The Impact of country development on the visibility of co-authorship

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 8, Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3, June 2012, Pages 159-180   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/riis.v2i2.11015

Authors

mohammad reza davarpanah¹; reza adamian^{* 2}

¹Professor of Library and Information Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²A master's student in librarianship and information from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Purpose: The main aim of this study was to investigate the impact of country development on scientific collaboration and visibility.

Method: Based on the purpose the study we used scientometric method as our research methodology. The statistical population of the research included co-authored articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) indexed in ISI from 2005 to 2006, along with their citations during 2005-2010.

Findings: The results indicated that developing countries co-authored articles with developed countries were cited at an average of 11.29 but developing countries co-authored articles with developed countries were cited at an average of 5.18. Also, there was a positive relation between the number of collaborating countries in articles resulted from scientific collaboration and their citation rate. In investigating the significant differences among scientific collaboration patterns in developed and developing countries, it was seen that the territorial or continental scientific collaboration rate in developed countries is 3 times more than developing countries and developed countries scientific collaboration with other developed countries was 11 times more than developing countries scientific collaboration with other developing countries. This showed that researchers in developed countries ` had a high tendency to collaborate with their colleagues in developed countries, but there was no relation between trans-territorial and national scientific collaboration in developed and developing countries. The average citation rate of international co-authorship articles was more than 1.8 times of the average citation rate of national co-authorship articles. The average citation rate of co-authored articles in developed countries was 2 times more than of the average citation rate of co-authored articles in developing countries. The results showed that international collaboration, especially collaboration with developed countries, increased the citation rate in developing countries articles; There was significant differences among scientific collaboration patterns in developed and developing countries. It is recommended that the increase of international collaboration increases the international visibility of the articles.

Keywords

Visibility; co-authorship; developing countries; Institute for Scientific Information; ISI

References

 

Davarpanah, M., R. (2009). The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences: Developing a Scientific Power Index. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 41(1), 67-91. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_scholarly_publishing/summary/v041/41.1.davarpanah.html       

Davarpanah, M., R., Behrouzfar, H. (2009). International visibility of Iranian ISI journals: A citation study. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 407-419. Retrieved April  10, 2010, from www.emeraldinsight.com/0001-253X.htm

De Granda-Orive JI., Villanueva-Serrano S., Aleixandre-Benavent R., Valderrama-Zurián JC., Alonso-Arroyo A., García Río F., & et al. (2009). Network of international scientific collaboration on smoking: analysis of coauthorship through the Science Citation Index (1999-2003). Gac Sanit, 23(3), 34-43. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19464767

Frederiksen, L. F. (2004). Disciplinary determinants of bibliometric impact in Danish industrial research: Collaboration and visibility. Scientometrics, 61 (2) : 253–270. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/t43162t 052l88327/

Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co­authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50 (2), 199–214. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from www.steunpuntoos.be/WG_Papers/Scientometrics_50_2_199.pdf   

Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & Derouen, K. Jr. (2003). Science from the periphery: collaboration, networks and ‘periphery effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from www.springerlink.com/index/J81H4XTM63277504.pdf    

Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 952–965. Retrieved January  5, 2011, from http://bada.hb.se/bitstream/2320/2296/1/jasist-2003-hara-et-al.pdf

Inzelt, A., Schubert, A., & Schubert, M. (2008). Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37-43. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com/index /06TQ47071720471T .pdf

Iribarren-Maestro, I., Lascurain-Sánchez, M. L., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2009). Are multi-authorship and visibility related? Study of ten research areas at Carlos III University of Madrid. Scientometrics, 79(1), 191-200. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com 

Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com/index/M06J287 1281PR764.pdf

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What Is Research Collaboration? Research Policy, 26 : 1–18. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/Res_ col9.pdf

Larivière, V., Lebel, J., & Lemelin, P. (2004). Collaborative research in the social sciences and humanities: bibliometric analysis of practices, report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), Observatoire des sciences et des technologies. Retrieved April  10, 2010, from http://www.ost.uqam.ca/Portals/0/docs /rapports/2004/SSHRC.pdf 

Leimu, L., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles?. Bioscience, 55(5), 438–443. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://research.eeescience.utoledo.edu/lees/papers_PDF/Leimu_2005_BioScien ce.pdf 

Liu, Z. (2003). Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications. Information Processing and Management, 39 (6), 889–898. Retrieved April  10, 2010, from http://www.sciencedirect.com 

Maienschein, J. (1993). Why Collaborate? Journal of the History of Biology, 26(2), 167-183. Retrieved January  5, 2011, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/u87041016gn27435/   

Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics,  21(3), 313-323.

Paraje, G., Sadana, R., & Salmela, R. (2009). Collaboration and "Visibility" of Health Research in the Western Pacific Region. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 128-136. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://aph.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/21/2/128  

Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international?. Scientometrics,  83(3), 397-401. Retrieved April  5, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com/index /Q8727181N82337X3.pdf

Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?. Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/8475pp504667561u/fulltext.pdf  

Smart, J. C., & Bayer, A. E. (1986). Author collaboration and impact: a note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics, 10(5), 297-305. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com/index/H71757647030T177.pdf

Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics. 81(1), 177-193. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.springerlink.com/index/J26G8241 11K74481.pdf

Suárez-Balseiro, C., García-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2009). Multi-authorship and its impact on the visibility of research from Puerto Rico. Information Processing and Management, 45(4), 469–476. Retrieved January  25, 2010, from http://www.sciencedirect.com 

Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results – Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2010). “Biotechnology". Retrieved April 21, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biotechnology