Assessing Pedestrian-Oriented Aspect Focusing on the New Urbanism Approach on Sajjad Boulevard, Mashhad

جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری

Article 2, Volume 4, Issue 2 - Serial Number 7, March 2018, Pages 1-24   

Document Type: Scientific-Research

DOI: 10.22067/gusd.v4i2.26025

Authors

Ghazaleh Rabbani Abolfazli^{* 1}; Mohammad Rahim Rahnama²; Barat Ali Khakpoor²

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, International Campus

²Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
Walking is one of the most basic means of moving throughout cities. Since the emergence of modernist urbanism, there has been an emphasis on developing cities to facilitate automobile rides which has led to paying little attention to providing suitable urban spaces for walking. However, such an approach has changed during the recent decades and streets are taken into consideration once more as a public urban space. New urbanism is one of the common approaches to modernize the cities. Given the transition from vehicle-oriented to human-oriented approach, it is of substantial importance to promote the pedestrian-oriented streets.
The general purpose of the present study is to investigate, assess, and improve the pedestrian-oriented approach on Sajjad Boulevard, Mashhad, in light of the new urbanism approach. This district was selected with respect to its demographic attraction along with its functions as a place for spending leisure time. The present study seeks to provide answers to the following questions: What are the main indices in assessing urban routes with respect to the new urbanism approach? What are the problems regarding the pedestrian-orientation approach on Sajjad Boulevard? What strategies can be proposed to improve the pedestrian-oriented aspect on Sajjad Boulevard?
The following hypotheses guided the present investigation.
First- The effective indices on the pedestrian-oriented aspect are in compliance with the entire ten-fold principles of the new urbanism approach.
Second- Due to a set of obstacles such as the absence of walking facilities, inaccessibility to the public transport, etc., the pedestrian-oriented features of Sajjad Boulevard have been weakened.
2. Methology
The present study was conducted through the descriptive-analytical approach using case samples. Given the purpose of the study, this inquiry consists of two main parts:
Introducing indices and criteria of assessing the pedestrian-oriented aspect with respect to the new urbanism approach using library studies and assessing the indices using questionnaires, documentary studies, observations, analyzing the present maps, and softwares including GIS and SPSS.
3. Results
In this study, the pedestrian-oriented indices were assessed with respect to the new urbanism approach on Sajjad Boulevard, Mashhad. Using tools such as observations, questionnaires, documentary studies, and map analysis, the following results were reached regarding each principle:
1. Walkability: Only the two indices sidewalk width and lighting have been positive, while flooring quality, urban furniture, W.Cs, and facilities for the disabled were considered as negative.
2. Connectivity: Both of the indices in this principle were positive.
3. Mixed use (land use system): As the indices including the presence of mixed use, attractive urban applications, and the block size index have been relatively positive, the principle was taken as positive.
4. Presence of valuable elements (attraction): As the indices including human scale and visual attractions were observed as relatively negative and positive, respectively, the principle is assessed as average.
5. Conventional structure: Depending on the maps regarding the historical process of the physical development of Mashhad’s metropolitan area, there is no particular historical or architectural element representative of the special identity of this district. Consequently, the principle is assessed as relatively negative.
6. Diversity: While the first index was relatively negative, the two indices including diversity in bodies and diversity in buildings were observed as moderately positive, thus, the diversity principle on Sajjad Boulevard was taken as positive.
7. Density: The density principle was assessed as relatively positive as it was the case for the indices of residential and commercial densities.
8. Green transportation: The principle was assessed as average, given the fact that three indices were relatively positive, one index was relatively negative, and the other was negative.
9. Environmental sustainability principle: With two relatively positive indices and a relatively negative index, the principle is considered as relatively negative.
10. Quality of life (Social): As the number of pedestrians and safety were positive, and the walking culture was average, the principle is assessed as relatively positive.
Evaluating the pedestrian-oriented aspect of Sajjad Boulevard, the connectivity principle was assessed as positive indicating a more desirable status among the ten principles of the new urbanism approach. As the area of study was devoid of historical texture as well as special identity, the principle of historical structure can be considered as being in the most undesirable condition compared to the other principles of the new urbanism approach revealing that the district requires identity empowerment.
4. Conclusion
In order to improve the pedestrian-oriented aspect on Sajjad Boulevard, Mashhad, 17 strategies were laid out, among which six were offensive, four were adaptive, three were contingent, and four were defensive. As the pedestrian-oriented aspects on Sajjad Boulevard were assessed as relatively positive, the route happened to be at an offensive state; consequently, priorities must be given to the strategies that can exploit the positive aspects. Six offensive strategies among the total of 17 are listed below in order of priorities:
1. Continuity in assigning purposeful roles for the route concerning urban applications
2. Attempts to promote investments and participations from Astan Quds Razavi
3. Strengthening and restoring social and physical values to conserve the identity of the route
4. Planning and designing walking spaces in order to strengthen social interactions as well as the pedestrian-oriented aspects
5. Organizing marginal green environments to provide urban spaces
6. Employing encouraging policies to establish applications with no time limits

Keywords

New urbanism approach; Pedestrian orientation; Urban routes; Assessment indices; Sajjad Boulevard; Mashhad

References

1. ارندت، ر. (1387) . منشور نوشهرگرایی. دانش، ع.ر وبصیری مژدهی، ر. تهران: انتشارات پردازش و برنامه ریزی شهری.

2. پاکزاد، ج.(1385) . مبانی نظری و فرآیند طراحی شهری. تهران: انتشارات شهیدی.

3. پاکزاد،ج و سوری، ا. (1391) . راهنمای نورپردازی مکان های شهری. تهران: انتشارات آرمانشهر.

4. سازمان برنامه ریزی منطقه ای سن دیه گو. (1388) . برنامه ریزی و طراحی برای پیاده ها-رهنمودهای طراحی شهری پیاده مدار؛ بصیری مژدهی، ر. تهران: انتشارات طحان.

5. سازمان برنامه و بودجه. (1375) . دستورالعمل تسهیلات پیاده روی. نشریه شماره 144. جلد دوم. تهران: انتشارات سازمان برنامه و بودجه.

6. سلطان حسینی، م ، پورسلطانی، ح ، سلیمی، م و عمادی، س. (1390) ." امکانسنجی قابلیت پیاده روی در فضای شهری بر پایه الگوهای توسعه ی پایدار و نوشهرگرایی مطالعه موردی: محله سعادت آباد". مجله پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری. شماره4. 43-56.

7. شرکت قطار شهری مشهد. (مرداد ماه 1392) . " شبکه خطوط حمل و نقل ریلی (قطار شهری) مشهد ". http://murco.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=873.

8. شرکت مطالعات جامع حمل‌ونقل و ترافیک. ( 1391) . بازبینی طرح جامع حمل‌ونقل و ترافیک؛ بخش عابر پیاده. جلد دوم.

9. شریفی، پ و نجفی زند، ح. (1373) . روش های آماری درعلوم رفتاری.تهران: نشر دانا.

10. شهیدی، م.ح. (1380) . "حمل و نقل پایدار شهری". فصلنامه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی شهری. شماره 5. 88-93.

11. شهیدی، م.ح. (1381). "حمل و نقل پایدار شهری ابزاری برای تحقق شهرهای شهروند مدار". فصلنامه مدیریت شهری. شماره 11. 6 – 15

12. قریب، ف. (1382) . شبکه ارتباطی در طراحی شهری. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

13. کاشانی جو، خ. (1385)." اهمیت فضاهای پیاده در شهرهای هزاره سوم". جستارهای شهری. شماره 17و18 .51-40.

14. کاشانی جو،خ. (1389) . پیاده راه ها، از مبانی طراحی تا ویژگی های کارکردی.تهران: آذرخش.

15. کنف لاخر، ه. (1381). اصول برنامه ریزی تردد پیاده و دوچرخه. قریب، ف. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.

16. گلکار، ک. (1385) ."مناسب سازی تکنیک تحلیلی سوآت (SWOT) برای کاربرد در طراحی شهری". صفه . شماره41، 2-21.

17. مرکز تحقیقات ساختمان و مسکن. (1387) .ضوابط و مقررات معماری و شهرسازی برای افراد معلول جسمی-حرکتی.تهران: انتشارات مرکز تحقیقات ساختمان و مسکن.

18. معاونت حمل و نقل و ترافیک شهرداری مشهد. (هفدهم مرداد ماه 1392) ." نقشه ترافیک آنلاین کلان شهر مشهد". http://map.mashhad.ir/@36.30515,59.58473,13z

19. معصومی، ه و پرتوی، پ. (1385) . "اصول جنبش نوشهرگرایی"؛ ماهنامه عمران و معماری ، شماره 15. 28-32

20. معینی، م. (1385). "افزایش قابلیت پیاده مداری، گامی بسوی شهری انسانی تر"؛ هنرهای زیبا. شماره27.16-5.

21. معینی، م. (1391). شهرهای پیاده مدار. تهران: آذرخش.

22. مهدیزاده، ج. (1379)."مفاهیم و مبانی پیاده راه سازی". ماهنامه شهرداریها. سال دوم. شماره19. 12.

23. مهندسین مشاور اردام و مهرازان. (1370) . طرح جامع مشهد. وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی. جلد پانزدهم.

24. مهندسین مشاور پارسوماش.(1391) . طرح تفصیلی حوزه میانی غربی. مشهد. وزارت راه و شهرسازی.

25. مهندسین مشاور خازنی. (1359) . طرح تفصیلی کلان شهر مشهد. وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی.

26. مهندسین مشاور فرنهاد .(1389) . طرح توسعه و عمران (جامع)کلان شهر مشهد مقدس. وزارت راه و شهرسازی.

27. مهندسین مشاور پارت. (1380) .طرح منطقه بندی و تعیین محدوده های دارای پتانسیل بلند مرتبه سازی در کلان شهر مشهد مقدس. وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی.

28. وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی.(1375) . آئین نامه طراحی راه های شهری -بخش 10 مسیرهای پیاده. تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات شهرسازی و معماری ایران.

29. Abley, S. (2005). Walkability scoping paper. Retrieved from http:// www. levelofservice. com/ walkability - research.pdf.

30. Arora, P. (2007). Burnet avenue, Avondale neighborhood: Revitalization strategy (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

31. Berke, P. R., Macdonald, J., White, N., Holmes, M., Line, D., Oury, K., & Ryznar, R. (2003). Greening development to protect watersheds: Does new urbanism make a difference? Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 397-413.

32. Bohl, C. C. (2000). New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner‐city neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 761-801.

33. Boyko, C., Graeme-Evans, P., & Cooper, R. (2009). Designing sustainable cities. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

34. Brennan Ramirez, L. K., Hoehner, C. M., Brownson, R. C., Cook, R., Orleans, C. T., Hollander, M., ... Wilkinson, W. (2006). Indicators of activity-friendly communities: An evidence-based consensus process. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(6), 515-524.

35. Forsyth, A., & Crewe, K. (2009). New visions for suburbia: Reassessing aesthetics and place-making in modernism, imageability and new urbanism. Journal of Urban Design, 14(4), 415-438.

36. Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75-87.

37. Jepson, E. J., & Edwards, M. M. (2010). How possible is sustainable urban development? An analysis of planners' perceptions about new urbanism, smart growth and the ecological city. Planning Practice & Research, 25(4), 417-437.

38. Kumar, R. (2009). Walkability of neighborhoods: A critical analysis of zoning codes. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.

39. Larsen, K. (2005). New urbanism's role in inner-city neighborhood revitalization. Housing Studies, 20(5), 795-813.

40. Leather, J., Fabian, H., Gota, S., & Mejia, A. (2011). Walkability and pedestrian facilities in Asian cities: State and issues. Manila, PH: Asian Development Bank.

41. Meredith, J. R. (2003). Sprawl and the new urbanist solution. Virginia Law Review, 89(2), 447-503.

42. Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Garvin, C., Johnson, D., Schmid, T. L... Lin, L. (2006). Operational definitions of walkable neighborhood: Theoretical and empirical insights. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(1), 99-117.

43. Park, S. (2008). Defining, measuring, and evaluating path walkability, and testing its impact on transit users' mode choice and walking distance to the station. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

44. Shatfoe, H. (2008). Convivial urban spaces: Creating effective public places. London, England: Earthscan.

45. Shay, E., Spoon, S. C., & Khattak, A. J. (2003). Walkable environments and walking activity. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.

46. Southworth, M. (2010). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning Development, 131(4), 246-257.

47. Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2011). Is subsidized housing in sustainable neighborhoods? Evidence from Chicago. Housing Policy Debate, 21(1), 1-28.

48. Tolley, T. (2003). Providing for pedestrians: Principles and guidelines for improving pedestrian access to destinations and urban spaces. Victoria, Australia: Department of Infrastructure.

49. Walters, D., & Brown, L. L. (2004). Design first: Design-based planning for communities. Oxford, England: Architectural.

50. Winstanley, A., Thorns, D. C., & Perkins, H. C. (2003). Nostalgia, community and new housing developments: A critique of new urbanism incorporating a New Zealand perspective. Urban Policy and Research, 21(2), 175-189.

51. Zehner, O. (2012). Green illusion. London, England: University of Nebraska Press.