ویژگی های روانسنجی نسخه ایرانی پرسشنامه ماشدگی زناشویی

پژوهش های روان شناسی بالینی و مشاوره

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 14 آبان 1404

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/tpccp.2025.85490.1595

نویسندگان

سجاد نقیبی فر¹؛ سید علی کیمیایی^{* 2}؛ بتول شکوهی نیک¹

¹دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مشاورة خانواده، گروه روان‌شناسی مشاوره و تربیتی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

²دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی مشاوره و تربیتی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: درک وابستگی متقابل زوج‌ها و هویت متقابل همسر سازه‌ای کلیدی در تحقیق پیرامون خانواده و زوج‌درمانی می‌باشد. در همین راستا، نیاز به ابزاری خود - سنجی که ابعاد شناختی، عاطفی و رفتاری درک زوج‌ها از وابستگی متقابل ایشان که ماشدگی نامیده می‌شود را بسنجد کاربردی به نظر می‌رسد.هدف پژوهش حاضرارزیابی پایایی و روایی پرسشنامه ماشدگی در جامعه ایران می باشد.
 روش: در پژوهشی توصیفی - همبستگی از نوع انطباق یابی، تعداد نمونه در دسترس 623 نفر انتخاب شده و پرسشنامه‌های ماشدگی، راهبردهای مقابله‌ای زوج‌ها، آزار عاطفی، سازگاری زناشویی و طرح‌واره در اختیار ایشان قرار گرفت.
 یافته­‌ها: میزان همسانی درونی در نمونه نهایی 0/95 و میزان نسبت روایی محتوایی و شاخص روایی محتوایی به ترتیب 0/87و 0/85  به دست آمد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، وجود یک عامل که تبیین کننده 58/06 واریانس بود را نشان داده و 17 گویه پرسشنامه ماشدگی، بار عاملی در بازه 0/63 تا 0/83 داشته‌اند. همچنین بین پرسشنامه ماشدگی با مقیاس سبک­های مقابله با استرس مشترک از پرسشنامه راهبردهای مقابله‌ای زوج­ها و مقیاس توافق دونفره پرسشنامه سازگاری زناشویی همبستگی مثبت و معنادار به میزان 0/68 و 0/71 و بین پرسشنامه ماشدگی با پرسش‌نامه‌های آزار عاطفی و طرح‌واره بی اعتمادی، همبستگی منفی و معنادار به میزان 0/63- و 0/20- به دست آمد که تأیید کننده روایی همگرا و واگرای این پرسشنامه می­باشد.
 نتیجه: با توجه به نتایج به دست آمده پرسشنامه ماشدگی در جامعه ایرانی، انطباق یابی شده و قابلیت استفاده پژوهشی و بالینی را دارد.      

کلیدواژه‌ها

ماشدگی؛ روایی؛ پایایی

مراجع

Abedini Chamgordani, S., & Niknejadi, F. (2022). Investigating the mediating role of Dyadic Coping and Understanding and Intellectual Coordination in the relationship between Marital Attractions and Marital Quality. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 10(12), 73-84. http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-3149-en.html

Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender Differences in Relationship Awareness and Marital Satisfaction among Young Married Couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181015

Acitelli, L. K., Rogers, S., & Knee, C. R. (1999). The Role of Identity in the Link between Relationship Thinking and Relationship Satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(5), 591-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599165003

Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 939-954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939

Ahi, g., Mohhamadi far, M. a., & Besharati, m. a. (2008). Reliability and validity of the short form of Young's Schemas Questionnaire. Psychology and Educational Sciences, 3(37), 5-20. https://sid.ir/paper/55767/fa

Ahmad, S., & Reid, D. W. (2016). Enhancing the relationship adjustment of South Asian Canadian couples using a systemic‐constructivist approach to couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(4), 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12161

Alea, N., Singer, J. A., & Labunko, B. (2015). “We-ness” in Relationship-Defining Memories and Marital Satisfaction. In K. Skerrett & K. Fergus (Eds.), Couple Resilience: Emerging Perspectives (pp. 163-177). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_9

Aydogan, D., Özgülük Üçok, S. B., & Randall, A. K. (2024). Being One and Staying Two as a Couple: Turkish Married Couples’ Sense of We-Ness, Psychological Distress, and Common Dyadic Coping. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 23(4), 282-304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2406812

Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2013). Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808

Barahimi, N. (2008). The Effect of Choice/Control Training on Emotional Abuse of Couple in Isfahan Isfahan University].

Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches coping inventar (DCI). http://www.verlag-hanshuber.com/testverlag/spezial/DCI/edit_index.html

Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3-4), 295-318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295

Carrère, S., Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J. A., & Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.42

Chircop, Y. R. (2017). From “Me” to “We”: The journey of young married couples’ experience towards the co-construction of couplehood. Institute of Family Therapy Malta.

Fatty, l., Motabi, f., Molodi, r., & Zia'i, k. (2010). The factor structure of the Iranian version of the Yang Schema Questionnaire - 232-question form in a non-clinical sample. New psychological researches (Psychology of Tabriz University), 4(16), 227-246. https://sid.ir/paper/448976/fa

Fergus, K., & Skerrett, K. (2015). Resilient Couple Coping Revisited: Building Relationship Muscle. In K. Skerrett & K. Fergus (Eds.), Couple Resilience: Emerging Perspectives (pp. 199-210). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_11

Fergus, K. D., & Reid, D. W. (2001). The Couple's Mutual Identity and Reflexivity: A Systemic-Constructivist Approach to the Integration of Persons and Systems. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 11(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016658301629

Gildersleeve, S., Singer, J. A., Skerrett, K., & Wein, S. (2017). Coding “We-ness” in couple’s relationship stories: A method for assessing mutuality in couple therapy†. Psychotherapy Research, 27(3), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1262566

Godwin, K. M., Swank, P. R., Vaeth, P., & Ostwald, S. K. (2013). The longitudinal and dyadic effects of mutuality on perceived stress for stroke survivors and their spousal caregivers. Aging & Mental Health, 17(4), 423-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.756457

Gottman, J. M. (2011). The science of trust: Emotional attunement for couples. W W Norton & Co.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1999). Dysfunctional Marital Conflict. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 31(3-4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v31n03_01

Halford, W. K., Rhoades, G., & Morris, M. (2018). Effects of the parents’ relationship on children. Handbook of parenting and child development across the lifespan, 97-120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94598-9_5

Jazayeri, R. S., & Sharifi, M. (2012). Comparing the level of spouse emotional abuse and the perception of social support in patients with chronic tension headaches and migraines with healthy people. Scientific Journal of Legal Medicine, 17, 87-94, Article 2. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/922737

Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice: Principles, Advances, and Applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347

Kareshki, H. (2019). Testing and testing in educational and psychological research. Respected publications.

KHojaste mehr, R., Naderi, F., & Sudani, M. (2013). The Mediating Role of Dyadic Coping on the Relationship Between Marital Standards and Marital Satisfaction. Psychological Models and Methods, 3(vol 3/ no 12), 47-67. https://jpmm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_291_6ad58d855d89cf3f53045d5989f35496.pdf

Konstam, V. (2019). The Romantic Lives of Emerging Adults: Getting from I to We. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190639778.001.0001

Long, L., & Young, M. (2006). Counseling and treatment of husband and wife problems book "Counseling and psychotherapy for problems of couples" (A. M. Nazari, Trans.). Avai Noor Publications.

Peirouvi, M., & Bahrami, H. (2017). INVESTIGATE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS COUPLES AND MARITAL ADJUSTMENT IN MARRIED STUDENTS OF TEHRAN SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BRANCH. ROOYESH E RAVANSHENASI JOURNAL, 6(18), 158-131. https://doi.org/https://sid.ir/paper/224201/en.

Reid, D. W., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Identification with the Relationship as Essential to Marital Resilience: Theory, Application, and Evidence. In K. Skerrett & K. Fergus (Eds.), Couple Resilience: Emerging Perspectives (pp. 139-161). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_8 .

Randall A, Bodenmann G. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology. 13, 96-106.

Reid, D. W., Dalton, E. J., Laderoute, K., Doell, F. K., & Nguyen, T. (2006). Therapeutically Induced Changes in Couple Identity: The Role of We-ness and Interpersonal Processing in Relationship Satisfaction. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(3), 241-284. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.3.241-288

Reid, D. W., Doell, F. K., Dalton, E. J., & Ahmad, S. (2008). Systemic-constructivist couple therapy (SCCT): Description of approach, theoretical advances, and published longitudinal evidence. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45(4), 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014334

Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 140(1), 187-140. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/a0031859

Rohrbaugh, M. J., Shoham, V., Skoyen, J. A., Jensen, M., & Mehl, M. R. (2012). We‐talk, communal coping, and cessation success in a couple‐focused intervention for health‐compromised smokers. Family Process, 51(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01388.x

Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367

sanayi, b., alaghemand, s., homan, a., & falahati, s. (2018). Haas family and marriage scale. mission.

Shahabi, S., & Sanagouye-Moharer, G. (2019). The effect of group schema therapy on marital adjustment and marital intimacy in couples in Kerman. Salamat Ijtimai (Community Health), 6(2), 236-243. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22037/ch.v6i3.22565.

Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What Makes for a Good Day? Competence and Autonomy in the Day and in the Person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1270-1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212007

Singer, J. A., Labunko, B., Alea, N., & Baddeley, J. L. (2015). Mutuality and the Marital Engagement – Type of Union Scale [ME (To US)]: Empirical Support for a Clinical Instrument in Couples Therapy. In K. Skerrett & K. Fergus (Eds.), Couple Resilience: Emerging Perspectives (pp. 123-137). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_7

Singer, J. A., & Skerrett, K. (2014). Positive couple therapy: Using We-Stories to enhance resilience  [doi:10.4324/9780203383995]. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383995

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547

Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Whitton, S. W. (2010). Commitment: Functions, Formation, and the Securing of Romantic Attachment. Journal of family theory & review, 2(4), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x

Topcu-Uzer, C., Randall, A. K., Vedes, A. M., Reid, D., & Bodenmann, G. (2021). We-ness Questionnaire: Development and Validation. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 20(3), 256-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2020.1805082

Üçok, S. B. Ö., Aydoğan, D., Topcu, Ç., & Randall, A. K. (2024). Adaptation and Validation of the We-ness Questionnaire in a Turkish Sample. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(1), 222-231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1247631

Young, E. J., & Brown, G. (1990). Young schema questionnaire, short form (YSQ-SF).

Young, J. E., Schmidt, N. B., Joiner, T. E., & Telch, M. J. (1995). The schema questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(3), 295-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230402