Digital Accounting Legitimacy Perspectives Based on the Need for More Developed Software Services

Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

مقاله 8، دوره 9، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 33، اسفند 2025، صفحه 149-181   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijaaf.2025.46641.1523

نویسندگان

Abolfazl Manafi¹؛ Seyyed Abbas Borhani²؛ Mehdi Safari Gerayli^{* 3}؛ Hossein Jahangirnia⁴

¹PhD student, Department of Accounting, QO.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

²Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

³Department of Accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz,Iran

⁴Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

چکیده

The current study aims to outline the legitimacy perspectives of digital accounting in light of the increasing need for more advanced software services in Iran. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative and quantitative analytical procedures to achieve the study’s objectives. In the qualitative phase, grounded theory and Delphi analyses were conducted based on input from 14 experts and scholars familiar with the core phenomenon under investigation. In the quantitative phase, a futures studies approach was applied to identify potential scenarios that could define the legitimacy perspectives of digital accounting in the context of enhanced software service requirements in Iran. Based on the 14 interviews, the qualitative findings produced 282 open codes categorized into 33 conceptual themes, six core components, and three structural dimensions, forming the foundational framework for the legitimacy of digital accounting. Conversely, the quantitative results—through matrix analysis—identified four scenarios along two key axes: systemic mechanisms related to financial planning and those associated with the supply chain. According to the mathematical function matrix, the most probable scenario emerged at the intersection of high-impact systemic mechanisms associated with the supply chain and low-impact mechanisms related to financial planning. This scenario, termed the “Amadic Scenario,” offers a more reliable justification for the legitimacy of digital accounting grounded in the advancement of software services in Iran’s future. In interpreting these findings, it is important to note that achieving legitimacy for digital accounting—based on software service development requires logistical capabilities that enhance inventory and resource management within production systems, thereby ensuring higher computational capacity and operational efficiency.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Digital Accounting؛ Legitimacy؛ Software Services

مراجع

1. Abikoye, B. E., Umeorah, S. C., Adelaja, A. O., Ayodele, O. and Ogunsuji, Y. M. (2024). Regulatory compliance and efficiency in financial technologies: challenges and innovations. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(1), pp. 1830-1844.
2. Agyei-Boapeah, H., Evans, R. and Nisar, T. M. (2022). Disruptive innovation: designing business platforms for new financial services. Journal of Business Research, 150, pp. 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.066
3. Alsharari, N. M. and Ikem, F. (2023). Digital accounting systems and information technology in the public sector: mutual interaction. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 25(1), pp. 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-09-2021-0190
4. Antonini, C. (2024). Accounting digitalization in the quest for environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 66, A. 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101399
5. Ayabei, W., Makokha, A. N. and Malenya, A. (2023). Effect of quickbooks systems on financial performance among the small and medium enterprises in bungoma county, Kenya. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science, 11(6), pp. 467-482.
6. Behling, G., Lenzi, F. C. and Rossetto, C. R. (2022). Upcoming issues, new methods: using interactive qualitative analysis (IQA) in management research. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(04), A. e200417.
   https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022200417.en
7. Berger, A. N. and Boot, A. W. (2024). Financial intermediation services and competition analyses: Review and paths forward for improvement. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 57(2), A. 101072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2024.101072
8. Boluo, G. , Barzideh, F. and Alahyari Abhari, H. (2020). A model for assessment of the risk of fraud in an audit of financial statements. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 11(4), pp. 25-45. https://doi.org/10.22103/jak.2020.15880.3254
9. Breakey, H. (2020). Incorporating philosophical theory, ethical decision-making models, and multidimensional legitimacy into practical ethics education, Schwartz, M., Harris, H., Highfield, C. and Breakey, H. (Ed.) Educating for Ethical Survival (Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, Vol. 24), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-209620200000024007
10. Carè, R., Boitan, I. A., Stoian, A. M. and Fatima, R. (2025). Exploring the landscape of financial inclusion through the lens of financial technologies: A review. Finance Research Letters, 72, A. 106500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106500
11. Cochoy, F., Hagberg, J., McIntyre, M.P. and SöRum, N. (2017). Digitalizing consumption: introduction, in Cochoy, F., Hagberg, J., Sörum, N. and McIntyre, M.P. (Eds), Digitalizing Consumption: How Devices Shape Consumer Culture, Routledge, London, pp. 1-19.
12. Davis, J. S. (2019). IQA: qualitative research to discover how and why students learn from economic games. International Review of Economics Education, 31(2), A. 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2019.100160
13. Dethier, E., Kern, D. R., Stevens, G. and Boden, A. (2024). Making order in household accounting-digital invoices as domestic work artifacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 33(4), pp. 879-924.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-024-09495-w
14. Gao, X. (2024). Unlocking the path to digital financial accounting: a study on Chinese SMEs and startups. Global Finance Journal, 61(2), A. 100970.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100970
15. Ghashghaei, F. and Mashayekh, Sh. (2019). Developing process ability and information system maturity Model In accounting department. Journal of Accounting Knowledge and Management Auditing, 8(29), pp. 91-118 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2018.22058.2174
16. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Calif.: Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
17. Henwood, K. L. and Pidgeon, N. F. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83(1), pp. 97-111.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x
18. Huy, P. Q. and Phuc, V. K. (2024). Insight into the impact of digital accounting information system on sustainable innovation ecosystem. Sustainable Futures, 8(2), A. 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100377
19. Kalalian Moghadam, H., Maharti, Y., Ashrafi, M. and Khorakian, A. (2020). Identifying effective factors on the recognition of opportunities for creating social value in Iran: Glaserian Grounded Theory. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), pp. 141-87 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/social.2021.29569
20. Lacy, S., Gills, C., Walker, F., Reedy, C., Runnels, T., Mala, T., ... and Larson, T. (2019). Accounting system features: usage for different types of businesses. International Journal of Recent Research Aspects, 6(3), pp. 1-7.
21. Laili, N, H., Khairi, Kh, F. and Masruki, R. (2023). An analysis of the use of accounting system on cloud: A case study in Malaysia, In: Hamdan, A., Harraf, A., Buallay, A., Arora, P., Alsabatin, H. (eds) From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 470. Springer, Cham. pp. 999-1010.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28314-7_84
22. Li, X., Chen, X., Ou, L. and Wang, W. (2024). Design method of microcontroller-based intelligent accounting device assisted power supply study, Proc. SPIE 12979, Ninth International Conference on Energy Materials and Electrical Engineering (ICEMEE 2023), A. 1297948 (6 February 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3015219
23. Liu, X., Tian, H., Leng, Z. and Ma, Y. (2025). Financial technology, financing constraints, and future industrial development. Finance Research Letters, 73, A. 106671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106671
24. Lock, I. and Schulz-Knappe, C. (2019). Credible corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication predicts legitimacy: Evidence from an experimental study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(1), pp. 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0071
25. Lombardi, R. and Secundo, G. (2021). The digital transformation of corporate reporting–a systematic literature review and avenues for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(5), pp. 1179-1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2020-0870
26. Loo, I. D. and Bots, J. (2018). The life of an accounting information systems research course. Accounting Education, 27(4), pp. 358-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1471726
27. Napisah, L. S., Taufikurochman, C. and Harto, B. (2024). The effect of digitalization on the sustainability of accounting practices in the financial industry. Journal of Social Science and Business Studies, 2(4), pp. 268-276. https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v2i4.100
28. Naser, K. (1993). Creative financial accounting: its nature and use, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.
29. Northcutt, N., McCoy, D. (2004). Interactive qualitative analysis: a systems method for qualitative research, US: Sage, US.
30. Nwoke, J. (2024). Digital transformation in financial services and FinTech: Trends, innovations and emerging technologies. International Journal of Finance, 9(6), pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijf.2224
31. Offiong, U. P., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Cheba, K. and Ioppolo, G. (2024). FinTech as a digital innovation in microfinance companies–systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(9), pp. 562-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0462
32. Osuma, G. (2025). The impact of financial inclusion on poverty reduction and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study of digital financial services. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11(2), A. 101263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101263
33. Pham, Q. H. and Vu, K. P. (2022). Digitalization in small and medium enterprise: a parsimonious model of digitalization of accounting information for sustainable innovation ecosystem value generation. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(1), pp. 2-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-02-2022-0013
34. Prasetianingrum, S. and Sonjaya, Y. (2024). The evolution of digital accounting and accounting information systems in the modern business landscape. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 2(1), pp. 39-53. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i1.165
35. Qatawneh, A. M. and Makhlouf, M. H. (2025). Influence of smart mobile banking services on senior banks’ clients intention to use: moderating role of digital accounting. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 74(3/4), pp. 1028-1044.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2023-0018
36. Rakhshani, M. , Zeratgari, R. , Pifeh, A. and Payan, A. (2024). Analyzing consequences of accounting information systems on the performance efficiency managers with a mixed approach. Public Management Researches, 16(62), pp. 289-316. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2024.43322.5835
37. Reinecke, J., Van Bommel, K. and Spicer, A. (2017). When orders of worth clash: negotiating legitimacy in situations of moral multiplexity, justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 52), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 33-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052002
38. Sadri, N., Ranjbar, M.H. and Rostamijaz, H. (2023). Effective evaluation system based on management accounting information for strategy control using an exploratory approach, Journal of Management Accounting, 15(55), pp. 41-61 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30495/jma.2023.21908
39. Said, Y. and Aliu, A. (2022). The influece of accounting softwear in achieving the international accounting standard boards qualitative characteristics of financial information. International Journal of Advanced Research, 10(2), pp. 26-38.
40. Santos, M. (2024). ‘If you believe in a platform world…’–corporate banking and digital transformation in investor relations discourse. Geoforum, 151(1), A. 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103695
41. Sheikhi, M., Hejazi, R. and Zajindar, M. (2023). Presenting the model of the role of emerging technologies in the accounting information system and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Social Interests, 13(2), pp. 1-30 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22051/JAASCI.2023.43186.1764
42. Soleimani, Sh., Moradi, Z. and Moghadam, A. (2024). Proposing the accounting model of strategic management based on the development of accounting databases in crisis conditions, Management Accounting Journal, 16(57), pp. 127-148 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30495/jma.2023.22627
43. Thottoli, M. M. (2021). Knowledge and use of accounting software: evidence from Oman. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 3(1), pp. 2-14.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JIUC-04-2020-0005
44. Valentinetti, D. and Rea, M. A. (2025). Factors influencing the digitalization of sustainability accounting, reporting and disclosure: a systematic literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 33(2), pp. 633-680. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2024-2385
45. Wu, C. H. and Pambudi, P. D. L. (2025). Digital transformation in fintech: choosing between application and Software as a Service (SaaS). Asia Pacific Management Review, 30(2), A. 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.12.006
46. Xiu, L., Lu, F. and Liang, X. (2020). Legitimized identity vs identifiable legitimacy: toward a theoretical framework of the relationship between organizational identity and organizational legitimacy. Nankai Business Review International, 11(1), pp. 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-03-2019-0009
47. Yaftian, A., Mirshekary, S. and Mihret, D. G. (2017). Learning commercial computerised accounting programmes: perceptions and motivations. Accounting Research Journal, 30(3), pp. 312-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-08-2015-0107