اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات52
تعداد شماره‌ها2,117
تعداد مقالات21,937
تعداد مشاهده مقاله93,860,117
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله28,255,837
حسینی, سیدسجاد, رجالی, فرهاد, کشاورز, پیمان. (1404). مقایسه تأثیر کودهای زیستی باکتریایی و قارچی بر عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب گندم در شرایط تنش آبی: نقش آنزیم ACC-دآمیناز و فرمولاسیون‌های مختلف قارچی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 39(1), 34-17. doi: 10.22067/jsw.2025.90176.1440
سیدسجاد حسینی; فرهاد رجالی; پیمان کشاورز. "مقایسه تأثیر کودهای زیستی باکتریایی و قارچی بر عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب گندم در شرایط تنش آبی: نقش آنزیم ACC-دآمیناز و فرمولاسیون‌های مختلف قارچی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 39, 1, 1404, 34-17. doi: 10.22067/jsw.2025.90176.1440
حسینی, سیدسجاد, رجالی, فرهاد, کشاورز, پیمان. (1404). 'مقایسه تأثیر کودهای زیستی باکتریایی و قارچی بر عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب گندم در شرایط تنش آبی: نقش آنزیم ACC-دآمیناز و فرمولاسیون‌های مختلف قارچی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 39(1), pp. 34-17. doi: 10.22067/jsw.2025.90176.1440
حسینی, سیدسجاد, رجالی, فرهاد, کشاورز, پیمان. مقایسه تأثیر کودهای زیستی باکتریایی و قارچی بر عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب گندم در شرایط تنش آبی: نقش آنزیم ACC-دآمیناز و فرمولاسیون‌های مختلف قارچی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 39(1): 34-17. doi: 10.22067/jsw.2025.90176.1440

مقایسه تأثیر کودهای زیستی باکتریایی و قارچی بر عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب گندم در شرایط تنش آبی: نقش آنزیم ACC-دآمیناز و فرمولاسیون‌های مختلف قارچی

آب و خاک
دوره 39، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 99، فروردین و اردیبهشت 1404، صفحه 34-17    اصل مقاله (1.39 M)
نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jsw.2025.90176.1440
نویسندگان
سیدسجاد حسینی* 1؛ فرهاد رجالی2؛ پیمان کشاورز3
1گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2بخش تحقیقات بیولوژی و بیوتکنولوژی خاک، مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران
3بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
این آزمایش با هدف انتخاب نوع کود زیستی (باکتریایی یا قارچی) و فرمولاسیون کودی مناسب برای گیاه گندم به‌صورت اسپلیت پلات در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقاتی طرق، واقع در مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی در طی سال زراعی 1401-1402 اجرا شد. کرت‌های اصلی شامل سطوح آبیاری بودند: آبیاری کامل، تنش آبی ملایم و شدید که به‌ترتیب معادل 100 درصد (5438 متر مکعب در هکتار)، 85 درصدو 65درصد نیاز آبی گیاه بود. کرت‌های فرعی شامل سطوح کود زیستی بودند: بدون کود زیستی (F1)، باکتری Pseudomonas fluorescens تولیدکننده آنزیم ACC-دآمیناز (F2)، باکتری P. fluorescens فاقد ACC-دآمیناز (F3)، قارچ میکوریز آربسکولار (AM) به‌صورت مایع (F4)، و پودری (F5). ویژگی‌های مورد مطالعه شامل درصد کلنیزاسیون ریشه، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد دانه، عملکرد زیستی، شاخص برداشت و کارایی مصرف آب بود. نتایج نشان داد که در بین کودهای زیستی باکتریایی، تنها کاربرد تیمار F2 در تنش آبی شدید موجب افزایش 9 درصد عملکرد دانه، 7 درصد عملکرد زیستی، 6/8 درصد کارایی مصرف آب دانه و 7 درصد کارایی مصرف آب بر حسب عملکرد زیستی نسبت به شاهد شد. کارایی کودهای زیستی قارچی نسبت به باکتریایی به‌طور قابل توجهی بیشتر بود. همچنین شکل پودری قارچ AM نسبت به مایع آن کارایی بیشتری داشت به‌طوری‌که این تیمار موجب افزایش 26 و 21 درصد عملکرد دانه و عملکرد زیستی، و افزایش 26 و 22 درصد کارایی مصرف آب برحسب عملکرد دانه و عملکرد زیستی در تنش آبی شدید شد. به‌طور کلی، تفاوت‌های مشاهده‌ شده در کارایی کودهای زیستی نشان می‌دهد که انتخاب مناسب نوع و فرم این کودها می‌تواند نقش قابل‌توجهی در مدیریت تنش آبی و بهبود تولید محصول داشته باشد. با این حال، انجام پژوهش‌های بلند مدت برای تأیید و تقویت این نتایج ضروری است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
باکتری‌های PGPR؛ تنش خشکی؛ ریزجانداران؛ سطوح آبیاری؛ قارچ‌های میکوریز آرباسکولار
مراجع
  1. Ahluwalia, O., Singh, P.C., & Bhatia, R. (2021). Resources, environment and sustainability a review on drought stress in plants : Implications, mitigation and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 5(July), 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100032
  2. Akhtar, S.S., Amby, D.B., Hegelund, J.N., Fimognari, L., Großkinsky, D.K., Westergaard, J.C., Müller, R., Moelbak, L., Liu, F., & Roitsch, T. (2020). Bacillus licheniformis FMCH001 increases water use efficiency via growth stimulation in both normal and drought conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00297
  3. Amiri, R., Nikbakht, A., & Etemadi, N. (2015). Alleviation of drought stress on rose geranium [Pelargonium graveolens (L.) Herit.] in terms of antioxidant activity and secondary metabolites by mycorrhizal inoculation. Scientia Horticulturae, 197, 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.062
  4. Askari, A., Ardakani, M.R., Paknejad, F., & Hosseini, Y. (2019). Effects of mycorrhizal symbiosis and seed priming on yield and water use efficiency of sesame under drought stress condition. Scientia Horticulturae, 257, 108749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108749
  5. Azaizeh, H.A., Marschner, H., Römheld, V., & Wittenmayer, L. (1995). Effects of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and other soil microorganisms on growth, mineral nutrient acquisition and root exudation of soil-grown maize plants. Mycorrhiza, 5(5), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207404
  6. Azami-Atajan, F., Hammami, H., & Yaghoobzadeh, M. (2020). The application of plant growth promoting microorganisms and phosphate fertilizers on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of wheat at levels of irrigation water. Journal of Crop Production, 12(4), 1–24. (In Persian with English abstract).
  7. Barazetti, A.R., Simionato, A.S., Navarro, M.O.P., Santos, I.M.O. dos, Modolon, F., Andreata, M.F. de L., Liuti, G., Cely, M.V.T., Chryssafidis, A.L., Dealis, M.L., & Andrade, G. (2019). Formulations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum applied to soybean and corn plants under controlled and field conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 142, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.05.015
  8. Basiru, S., Mwanza, H.P., & Hijri, M. (2020). Analysis of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculant benchmarks. Microorganisms, 9(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010081
  9. Beltrano, J., & Ronco, M.G. (2008). Improved tolerance of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 20(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202008000100004
  10. Bilal, S., Khan, A.L., Shahzad, R., Asaf, S., Kang, S.-M., & Lee, I.-J. (2017). Endophytic Paecilomyces formosus LHL10 augments Glycine max adaptation to Ni-contamination through affecting Endogenous phytohormones and oxidative stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00870
  11. Birhane, E., Sterck, F.J., Fetene, M., Bongers, F., & Kuyper, T.W. (2012). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance photosynthesis, water use efficiency, and growth of frankincense seedlings under pulsed water availability conditions. Oecologia, 169(4), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2258-3
  12. Bramley, H., Turner, N.C., & Siddique, K.H.M. (2013). Water use efficiency. In C. Kole (Ed.), Genomics and Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops (pp. 225–268). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37048-9_6
  13. Brunetti, C., Saleem, A.R., Della Rocca, G., Emiliani, G., De Carlo, A., Balestrini, R., Khalid, A., Mahmood, T., & Centritto, M. (2021). Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria strains producing ACC deaminase on photosynthesis, isoprene emission, ethylene formation and growth of Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. in response to water deficit. Journal of Biotechnology, 331, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.03.008
  14. Calvet, C., Camprubi, A., Pérez-Hernández, A., & Lovato, P.E. (2013). Plant growth stimulation and root colonization potential of in vivo versus in vitro arbuscular mycorrhizal inocula. HortScience Horts, 48(7), 897–901. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.7.897
  15. Cardoso, I., & Kuyper, T. (2006). Mycorrhizas and tropical soil fertility. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 116(1–2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.011
  16. Carmen, C.A., Patricia, P., Rubén, B., & Victoria, S.M. (2016). Plant–Rhizobacteria interaction and drought stress tolerance in plants. In M. A. Hossain, S. H. Wani, S. Bhattacharjee, D. J. Burritt, & L.-S. P. Tran (Eds.), Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 1 (pp. 287–308). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28899-4_12
  17. Cheng, Z., Park, E., & Glick, B.R. (2007). 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase from Pseudomonas putida UW4 facilitates the growth of canola in the presence of salt. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 53(7), 912–918. https://doi.org/10.1139/W07-050
  18. Crossay, T., Majorel, C., Redecker, D., Gensous, S., Medevielle, V., Durrieu, G., Cavaloc, Y., & Amir, H. (2019). Is a mixture of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi better for plant growth than single-species inoculants? Mycorrhiza, 29(4), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00898-y
  19. Garmendia, I., & Mangas, V. J. (2014). Comparative study of substrate-based and commercial formulations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Romaine lettuce subjected to salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37(11), 1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.889149
  20. Glick, B.R., Liu, C., Ghosh, S., & Dumbroff, E.B. (1997). Early development of canola seedlings in the presence of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29(8), 1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00026-6
  21. Glick, B.R., Penrose, D. M., & Li, J. (1998). A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 190(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532
  22. Hasanpour, J., & Zand, B. (2014). Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) seed inoculation with bio-fertilizers on reduction of drought stress damage. Iranian Journal of Seed Sciences and Research, 1(2), 1–12. (In Persian with English abstract).
  23. Hashem, A., Abd_Allah, E.F., Alqarawi, A.A., Al Huqail, A.A., Egamberdieva, D., & Wirth, S. (2016). Alleviation of cadmium stress in Solanum lycopersicum by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi via induction of acquired systemic tolerance. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 23(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.11.002
  24. Hosseini, S.S., Rejali, F., & Keshavarz, P. (2024). Effect of some biofertilizers on the physiological characteristics of wheat flag leaves and rhizosphere enzyme activities at different irrigation levels. Journal of Sol Biology, 12(1), 65–88. (In Persian with English abstract).
  25. Hyde, K.D., Xu, J., Rapior, S., Jeewon, R., Lumyong, S., Niego, A.G.T., Abeywickrama, P.D., Aluthmuhandiram, J.V.S., Brahamanage, R.S., Brooks, S., Chaiyasen, A., Chethana, K.W.T., Chomnunti, P., Chepkirui, C., Chuankid, B., de Silva, N.I., Doilom, M., Faulds, C., Gentekaki, E., & Stadler, M. (2019). The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially. Fungal Diversity, 97(1), 1–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00430-9
  26. Jalili, F., Khavazi, K., Pazira, E., Nejati, A., Rahmani, H. A., Sadaghiani, H.R., & Miransari, M. (2009). Isolation and characterization of ACC deaminase-producing fluorescent Pseudomonads, to alleviate salinity stress on canola (Brassica napus) growth. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166(6), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph. 2008.08.004
  27. Jiriaie, M., Fateh, E., & Aynehband, A. (2014). Evaluation the morph physiological changes in wheat cultivars from the use of Mycorrhiza and Azospirillum. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(4), 841–851. (In Persian with English abstract).
  28. Johansson, J.F., Paul, L.R., & Finlay, R.D. (2004). Microbial interactions in the mycorrhizosphere and their significance for sustainable agriculture. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 48(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2003.11.012
  29. Khan, Y., Shah, S., & Hui, T. (2022). The roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in influencing plant nutrients, photosynthesis, and Metabolites of Cereal Crops—A Review. Agronomy, 12(9), 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092191
  30. Kormanik, P. P., & McGraw, A.-C. (1982). Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots. In N. C. Schenck (Ed.), Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research (pp. 37–47). American Phytopathological Society. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:91636228
  31. Kumar, A., Patel, J. S., Meena, V. S., & Srivastava, R. (2019). Recent advances of PGPR based approaches for stress tolerance in plants for sustainable agriculture. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 20, 101271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101271
  32. Li, H., Guo, Q., Jing, Y., Liu, Z., Zheng, Z., Sun, Y., Xue, Q., & Lai, H. (2020). Application of streptomyces pactum Act12 enhances drought resistance in wheat. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 39(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09968-z
  33. Li, J., Meng, B., Chai, H., Yang, X., Song, W., Li, S., Lu, A., Zhang, T., & Sun, W. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate drought stress in C3 (Leymus chinensis) and C4 (Hemarthria altissima) grasses via altering antioxidant enzyme activities and photosynthesis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 450785. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2019.00499
  34. Lim, J.-H., & Kim, S.-D. (2013). Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR Bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper. The Plant Pathology Journal, 29(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.SI.02.2013.0021
  35. Majidi, A., & Rejali, F. (2023). Mycorrhizal symbiosis and glycine betaine effect foliar application on some agronomic traits of rainfed wheat in calcareous soils. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 54(2), 281–297. (In Persian with English abstract).
  36. Malusà, E., Pinzari, F., & Canfora, L. (2016). Efficacy of biofertilizers: Challenges to improve crop production. in Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity (pp. 17–40). Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2644-4_2
  37. Mathur, S., Tomar, R.S., & Jajoo, A. (2019). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protects photosynthetic apparatus of wheat under drought stress. Photosynthesis Research, 139(1–3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-018-0538-4
  38. Mayak, S., Tirosh, T., & Glick, B.R. (2004). Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomatoes and peppers. Plant Science, 166(2), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.025
  39. Moradgholi, A., Mobasser, H., Ganjali, H., Fanaie, H., & Mehraban, A. (2022). WUE, protein and grain yield of wheat under the interaction of biological and chemical fertilizers and different moisture regimes. Cereal Research Communications, 50(1), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-021-00145-1
  40. Nadeem, S. M., Ahmad, M., Zahir, Z. A., Javaid, A., & Ashraf, M. (2014). The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnology Advances, 32(2), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005
  41. Nadeem, S.M., Naveed, M., Ayyub, M., Khan, M.Y., Ahmad, M., & Zahir, Z.A. (2016). Potential, limitations and future prospects of Pseudomonas for sustainable agriculture and environment: A Review. Soil & Environment, 35(2).
  42. Naseri, R., Barary, M., Zarea, M. J., Khavazi, K., & Tahmasebi, Z. (2017). Effect of plant growth promoting bacteria and Mycorrhizal fungi on growth and yield of wheat under dryland conditions. Journal of Sol Biology, 5(1), 49–66. (In Persian with English abstract).
  43. Naseri rad, H., Naseri, R., Mirzaei, A., & Zarei, B. (2021). Effects of phosphorous fertilizer and mycorrhizal fungi on yield and yield components of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) under rainfed condition. Applied Field Crops Research, 34(3), 43–68. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.21608/ajas.2021.93649.1043
  44. Oliveira, R.S., Rocha, I., Ma, Y., Vosátka, M., & Freitas, H. (2016). Seed coating with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as an ecotechnologicalapproach for sustainable agricultural production of common wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part A, 79(7), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2016.1153448
  45. Olumi somarin, S., Ajali, J., Faramarzi, A., Abdi, M., & Nazari, N. (2023). Study of the effect of irrigation, mycorrhiza, and azospirillum on the quantitative and qualitative yield of barley varieties. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 54(2), 407–427. (In Persian with English abstract).
  46. Omidvari, S., Salamati, N., & Abdi, S. (2020). Study the effects of irrigation regime and biofertilizers on yield and yield component of wheat. Journal of Crops Improvement, 22(2), 193–204. (In Persian with English abstract).
  47. Ortas, I., & Ustuner, O. (2014). The effects of single species, dual species and indigenous mycorrhiza inoculation on citrus growth and nutrient uptake. European Journal of Soil Biology, 63, 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejsobi.2014.05.007
  48. Parihar, M., Rakshit, A., Rana, K., Prasad Meena, R., & Chandra Joshi, D. (2020). A consortium of arbuscular mycorrizal fungi improves nutrient uptake, biochemical response, nodulation and growth of the pea (Pisum sativum) under salt stress. Rhizosphere, 15, 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100235
  49. Pellegrino, E., Nuti, M., & Ercoli, L. (2022). Multiple arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal consortia enhance yield and fatty acids of Medicago sativa: A two-year field study on agronomic traits and tracing of fungal persistence. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.814401
  50. Phillips, J., & Hayman, D. (1970). Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55(1), 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
  51. Pons, C., & Müller, C. (2022). Impacts of Drought Stress and Mycorrhizal Inoculation on the Performance of Two Spring Wheat Cultivars. Plants, 11(17), 2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172187
  52. Rahimi, Z., Hosseinpanahi, F., & Siosemardeh, A. (2019). Evaluation of yield, radiation and water use efficiency of drought resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars under different irrigation levels. Plant Production and Genetics, 2(1), 19–34. (In Persian with English abstract). https://jwr.uok.ac.ir/article_61144.html
  53. Rehman, M.M.U., Zhu, Y., Abrar, M., Khan, W., Wang, W., Iqbal, A., Khan, A., Chen, Y., Rafiq, M., Tufail, M. A., Ye, J.-S., & Xiong, Y.-C. (2024). Moisture- and period-dependent interactive effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and AM fungus on water use and yield formation in dryland wheat. Plant and Soil, 502(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1516690/v1
  54. Rocha, I., Duarte, I., Ma, Y., Souza-Alonso, P., Látr, A., Vosátka, M., Freitas, H., & Oliveira, R.S. (2019). Seed Coating with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for improved field production of Chickpea. Agronomy, 9(8), 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9080471
  55. Rocha, I., Ma, Y., Souza-Alonso, P., Vosátka, M., Freitas, H., & Oliveira, R.S. (2019). Seed coating: A tool for delivering beneficial microbes to agricultural crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01357
  56. Rubin, R.L., van Groenigen, K.J., & Hungate, B.A. (2017). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria are more effective under drought: a meta-analysis. Plant and Soil, 416(1–2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3199-8
  57. Ruíz-Sánchez, M., Armada, E., Muñoz, Y., García de Salamone, I.E., Aroca, R., Ruíz-Lozano, J.M., & Azcón, R. (2011). Azospirillum and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization enhance rice growth and physiological traits under well-watered and drought conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology, 168(10), 1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.12.019
  58. Sahu, P. K., & Brahmaprakash, G. P. (2016). Formulations of biofertilizers – Approaches and advances. In R. Singh, D., Singh, H., Prabha (Ed.), Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity (pp. 179–198). Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2644-4_12
  59. Saif, S., Abid, Z., Ashiq, M.F., Altaf, M., & Ashraf, R.S. (2021). Biofertilizer formulations. In Biofertilizers (pp. 211–256). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119724995.ch7
  60. Siddiqui, Z. A., & Kataoka, R. (2011). Mycorrhizal inoculants: Progress in inoculant production technology. In Microbes and Microbial Technology (pp. 489–506). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7931-5_18
  61. Smyth, E.M., McCarthy, J., Nevin, R., Khan, M. R., Dow, J.M., O’Gara, F., & Doohan, F.M. (2011). In vitro analyses are not reliable predictors of the plant growth promotion capability of bacteria; a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain that promotes the growth and yield of wheat. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 111(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05079.x
  62. Tabassum, B., Khan, A., Tariq, M., Ramzan, M., Iqbal Khan, M.S., Shahid, N., & Aaliya, K. (2017). Bottlenecks in commercialisation and future prospects of PGPR. Applied Soil Ecology, 121(October), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.030
  63. Tang, H., Hassan, M.U., Feng, L., Nawaz, M., Shah, A.N., Qari, S.H., Liu, Y., & Miao, J. (2022). The critical role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve drought tolerance and nitrogen use efficiency in crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.919166
  64. Treseder, K. K. (2013). The extent of mycorrhizal colonization of roots and its influence on plant growth and phosphorus content. Plant and Soil, 371(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1681-5
  65. Unkovich, M., Baldock, J., & Forbes, M. (2010). Variability in harvest index of grain crops and potential significance for carbon accounting. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy (Vol. 105, pp. 173–219). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05005-4
  66. Yagini, F., seyed sharifi, R., Khomari, S., & Gasemi, M. (2020). Effect of supplementary irrigation and seed inoculation with bio fertilizers on yield and some physiological traits of rainfed wheat. Jispp, 9(39), 147–163. (In Persian with English abstract). http://jispp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-1321-en.html
  67. Yavuz, D., Baştaş, K. K., Seymen, M., Yavuz, N., Kurtar, E. S., Süheri, S., Türkmen, Ö., Gür, A., & Kıymacı, G. (2023). Role of ACC deaminase-producing rhizobacteria in alleviation of water stress in watermelon. Scientia Horticulturae, 321, 112288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112288
  68. Zabihi, H. R., Savaghebi, G. R., Khavazi, K., Ganjali, A., & Miransari, M. (2011). Pseudomonas bacteria and phosphorous fertilization, affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum ) yield and P uptake under greenhouse and field conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 33(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0531-9
  69. Zahir, Z.A., Munir, A., Asghar, H.N., Shaharoona, B., & Arshad, M. (2008). Effectiveness of rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase for growth promotion of peas (Pisum sativum) under drought conditions. JOournal Microbiology Biotechnology, 18(5), 958–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(08)60055-7
  70. Zarei, T., Moradi, A., Kazemeini, S.A., Akhgar, A., & Rahi, A.A. (2020). The role of ACC deaminase producing bacteria in improving sweet corn (Zea mays var saccharata) productivity under limited availability of irrigation water. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 20361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77305-6
  71. Zhang, X., Wang, L., Ma, F., Yang, J., & Su, M. (2017). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on carbon and nitrogen distribution and grain yield and nutritional quality in rice (Oryza sativa ). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 97(9), 2919–2925. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8129
 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 311
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 66


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب