ارزیابی خدمت اکوسیستمی کاهش خطر سیلاب شهری (UFRM) با رویکرد دوره کوتاه مدت (2 ساله)، مطالعه موردی: کلان شهر تبریز

جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 29 شهریور 1404   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/geoeh.2025.94245.1589

نویسندگان

مهدی هریسچیان¹؛ حسن محمودزاده^{* 2}

¹دانشجوی دکترای جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، گروه برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای، دانشکده برنامه ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز،

²استاد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، گروه برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ای، دانشکده برنامه ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش با استفاده از داده های تصاویر ماهواره ای لندست، کاربری اراضی/پوشش اراضی، هواشناسی، جدول بیوفیزیکی، GIS و نرم افزار InVEST به ارزیابی خدمت اکوسیستمی کاهش ریسک سیلاب شهری تبریز پرداخته شده است. یافته ها نشان داد که در سال 1363 با دروه بازگشت 2 ساله و در طی بارندگی 15 دقیقه ای، حجم آب جذب و نگهداشته شده و میزان منفعت خدمت اکوسیستمی کاهش ریسک سیلاب شهری به ترتیب 28/4 میلیون متر مکعب، 87/10 میلیون دلار، با بارندگی 30 دقیقه ای 17/3 میلیون متر مکعب و 04/8 میلیون دلار و با بارندگی 45 دقیقه ای 58/2 میلیون متر مکعب و 56/6 میلیون دلار، در سال 1381 با بارندگی 15 دقیقه ای 37/4 میلیون متر مکعب و 01/2 میلیون دلار، با بارندگی 30 دقیقه ای 21/3 میلیون متر مکعب 71/14 میلیون دلار و با بارندگی 45 دقیقه ای 60/2 میلیون متر مکعب و 94/11 میلیون دلار و در سال 1401 با بارندگی 15 دقیقه ای 65/4 میلیون متر مکعب و 25/33 میلیون دلار، با بارندگی 30 دقیقه ای 15/6 میلیون متر مکعب و 96/43 میلیون دلار و با بارندگی 45 دقیقه ای، 20/5 میلیون متر مکعب و 14/37 میلیون دلار برای تبریز بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

خدمت اکوسیستمی؛ کاهش ریسک سیلاب شهری؛ زیرساخت های آبی و سبز شهری؛ نرم افزار InVEST؛ کلان شهر تبریز

مراجع

Ahiablame, L., & Shakya, R. (2016). Modeling flood reduction effects of low impact development at a watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 171, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.036

Ahmadi, Y., Bazrafshan, O. B., Salajeghe, A., Holisaz, A., & Azare, A. (2021). Risk analysis of urban flood in Bandar Abbas using Machine Learning model and Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Environmental Erosion Research, 11(1), 36-57. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.52547/jeer.11.1.36

Alderman, K., Turner, L. R., & Tong, S. (2012). Floods and human health: a systematic review. Environment International, 47, 37-47 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003

Bose, S., & Mazumdar, A. (2023). Urban flood risk assessment and mitigation with InVEST-UFRM model: a case study on Kolkata city, West Bengal state (India). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 16(5), 320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11486-y

Dai, K., Cheng, C., Shen, S., Geng, J., & Zhang, T. (2024). Evaluating future flood risk mitigation capacities in major cities across China. Urban Climate, 55, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101890

Ekmekcioğlu, Ö., Koc, K., & Özger, M. (2021). District based flood risk assessment in Istanbul using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35, 617-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01924-8

Farahnakian, Z., Ghazavi, R., Dokhan, S., & Omidvar, E. (2024). Investigating the effect of climate change on temperature, rainfall, and intensity-duration-frequency curves in dry areas (case study: Kashan Watershed). Journal of Water and Soil Management and Modelling, 4(2), 211-226. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2023.12570.1254

Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., ... & Viklander, M. (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban water journal, 12(7), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314

Fotouhi, S., & Kiani, S. (2015). Micro-zonation of the Urban Flood Risk Model Using AHP (Case Study: Nahavand city). Quarterly Journal of Environmental-based Territorial Planning, 8(29), 133-152. [In Persian] https://journals.iau.ir/article_515572.html

Ghadbeygi, M., Mazaheri, H., Shafiei, H., & Mardian, M. (2024). Urban flood risk management, a solution for the protection of ecosystems (Case study: Arak City). Journal of Research in Ethnobiology and Conservation, 1(2), 38-50. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22091/ETHC.2024.10558.1018

Ghahraman, B., & Abkhezr, H. (2004). Improvement in Intensity-Duration-Frequency Relationships of Rainfall in Iran. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 8(2), 1-14. [In Persian] https://doi.org/20.1001.1.24763594.1383.8.2.1.4

Gitika, T., & Ranjan, S. (2014). Estimation of surface runoff using NRCS curve number procedure in Buriganga Watershed, Assam, India-a geospatial approach. International Research Journal of Earth Sciences, 2(5), 1-7.‏ https://www.isca.in/EARTH_SCI/Archive/v2/i5/1.ISCA-IRJES-2014-011.php

Gu, X., & Liu, X. (2024). Planning scale flood risk assessment and prediction in ultra-high density urban environments: The case of Hong Kong. Ecological Indicators, 162, 112000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112000

Hou, J., Liu, F., Tong, Y., Guo, K., Ma, L., & Li, D. (2020). Numerical simulation for runoff regulation in rain garden using 2D hydrodynamic model. Ecological Engineering, 153, 105794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105794

Kuller, M., Farrelly, M., Deletic, A., & Bach, P. M. (2018). Building effective Planning Support Systems for green urban water infrastructure—Practitioners’ perceptions. Environmental Science & Policy, 89, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.011

Liang, C. Y., You, G. J. Y., & Lee, H. Y. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness and optimal spatial arrangement of low-impact development facilities. Journal of Hydrology, 577, 124008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124008

Ma, Y., Deilami, K., Egodawatta, P., Liu, A., McGree, J., & Goonetilleke, A. (2019). Creating a hierarchy of hazard control for urban stormwater management. Environmental Pollution, 255, 113217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113217

MahmoodZadeh, H., Emami Kia, V., & Rasooli, A. A. (2015). Micro Zonation of Flood Risk in Tabriz Suburb with using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Geographical Research, 30(1), 167-180. [In Persian] https://jgr.ui.ac.ir/article_18098.html?

Peng, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). Urban flooding risk assessment based on GIS-game theory combination weight: A case study of Zhengzhou City. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77, 103080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103080

Pham, B. T., Luu, C., Van Phong, T., Nguyen, H. D., Van Le, H., Tran, T. Q., ... & Prakash, I. (2021). Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology, 592, 125815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815

Prudencio, L., & Null, S. E. (2018). Stormwater management and ecosystem services: A review. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3), 033002.‏ https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a

Pyke, C., Warren, M. P., Johnson, T., LaGro Jr, J., Scharfenberg, J., Groth, P., ... & Main, E. (2011). Assessment of low impact development for managing stormwater with changing precipitation due to climate change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103(2), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.006

Qi, W., Ma, C., Xu, H., Chen, Z., Zhao, K., & Han, H. (2021). A review on applications of urban flood models in flood mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards, 108, 31-62.‏  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04715-8

Qin, H. P., Li, Z. X., & Fu, G. (2013). The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 577-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026

Rentschler, J., Avner, P., Marconcini, M., Su, R., Strano, E., Vousdoukas, M., & Hallegatte, S. (2023). Global evidence of rapid urban growth in flood zones since 1985. Nature, 622(7981), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06468-9

Row, S. (1976). Appendix I : USDA / SCS curve number method for estimating daily runoff, 88–90.

Rözer, V., Mehryar, S., & Surminski, S. (2022). From managing risk to increasing resilience: a review on the development of urban flood resilience, its assessment and the implications for decision making. Environmental Research Letters, 17(12), 123006.‏  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bc

Rufat, S., & Botzen, W. W. (2022). Drivers and dimensions of flood risk perceptions: Revealing an implicit selection bias and lessons for communication policies. Global Environmental Change, 73, 102465.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102465

Sharp, R., Douglass, J., Wolny, S., Arkema, K., Bernhardt, J., Bierbower, W., ... & Wyatt, K. (2020). SDR: Sediment Delivery Ratio—InVEST documentation. InVEST, 3(2). https://storage.googleapis.com/releases.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest/3.9.0/userguide/index.html

Sohn, W., Kim, J. H., Li, M. H., & Brown, R. (2019). The influence of climate on the effectiveness of low impact development: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.041

Soomro, A. G., Babar, M. M., Memon, A. H., Zaidi, A. Z., Ashraf, A., & Lund, J. (2019). Sensitivity of direct runoff to curve number using the SCS-CN method. Civil Engineering Journal, 5(12), 2738-2746. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091445

Tabeyi, N., Babaee Aghdam, F., & Hakimi, H. (2022). Inclusive city; A new approach in urban planning A case study the Tabriz city. Journal of Geographical Urban Planning Research, 10(2), 115-132. [In Persian] https://doi.org/ 10.22059/JURBANGEO.2022.335543.1627

Tellman, B., Sullivan, J. A., Kuhn, C., Kettner, A. J., Doyle, C. S., Brakenridge, G. R., ... & Slayback, D. A. (2021). Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods. Nature, 596(7870), 80-86.‏ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03695-w

Tessema, S. M., Lyon, S. W., Setegn, S. G., & Mörtberg, U. (2014). Effects of different retention parameter estimation methods on the prediction of surface runoff using the SCS curve number method. Water Resources Management, 28, 3241-3254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0674-3

UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2020). Human cost of disasters. An overview of the last 20 years 2000-2019. UN.

Vilca-Campana, K., Carrasco-Valencia, L., Iruri-Ramos, C., Cárdenas-Pillco, B., Escudero, A., & Chanove-Manrique, A. (2024). An Ecosystem Service Evaluation for Urban Flood Mitigation in a Desert Region Using the Invest Model. Available at SSRN 4885367. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4885367

Wang, Y., Peng, L., Yang, L. E., Wang, Z., & Deng, X. (2024). Attributing effects of classified infrastructure management on mitigating urban flood risks: A case study in Beijing, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105141.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105141

Wu, M., Wei, X., Ge, W., Chen, G., Zheng, D., Zhao, Y., ... & Xin, Y. (2024). Analyzing the spatial scale effects of urban elements on urban flooding based on multiscale geographically weighted regression. Journal of Hydrology, 132178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132178

Yazdani, M. H., Ghasemi, M., & Saleki Maleki, M. A. (2018). Micro-zoning vulnerability of cities against flood risk (case study: Tabriz city). Journal of Rescue and Relief, 10(4), 33-44. [In Persian] http://jorar.ir/article-1-355-en.html

Zeng, S., Guo, H., & Dong, X. (2019). Understanding the synergistic effect between LID facility and drainage network: With a comprehensive perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 849-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.028

Zeynali Azim, A., Hatami Golzari, E., Karami, I., & Babazadeh Oskoui, S. (2021). Measuring the Environmental Sustainability of Tabriz City Based on Environmental Indicators of Smart Urban Growth. Journal of Sustainability, Development & Environment, 2(3), 41-59. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jsde/Article/846581/FullText

Zischg, J., Goncalves, M. L., Bacchin, T. K., Leonhardt, G., Viklander, M., Van Timmeren, A., ... & Sitzenfrei, R. (2017). Info-Gap robustness pathway method for transitioning of urban drainage systems under deep uncertainties. Water Science and Technology, 76(5), 1272-1281. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.320