News

 Statistics

Number of Journals53
Number of Issues2,130
Number of Articles22,015
Article View94,327,720
PDF Download29,438,179
Sabourifard, H., Keshavarz, H. (2023). The effect of planting date on quality and seed yield potential of four grass pea ecotype. , 14(1), 34-47. doi: 10.22067/ijpr.v14i1.2202-1024
Hossein Sabourifard; Hamed Keshavarz. "The effect of planting date on quality and seed yield potential of four grass pea ecotype". , 14, 1, 2023, 34-47. doi: 10.22067/ijpr.v14i1.2202-1024
Sabourifard, H., Keshavarz, H. (2023). 'The effect of planting date on quality and seed yield potential of four grass pea ecotype', , 14(1), pp. 34-47. doi: 10.22067/ijpr.v14i1.2202-1024
Sabourifard, H., Keshavarz, H. The effect of planting date on quality and seed yield potential of four grass pea ecotype. , 2023; 14(1): 34-47. doi: 10.22067/ijpr.v14i1.2202-1024

The effect of planting date on quality and seed yield potential of four grass pea ecotype

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران
Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 27, June 2023, Pages 34-47    PDF (757.45 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v14i1.2202-1024
Authors
Hossein Sabourifard1; Hamed Keshavarz* 2
1Department of Agriculture Science, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
2Agronomy Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Due to the increasing population and consequently the need to supply the protein needed by the country through the production of livestock and also the importance of maintaining soil structure by creating the right crop rotation in agricultural fields, research on forage plants is inevitable. One of the methods to increase soil fertility and increase crop production is to alternate the plants of legumes in the fields. Pomegranate is also used as a source of protein in livestock and poultry feed and can be used as dry fodder, green fodder and straw for cattle and sheep. Because the organic matter in kelp forage (carbohydrates, proteins and fats) can be catabolized in livestock and used as a source of energy, kelp fodder is important in providing the minerals needed by livestock.
 
Materials and Methods
In order to study the effects of sowing date on seed and forage yield of four local and foreign Lathyrus sativa L. ecotype a field experiment was conducted at Shahriar, Tehran in 2021 growing season. Experimental treatments were arranged in randomized complete blocks design with factorial arrangement with three replications. In this research sowing date were in three levels (including 14th March, 6th April and 29th April) and grass pea ecotype were in four levels (Syria, Ethiopia, Eshnoye and Mashhad). For field sampling and quantitative and qualitative analysis of samples, grass pea forage crop was harvested at 50% flowering and pod stage. After determining the dry forage yield, a sample of forage of each plot was prepared to determine the quality traits. At this stage, traits such as percentage of crude protein, percentage of water-soluble carbohydrates and percentage of crude fiber using Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy technology (Inframatic 8620 Percor, Germany) was measured. Simultaneously, one plant was harvested from each experimental unit and the green leaf area was calculated using a Leaf Area meter (England) in the laboratory. In order to determine the grain yield, an area of one square meter per harvest plot and measurements including grain yield and grain yield components (total number of pods, number of seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight) were performed on harvested plants. Significant differences among sowing date, ecotypes and their interaction for traits were compared by LSD test (P≤0.05) using using the SAS (9.1) package. Microsoft Office Excel (2013) and Origin Pro. 9.1 were used for figures drawing.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of the analysis of variance revealed ecotype, planting date and interaction between them was significant for most traits. Foreign yield was significantly affected by planting date and the highest yield was from Ethiopia ecotype in first planting. The highest percentage of organic matter, soluble sugars and crude fiber was found in the third culture, whereas protein content and leaf area were higher in the second planting date. The cultivars also showed significant difference in terms of agronomic characteristics and the maximum number of pod per plant, number of seeds per pod and seed yield was achieved from Mashhad ecotype. There is a significant interaction between cultivars and planting date, indicate that various ecotypes have different reactions at different planting dates. In additional, the results of this study showed that delay in planting due to change of temperature and day length leads to faster development, lower photosynthetic area, earlier flowering and these consequently lower yield.
 
Conclusion
Based on the findings of the current experiment, it can be concluded that the timing of sowing has a substantial impact on both the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of grass pea seed yield and forage production. The results clearly demonstrated that delaying the sowing significantly reduces grain yield. Specifically, this study identified mid-March to mid-April as the most suitable planting period for the studied ecotypes. Among the ecotypes, the Mashhad ecotype outperformed others in terms of grain yield, mainly attributed to its higher number of pods and seeds per pod. Additionally, it was observed that delayed sowing, leading to the critical flowering and seed filling stages coinciding with hot weather conditions, resulted in yield losses. These findings underscore the significance of selecting optimal sowing dates to maximize yield and avoid potential yield reductions associated with unfavorable environmental conditions during critical growth stages. On the other hand, it was found that delaying sowing from the usual planting time reduces forage quality and in the climate of the region, mid-April to early May is the best time to obtain low-volume and high-quality forage.
Keywords
Lathyrus sativa L; Leaf area index; Protein; Season planting; Yield and yield component
References
  1. Apeyuan, K., Nwankiti, A., Oluma, O., Ekefan, E. 2017. Effect of different sowing dates on disease initiation and development of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) leaf spot disease caused by Coniella musaiensis Var. hibisci in Makurdi, Central Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience Environment and Protection 5: 94-101. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.511007
  2. Asadpour, S., Madani, H., Nour Mohammadi, Gh., Majidi Heravan, I., and Heidari Sharif Abad, H. 2020. Improving maize yield with advancing planting time and nano-silicon foliar spray alone or combined with zinc. Silicon 14(5):1-9. Online Availabe. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-20-00815-5.
  3. Atıs, I., and Acıkalın, S. 2020. Yield, quality and competition properties of grass pea and wheat grown as pure and binary mixture in different plant densities. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 25(1): 18-25. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.737476.
  4. Bhandari, B., Shrestha, J., and Tripathi, M.P. 2018. Productivity of maize (Zea mays) as affected by varieties and sowing dates. International Journal of Applied Biology 2(2): 13-19.
  5. Din, J., Khan, S.U., Ali, I., and Gurmani, A.R. 2011. Physiological and agronomic response of canola varieties to drought stress. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 21(1): 78-82.
  6. Faraji,, Latifi, M., Aghajani, A., and Rahnama, K. 2006. Effects of some agronomy factors on phonology stage, vegetative characters, and incidence of Scleroti niastem rot in two genotypes of canola in Gonbad area. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 13: 56-68. (In Persian with English Summary).
  7. Faramarzi, A., Seyedin, S., Mohbali Poor, N., and Shahrokhi, S. 2012. Study of sowing date on yield and components of Cotton varieties (Gossypium hirsutum) yield of in Miandeh region. Journal of Research in Agronomy Science 16(4): 27-38. (In Persian with English Summary).
  8. Hojjat, S.S. 2020. Effects of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Germination and Growth Characteristics of Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus) Seed under Drought Stress. Nanotechnol Russia 15: 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1134/S199507802002010X
  9. Keshavarz Mirzamohammadi, H., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Sefidkon, F., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., and Mirjalili M.H. 2021. Irrigation and fertilizer treatments affecting rosmarinic acid accumulation, total phenolic content, antioxidant potential and correlation between them in peppermint (Mentha piperita). Irrigation Science 39:671-683: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00729-z
  10. Keshavarz, H., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., and Mahdipour Afra, M. 2018. Organic and chemical fertilizer affected yield and essential oil of two mint species. Journal of Essential Oil-Bearing Plant 21(6): 1674-1681. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2018.1497545
  11. Khan, A.A., Hussain, A., Ganai, M.A., Sofi, N.R., and Talib Hussain, S. 2018. Yield, nutrient uptake and quality of sweet corn as influenced by transplanting dates and nitrogen levels. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(2): 3567-3571.
  12. Lambein, F., Travella, S., Kuo, Y.H., Montagu, M.V., and Heijde, M. 2019. Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus): orphan crop, nutraceutical or just plain food?. Planta 250: 821-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-018-03084-0
  13. Liu, B., Qu, D., and Liu, J. 2020. Light enrichment, flowering asynchrony and reproduction success in two field-grown soybeans in Northern China. Legume Research 43(2): 241-246.
  14. Llorent-Martínez, E.J., Zengin, G., Fernández-de Córdova, M.L., Bender, O., Atalay, A., Ceylan, R., Mollica, A., Mocan, A., Uysal, S., Guler, G.O., and Aktumsek, A. 2017. Traditionally used Lathyrus species: phytochemical composition, antioxidant activity, enzyme inhibitory properties, cytotoxic effects, and in silico studies of L. czeczottianus and L. nissolia. Front Pharmacol 8: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00083
  15. Marghali, S., Touati, A., Gharbi, M., Sdouga, D., and Trifi-Farah, N. 2016. Molecular phylogeny of Lathyrus species: insights from sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. Genetic Molecule Research 15(1): gmr.15017198. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15017198.
  16. Piecyk, M., Worobiej, E., Wołosiak, R., Drużyńska, B., and Ostrowska-Ligęza, E. 2019. Effect of different processes on composition, properties and in vitro starch digestibility of grass pea flour. Food Measure 13: 848-https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9997-8.
  17. Pouri, K., Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Sohrabi, Y., and Soltani, A. 2019. Crop phenotyping for wheat yield and yield components against drought s Cereal Research Communications 47(2): 383-393.
  18. Rafaat, J.G., Ghareeb, S.A., and Hasan, S.S. 2022. Effect of Sowing Dates on Growth, Yield, and Its Components of Grass Pea (Lathyrus Sativus) Varieties under Rainfed Condition in Sulaimani Region. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences 21(1): 59-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.25130/tjas.v21i1.477.
  19. Rah Khosravani, T., Mansouriear, C., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Asilan, K.S. and Keshavarz, H. 2017. Effects of sowing date on physiological characteristics, yield and yield components for different maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Notulae biologicae. 9(1): 143-147. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb919913.
  20. Salih, R.F. 2019. Effect of sowing dates and varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) on growth and yield parameters. Agriculture Environment Research 31(3): 64-70. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjpas.31.3.9
  21. Seyithan, S. 2020. Effects of different mixture ratios of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) on quality of silage. Legume Research - An International Journal 42 (5): 666-670. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-468.
  22. Silva, J.R., Gastauer, M., Ramos, S.J., Mitre, S.K., Furtini Neto, A.E., Siqueira, J.O., and Caldeira, CF. 2018. Initial growth of Fabaceae species: Combined effects of topsoil and fertilizer application for mineland revegetation. Flora 246(247): 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.08.001
  23. Talukdar, D. 2012. An induced glutathione-deficient mutant in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus): modifications in plant morphology, alteration in antioxidant activities and increased sensitivity to cadmium. Bioremediat Biodivers Bioavailab 6:75–86.
  24. Tripathy, S.K., Panda, A., Nayak, P.K., Dash, S., Lenka, D., Mishra, D.R., Kar, R.K., Senapati, N., and Dash, G.B. 2016. Somaclonal variation for genetic improvement in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Legume Research 39:329-335. https://doi.org/10.18805/1r.v0iOF.6853
  25. Vaz Patto, M.C., and Rubiales, D. 2014. Lathyrus diversity: available resources with relevance to crop improvement—L. sativus and L. cicera as case studies. Annal of Botany 113:895–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu024
  26. Xu, H.J., Wang, X.P., Zhao, C.Y., and Zhang, X.X. 2019. Responses of ecosystem water use efficiency to meteorological drought under different biomes and drought magnitudes in northern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 278: 107660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107660
  27. Zhou, L., Cheng, W., Hou, H., Peng, R., Hai, N., Bian, Z., Jiao, C., and Wang, C. 2016. Antioxidative responses and morpho-anatomical alterations for coping with flood-induced hypoxic stress in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) in comparison with pea (Pisum sativum). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 35:690-700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-016-9572-7.
Statistics
Article View: 71,282
PDF Download: 4,729


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb