradhan, S., Immerzeel, W., & Shrestha, B. (2009). Land suitability analysis for cereal production in Himachal Pradesh (india) using geographical information system. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-009-0018-6
5. Chandora R, & Gayacharan, Shekhawat N, M. N. (2020). Chickpea genetic resources: Collection, conservation, characterization, and maintenance. In: Chickpea: Crop Wild Gains; Academic Press. Relatives for Enhancing Genetic Acadamic Press 37–61.
6. FAO. (2022). Agricultural production statistics 2000–2020. FAOSTAT analytical brief series no. 41.‏
7. Change, F. C. (2015). Food Security: Risks and Responses. FAO: Rome, Italy, 86.
8. Gayacharan, Rani, U., Singh, S., Basandrai, A. K., Rathee, V. K., Tripathi, K., Singh, N., Dixit, G. P., Rana, J. C., Pandey, S., Kumar, A., & Singh, K.(2020). Identification of novel resistant sources for ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei) in chickpea. PLoS One 15, e0240589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240589
9. Kanuni, H. (2001). The yielding ability and adaptability of chickpea cultivars under rainfed conditions of kurdistan. Seed Plant, 17, 1–11. (in Persian)
10. Kumar, S., Patel, N. R., Sarkar, A., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2013). Geospatial approach in assessing agro-climatic suitability of soybean in rainfed agro-ecosystem. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 41, 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-012-0249-9
11. Mahdavi, M., Salajegheh, A., Keshtkar, A. R., Fahmi, H., & Sharif, F. (2006). A study of the appropriate probability distributions for annual flow series, using L-moment method in arid and semi-arid regions. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources Research, 59, 75–87.
12. Mansourian, S., Izadi Darbandi, E., RashedMohassel, M. H., Rastgoo, M., & Kanouni, H. (2017). Comparison of artificial neural networks and logistic regression as potential methods for predicting weed populations on dryland chickpea and winter wheat fields of Kurdistan province, Iranian Journal of Crop Protection, 93, 43–51.
13. Miller, P., McKay, K., Jenks, B., Riesselman, J., Neill, K., Buschena, D., & Bussan, A. (2002). Growing chickpeas in the northern great plains. MT200204 AG 3/2002. Montana Extension and Experiment Station Publications.
14. Sharma, A., Bharat, R., RaoK, K.V., Vittal, P. R., Ramakrishna, Y. S., & Amarasinghe, U. (2010). Estimating the potential of rainfed agriculture in India: Prospects for water productivity improvements. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 23–30.
15. Shikwambana, S., Malaza, N., & Shale, K. (2021). Impacts of rainfall and temperature changes on smallholder agriculture in the Limpopo province, South Africa. Water, 13, 2872.
16. Sobhani, B. (2005). Agro-climatic zoning of Ardabil province using satellite images in GIS environment. Dr. Diss. University of Tabriz 160.
17. Sobhani, B., Safarianzengir, V., & Tabatabaei, B. (2020). Agroecological zoning of sugar beet cultivation based on soil nutrients and climatic conditions (Case study: East Azarbayjan province). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22, 95–107.
18. Soltani, F.R., Khooie, K., & Moghaddam Ghassemi-Golezani, M. (2001). A simulation study of chickpea crop response to limited irrigation in a semiarid environment. Agricaltural Water Management, 49, 225–237.
19. Soltania, A., & Hajjarpoura, A., Vadez, V. (2016). Analysis of chickpea yield gap and water-limited potential yield. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research, 185, 21–30.
20. Soltani, A.(2009). Mathematical modeling in crops. Jahade Daneshgahi Mashhad Press, Mashhad, Iran. (In persian)
21. Soltani, A., Robertson, M. J., Mohammad-Nejad, Y., & Rahemi-Karizaki, A. (2006). Modeling chickpea growth and development: Leaf production and senescence. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research, 99, 14–23. (In persian)
22. Veisi, M., Zand, E., Moeini, M. M., & Bassiri, K. (2020). Review of research on weed management of chickpea in Iran: Challenges, strategies and perspectives. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 60, 113–125.
23. Zohary, D., Hopf, M., & Weiss, E. (2012). Domestication of plants in the old world - the origin and spread of domesticated plants in South-West Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford University Press, 1–8.