Dominant Discourse to Globalization and City Development Policies, A Critic of Urban Investment Projects In Mashhad

پژوهش ‎های جغرافیای سیاسی

Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 4, January 2017, Pages 1-20   

Document Type: مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/pg.v1i4.61210

Authors

Mohammad Hassan Razavi^{* 1}; Mozaffar Sarrafi¹; Jamile Tavakoli-nia¹; Mohammad Taghi Razavian²

¹Shahid Beheshti University

²Human Geography Dept

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1- INTRODUCTION
Globalization as a meta-process or a set of processes is largely accepted as free movement of capitals, goods, people, technologies, ideas, etc., all over the world. This “time-space compression” and formation of “space of flow” is changing our understanding of contemporary world, or in a better word, it compels us to think seriously about new ontology of space. At the same time, it is a fact that we are living in an urban era. Nowadays we can speak about “planetary urbanization”, and we can ask if there is any space which is not urban. No matter what we name them; concept, phenomenon, historical event or [meta]process, cities become the place of globaliztion. This leads to creat a body of studies in the urban domain. It is proclaimed that Iran, as a so-called developing oil-exporting country, with adherence to ideological government, is not part of this global space of flows or “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. But it is possible to say that a process which compels us with a new ontology to space does not affect Iranian cities. We say NO. Hence, in this paper, the relationship between the globalization and Iranian cities raises a question. Then, the main question of this paper is as follows:
Q: How does globalization affect Iranian cities?
2-METHODOLOGY
This paper is a theoretical one. We used discourse analysis in order to answer the research question. On the other hand, we used the spatial distribution of urban mega-project in Mashhad as the second most populated city of Iran to show the theoretical framework in an actual existing policy in an Iranian city. For the spatial analysis, we used Spatial Autocorrelation in software such as ArcGIS and GeoDa.
3- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
It’s a belief that Iran is not part of the global space of flows. The minimum share of global capital circulation (Foreign Direct Investment is only 2 percent of Gross Fixed Capital formation in Iran) and the fact that Iran was ranked among the lowest countries in globalization indexes indicates its present position. Hence, Iranian cities are not considered as an actor in the global scale; none of the Iranian cities are in the world city network. Rennie Short named Tehran as a ‘Black Hole’; it is among eleven cities which met three criteria: they had a population of over 3 million, were not identified by GAWC as a world city and did not share their national territory with a world city.
There is a body of studies related to the globalization and cities in Iran. Most of them are dedicated to the dominant literature. They study the position of the Iranian cities in different rankings. They, generally, persist in the necessity of improving the position of Iranian cities in the global ladder of global cities. As a result, we can see ‘urban reconstruction for globalization’ as the key agenda for urban planners and city authorities in Iran. Some others conclude the fact that Iranian cities are not part of space of flows is rooted in the Constitution, because it represents specific geo-political code which limits the capacity of cities to play an active role in space of flow and it is why Short put Tehran amongst “Resisting Cities”.
This conception of globalization, which itself is discursive, based on some statements. It is necessary to reconstruct the city for globalization and it is one of the most important statements in today’s urban planning in Iran. We can claim that this statement is the “planning habitus” amongst Iranian planners and city authorities in Iran.
4- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The dominant discourse of globalization, which is called as globalization of neoliberalism discourse, presents a linear-scalar interpretation. This discourse of globalization is shaping planning habitus amongst Iranian city authorities and planners. Iranian cities reconstructing based on globalization flow is a key statement for this discourse. Based on this common sense or habitus, cities compete to attract different form of capitals. On the mentioned statement, it is reasonable to accept that building “high-tech global trade zones” and “investing urban mega-projects” could help the process. This process will result in raising the position of Iranian cities among global cities. In this atmosphere, Islamic ideology and oil revenue are important issues in urban network of Iranian cities, for instance latter one play a major role in financing urban mega-projects.
All we have discussed here was about globalization and global scale. But local scale is also important. It is clearl that local communities continue to obtain political potential in the age of globalized power. Hence, the distinction between the “local” and the “global” as separate scalar fields remains problematic, as matters of the shifting boundary between a territorial inside and a territorial outside or as “in here” and “out there”.
Globalization and new communicational networks offer the potential of “action at a distance” and therefore we can suggest new type of community titled “distanciated community” in the “open source neighborhoods”. We could, thus, see localities as the sites of intersection and juxtaposition of new spatio-temporalities with older ones. Then we can speak about globalization in Iran Cities in different way (beyond studying Iranian cities in hierarchy of globalized city or studying APS spatial distribution).

Keywords

discourse; Globalization; Iranian cities; Neoliberalism

References

1. Abdolahi, A. (2008). Globalization, Metropolises and transforming patterns of urban-rural development (the case of poverty and inequality in Mashhad Metropolis, Mashhad: PhD. Thesis in the Geography and Rural Planning in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [in Persian].

2. Amin, A & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities; Re-imagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity.

3. Biau, D. (2012). Are Asian Cities Shaped by Global Forces? Economic & Political Weekly, vol xlvii(29): 31-33

4. Brenner, N. (2014). Implosions/Explosions, Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, Urban Geography,Pp.1-3.

5. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode, 34, 349–379.

6. Castells, M. (2001). Information Age; economy, society and culture. 2nd volume,Translated by Chavoshian, H. Tehran Tarhe Now publication. [in Persian].

7. Clark, w.a.v and Hosking, p.l. (1986). Statistical Methods for geographers, New York: John Wiley and sons.

8. Cliff, A.D. and Ord, J.K. (1973). Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion.

9. Cox, R.W. (2002). Political economy of a plural world: Critical reflections on power, morals and civilization. New York, NY: Routledge.

10. Deleuze, G. (2013). Foucault, Translated by Sarkhosh, N. & Jahandideh, A. Tehran: Nashre Ney, [in Persian].

11. DeSousa, C. A. (2002) : Brownfield Redevelopment in Toronto:an examination of past trends and future prospects. Land Use Policy 19. PP: 297-309.

12. Dreyfus, H. L. & Rabinow, P. (2003). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Translated by Bashiriyeh, H. Tehran: Nashre Ney. [in Persian]

13. Fakuhi, N. (2004). Urban anthropology,Tehran: Nashre Ney,[in Persian].

14. Faocoualt, M. (2010). Teather of philosophy,translated by Jahandide A & Sarkhosh, N. Tehran: Nashre Ney, [in Persian].

15. Farnahad Consulting (2009). Mashhad Master Plan, Land and space report, Mahhad, [in Persian].

16. Friedmann, J. & Wolff, G. (1982). World cityformation: an agenda for research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6(3); 309-344

17. Friedmann, J. (1995). Where we stand: a decade of world city research. in P. Knox and P. Taylor (eds.), World cities in a world-system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Friedmann, J. (2005). Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning 64: 183-234.

19. Ghurchi, M. (2012). Explaining formation of global cities with implication for Tehran to be a global city, Tehran: PhD. Thesis in the Geography and Urban Planning in Tarbiat Modares University. [in Persian].

20. Hall, P. (1966). The world cities. London: Weidenfeldand Nicolson.

21. Hall, P. (1998). Information technology, globalization and regional development. In Gravesteijn,S.G.E., Griensven, S. and Smidt, M., editors, Timing global cities, Utrecht: Netherlands Geographical Studies, 101-115.

22. Harvey, D. (2012). A brief history of neoliberalism, translated by Abodlahzade, M. Tehran, [in Persian].

23. Hopkins, L. (1977). Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation. Journal for American Institute of Planners 34 (1), 19–29.

24. Iranzade, S. (2001). Globalization and strategic shifts in the management and organization, Tabriz: Center for Teaching Management. [in Persian].

25. Jafre, M. & Saffar, R. (2011). Methods of Foreign Direct Investment. Economic-Political Information. (283). Pp 160-172. [in Persian].

26. Karaman, O. (2010). Remaking Space for Globalization: Dispossession through Urban Renewal in Istanbul, A DISSERTATION. MINNESOTA: THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA.

27. Karaman, O.(2013). Urban neoliberalism with Islamic characteristics. Urban Studies, 50(16): 3412-3427

28. Komeyjani, A. & Ghavidel, S. (2006) the impact of the foreign direct investment in the employment in service sector in Iran, Economic Research Journal. (76). Pp 29-50, [in Persian].

29. Lee, Jay Wong and David.w.s. (2001). Statistical analysis with Arcview GIS. New York: John Wiley and sons, pp: 135-137

30. Lefebvre, H. (2003 (1970)). The Urban Revolution. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

31. Maljou, M. (2013a). Political economy of 11th government [in Persian]. downloaded at 03/04/2016 from https://pecritique.com

32. Maljou, M. (2013b). Economies of commodification labor power in 11th government [in Persian]. downloaded at 03/04/2016 from https://pecritique.com

33. Maljou, M. (2014a). Accumulation economy via disposition in 11th government [in Persian]. downloaded at 03/04/2016 from https://pecritique.com

34. Maljou, M. (2014c). Commodification of nature in the 11th government [in Persian]. downloaded at 03/04/2016 from https://pecritique.com

35. Maljou, M. (2015). Criticizing the political economy project of 11th government [in Persian]. downloaded at 03/04/2016 from https://pecritique.com

36. Maljou, M. (2016). Commodification of higher education in the 11th government [in Persian]. downloaded at 03/04/2016 from https://pecritique.com

37. Mashhad Municipality. (2009). Social GIS of Mashhad Municipality. Mashhad

38. McKinnon, M. (2011). Asian Cities: Globalisation, Urbanisation and Nation-Building . Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.

39. Myers, D& Wyatt, P. (2004). Rethinking urban capacity: identifying and appraising vacant buildings. Building Research & Information, 32 (4). Pp: 285-292.

40. Peck, J. (2001). Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 445–455.

41. Phillips, L. and Jørgensen, M. (2010). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method, translated by Jalili, H. Tehran: Nashre Ney, [in Persian].

42. Quinlan, M. C. (2005). An exploration of brownfield reclamation and housing redevelopment in southern Ontario. Guelph: In partial fiufillment of requirments for the degree of master of landscape architecture university of Guelph.

43. Rahnama, M. & Abaszade, G. (2008). Principles and models of urban physical form, Mashhad: ACRER publication,[in Persian].

44. Rahnama, M. & Tavangar, M. (2010). The role of border cities in the process of globalization and regional development, Geopolitic quarterly journal. 6 (3). Pp 152-185[in Persian].

45. Razavian, M. (2012). Class Paper on Development economy with emphasis on Iran. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University

46. Rennie Short, J. (2009). Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment, translated by Ziari, K. et al. Tehran: Tehran University Publication[in Persian].

47. Sarkhosh, N. (2013). Transforming from sovereignty to governmentality, Shargh Newspaper. Number 1922; p 7. [in Persian].

48. Sarvar, H. (2008). Economic globalization and sustainable development of metropolises the case of Tehran metropolis, Tehran: PhD. Thesis in the Geography and Urban Planning in Tarbiat Modares University. [in Persian].

49. Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Revised edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

50. Shahnoushi, N. (2007). Ranking development level of Mashhad sectors, Mashhad: Mashhad City Council, [in Persian].

51. Shaterian, M. & Ganjipoor, M. (2011). The impacts of investment in the enabling rural areas, Rural research journal, 1(3). Pp 131-152, [in Persian].

52. Shokouei, H. (2004). New approaches in urban geography, Tehran; Samt publication, [in Persian].

53. Smith, R. G. (2013). Beyond the Global City Concept and the Myth of ‘Command and Control’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,.38(1): 1-18

54. Springer, S. (2010). Neoliberal discursive formations: on the contours of subjectivation, good governance, and symbolic violence in posttransitional Cambodia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (5): 931-950.

55. Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies 9 (2): 133-147.

56. Taylor, P. (2004). World city network: a global urban analysis. London: Routledge.

57. Taylor, P. J. (2008). Is there a Europe of Cities? World Cities and limitation of Geographical Scale Analyses. in E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster, Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method. Pages 213-235. Wiley-Blackwell.

58. Taylor, P. J., & Derudde, B. (2016). World city network: a global urban analysis. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.

59. Thrift, N. (2010). Interview with Nigel Thrift, In Farias, I. & Bender, T. Urban Assemblages, how actor-network theory changes urban studies. pages 109-120. London and NewYork: Routledge.

60. UN-Habitat. (03/2016). The city we Need available at http:// mirror. unhabitat. org/ downloads/ docs/ The%20City%20We%20Need.pdf

61. Ward, K., & England, K. (2007). Introduction: Reading neoliberalization. In K. England & K. Ward (Eds.), Neoliberalization: States, networks, peoples (pp. 1–22). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

62. Ziari, K. et all. (2009). Principles and technics of urban planning , Chabahar: Chabahar University publication, [in Persian].