یک مدل اجزای محدود برهم‌کنش کاوشگر تنش-خاک زیر یک چرخ صلب متحرک

ماشین های کشاورزی

مقاله 12، دوره 14، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 31، فروردین 1403، صفحه 49-67   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی انگلیسی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jam.2023.84158.1185

نویسندگان

مجتبی نادری بلداجی^{* 1}؛ هادی عظیمی نژادیان²؛ مصطفی بهرامی³

¹بخش مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران

²بخش مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه جهرم، جهرم، ایران

³دانش‌آموخته دکتری، بخش مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران

چکیده

تردد ماشین‌های کشاورزی با اعمال تنش بر سطح خاک دلیل اصلی تراکم خاک‌های کشاورزی است. مطالعه انتشار تنش در خاک نیاز به اندازه‌گیری تنش در خاک دارد، در حالی‌که تنش اندازه‌گیری‌شده با نصب هر نوع کاوشگر ممکن است با تنش واقعی خاک، یعنی تنش خاک در غیاب کاوشگر متفاوت باشد. این مطالعه با هدف شبیه‌سازی برهم‌کنش کاوشگر تنش در زیر یک چرخ صلب متحرک با استفاده از روش اجزای محدود به‌منظور بررسی تطابق تنش شبیه‌سازی‌شده با کاوشگر با تنش تجربی اندازه‌گیری‌شده در یک مخزن خاک انجام شد. خاک به‌عنوان یک ماده کشسان- خمیری مدل‌سازی و خواص آن با شبیه‌سازی نفوذ مخروط و نشست چرخ در خاک کالیبره شد. نتایج نشان داد که تنش به‌دست‌آمده از پروب با روش اجزای محدود به‌طور متوسط 28 درصد بیش‌تخمینی در مقایسه با تنش تجربی برای بارهای چرخ 600 و 1200 نیوتن داشته است. میانگین نسبت شبیه‌سازی‌شده تنش با کاوشگر به تنش بدون کاوشگر برای دو آزمون 1.22 به‌دست آمد که به‌طور معنی‌داری کوچک‌تر از همین نسبت تحت بارگذاری نشست صفحه دایره‌ای با مقدار 1.9 بود و همچنین به‌طور قابل‌توجهی بزرگ‌تر از نتیجه به‌به‌دست‌آمده از روش اجزای گسسته است. افزایش سرعت حرکت چرخ افزایشی جزئی در تنش خاک را نشان داد. نسبت بیش تخمینی تنش (همان نسبت تنش با کاوشگر به تنش بدون کاوشگر) به‌طور قابل‌توجهی با عمق افزایش یافت ولی افزایش کمی با سرعت در عمق زیر 0.2 متر داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

انباره خاک؛ تردد ماشین؛ تنش خاک؛ شبیه‌سازی اجزای محدود؛ کاوشگر تنش

سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله

4.xml

f1.jpg

f2.jpg

f3.jpg

f4.jpg

f5.jpg

f6.jpg

f7.jpg

f8.jpg

f9.jpg

f10.jpg

f11.jpg

مراجع

1. ABAQUS, (2019). ABAQUS user’s manuals version 6.19.1. Provid. RI ABAQUS, Inc. van den.
2. Acquah, K., & Chen, Y. (2021). Discrete element modeling of soil compaction of a press-wheel. AgriEngineering, 3, 278-293. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering3020019
3. Akker, J. J. (2004). SOCOMO: a soil compaction model to calculate soil stresses and the subsoil carrying capacity. Soil and Tillage Research, 79, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.03.021
4. Arefi, M., Karparvarfard, S. H., Azimi-Nejadian, H., & Naderi-Boldaji, M. (2022). Draught force prediction from soil relative density and relative water content for a non-winged chisel blade using finite element modelling. Journal of Terramechanics, 100, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2022.01.001
5. Azimi-Nejadian, H., Karparvarfard, S. H., Naderi-Boldaji, M., & Rahmanian-Koushkaki, H. (2019). Combined finite element and statistical models for predicting force components on a cylindrical mouldboard plough. Biosystems Engineering, 186, 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.007
6. Bahrami, M., Naderi-Boldaji, M., Ghanbarian, D., & Keller, T. (2022). Simulation of soil stress under plate sinkage loading: A comparison of finite element and discrete element methods. Soil and Tillage Research, 223, 105463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105463
7. Bahrami, M., Naderi-Boldaji, M., Ghanbarian, D., & Keller, T. (2023). Discrete element modelling of stress propagation in soil under a rigid wheel in a soil bin։ a simulation of probe inducing stress deviation and wheel speed. Biosystems Engineering, 230, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.04.013
8. Bolling, I. H. (1985). How to predict soil compaction from agricultural tires. Journal of Terramechanics, 22(4), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(85)90017-5
9. Boussinesq, M. J. (1885). Application Des Potentiels. Gauthier-Villars. https://books.google.com/books?id¼IYvpq89K_O8C
10. Cueto, O. G., Coronel, C. E. I., Bravo, E. L., Morfa, C. A. R., & Suárez, M. H. (2016). Modelling in FEM the soil pressures distribution caused by a tyre on a Rhodic Ferralsol soil. Journal of Terramechanics, 63, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2015.09.003
11. de Lima, R. P., & Keller, T. (2021). Soil stress measurement by load cell probes as influenced by probe design, probe position, and soil mechanical behavior. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, 104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104796
12. De Pue, J., & Cornelis, W. M. (2019). DEM simulation of stress transmission under agricultural traffic Part 1: Comparison with continuum model and parametric study. Soil and Tillage Research, 195, 104408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104408
13. De Pue, J., Lamandé, M., & Cornelis, W. (2020). DEM simulation of stress transmission under agricultural traffic Part 2: Shear stress at the tyre-soil interface. Soil and Tillage Research, 203, 104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104660
14. Farhadi, P., Golmohammadi, A., Sharifi Malvajerdi, A., & Shahgholi, G. (2020). Finite element modeling of the interaction of a treaded tire with clay-loam soil. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162,793-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.05.031
15. Frohlich, O. K. (1934). Druckverteilung im Baugrunde. Springer Verlag, Wien, pp. 178
16. Gheshlaghi, F., & Mardani, A. (2021). Prediction of soil vertical stress under off-road tire using smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Terramechanics, 95, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.02.004
17. Hamza, M. A., & Anderson, W. K. (2005). Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil and Tillage Research, 82(2), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009
18. Horn, R., Blackwell, P. S., & White, R. (1989). The effect of speed of wheeling on soil stresses, rut depth and soil physical properties in an ameliorated transitional red-brown earth. Soil and Tillage Research, 13, 353e364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(89)90043-3
19. Ibrahmi, A., Bentaher, H., Hbaieb, M., Maalej, A., & Mouazen, A. M. (2015). Study the effect of tool geometry and operational conditions on mouldboard plough forces and energy requirement: Part 1. Finite element simulation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 117, 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.006
20. Jimenez, K. J., Rolim, M. M., Gomes, I. F., de Lima, R. P., Berrío, L. L. A., & Ortiz, P. F. (2021). Numerical analysis applied to the study of soil stress and compaction due to mechanised sugarcane harvest. Soil and Tillage Research, 206, 104847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104847
21. Keller, T., Défossez, P., Weisskopf, P., Arvidsson, J., & Richard, G. (2007). SoilFlex: A model for prediction of soil stresses and soil compaction due to agricultural field traffic including a synthesis of analytical approaches. Soil and Tillage Research, 93(2), 391-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.05.012
22. Keller, T., Lamandé, M., Naderi-Boldaji, M., & de Lima, R. P. (2022). Soil Compaction Due to Agricultural Field Traffic: An Overview of Current Knowledge and Techniques for Compaction Quantification and Mapping. In: Saljnikov, E., Mueller, L., Lavrishchev, A., Eulenstein, F. (eds) Advances in Understanding Soil Degradation. Innovations in Landscape Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85682-3_13
23. Keller, T., Ruiz, S., Stettler, M., & Berli, M. (2016). Determining soil stress beneath a tire: measurements and simulations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 80(3), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.07.0252
24. Khalid, U., Farooq, K., & Mujtaba, H. (2018). On yield stress of compacted clays. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/1186/s40703-018-0090-2
25. Kirby, J. M. (1999a). Soil stress measurement: Part I. Transducer in a uniform stress field. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 72(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0357
26. Kirby, J. M. (1999b). Soil stress measurement. Part 2: transducer beneath a circular loaded area. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73(2), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0400
27. Koolen, A. J., & Kuipers, H. (1983). Agricultural Soil Mechanics: Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences Springer, Heidelberg, 241 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69010-5
28. Labuz, J. F., & Theroux, B. (2005). Laboratory calibration of earth pressure cells. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 28(2), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ12089
29. Mahboub Yangeje, H., & Mardani, A. (2022). Investigating the interaction between soil and cultivator blade by numerical simulation and validation of results by soil bin tests. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 12(4), 587-599. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2021.70572.1041
30. Naderi-Boldaji, M., Alimardani, R., Hemmat, A., Sharifi, A., Keyhani, A., Tekeste, M. Z., & Keller, T. (2013). 3D finite element simulation of a single-tip horizontal penetrometer–soil interaction. Part I: Development of the model and evaluation of the model parameters. Soil and Tillage Research, 134, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.08.002
31. Naderi-Boldaji, M., Kazemzadeh, A., Hemmat, A., Rostami, S., & Keller, T. (2018). Changes in soil stress during repeated wheeling: A comparison of measured and simulated values. Soil Research, 56(2), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR17093
32. Naderi-Boldaji, M., Hajian, A., Ghanbarian, D., & Bahrami, M. (2018). Finite element simulation of plate sinkage, confined and semi-confined compression tests: A comparison of the response to yield stress. Soil and Tillage Research, 179, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.02.003
33. Naderi-Boldaji, M., Karparvarfard, S. H., & Azimi-Nejadian, H. (2023). Investigation of the predictability of mouldboard plough draught from soil mechanical strength (cone index shear strength) using finite element modelling. Journal of Terramechanics, 108, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2023.04.001
34. Nawaz, M. F., Bourrie, G., & Trolard, F. (2013). Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 33, 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0071-8
35. Or, D., & Ghezzehei, T. A. (2002). Modeling post-tillage soil structural dynamics: a review. Soil and Tillage Research, 64(1-2), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00256-2
36. Peth, S., Horn, R., Fazekas, O., & Richards, B. G. (2006). Heavy soil loading its consequence for soil structure, strength, deformation of arable soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 169(6), 775-783. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200620112
37. Pytka, J. A. (2013). Dynamics of wheelesoil systems: A soil stress and deformation-based approach. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12729
38. Rücknagel, J., Hofmann, B., Deumelandt, P., Reinicke, F., Bauhardt, J., Hülsbergen, K. J., & Christen, O. (2015). Indicator based assessment of the soil compaction risk at arable sites using the model REPRO. Ecological Indicators, 52, 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.022
39. Schjønning, P., Lamandé, M., Tøgersen, F. A., Arvidsson, J., & Keller, T. (2008). Modelling effects of tyre inflation pressure on the stress distribution near the soil–tyre interface. Biosystems Engineering, 99(1), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.08.005
40. Shahgholi, G., Ghafouri Chiyaneh, H., & Mesri Gundoshmian, T. (2018). Modeling of soil compaction beneath the tractor tire using multilayer perceptron neural networks. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 8(1), 105-118. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v8i1.58891
41. Shmulevich, I., Mussel, U., & Wolf, D. (1998). The effect of velocity on rigid wheel performance. Journal of Terramechanics, 35(3), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4898(98)00022-6
42. Silva, R. P., Rolim, M. M., Gomes, I. F., Pedrosa, E. M., Tavares, U. E., & Santos, A. N. (2018). Numerical modeling of soil compaction in a sugarcane crop using the finite element method. Soil and Tillage Research, 181, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.03.019
43. Söhne, W. (1953). Druckverteilung im Boden und Bodenformung unter Schlepperreifen (Pressure distribution in the soil and soil deformation under tractor tyres). Grundl Land Technik, 5, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01512930
44. Stafford, J. V., & de Carvalho Mattos, P. (1981). The effect of forward speed on wheel-induced soil compaction: laboratory simulation and field experiments. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 26(4), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(81)90075-5
45. Stettler, M., Keller, T., Weisskopf, P., Lamandé, M., Lassen, P., & Schjønning, P. (2014). Terranimo®–a web-based tool for evaluating soil compaction. Landtechnik, 69(3), 132-138.
46. Taghavifar, H., & Mardani, A. (2014). Effect of velocity, wheel load and multipass on soil compaction. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 13(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2013.01.004
47. Ucgul, M., Saunders, C., & Fielke, J. M. (2017). Particle and geometry scaling of the hysteretic spring/linear cohesion contact model for discrete element modelling of soil-tool simulation. ASABE Paper No. 1701372. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201701372
48. Van den Akker, J. J. H. (2004). SOCOMO: a soil compaction model to calculate soil stresses and the subsoil carrying capacity. Soil and Tillage Research, 79(1), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.03.021
49. Weiler Jr, W. A., & Kulhawy, F. H. (1982). Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 108(12), 1529-1548. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001393
50. Xia, K. (2011). Finite element modeling of tire/terrain interaction: Application to predicting soil compaction and tire mobility. Journal of Terramechanics, 48(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.001