Schleiermacher’s Hermeneutics in Some of Keats’s Poems

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 1, Volume 48, Issue 1, April 2015, Pages 1-18   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.v48i1.32313

Authors

Nasser Maleki^{* 1}; Maryam Navidi²

¹ِDepartment of English Language and Literature, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

²Department of English Language and Literature,, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Friedrich Schleiermacher was the first who introduced hermeneutics in two branches including comparison and association, the former is based on comparison of concepts, and words, and the later is physical objectification of concepts. In fact, it is association of ideas, a new method to get rid of the traditional concepts. Therefore the new method leads to the innovative interpretations and illustrations which are suspended to be revealed, hence it produces what Derrida called Difference, Privileging here the hermeneutics of suspicion, the function of differences or contrasts refers to what Derrida extrapolated as Differance or to differ. These innovative ways of looking at the world, pave the way for new perceptions which are not revealed promptly, instead, challenges and penetrates the readers to discover the new conception which further makes some lingering in the new perception. In this sense, the slowness of new perception can become the other manifestation of Derridaian term, Différance(defer). Considering such a postmodern prospective in mind, this study is to illustrate these manifestations in some of the poems by John Keats. The authors of this paper believe that the essence or the motifs in most of the artistic works of these two poets respond to a dualistic notion which is – or might be – an ongoing process in literary criticism. This study tries to compare hermeneutics and Différance in some of Keats’s poems and it shows the relation among speech act theory and hermeneutics and Différance in his poems.

Keywords

Keats; Concept; Différance; Contrast; Being

References

منابع

- احمدی، بابک (1386). چهار گزارش از تذکرة الاولیاء عطار، چاپ سوم، تهران: نشر مرکز.

 

بدوی، طبانه (1967). علم البیان، مکتبة الانجوا المصریه، چاپ دوم.

 

محمدی آسیابادی، علی (1387). هرمنوتیک و نمادپردازی در غزلیات شمس، تهران: سخن

 

Bell, J. (1968) The Elementary Structures of kinship, trans. John Von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham, Boston: Beacon Press.

Blackburn, S. (2005) The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, London: Oxford university Press.

Brown, G and G. Yule (1989). Discourse Analysis (reprinted). Cambridge: Cambridge university press

 

Crawford, L. Victor Shklovskij: Difference in Defamiliarization, Comparative Literature 36 (1984): 209-19. JSTOR. 24. Februry 2008.

 

Cirlot, J.E. (1955). A Dictionary of symbols, trans. Jack Sage, New York: Philosophical Library.

 

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference, trans. London: Allan Bass.

_______ (1982) Margins of philosophy, trans. Chicago: Allan Bass.

_______ (1982) Psyche: Inventions De L’autre. Paris:La Pour.

-

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

 

Fairclough, N. (2001). The Discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis in M. Wetherell and et al (eds.) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis: London: Sage

 

Heidegger, M. (1991). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. Trans. Nicholas Walker. Indiana: Indiana university Press.

Jung, C.G. (1998) The Struture and Dynamics of the Psyche. London: Harcourt Press.

Keats, J. ) 1958John Keats: From The Letters of John Keats.ed.by Hyder Edward Rollins, London: Harward University Press.

Keynes, G. (1946) Vision of the last Judgement in Poetry and Prose. London: Peter Lang Publishing.

Mayhead, R. (1967) John Keats. London: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, Claude (1963) Structural Anthropology. trans. Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York: Basic Books.

Shklovskij, V. (1917) Art as Technique, Vicipedia.

Schleiermacher, F. (1977). Hermeneutik (Ed) H. Kimmerle Heidlberg: Car Winter. Hermeneutics: The Hand Witten Manuscriots. (Ed.) H. Kimmerle. James D. & J. Forstman. Missoula: Scholars P.

Yule, George. (2000). Pragatics (fifth eds). London: Oxford University press.

Ward, A. (1963) John Keats’s: The Making of a Poet. London: Secker and Wardburg, London:Oxford University press.

Wheelwright, J. (1962) Metaphor and Reality. India, Bloomingo: India University press.