A Systematic Review of the Viable System Model: Applications, Insights, and Future Directions

Journal of Systems Thinking in Practice

دوره 4، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 14، آذر 2025، صفحه 109-145   

نوع مقاله: Review Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jstinp.2025.91552.1136

نویسندگان

Mohammad Reza Fathi^* ؛ Soraya Birami؛ Alireza Payvar؛ SeyedAli Doorafshan

Departmen of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.

چکیده

The Viable System Model (VSM) is a foundational framework in organizational cybernetics, designed to manage complexity and ensure systemic viability in dynamic environments. Given the increasing importance of this model in addressing complex organizational challenges, the primary objective of this research is to conduct a comprehensive and systematic review of existing studies in the field of the Viable System Model. This review aims to identify and analyze the practical areas of this model, evaluate its challenges and opportunities in confronting contemporary systemic issues, and extract key insights from 21 peer-reviewed studies. By synthesizing and analyzing the findings of these studies, this paper intends to provide a clear and coherent picture of the Viable System Model's current state and future potential. The process of identifying relevant studies was conducted using the PRISMA method, which involved searching the Scopus database and performing manual searches. This study employs a bibliometric research design, utilizing a quantitative approach and combining bibliometric and network analysis to examine the landscape of VSM research. Key findings highlight VSM’s role in enhancing organizational resilience, improving decentralized decision-making, and enabling systemic adaptability. The integration of VSM with emerging technologies—such as artificial intelligence, digital twins, and big data analytics—demonstrates its potential to address contemporary organizational challenges. However, critical gaps remain, including limited empirical validation, insufficient applications in underrepresented sectors such as agriculture and education, and scalability issues for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The study emphasizes the need for longitudinal research, hybrid frameworks, and sector-specific models to enhance the theoretical and practical utility of VSM. By synthesizing recent applications and identifying research opportunities, this paper reinforces the significance of VSM as a robust approach to managing complexity and outlines pathways for future research.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Viable System Model؛ Systematic Review؛ Organizational Cybernetics؛ Complexity Management

مراجع

Adamides, E.D., Georgousoglou, K. and Mouzakitis, Y., 2023. Designing a Flexible and Adaptive Municipal Waste Management Organisation Using the Viable System Model. Sustainability, 15(18), p.13323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813323.

Adamides, E.D., Katopodis, T., Mountouris, A. and Sfetsos, A., 2023. Organising for Resilience to Climate Change in Critical Infrastructures: The Application of Viable System Model in an Oil Refinery. Systemic Practice And Action Research, 36(4), pp.609-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-022-09623-x.

Adham, K.A., Muhamad, N.S.A. and Said, M.F., 2020. Diagnosing the Halal Industry of Taiwan: A viable system model approach. Jurnal Pengurusan, 58, pp.169-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2020-58-14.

Adham, K.A., Rahim, A.A., Masood, A. and Said, M.F., 2022. Evolution of the Malaysian Halal Certification System: Viable System Model as the Diagnostic Framework. Jurnal Pengurusan, 66.https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2022-66-03.

Alves, J.M., Rodrigues, W., Vergara, F.E., Souza, F.N. and Terra, L.A.A., 2021. From the black box to the fish farming development policy project: A diagnosis from the viable system model. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(4), pp.459-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.2675.

Ashby W. R. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.

Beer S. 1972. Brain of the Firm. London: Allen Lane.

Beer S. 1979. The Heart of Enterprise. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Beer S. 1985. Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Cardoso Castro, P.P. and Espinosa, A., 2020. Identification of organisational pathologies: Exploration of social network analysis to support the viable system model diagnostic. Kybernetes, 49(2), pp.285-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2018-0557.

Chan, J.W., 2011. Enhancing organisational resilience: application of viable system model and MCDA in a small Hong Kong company. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), pp.5545-5563.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563829.

Checkland P. 1981. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Espejo R, & Harnden R. (Eds.). 1989. The Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer's VSM. Chichester: Wiley.

Espejo, R., 2021. The enterprise complexity model: An extension of the viable system model for emerging organizational forms. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(6), pp.721-737.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.2735.

Espinosa A, and Walker J. 2011. A Complexity Approach to Sustainability: Theory and Application. London: Imperial College Press.

Espinosa, A., Harnden, R. and Walker, J., 2007. Beyond hierarchy: a complexity management perspective. Kybernetes, 36(3/4), pp.333-347.https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920710746919.

Espinosa, A., Reficco, E., Martínez, A. and Guzmán, D., 2015. A methodology for supporting strategy implementation based on the VSM: A case study in a Latin-American multi-national. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), pp.202-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.014.

Espinosa, A.M., Walker, J., Grover, K. and Vachkova, M.V., 2023. The viability and sustainability approach to support organisational resilience: Learning in a recent case study in the health sector. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 40(4), pp.689-700.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.2951.

Flood R. L, & Jackson M. C. 1991. Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Gallego-García, S., Reschke, J. and García-García, M., 2019. Design and simulation of a capacity management model using a digital twin approach based on the viable system model: Case study of an automotive plant. Applied Sciences, 9(24), p.5567. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9245567 .

Hildreth A. J, & Kimble C. 2004. Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2(1) , pp.53–67. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500026.

Hoverstadt P. 2008. The Fractal Organization: Creating Sustainable Organizations with the Viable System Model. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Jackson M. C. 2003. Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Leonard, A., 2009. The viable system model and its application to complex organizations. Systemic practice and action research, 22(4), pp.223-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9108-z.

Lowe, D., Espinosa, A. and Yearworth, M., 2020. Constitutive rules for guiding the use of the viable system model: Reflections on practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(3), pp.1014-1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.030.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. G, and PRISMA Group*, T. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), pp. 264-269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

Panagiotakopoulos, P.D., Espinosa, A. and Walker, J., 2016. Sustainability management: insights from the viable system model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, pp.792-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.035.

Perko, I., del Gaudio, G. and Potocan, V., 2024. Sustainable supply chains–Designing a requisite holistic model. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12707.

Perko, I., 2023. Data sharing concepts: a viable system model diagnosis. Kybernetes, 52(9), pp.2976-2991.https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2022-0575.

Pollock, K. and Steen, R., 2021. Total defence resilience: Viable or not during COVID‐19? A comparative study of Norway and the UK. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 12(1), pp.73-109.https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12207.

Rodriguez-Ulloa, R., 2022. Cybernetic governance of the Peruvian State: a proposal. AI & society, 37(3), pp.1207-1229.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01329-3.

Schwaninger, M., 2006. Design for viable organizations: The diagnostic power of the viable system model. Kybernetes, 35(7/8), pp.955-966. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920610675164.

Shaw, D., Fattoum, A., Moreno, J. and Bealt, J., 2020. A structured methodology to peer review disaster risk reduction activities: The Viable System Review. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 46, p.101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101486.

Spyridopoulos, T., Topa, I.A., Tryfonas, T. and Karyda, M., 2014, June. A holistic approach for cyber assurance of critical infrastructure with the viable system model. In IFIP International Information Security Conference (pp. 438-445). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2012.3847.

Steen, R., Roud, E., Torp, T.M. and Hansen, T.A., 2024. The impact of interorganizational collaboration on the viability of disaster response operations: The Gjerdrum landslide in Norway. Safety science, 173, p.106459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106459.

Sydelko, P., Espinosa, A. and Midgley, G., 2024. Designing interagency responses to wicked problems: A viable system model board game. European Journal of Operational Research, 312(2), pp.746-764.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.040.

Tugwell, P. and Tovey, D., 2021. PRISMA 2020. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, pp.A5-A6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.008.

Vahidi, A. and Aliahmadi, A., 2019. Describing the necessity of multi-methodological approach for viable system model: case study of viable system model and system dynamics multi-methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32(1), pp.13-37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11213-018-9452-0.