Transdisciplinary Thinking in Information science

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 2, Volume 1, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 11-28   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/riis.v1i2.9561

Author

narges neshat^*

Associate Professor of the National Library and Document Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Abstract

Information is a fluid concept, so that any time we want to investigate it are multiple and multifaceted. This led to assume that their information is a diversity and multiplicity. Because of the close interdependence between different variables and there is another use of the information is not merely a model for efficient and successful analysis of information and a series of positions to be more actively into the analysis. Here role of transdisciplinary is meant to benefit from the multiplicity of this approach, the approach suggests that the desire to create unity and models to explain the causes and implications of the recognition of multiple causes. Thus, the new methods and models to describe and explain the problem and will be criticism and analysis. It is evident that only through practical activities in the field of information can not reach a comprehensive understanding of the field. To answer the basic questions facing the field of information and information science is the understanding of information science is necessary but not sufficient, in comparison, a solid foundation of information science that is rooted in the traditions of extensive research for each active librarian and informationist update access to the collective results of many other minds, and the overall experience provides a more general degree. Although, the extent of information science with the information functions, but this does not function, the methodical and systematic research on the information - and other related issues - that makes up the research in the field of Information science. From this, it is intended to study the role of transdisciplinary thinking in information science.

References

 

Andersen, J. (2005). Genre. In Hjørland, B. & Nicolaisen, J. (ed.) The Epistemological Lifeboat. [Online] Available: http://www.db.dk/ jni/lifeboat/ info.asp?subjectid=83 [accessed, 2009]

Davidson, M. (2004). Bones of contention: using self and story in the Quest to professionalize higher education, an interdisciplinary approach. Teaching in higher education, 9 (3):299-310

Dieter, W. (2007). The unity of knowledge: An interdisciplinary. [Online] Available: http://www.dieterwolf.net/pdf/unity-of-knowledge-1pdf

Floridi, L. (2003). Information In The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing & information. [Online] Available: http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~floridi/Blackwell/chaters/chapter5.pdf

Floridi, L.(2002). What is philosophy of information? [Online] Available: http://www.wolfson.ox.uk/~floridi/pdf/wipi.pdf

Garbay, C. (2008). Rethinking interdisciplinary: The role of information science in interdisciplinary research. [Online] Available: www.Interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/2

Klein, J. T. et al. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: An effective way for managing complexity. Basel: Birkhauser.

Negre, A. (2004). A transdisciplinary approach to science and astrology. [Oline] available: http://www.cura.free.fr/quinq/02negre2.html

Nikolescu, B. (1996). Transdisciplinarity, USA: Lexington, Watersign press.

Max- Neef, M.A.(2005). Commentary: Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological economics, 53, pp. 5-16

Pohl, C.(2000). Inter – and transdisciplinary research methods, in R. Haberli, R.W. Scholz, A. Bill and M. Welti (eds). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem – solving among science, technology and society, workbook1: Dialogue sessions and idea market (vol.1). Zurich: Haffmans Sachbuch Verlag, pp. 18-19.

Regeer, B. (2004). Transdisciplinary.  [Online] Available: http://www.bio.vu.nl/vakgroepen/bens/HTML  

Wilson, E.O. (2001). Consilience: the unity of knowledge, New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.