Parent’s training styles and the feeling of need for achievement

علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Article 1, Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 31, September 2018, Pages 1-20   

Document Type: Scientific-Research

DOI: 10.22067/jss.v15i1.45965

Authors

Hossien Mirzaei^{* 1}; Mojtaba Mirzaei¹; Elham Mazlumi²

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²Tabriz University

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Nowadays all societies seek the development of which human being is its basic factor. The development would not be completed if the human beings as the basis of it are not paid attention to and are not improved during this process. Human beings not only are the main purpose of development، but also they are the main factor and the capital of this development. Therefore, it is very important to consider all the factors that influence this vital capital. Given all the studies on this issue, it is necessary to consider the variables affecting motivation, job commitment, need for achievement, diligence and being competitive of work force. The family is one of the vital variables that has an important role in the life style, future, and personality formation of people. In this research, we have attempted to measure the impact parent's training styles on the feeling of need for achievement among female students of Tabriz University

Theoretical Framework

Development theories have been categorized into different dimensions. In this paper, we divided them into pessimistic and optimistic theories. Some pessimistic thinkers believe that development path is not open for some societies (under developing and third world countries); Andre Gunder Frank (1971) is one of this scientists. On the other hand, optimistic thinkers suppose that there is no inherent barrier for the development of countries, and this way is open for the third world countries and other societies.
The modernization theories belong to optimistic view. These theories are presented in three areas of social, economic and psychological types.  In the social field, we have theorists such Smelser (1959), Hoselitz (1952), and Eisenstadt (1973). In the economic field, Hirschman (1973), Schumpeter (1962), and Rostow (1960) can be seen. And in the area of psychological renewal theory, which points to the beginning of development as human renewal and the personality system, it is possible to refer to Hagen (1962) and McClelland (1953) theories. These theories consider the beginning of development as human renewal and personality system. In this study, we focused on McClellan's Need for achievement theory. According to this theory, the main factor for development and modernization is the tendency to success. Of course there are many different and important variables which influence this need. Some of these variables are mass media, formal and informal educational system, organizations, religion, family, and etc. For some limitation, we have chosen only the factor of "parents training style" as the main variable which affects the need for achievement.

Methodology

The present study is an applied research using a survey method. In this investigation we utilized the first-hand data gathered by the use of questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed by the researchers and the pre-test was also taken before administration. A sample of 166 students are chosen among all female students in Tabriz University during 2013-2014 school year. The sampling was done using Chochran's formula and random stratified sampling technique.
We measured parenting styles according to the APA (1960) model. She recognized three different parenting styles. Authoritarian ("too hard")) or despotic (: the authoritarian parenting style is characterized by high demandingness with low responsiveness. Permissive ("too soft") (or easygoing): this parenting style is characterized by low demandingness with high responsiveness. And authoritative ("just right") (or democratic): this parenting style is characterized by high demandingness with huge responsiveness.

Results

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of parents training styles on the feeling of need for achievement in female students. According to this end, the results of the correlation coefficient showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between the “democratic training style” and the “feeling of need for achievement”. According this important result, we can conclude that Democratic training style will provide the basic conditions for increasing the need of achievement. But “despotic training style” had a negative impact on need achievement of female students. And there was no relationship between “easy training style” and the feeling need for achievement. The results of regression analysis also confirmed these findings. Other results showed that there is negative and significant relationship between educational level and need of achievement and there was a positive and significant between dependent variable and “the degree of interest in the field of study”.

Conclusion

Today it is proved that the development process is impossible without interested and highly motivated human resources. For this reason, each society that wants to follow the development process must give particular attention to human resources. The results of the research showed that the training styles of parents has important effect on the feeling of need for achievement among female students. In other words, parents can increase the need for success in their children directly and indirectly if they behave democratic with their children. The findings of this study confirmed, the views of McClelland (1953), Hagen (1963) and other scholars in the psychological field of development process. In terms of empirical research, the results of the present study are consistent with the results of the research conducted by Santrock (1984), Glasgow (1997) and Beirami and Khosroshahi (2010). Finally, according to these findings, researchers suggest that we must train parents for development process in every society especially in third world countries. And the family is the first step for development and every society must start its development from its families.

Keywords

development; McClelland; need for achievement; training style; Students

References

1. احدی، ح. و محسنی، ن. (1371). مفاهیم بنیادی روانشناسی نوجوانی و جوانی، تهران، انتشارات بنیاد.

2. ازکیا، م. و غفاری، غ. (1388). جامعه شناسی توسعه. نشرکیهان، چاپ هشتم.

3. اسعدی، م. زکایی، ن. کاویانی، ح. محمدی، م. و گوهری، م. (1385). رابطه پس زمینه اجتماعی فرهنگی با شیوه تربیتی والدین، موفقیت تحصیلی و سبک یادگیری فرزندان. اندیشه و رفتار، 12 (1)، 28-21.

4. ایمانی راد، م. (1369). توسعه و برنامه درجهان سوم(با نگاهی به تجارب توسعه در ایران). تهران ، نشر پیشبرد، چاپ اول.

5. بیرامی، م. و بهادری خسروشاهی، ج. (1389). ارتباط شیوه تربیتی والدین با پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش آموزان راهنمایی مدارس شهر ایلخچی. نشریه علوم تربیتی، 3 (10)، 21-7.

6. پورپاریزی، م. و صفورایی پاریزی، م. (1389). شیوه های تربیت فرزندان. فصلنامه ای در عرصه مطالعات زنان و خانواده، 3 (7) ، 39-15.

7. جلالی، م. (1386). تحلیل رابطه نابرابری های طبقاتی و نابرابری های آموزشی با تاکید بر نقش متغیرهای واسطه ای. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، 23 (3)، 53-15.

8. حریری اکبری، م. (1387). مدیریت توسعه، تهران، نشرنی، چاپ اول.

9. رحمانی، ف. سید فاطمی، ن. برادران رضایی، م. صداقت، ک. و فتحی آذر، ا. (1385). ارتباط شیوه تربیتی والدین با میزان مشکلات رفتاری دانش آموزان. مجله روانپزشکی و روانشناسی بالینی ایران، 12 (4)، 370- 365.

10. رضوی، ع. محمودی، م. و رحیمی، م. (1387). بررسی رضایت زناشویی و سبک های فرزند پروری والدین با مشکلات رفتاری فرزندان در دوره ابتدایی شهر ارسنجان. فصلنامه خانواده و پژوهش، 2 (4)، 90-73.

11. زارعی، ا. حسنی، ک. ( 1384). بررسی تاثیر خانواده بر رشد اجتماعی دانش آموزان" استان کرمانشاه". پژوهش های تربیت اسلامی، (1)، 104-101.

12. ساعی، ا. (1384). توسعه در مکاتب متعارض. نشر قومس، چاپ اول.

13. شفیع زاده، ح. شجاعی، ج.( 1387). کارآفرینان و نیاز به موفقیت. مجله تدبیر، (196)، 37-34.

14. شکرکن، ح. محب، ا. (1388). بررسی عملی بودن، اعتبار، روایی سیاهه انگیزه پیشرفت در کارمندان. تحقیقات روانشناختی، 1 (2)، 75-61.

15. نوری، ف. عباسپور، ج. (1388). بررسی رابطه بین هویت کار، رضایت کار و عدالت کار با تعهد کارکنان. پژوهش نامه علوم اجتماعی،3 (4)، 69-55.

16. Glasgow, K. L., Dornbusch, S. M., Troyer, L., Steinberg, L., & Ritter, P. L. (1997). Parenting styles, adolescents' attributions, and educational outcomes in nine heterogeneous high schools. Child Development, 68(3), 507-529.

17. Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62(5), 1049-1065.

18. Patock Peckham, J. A., Cheong, J., Balhorn, M. E., & Nagoshi, C. T. (2001). A social learning perspective: A model of parenting styles, self‐regulation, perceived drinking control, and alcohol Use and problems. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25(9), 1284-1292.

19. Santrock, J. W. (1984). Adolescence: Introduction. Dubukue, Lowa: Brown Publishers.