واکاوی موانع فرهنگی نظریه پردازی در حوزه علوم انسانی

پژوهش نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت

مقاله 7، دوره 14، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 27، شهریور 1403، صفحه 149-172   

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/fedu.2025.90102.1374

نویسندگان

راضیه یوسف بروجردی^* ؛ سید هدایت اله داورپناه

استادیار، گروه .علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان ، ایران

چکیده

امروزه مرجعیت علمی به‌عنوان منبع اصلی مشروعیت و بقا در بستر رقابتی حاکمیت آموزش در جهان عمل می‌کند. در این میان، یکی از بایسته‌های مرجعیت علمی، نظریه‌پردازی علمی است. نظریه‌پردازی در همه‌ی حوزه‌های دانش بشری، اغلب با چالش‌ها و موانعی روبه‌رو می‌باشد، اما این موانع در حوزه علوم انسانی بسیار چشمگیر هستند. ازجمله مهم‌ترین موانع فرایند خلق و بسط مفاهیم انسانی و اجتماعی نوظهور در حوزه علوم انسانی که می‌توانند به‌طور قابل‌توجهی بر فرآیند نظریه‌پردازی در این حوزه تأثیر گذاشته و از سرعت آن بکاهند، موانع فرهنگی است. از همین رو پژوهش حاضر باهدف واکاوی و تبیین موانع فرهنگی نظریه‌پردازی در علوم انسانی با رویکرد تحلیل مضمون انجام‌شده است. در این پژوهش از طریق مصاحبه با متخصصان و صاحب‌نظران حوزه‌ی علوم انسانی،13 مضمون به‌عنوان موانع فرهنگی نظریه‌پردازی در حوزه علوم انسانی شناسایی و مورد تبیین قرار گرفتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

نظریه پردازی؛ علوم انسانی؛ موانع فرهنگی؛ مرجعیت علمی؛ فرهنگ تحول آفرین

مراجع

Al-Husseini, S., El Beltagi, I., & Moizer, J. (2021). Transformational leadership and innovation: the mediating role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(5), 670-693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (2022). Reproduction in education, society and culture (T. Boroomand, Trans. Tehran: Jameh Shenasan. https://www.gisoom.com/book/44795712. (In Persian).

Chang, C. L.-h., & Lin, T.-C. (2015). The role of organizational culture in the knowledge management process. Journal of Knowledge management, 19(3), 433-455. doi:. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2014-0353

Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 52(3), 351-386. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.351

Chave, S. (2024). On Bewilderment, Education and Opening Spaces for Creativity and Emergent Educational Futures Creative Ruptions for Emergent Educational Futures (pp. 71-91): Springer Nature Switzerland Cham. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52973-3_4.

Corcoran, N., & Duane, A. (2017). The Impact of Organisational Culture on Staff Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education. Paper presented at the ECKM 2017 18th European Conference on Knowledge Management. https://research.setu.ie/en/publications/the-impact-of-organisational-culture-on-staffknowledge-sharing-in-6.

Danaeefard, H. (2009). An Analysis of Barriers to Knowledge Generation in Field of the Humanities: Some Recommendations for Promoting the Capacity of Iranian Science Policy. Journal of, 2(1), 2-15. doi:https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12770.html?lang=en . (In Persian).

Davarpanah, S. H., Hoveida, R., Barnett, R., Javdani, H., & Jamshidian, A. (2021). Ritualism as a Form of Academic Malfunctioning: Iranian Higher Education as a Case Study. Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies, 2(3), 30-56. doi:http://johepal.com/article-1-127-fa.html

Davis, M. S., Wester, K. L., & King, B. (2008). Narcissism, entitlement, and questionable research practices in counseling: A pilot study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(2), 200-210. doi:https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00498.x

Dolan, S., Schuler, R. S., & Cabrera, R. V. (2013). Human resource management (M. Saeibi & M. A. Tusi, Trans.). . Tehran: Center for Public Management Training. (Original work published 1987). https://www.gisoom.com/book/11085639.. (In Persian).

Dupré, J. (1990). Scientific Pluralism and the Plurality of the Sciences: Comments on David Hull's" Science as a Process". Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 60(1/2), 61-76. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00370977

Fartash, K., & Ghorbani, A. (2022). Proposing a policy mix for enhancing socio-economic effectiveness and applicability of humanities to achieve scientific authority. Rahyaft, 32(3), 33-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2023.11421.1430. (In Persian).

Fazlollahi Qomshi, S., & Jahanbakhshi, H. (2016). Barriers and priorities of theorizing in universities: Examining the perspectives of faculty members at the Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr Branch. Journal of Research Standards in Humanities, 5(2), 71. doi:https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1164577 . (In Persian)

Finley, S. L. (2018). Constructing Meaning through Talk: A Research Study Examining the Use of Dialogic Discourse in Guided Reading to Promote Student-Centered Classroom Practices in Primary Classrooms. Auburn University. https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/6565/Finley%20DISS%20FINAL%20Format%20Approved.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.

Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W. (2020). The University and the Global Knowledge Society. https://www.academia.edu/download/66592149/2021_KosmutzkyKrucken_FrankMeyer.pdf.

Ghadimi, K. (2020). Scientific-academic narcissism a new phenomenon in academic settings. Journal of Hospital, 19(4), 77-78. doi:http://jhosp.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6464-fa.html

Ghanadinezhad, F., & Heidari, G. (2018). Elucidate Barriers and Solutions to Theorizing in Humanities and Social Sciences (Case of Study: Ahwaz Shahid Chamran University). NRISP, 28(71), 1-18. doi:https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13668.html?lang=en. (In Persian)

Ghorbankhani, M., & Salehi, K. (2021). A Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Obstacles of Creation of Knowledge in Humanities Based on the Perception and Lived Experience of the University Elites and Scholars. Strategy for Culture, 13(52), 75-110. doi:https://sid.ir/paper/411371/en. (In Persian)

Goodarzi, G., & Roudi, K. (2012). Interpretation of scientific authority for educational institutions by applying Grounded Theory. Science & Technology, 4(2), 75-90. doi:https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1390.4.2.7.6. (In Persian).

Grijalva, E., & Harms, P. D. (2014). Narcissism: An integrative synthesis and dominance complementarity model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 108-127. doi:https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/amp.2012.0048

Hafezi, R., Mirza Rasouli, F., & Aminlou, M. (2022). An essay on scientific authority from the perspective of a selected pre-eminent Iranian scientist. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 15(3), 29-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/jstp.2022.13956. (In Persian).

Hoffman, J. (2013). Theorizing power in transition studies: the role of creativity and novel practices in structural change. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 257-275. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9173-2

Izadi, S., Alipor, Y., Salehi-Omran, E., & Safar-Haydari, H. (2022). Investigating the current and desirable situation of academic freedom in the Iranian higher education system. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(2), 263-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.52547/irphe.28.2.263. (In Persian)

Jałocha, B., Bogacz-Wojtanowska, E., Góral, A., Prawelska-Skrzypek, G., & Jedynak, P. (2021). Opening the doors of the ivory tower: action research as a tool supporting cooperation between universities and external organizations Research in Organizational Change and Development (pp. 143-171): Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620210000029007.

Jandaghi, G., Kozekanan, S. F., & Piranneja, A. (2014). Clarifying the impacts of Professors' narcissism variables on effective performance. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 44, 93-105. doi:10.18052/ www.scipress.com/ILSHS.44.93. (In Persian)

Khorsand, S., Janalizadeh Choobbasti, H., & Razeghi, N. (2022). Scientific freedom in the academic environment: Challenges, strategies, and consequences. Strategic Research on Social Problems, 11(1), 1-32. doi:https://doi.org/10.22108/srspi.2022.1324711773. (In Persian)

Latifi, M., Tahmaseby, B. R., Javadi, M., & Mirzaee, H. M. H. (2018). Extracting and prioritizing strategies for achieving scientific authority an importance-performance analysis (IPA). A quarterly journal of strategy,, 27(1), 5-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2023.11413.1434. (In Persian).

Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2017). How transformational leadership supports knowledge sharing: evidence from Chinese manufacturing and service firms. Chinese Management Studies, 11(3), 479-497. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CMS-02-2017-0039

Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2020). Creativity-enhancing technological change in the production of scientific knowledge. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(5), 489-500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1636449

Ludwig, D., & Ruphy, S. (2021). Scientific pluralism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. doi:https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/scientific-pluralism

Mahmoudi Topkanlou, H. (2023). Scientific authority in the light of the development of academic freedom: A study of faculty members' perspectives. Rahyaft, 33(1), 41-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2023.11450.1447. (In Persian)

McNay, L. (2020). The limits of justification: Critique, disclosure and reflexivity. European Journal of Political Theory, 19(1), 26-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116670294

Metz, A., Boaz, A., & Robert, G. (2019). Co-creative approaches to knowledge production: what next for bridging the research to practice gap? Evidence & policy, 15(3), 331-337. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15623193264226

Mohammadi, A. (2005). Investigating the effect of organizational and individual barriers on scientific activities in Iran. (In Persian). (Doctoral dissertation Doctoral dissertation), Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian).

Peacocke, A. R. (2004). Creation and the World of Science: The Reshaping of Belief: Oxford University Press, USA. https://www.amazon.com/Creation-World-Science-Re-Shaping-Belief/dp/0199271690.

Pour Ezzat, A. A., Rezaeei, P., & Yazdani, H. R. (2009). Survey of Theory-building Barriers in Social Sciences Area. Journal of Business Management, 1(2). doi:https://jibm.ut.ac.ir/article_20323_en.html?lang=en. (In Persian).

Rasuli, B., & Shahriari, P. (2021). Barriers to Research in the Humanities in Iran: a window to Science Policy. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 37(2), 333-361. doi:https://doi.org/10.52547/jipm.37.2.333. (In Persian)

Sanders, C. E., Borron, A., Lamm, A. J., Harrell, E., & Worley, B. (2024). Using dialogue-centered approaches to community-engaged research: an application of dialectical inquiry. Discover Global Society, 2(1), 30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00055-7

Sandholtz, W., & Taagepera, R. (2005). Corruption, culture, and communism. International Review of Sociology, 15(1), 109-131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700500038678

Santos, L. F. (2017). The role of critical thinking in science education. Online Submission, 8(20), 160-173. doi:https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-5-9

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2): John Wiley & Sons. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2404590.

Seifoori, B., Taghavi, R., & Taghavi, A. (2016). Comparing the Value Preferences between Female Students of Payam Noor and Azad University in Kerman. Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society, 7(26), 21-38. doi:https://jzvj.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_2022.html#:~:text=20.1001.1.20088566.1395.7.26.2.8. (In Persian)

Seyed Javadin, S. R., Hassanqoli Pour, T., Rahnavard, F., & Taab, M. (2012). Conceptualization of scientific authority in higher education systems. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 6(16), 1-27. doi:https://www.jiera.ir/article_53139.html. (In Persian)

Shirkhani, A., & Sabzi, D. (2019). Challenges of Localization and Theorizing in Human Sciences. Iranian Political Research, 6(20), 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/sej.2020.529402.1017. (In Persian)

Torkzadeh, J., Mohammadi, M., & Sawab, L. (2017). Predicting the judgment patterns of faculty members based on their value and cultural orientations. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 12(3), 45-62. doi:https://journal.sanjesh.org/article_43618.html?lang=en. (In Persian)

Van Bouwel, J. (2015). Towards democratic models of science: exploring the case of scientific pluralism. Perspectives on science, 23(2), 149-172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00165

Van der Merwe, R. (2024). Stance Pluralism, Scientology, and the Problem of Relativism. Foundations of Science, 29(3), 625-644. doi:https://philpapers.org/go.pl?id=VANSPS-4&proxyId=&u=https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1007%2Fs10699-022-09882-w

Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2022). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking in science education Education in the 21st Century: STEM, Creativity and Critical Thinking (pp. 29-47): Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85300-6_3.

Yadolahi Dehcheshmeh, A., Liaghatdar, M. J., & Davarpanah, S. H. (2019). Identifing effective factors on the Quality of Performance of Multi-grade classes Teachers. Teaching and Learning Research, 16(2), 129-146. doi:https://tlr.shahed.ac.ir/article_3324.html?lang=en. (In Persian)

Yusefzadeh, M. R., & Mirzaee, M. (2013). A study of obstacles to Theory-making in the Humanities: Bu Ali-Sina University. National Studies Journal, 13(2), 75-95. doi:https://www.rjnsq.ir/article_100399.html?lang=en. (In Persian)

Zapp, M. (2021). The authority of science and the legitimacy of international organisations: OECD, UNESCO and World Bank in global education governance. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(7), 1022-1041. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1702503

Zhu, W., Shang, S., Jiang, W., Pei, M., & Su, Y. (2019). Convergent thinking moderates the relationship between divergent thinking and scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 320-328. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641685