Geostrategic analysis of global powers on the Islamic world with emphasis on the opposing theories of Alexander Dugin and Samuel Huntington

پژوهش ‎های جغرافیای سیاسی

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 25 October 2025

Document Type: مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/pg.2025.95921.1406

Authors

Aye Shabani^{* 1}; alireza mehrabi¹; s yahya safavi²

¹shahid beheshti university

²emam hoseyn university

Abstract

After the Cold War in the international system, the occurrence of remarkable changes, especially the shift in the centers of power, led the main claimants and founders of this transformation in the West and the East to dream of the end of history or the clash of civilizations, and in the East, to think that the world has gradually faced the beginning of history.
Therefore, at this level of competition in the field of geostrategy in the international system, between the philosophical currents of the West and the East, the theoretical of the North and the South, and the functional of the First and Third Worlds, it is a matter of debt and controversy.
As Alexander Dugin, as a prominent theorist and founder of the Neo-Eurasia theory and a serious critic of liberalism, criticizes modernity and his mental drawing of the new future of power, and has given the Islamic world a special place in this confrontation with the Atlanticist sphere. On the other hand, Samuel Huntington, who is undoubtedly one of the most famous and controversial political scientists, raises the conflict between the Western world and other civilizations, especially the Islamic world.

Keywords

Geostrategy; Islamic World; Neo-Eurasia; Atlantis; Iran

References