Strategic Analysis of the Urban Diplomacy of Mashhad Metropolitan Area

پژوهش ‎های جغرافیای سیاسی

Article 6, Volume 3, Issue 3 - Serial Number 9, January 2019, Pages 105-131

Document Type: مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/pg.v4i9.77501

Authors

Moharram Mashayekhi; Seyyed Hadi Zarghani^* ; Omid Ali Kharazmi

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

In a world of international communications and interactions, cities are studied as geographical regions within an atmosphere of streams built upon direct connections between cities (Najati Hosseini, 2011). In other words, cities play a significant role in the global politics, economy, and the restoration of global management. In the globalization age, cities can be introduced as key players within the frameworks of decentralization policies and interactive actions between cities and provide the means for increasing interactions in areas including information technology, economy, society, and culture (Acuto, 2012). Therefore, in today’s world, the development and progress of cities highly depend on communications and interactions between them at a transnational level. In fact, modern cities are regarded as spatial-geographical territories that enter transnational interactions and assume international roles. The subject of urban diplomacy is a tool used for studying the role of urban geographical regions in international interactions. Urban diplomacy can be defined as institutions and processes through which cities serve the purpose of demonstrating their capacities and interests in one another in relation with other actors as well as within international politics (Pluijm & Melissen, 2007). During the past few years, Mashhad metropolitan area has managed to take a bold step in the direction of growth and development at both national and international levels through progress in areas such as industry, science, tourism, etc. The backgrounds and requirements for Mashhad metropolitan area to play a role within the urban diplomacy framework is an important subject which is examined in the present study.
 

Method

The present inquiry is an applied study conducted using the descriptive-analytical method. This study seeks to provide answers to the following question: How is the position of urban diplomacy in Mashhad metropolitan area with focus on transnational actions of municipality and universities? Data were collected using library studies and by referring to valid sources, along with field observations and gathering the comments of experts through interviews and questionnaires. 

Results and Discussion

The analysis and examination of the findings show the active role of Mashhad municipality and universities in the context of urban diplomacy development. According to the results of SWOT model, the perceivable reality is that, given the high position of Mashhad metropolitan area in Iran and the Islamic world, the activities carried out under the present conditions with regards to urban diplomacy development of this city have not been acceptable and significant. There is a need for organized planning and more scientific actions, particularly in the municipality sector and universities. Based on the findings from the IE matrix (the internal-external factor assessment matrix) the urban diplomacy in Mashhad metropolitan area is currently at a conservative position (wo). The conservative position denotes that to develop the urban diplomacy in Mashhad metropolitan area, the internal weaknesses should be mitigated using external opportunities.

Conclusion

Considering its exceptional capacities in religious, historical, scientific, cultural, and geo-cultural areas, Mashhad metropolitan area can play an influential role in the context of urban diplomacy and particularly, religious and scientific diplomacies, both at regional and the Islamic world levels. However, the findings of the study point to a number of challenges faced by this city along this path. According to the results of SWOT model, despite the strengths (10 strengths) of Mashhad metropolitan area in the context of urban diplomacy development, there exist multiple weaknesses as well which are subject to systemic inadequacies. Moreover, regardless of the effective roles of universities and scientific centers in Mashhad in the field of international scientific interactions during the past few years, urban diplomacy development in this city requires making use of opportunities, esp. efficient planning and policymaking in the area of municipality and universities’ transnational interactions. As a result, Mashhad metropolitan area can rely on increasing the transnational interactions of municipality and universities and making use of external opportunities to mitigate its internal weaknesses in line with urban diplomacy development.

Keywords

diplomacy; urban diplomacy; Mashhad Metropolitan Area; SWOT

References

1. Asadi, R (2017). Studying the potentialsfor urban diplomacy in Mashhad and its priorities with emphasis on Islamic countries. Research project affiliated to the Planning and Development Department of Human Capital of Mashhad Municipality [In Persian].

2. Ahmadipour, Z; Ghourchi, M & GhaderiHajat, M (2012). Explaining the Place of Urban Diplomacy in the Development of Geopolitical Influence area. Geography and Urban Development periodical , Spring and Summer 2012, No. 1, 157- 182 [In Persian].

3. AshouriKarizaki, S. (2016). Evaluation of Tourism Scenarios in Mashhad based on 1404Horizon. Master's Degree Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [In Persian].

4. Acuto, M., (2012). Urban Diplomacy Local Leaders Global Challenges. In: http://opencanada.org/features/ the-think/essays/urban-diplomacy.

5. Beall, J., (2002). Globalization and Social Exclusion In Cities : Framing The Debate With Lessons Form Africa and Asia. In:http://Www.sagejournals.com.

6. Dehshiri, M.R. (2013), Para-Diplomacy in Globalization Era: Case Study of Urban Diplomacy.Periodical of GlobalizationStrategic Studies, winter 2013, forth year, No. 13, 34-54 [In Persian].

7. Dassa Kaye, D., (2005). Rethinking Track Two Diplomacy, Clingendael: Netherland Institute Of International Relations.

8. FeredR, D.(2000). Strategic Management. Translation by Ali Parsaeean and Mohammad Aerabi, Tehran: Office of Cultural ResearchPublication, First Edition [In Persian].

9. Ghourchi, M (2015). Writings on globalization-global cities and transnational role of cities. Tehran: Center of Studies and Planning publication, First Edition [In Persian].

10. Henrikson, A.K., (2006). What Can Public Diplomacy Achive? Clingendael: Netherland Institute of International Relations

11. http://intl.iau.ir [In Persian].

12. http://stp.um.ac.ir [In Persian].

13. http://ana.ir [In Persian].

14. https://www.sadjad.ac.ir [In Persian].

15. The Head Office of International Studens of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [In Persian].

16. International Management of Mashhad Medical Sciences University [In Persian].

17. International and Scientific Cooperation Office of Razavi Islamic science University [In Persian].

18. International Students' Office of Imam Reza(PBUH) International University[In Persian].

19. International and Scientific Cooperation Office of Imam Reza (PBUH) International University [In Persian].

20. International Academic Relations Department in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [In Persian].

21. Mashhad Municipality, (2013). A report on the six-year performance of Mashhad Municipality from 2007 to 2012.Volume I: Prospects and Headquarters [In Persian].

22. MashhadMunicipality, (2016).Statistics of 2016 in Mashhad [In Persian]

23. NajatiHosseini, S.M (2011). Urban politics and urban diplomacy from theory to experience. Historical SociologyJournal, third year, No. 7, autumn and winter 2011, p. 117-142 [In Persian].

24. Naghibzadeh, A (2008). History Diplomacy and International Relations, Tehran, Publications Ghomes]In Persian[.

25. Non-Iranian Students Affairs of Razavi Islamic science University [In Persian].

26. Pluijm, R. Melissen, J., (2007). City Diplomacy: The Expanding Role Of Cities In International Politics, Clingendael: Netherland Institute Of International Relations.

27. Rahnama, M.R; Khakpour, B; Sadegi, M (2012). Strategic Management Analysis in Mashhad Metropolis with SWOT Model. Geography and Planning, 16(42). 173-198 [In Persian].

28. Results of the Population and Housing Census, 2016, Iran's Statistics Center, Population by country division differentiations [In Persian].

29. Sizoo, A. Musch, A., (2008). City Diplomacy: The Role Of Local Governments In Conflict Prevention, Peace-Building and Post-conflict Reconstruction, Deltahage, The Hague.

30. Taghvaei, M. Mobaraki, O. (2010). Studying and Analyzing Tabriz touristiccenters in order to plan tourism in this city. No. 33, autumn 2010, 59-82 [In Persian].

31. Toloei, M. (2006). Comprehensive Political Science Culture). Tehran: Elm Publication [In Persian].

32. Thonon, C.B., (2006). City Diplomacy Practices, Barcelona: City Diplomacy Office Of Diputacio Barcelona

33. Zolfagarzadeh, M. M. Sanaei, M. (2013). Scientific and Technological Diplomacy: Theoretical Framework and Scientific Ideas).RahyaftJournal, No. 54, spring and summer 2013, p. 45-66 [In Persian].

34. Zarghani, S.H. Skandaran, M. (2014). Urban Diplomacy- Analyzing the role of Cities as New Actor in the Field of International Relations. Publication of Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 5(20), spring 2014, p. 163-182 [In Persian].

35. Zarif, M.J.Sajjadpour, K.(2008). Multilateral Diplomacy. Tehran: Publication ofStudies Office [In Persian].

36. Ziyari, k. (2004). Schools, Theories and Models for Regional Planning and Programming. First Edition, Yazd:YazdUniversity Press [In Persian].