Comparison of Ca(OH)2 and NaOH on Hexavalent Chromium removal in drinking water treatment

فصلنامه آب و توسعه پایدار

Article 6, Volume 1, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages 35-42   

Document Type: review paper

DOI: 10.22067/jwsd.v1i3.37311

Authors

Reza Heydarzadeh^{* 1}; Mohsen Mohtasham²

¹Birjand University of Technology

²Southern khorasan water and wastewater company

Abstract

In parts of desert regions in our country, groundwater is the only source of fresh water and due to geological formation, the concentration of hexavalent chromium in groundwater will reach beyond the allowed limits. Furthermore, previous studies showed that hexavalent chromium is a cancerous substance for humans and toxic for other organisms. In this study the removal of hexavalent chromium from drinking water using reclamation method which turns hexavalent chromium into Cr(III) using Fe(II) as a function of pH and amount of Fe(II) injection were investigated. The removal of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) from drinking water using Fe(II) increased at pH 7.8-8.15, then any increase or decrease in pH leaded to decrease in the efficiency of hexavalent chromium removal. The pH adjustments were done by adding Ca(OH)2 Solution and o.lN NaOH. Results Showed that Cr(VI) reduction will be higher if we use Ca(OH)2 solution for pH adjustment instead of O.1N NaOH. Not only Ca(OH)2 solution improves the Cr(VI) removal efficiency but also it increases the final turbidity of water and it should be noticed in drinking purposes. On the other hand, Ca(OH)2 solution can be used because of its safety and lower cost.

Keywords

hexavalent Chromium removal; pH adjustment; reclamation; Ca(OH)2; FeSO4; Water treatment

References

مؤسسه استاندارد و تحقیقات صنعتی ایران. 1388. استاندارد 1053: آب آشامیدنی- ویژگی‏های فیزیکی و شیمیایی

Dossing L.N., Dideriksen K., Stipp S.L.S. and Frei R. 2011. Reduction of hexavalent chromium by ferrous iron: A process of chromium isotope fractionation and its relevance to natural environments. Chemical geology, 285: 157-166.

Eastmond D.A., MacGregor J.T. and Slesinski R.S. 2008. Trivalent Chromium: Assessing the Genotoxic Risk of an Essential Trace Element and Widely Used Human and Animal Nutritional Supplement. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 38(3): 173–190.

Fei L., Honghan c. and Yonggang L. 2003. Removal of Cr+6 from groundwater by using zero valence iron in the laboratory. Chemical speciation and Bioavailability, P.14.

Fendorf S.E. and Li G. 1996. Kinetics of Chromate Reduction by Ferrous Iron. Environ Sci Technol, 30: 1614-1617.

Franson M.H. (Ed). 1989. standard Methods for Examination of water and wastewater.17th Edition. American public Health Association. Washington, DC.

Gaughofer j., Bianchi i. and Merian. E. (Ed.), 1991. Chromium, vol 1, VHC, Weinheim, P.853.

Guan X., Dong H., Ma J. and Lo I.M. 2011. Simultaneous removal of chromium and arsenate from contaminated groundwater by ferrous sulfate: Batch uptake behavior. Journal of Environmental sciences, 23(3): 372-380.

Kim S.D., Park k.S. and Gu M.B. 2002. Toxicity of hexavalent chromium to Daphina magna: influence of reduction by ferrous iron. Journal of Hazardous material, 93(2): 155-164.

Sharma Y.C., Srivastava V., Singh V.K., Kaul S.N. and Weng C.H. 2009. Nano-adsorbents for the removal of metallic pollutants from water and wastewater, Environ technol. 30(6): 583-609.

Stumn W. and Morgan J.J. 1996. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural waters. 3rd Edition, Wiley, New york, P.683.

Su C. and Ludwig R.D. 2005. Treatment of hexavalent chromium in chromite ore processing solid waste using a mixed reductant solution of ferrous sulfate and sodium dithionite, Environ.Sci.Technol. 39: 6208-6216.

Wazne M., Moon D.H., jagupilla S.C., Christodulatos C., Dermants D. and Chrysochoou M. 2007. Remediation of chromite ore processing residue using ferrous sulfate and calcium polysulfide. Geoscince Journal. 11(2): 105-110.

WHO. 2011. 4th ed., Guidelines for drinking-water quality.