Identification and Prioritization of Business Risks of Poultry Production Units

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 3, Volume 38, Issue 1 - Serial Number 62, April 2024, Pages 33-52   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead.2024.84685.1222

Authors

M. Sheibani Nougabi; A. Karbasi^* ; H. Mohammadi

Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Today, the businesses of the poultry industry are facing many challenges, because this industry has to manage a number of unique processes, methods and risks at the same time. Therefore, identifying the business risks of poultry production units can play an effective role in reducing the level of vulnerability of these businesses. Considering the need to increase the productivity of the poultry industry, one of the basic solutions is to identify the risk and measure the existing risks of this industry. Risk identification and quantification can reduce costs for industry stakeholders, and risk reduction leads to better production planning. In this regard, this study identifies the business risks of poultry production units in Khorasan Razavi province.
 
Materials and Methods
This study is applied as purpose and descriptive survey in terms of nature and method. This research is based on mixed research, qualitatively and quantitatively. The statistical population is poultry industry experts, 18 of whom were investigated by snowball sampling method as the research sample. This study proposes a new Delphi technique that uses the features of traditional Delphi techniques and the Fuzzy Delphi method. The proposed new Delphi technique is based on the integration of pentagonal fuzzy sets and the Delphi technique.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of the modified pentagonal Fuzzy Delphi method showed that five main risks and 36 secondary risks out of 58 identified risks are part of the business risks of poultry production units. Identified business risks of poultry production units, in order of priority, include inputs price fluctuations, command pricing, exchange rate fluctuations, sanctions, chicken price fluctuations, delay in accessing inputs, fluctuations in the purchase price of day-old chickens, fluctuations in drug and vaccine prices, imported inputs, lack of government support in the matter of production, fluctuations in subsidies to inputs, lack of animal inputs, import of poultry products, Promulgation of various instructions, poultry diseases, lack of liquidity of poultry farmers, bankruptcy of poultry farmers, fluctuations in current costs, losses, lack of medicine and vaccines, lack of expansion of poultry business, lack of confidence of poultry farmers in the government, fluctuations in profitability, investment, seasonal fluctuations in egg demand, dependence of poultry farmers on Special suppliers, supply of day-old chicks, lack of energy, exclusivity of the livestock and poultry feed supply system, egg price fluctuations, seasonal fluctuations in chicken production, seasonal fluctuations in chicken demand, weakness in providing working capital facilities to poultry farmers, lack of skilled human resources in time Appropriate, lack of technical knowledge of advanced technologies and lack of variety of poultry food ingredients.
 
Conclusion
The business of poultry production units is facing various challenges and risks, and due to the many risks of this industry, production in this industry is facing problems and it is not possible to plan for it, and production will be disrupted in the future. Therefore, in this research, an effort was made to fully identify the business risks of poultry production units. In order to complete and finalize the business risks of poultry production units, the pentagonal Fuzzy Delphi method was used. In this regard, a questionnaire was prepared that included two parts. The first part is about the survey and information about the background of the respondents, and the second part includes the ranking of 54 identified risks. Fuzzy Delphi method in this study was done in two rounds and based on the opinion of experts, 4 more risks were added to the total of 54 risks, and finally 58 risks were analyzed using Fuzzy Delphi method. In Fuzzy Delphi, the selection of risk components among all the components that were identified in the research literature was based on the accepted threshold criterion. The results of the second round of modified pentagonal Fuzzy Delphi showed that there are 36 important sub-risks in the sector of production, market, financial, institutional and personal business risks of poultry production units. Considering the price fluctuations of livestock inputs and exchange rate fluctuations, it is suggested to allocate currency and control it by government policies in order to reduce mentioned fluctuations, or move towards diversifying poultry feed ingredients and formulating new poultry feed rations. Also, in order to avoid fluctuations in the price of chicken or eggs, it is suggested to make the distribution network smarter to prevent these fluctuations. In the poultry market, it is better to set a fair price for each kilogram of chicken according to the production costs of poultry farmers, or not to interfere with the government in the market and allow the government to set the price based on the supply and demand mechanism.
 

Keywords

Identification; Fuzzy Pentagonal Delphi; Poultry industry; Risk management

References

1. Abimbola, O.A., Omowunmi, A.T., & Abayomi, S.O. (2013). Risk coping behaviour of small scale poultry farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(6), 786-795.
2. Adelaja, A., & George, J. (2019). Effects of conflict on agriculture: evidence from the Boko Haram Insurgency. World Development, 117, 184–195.
3. Adeyonu, A.G., Otunaiya, A.O., Oyawoye, E.O., & Okeniyi, F.A. (2021). Risk perceptions and risk management strategies among poultry farmers in south-west Nigeria. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1891719
4. Agricultural statistics. (2022). The second volume. Ministry of agricultural, planning and economic deputy, information and communication technology center. (In Persian). Avaiable at:
5. Aimin, H. (2010). Uncertainty, risk aversion and risk management in agricultural. Journal of Agriculture and Science Procedia, 1, 152-156.
6. Ansari zadeh, A., Baversad, B., & Ahangari, A. (2009). Cooperative and private poultry enterprises in Ramhormoz Township: A case study. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 20(206-207), 95-109. (In Persian)
7. Arabsalehi, M., Moayedfar, R., & Safari Bideskan, S. (2012). The effect of environment risk, corporate strategy and capital structure on performance of listed companies in Tehran stock exchange. Financial Accounting Research, 4(3), 47-70. (In Persian)
8. Badraoui, I., Van der Vorst, J.G., & Boulaksil, Y. (2020). Horizontal logistics collaboration: An exploratory study in Morocco’s agri-food supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(1), 85–102.
9. Banjoko, I.K., Falola, A., Babatunde, F.B., & Atolagbe, R. (2014). Assessment of risks and uncertainties in poultry farming in Kwara State, Nigeria. Science Technology and Arts Research Journal, 3(4), 64-70.
10. Belhadi, A., Kamble, S.S., Mani, V., Benkhati, I., & Touriki, F.E. (2021). An ensemble machine learning approach for forecasting credit risk of agricultural SMEs’ investments in agriculture 4.0 through supply chain finance. Annals of Operations Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04366-9
11. Beykzadeh, S., Ghahremanzadeh, M., & Mahmoodi, A. (2020). The evaluation of price volatility of beef and chicken and livestock’s major inputs in Iran. Journal of Animal Science Research, 30(3), 85-103. (In Persian)
12. Blackhurst, J., Scheibe, K., & Johnson, D. (2008). Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for automotive industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 143-165.
13. Blos, M.F., Hoeflich, S.L., Dias, E.M., & Wee, H.-M. (2015). A note on supply chain risk classification: discussion and proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1568-1569.
14. Cavinato, J.L. (2004). Supply chain logistics risks: From the back room to the board room. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 383-387.
15. Chakraborty, A., Mondal, S.P., Alam, S., Ahmadian, A., Senu, N., De, D., & Salahshour, S. (2019). The pentagonal fuzzy number: its different representations, properties, ranking, defuzzification and application in game problems. Symmetry, 11(2), 248.
16. Chandrasekaran, N., & Raghuram, G. (2014). Agribusiness supply chain management. CRC Press.
17. Chen, C.-W., Wang, J.-H., Wang, J.C., & Shen, Z.-H. (2018). Developing indicators for sustainable campuses in Taiwan using Fuzzy Delphi Method and analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 661–671.
18. Dias, G.C., Hernandez, C.T., & Oliveira, U.R. (2020). Supply chain risk management and risk ranking in the automotive industry. Gestão & Produção, 27(1), e3800. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X3800-20
19. Ebong, V.O., & Awatt, N.K. (2023). Analysis of risk management in poultry production enterprises in Akwa Ibom State. International Journal of Innovative Agriculture & Biology Research, 11(1), 49-59.
20. )2022(. Production quantities of Meat, chicken by country 2022. Accessed via https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize
21. (2022). Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare
22. Fathi, F., & Ghorbanian, E. (2021). Risk management of Iran’s corn import. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 35(2), 179-191. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2021.69209.1027
23. Food & Agriculture Organization. (2019). Meat market Review. Overview of global meat market developments in 2018.
24. Gava, O., Bartolini, F., Brunori, G., & Galli, F. (2014). Sustainability of local versus global bread supply chains: a literature review. (eds). Proceedings of Conference “Feeding the Planet and Greening Agriculture: Challenges and opportunities for the bio-economy.25-27 June, 2014 Alghero, Italy.
25. Ghahremanzadeh, M., Faraji, S., & Pishbahar, E. (2020). The transmission world price and exchange rate to domestic prices of livestock’s major imported inputs in Iran. Agricultural Economics, 14(2), 23-52. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iaes.2020.134731.1780
26. Gray, R.S. (2020). Agriculture, transportation, and the COVID-19 Crisis. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie, 68(2), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12235
27. Greening, S.S., Mulqueen, K., Rawdon, T.G., French, N.P., & Gates, M.C. (2020). Estimating the level of disease risk and biosecurity on commercial poultry farms in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 68(5), 261-271.
28. Gunduz, M., & Elsherbeny, H.A. (2020). Operational framework for managing construction- contract administration practitioners’ perspective through modified Delphi method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), 04019110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001768
29. Guo, Y. (2011). Research on knowledge-oriented supply chain risk management system model. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(2), 72-77.
30. Hashemi Nejad, A., Abdeshahi, A., Ghanian, M., & Khosravipour, B. (2020). Analyzing factors affecting wheat production risk in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 33(4), 329-338. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v33i3.66850
31. Hasheminezhad, A., Ghanian, M., Abdeshahi, A., & Khosravipour, B. (2018). Assessment of wheat production related risks in the bread supply chain of Khuzestan Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(3), 439-459. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2018.239968.668477
32. Hasheminezhad, A., Ghanian, M., Abdeshahi, A., & Khosravipour, B. (2021). Application of bread supply chain framework to explain risk management strategies of bread production and consumption in Khuzestan province. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 12(2), 99-114. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/ejfpp.2021.16838.1557
33. Hossein Zad, J., & Hasanzadeh Honarvar, F. (2016). Impact of exchange rate changes on prices and consumption of main inputs under the livestock and pultry sector. Master Thesis of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Tabriz. (In Persian)
34. Hossein Zad, J., & Rashid Ghalam, M. (2017). Exchange rates impacts on poultry husbandry inputs prices. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 48(1), 1-8. (In Persian)
35. Hsu, Y.-L., Lee, C.-H., & Kreng, V.B. (2010). The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 419–425.
36. Hudnurkar, M., Deshpande, S., & Rathod, U., & Jakhar, S. (2017). Supply chain risk classification schemes: A literature review. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 182-199.
37. Iheke, O.R., & Igbelina, C.A. (2016). Risks management in poultry production in ikeduru local government area of imo state, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 12(1), 67-74.
38. Jalali, M. (2020). Estimation of import demand function of main livestock inputs and the effect of embargo on it, Second Accounting and Management Conference. (In Persian)
39. Javdan, E., Rajabi, E., & Baghestany, A.A. (2023). Exchange rate pass-through to the price of Imported Soybean Meal and Maize. Agricultural Economics and Development. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30490/aead.2023.359780.1459
40. Kaminskyi, A., & Nehrey, M. (2019). Investment risk measurement for agricultural ETF. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 95, 6^th International Conference on Strategies, Models and Technologies of Economic Systems Management.
41. Karami, A.A., & Mohammadi Tamari, Z. (2017). Identifying and prioritizing supply chain’s risks in agricultural farms in Mazandaran Province. Agricultural Economics, 11(3), 1-24. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iaes.2017.26476
42. Kern, D., Moser, R., Hartmann, E., & Moder, M. (2012). Supply risk management: model development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(1), 60-82.
43. Krishnan, R., Agarwal, R., Bajada, C., & Arshinder, K. (2020). Redesigning a food supply chain for environmental sustainability– an analysis of resource use and recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118374
44. Li, T. (2012). Risk assessment in the supply chain management based on Fuzzy AHP model. Progress in Applied Mathematics, 4(1), 9-13.
45. Mahdiyar, A., Mohandes, S.R., Durdyev, S., Tabatabaee, S., & Ismail, S. (2020). Barriers to green roof installation: An integrated fuzzy-based MCDM approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122365
46. Mahdiyar, A., Tabatabaee, S., Abdullah, A., & Marto, A. (2018). Identifying and assessing the critical criteria affecting decision-making for green roof type selection. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 772–783.
47. Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J.T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192-223.
48. Mary, A.A., & Sangeetha, S. (2016). Application of Fuzzy Linguistic SAW and TOPSIS multiple criteria group decision making method using Pentagonal Fuzzy Number for supplier selection International Journal of Mathematics and its Applications, 55, 7.
49. Miri, M., Sharifzadeh, M., Abdullahzadeh, G., & Abedi Sarostani, A. (2017). Investigating the supply chain in the agricultural sector (case study: production and cultivation of strawberries in Ramyan city, Golestan province). Journal of Studies in Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Agricultural Development, 4(3), 89-104. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/jead.2017.13541.1275
50. Mohandes, S.R., & Zhang, X. (2019). Towards the development of a comprehensive hybrid fuzzy-based occupational risk assessment model for construction workers. Safety Science, 115(6), 294–309.
51. Mohandes, S.R., Sadeghi, H., Fazeli, A., Mahdiyar, A., Hosseini, M. R., Arashpour, M., & Zayed, T. (2022). Causal analysis of accidents on construction sites: A hybrid Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL approach. Safety Science, 151(10). https://doi.org/1016/j.ssci.2022.105730
52. Mortezaei, A. (2016). Identifying and categorizing the obstacles and challenges of production and competitiveness in food chain enterprises and evaluating the law for removing obstacles to competitive production and improving the country's financial system. Tehran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture. (In Persian)
53. Moslehi, H.R. (2020). A collection of world experience publications in agriculture and natural resources; comparing the situation of chicken production in Iran with other countries. Deputy of Agricultural Education and Promotion, Deputy of Science and Technology. (In Persian).
54. Murrja, A., Ndreca, P., Maloku, S., & Meço, M. (2023). Analysis of production risk in intensive chicken farms – The case of Kosovo. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 3(2), 294-310.
55. Murrja, A., Ndregjoni, A., Kapaj, I., Maloku, S., & Kapaj, A. (2022). Financial risk analysis in the intensive poultry growth in the republic of Kosovo. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 14(3), 366-387.
56. Mustafavi, S.M. (2012). Challenges of Iran's poultry industry and solutions to deal with them. Deputy of Economic Research, strategic report: 148. Report code: 04-8-91-10. (In Persian)
57. Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004). Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub‐ supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 434-456.
58. Obike, K.C., Amusa, T.A., & Olowolafe, H.B. (2017). Risk management and determinants of farm output among small scale poultry farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension, 16(2), 9-16.
59. Panda, A., & Pal, M. (2015). A study on pentagonal fuzzy number and its corresponding matrices. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 131–139.
60. Pathinathan, T., & Mike Dison, E. (2018). Defuzzification for Pentagonal fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 7(1), 86-90.
61. Pfohl, H.C., Köhler, H., & Thomas, D. (2010). State of the art in supply chain risk management research: empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice. Logistics Research, 2(1), 33-44.
62. Pishbahar, E., Abdolkarimsaleh, K., & Dashti, G. (2016). Calculate the optimal hedge ratio for corn imported input of Iran poultry industry. Journal of Animal Science Research, 26(1), 167-174. (In Persian)
63. Pourmokhtar, E., Moghaddasi, R., Mohammadi Nejad, A., & Hosseini, S.S. (2022). Application of Quantile regression in the analysis of the fluctuations in the price of chicken meat in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 13(4), 175-191. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30495/jae.2021.14884.1761
64. Purwaningsih, R., Arief, A., Handayani, N.U., Rahmawati, D., & Mustikasari, A. (2018). Market risk assessment on poultry industry using Monte Carlo simulation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/403/1/012044
65. Rahmani, R., & Torkamani, J. (2010). The impacts of price and output uncertainty on chicken and beef meats in Fars Province. Agricultural Economics, 4(1), 51-79. (In Persian)
66. Rangel, D.A., De Oliveira, T.K., & Leite, M.S.A. (2014). Supply chain risk classification: discussion and proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6868-6887.
67. Salami, H., Ghahremanzadeh, M., Hosseini, S.S., & Yazdani, S. (2010). Revenue insurance, a policy tool for reducing production risk and price fluctuation in broiler production sector. Agricultural Economics, 3(4), 1-30. (In Persian)
68. Sepahpanah, M., Yaghoubifarani, A., & Mohammadi, Y. (2020). A study on agribusiness supply chain risk vulnerability (greenhouse owners in Hamadan Province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 51(1), 109-131. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2019.282587.668766
69. Shah, S.A.A., Solangi, Y.A., & Ikram, M. (2019). Analysis of barriers to the adoption of cleaner energy technologies in Pakistan using Modified Delphi and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1037–1050.
70. Shahraki, A., Ghorbani, M., & Asgharpour Masouleh, A. (2021). Integrating risk assessment and management and performance measurement in agricultural supply chain using agent-based simulation approach (A Case Study). Agricultural Economics, 15(3), 21-54. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iaes.2021.534404.1851
71. Taheri Reykandeh, E., & Rafiee, H. (2024). Modeling return and volatility spillovers between the Inputs market of Livestock and Poultry Industry in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30490/aead.2024.356654.1396
72. Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474-483.
73. Vajdi, F., Ghahremanzadeh, M., & Hosseinzad, J. (2018). Risk spillover effect of exchange rate on chicken market and its major inputs in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 32(3), 213-225. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v32i3.70821
74. Yan, X., Hui, S., & Wangmei, Y. )2009(. Research on the source and management of supply chain risk. Logistics Engineering and Management, 31(4), 58-61.
75. Zaghari, M., Honarbakhsh, S., Charkhkar, S., & Safari-asl, R. (2016). Determination of parameters for ranking the mortality risk in poultry production farms for poultry insurance. Journal of Veterinary Research, 71(3), 335-350. (In Persian).
76. Zaporozhtseva, L.A., Sabetova, T.V., & Tkacheva, J.V. (2018). Developing and testing model for investment risk assessment in agriculture. Advances in Engineering Research, 151, International Conference on Smart Solutions for Agriculture.