The Relationship between Sensation Seeking and Risky Driving Behavior in Mashhad

علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Article 3, Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29, September 2017, Pages 63-80   

Document Type: Scientific-Research

DOI: 10.22067/jss.v14i1.18290

Authors

Ali Yousofi^* ; Fatemeh Ghasemi Adkan

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
A driver's personality traits have a significant influence on his driving behavior. In Tillman and Hobbes (1994, cited in Jonah, 1997) words, people drive as the same way they live. Sensation seeking is a personality trait whose role in risky driving behavior has been of interest. Zuckerman (1994, cited in Jonah, 1997) defines sensation seeking as varied, novel, complex, and intense sensations and experiences and the willingness to take risks for the sake of such experiences. The high rate of driving violations in Mashhad requires a nuanced study of the factors leading to risky driving behavior in this city. The present study, through emphasizing and accentuating sensation seeking, aims to analyze risky driving behavior in Mashhad and reveal their interdependence.
2. Theoretical Framework
Elander, West, and French (1993, cited in Özkan & Lajunen, 2005) consider driving as a behavior which is chosen by drivers as a pattern for their driving, such as the speed, degree of focus, and keeping a safe distance between cars. Such behaviors include two types of positive and negative behaviors. In driving, negative behaviors are referred to as aggressive or negative driving. Sensation seeking, or individual’s willingness for novel experiences and sensations, is a major personality trait influencing dangerous driving behavior.
The main hypothesis of the research, based on Zuckerman's (1994) definition of sensation seeking, which consists of the two aspects of thrill-seeking and variety-seeking, and also the definition of risky driving behavior provided by Reason, Manstead, Stradling, Baxter, and Campbell (1990), which consists of error and driving violation, is as follows: While a driver’s sensation seeking is in itself a function of both thrill-seeking and variety-seeking in driving and risky driving behavior is a function of errors and driving violation, the two functions are interdependent and changes in one necessitates changes in the other.
3. Method
The data used for this study is based on a survey conducted in 2010 in Mashhad on 160 drivers who were at least18 years old, and were chosen using multistage sampling prior to the interview. The scale used for measuring risky driving behavior is based on the Manchester Driver Behavior Questionnaire, which includes the three factors of lapse, errors and violations. To measure sensation seeking in the present study, the Arnett Inventory of Sensation Seeking was used. This scale includes two factors of thrill-seeking and variety-seeking.
To test the main hypothesis of the research (i.e., the relationship between sensation seeking and risky driving behavior), canonical correlation analysis was used. This technique is used to measure the association among two sets of variables (i.e., functions). In the present study, sensation seeking is a function of excitement-seeking (X1) and variety-seeking (X2) and risky driving behavior is a function of straying and loss of orientation (Y1), error (Y2), and violation (Y3), and the objective is to reveal the association between the two functions. Canonical correlation analysis makes identification of linear combinations of these sets of variables that have the highest possible correlation.
4. Findings
The results of the canonical correlation analysis revealed a covariation of roughly 0.53 between the canonical variables of sensation seeking and risky driving behavior. The square root of this coefficient (0.28) denotes a covariation between these two sets of variables (linear combination). Accordingly, canonical variable of sensation seeking predicts 28 percent of the variation in the canonical variable of risky driving behavior.
As for the weight of the canonical variables, which reveals the share of each main variable in the canonical correlation, the findings showed that among the functions of risky driving behavior, the biggest weight (-0.71) belongs to the error variable and in the function of sensation seeking, the biggest weight belongs to the intensity of driving excitement (- 0.63).
In this analysis, canonical weights reveal the share of each main variable in formation of their respective canonical variable. Therefore, the findings of the research revealed that in forming the canonical variable of risky driving behavior, the biggest weight belongs to violations (-0.89) and in the forming canonical variable of sensation seeking, the biggest weight belongs to the drivers’ excitement-seeking (-0.92).
5. Discussion and Conclusion
Personality is a combination of feelings, thoughts, and specific behavioral patterns which determine the way people perceive events and incidents and reply to them. While driving, a driver's personality affects his driving approach and behavior. Sensation seeking is among the personality traits influencing risky driving behavior. The three aspects of risky driving behavior that are lapse, errors, and violations are influenced by sensation seeking, which itself is comprised of excitement-seeking and novelty-seeking.
An analysis of the relationship among sensation seeking and risky driving behavior in Mashhad revealed that firstly, subjects’ overall sensation seeking is in the middle range (49.6) and their risky driving behavior is in the lower range (21.9). Secondly, a high (ρ = 0.53) and statistically significant correlation exists between the two sets of variables pertaining to sensation seeking and risky driving behavior. In the formation of this correlation, the variable of intensity of excitement in sensation seeking and that of driving error in risky behavior have the major shares. Thirdly, in the main (canonical) variable of sensation seeking, intensity of excitement has a higher share than variety-seeking and in the main variable of risky driving behavior, the biggest share belongs to variable of violation, followed by error, and lapse, respectively.

Keywords

Sensation seeking; Risky driving behavior; Error; Lapse; Violation; Intensity of excitement; Variety-seeking

References

1. حسینی، ح. (1389). بررسی رابطۀ هیجان‌خواهی با نگرش به مصرف مواد مخدر در دانش‌آموزان. رشد آموزش مشاور مدرسه، (19). 24-1.

2. سلطانی، م؛ فولادوند، خ و فتحی آشتیانی، ع. (1389). رابطۀ هویت و هیجان‌خواهی بر اعتیاد اینترنتی. نشریه علوم رفتاری، (13)، 36-18.

3. گودرزی، م. ع؛ رستمی، د. (1383). مقایسۀ میزان تحریک‌جویی در افراد سوءمصرف‌کنندۀ تریاک و افراد به‌هنجار. سوء مصرف مواد مخدر، 2 (6). 26-12.

4. گودرزی، م.ع؛ شیرازی، م. (1384). بررسی رابطۀ بین تحریک‌جویی و رفتار رانندگی پرخطر. روان‌شناسی، 9 (1)، 43-30.

5. نجاریان، ب؛ زرگر، ی؛ مهرابی‌زاده هنرمند، م. و حقیقی، ج. (1382). بررسی همه‌گیرشناسی مصرف سیگار در کارکنان ادارات دولتی اهواز و مقایسۀ اثربخشی روش‌های رفتاری، رفتاری-آموزشی و رفتاری-دارویی در ترک سیگار با کنترل سن، مدت زمان مصرف و هیجان‌خواهی. علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، 10 (1و2)، 24-1.

6. Arnett, J., Offer, D., & Fine, M. (1997). Reckless driving in adolescence: State and trait factors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(1), 57-63.

7. Dahlen, E. R., Martin, R. C., Ragan, K., & Kuhlman, M. M. (2005). Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(2), 341-348.

8. Garson, B. (2008). Partial least squares (PLS). Retrieved from http:// www.statsoft.com/ textbook/partial-least-squares

9. Horvath, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 41-52.

10. Iversen, H., & Rundmo, T. (2002). Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(8), 1251-1263.

11. Jonah, B. A. (1997). Sensation seeking and risky driving: A review and synthesis of the literature. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(5), 651-665.

12. Jonah, B. A., Thiessen, R., & Au-Yeung, E. (2001). Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33(5), 679-684.

13. Lajunen, T. (2001). Personality and accident liability: Are extraversion, neuroticism and psychotics related to traffic and occupational fatalities? Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1365-1373.

14. Oltedal, S., & Rundmo, T. (2006). The effects of personality and gender on risky driving behaviour and accident involvement. Safety Science, 44(7), 621-628.

15. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). A new addition to DBQ: Positive driver behaviors scale. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 8(4), 355-368.

16. Perez, J., & Torrubia, R. (1985). Sensation seeking and antisocial behavior in a student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(3), 401-403.

17. Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 33(10-11), 1315-1332.

18. Satinder, K. P., & Black, A. (1984). Cannabis use and sensation-seeking orientation. The Journal of Psychology, 116(1), 101-105.

19. Schwarz, R. M., Burkhart, B. R., & Green, S. B. (1978). Turning on or turning off: Sensation seeking or tension reduction as motivational determinants of alcohol use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 1144-1145.

20. Schwebel, D. C., Ball, K. K., Severson, J., Barton, B. K., Rizzo, M., & Viamonte, S. M. (2007). Individual difference factors in risky driving among older adults. Journal of Safety Research, 38(5), 501-509.

21. Stradling, S. G., & Meadows, M. L. (2000). Highway code and aggressive violations in UK drivers. Retrieved from https:// www.stopandgo.org/ research/ aggressive/stradling-meadows.pdf

22. Sümer, N. (2003). Personality and behavioral predictors of traffic accidents: Testing a contextual mediated model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(6), 949-964.

23. Tacq, J. (1997). Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research: From problem to analysis. London, England: SAGE.

24. Wundersitz, L. N. (2008). Can personality characteristics predict the crash involvement of young drivers? In R. W. G. Anderson (Ed.), Proceedings of Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference (pp. 104-113). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.

25. Zuckerman, M., & Neeb, M. (1980). Demographic influences in sensation seeking and expressions of sensation seeking in religion, smoking and driving habits. Personality and Individual Differences, 1(3), 197-206.

26. Zuckerman, M., Tushup, R., & Finner, S. (1976). Sexual attitudes and experience: Attitude and personality correlates and changes produced by a course in sexuality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(1), 7-19.