Applying methods of "Jabr" and "Taazod" in the theory of aggregation of conjectures "with an emphasis on the practical method of Sabzevari"

فقه و اصول (Fiqh va uṣūl)

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 18 November 2024   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/jfiqh.2024.82640.1808

Authors

fatemeh hosseinzadehsani¹; sayyed mohammad hadi Ghabooli Dorafshan^{* 2}; mohamadtaghi fakhlaei³

¹Doctoral student, Department of Jurisprudence, Faculty of Theology, Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad (FUM). Iran.

²Associate Professor, Department of Fiqh and Basics of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³Professor of the Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Mohaghegh Sabzevari has paid special attention to the discussion of "Jabr" and "Etzad" in his two jurisprudence books named "Zakhirat al-Ma'ad" and "Kafayat al-Ahkam". The present essay has analyzed the methods of Enjebar and Etzad of narrations from the perspective of Mohaghegh Sabzevari. He did not accept the division of hadiths into four categories. Mohaghegh Sabzevari's criterion about narration is only its validity; Whether this credibility is obtained through the validity of the hadith document or through other evidences. He tries to validate weak narrations by using the method of aggregation of conjectors such as “Enjebar with Shohrat” and “Enjebar with ejma” to compensate the weakness of the Hadith document. Also, he tries to strengthen the implications of hadiths by using the aggregation of various conjectors. The most important evidences, from the perspective of Mohaghegh Sabzevari, that strengthen the implication of the narratives, are the “Etzad with the verse”, “Etzad with the hadiths”, and, etc.

Keywords

Enjebar; Taazod; Weak narrative; Theory of vosoq sodori:Theory of vosoq sanadi: Mohaghegh Sabzevari

References