Pathology of the Formation of Iranian Local Governance using Constructing Grounded Theory

جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری

Article 4, Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 10, March 2020, Pages 63-80   

Document Type: Scientific-Research

DOI: 10.22067/gusd.v6i1.73965

Authors

Gholamreza Kazemian^* ; Reza Vaezi; Vajhollah Ghorbanizadeh; Marzieh Shahmohammadi

Allameh Tabataba'i University

Abstract

Extended Abstract1.IntroductionLocal governance is a comprehensive concept and a continuous process in which the government and citizens govern the affairs of a territory through bilateral interactions. Accordingly, given the accelerated global developments and inefficiency of one-sided and hierarchical relations between central and local governments, centralization and monopolism of central governments are no longer efficient in governing the vast territory of a nation; as a result, there is a need for strategies to offer an effective relation between these two levels so as to facilitate service provision to citizens. In addition, considering the country’s objectives in line with assembling all resources and terminating sole dependency on fossil fuel supplies to achieve sustainable developments, the notions of decentralization followed by government improvement can be advantageous. To this end, the purpose of the present inquiry is to present a pathologic study of national-local relations through the identification of potentials, limitations, contextual factors and strategies on the formation of local government within the Iranian administrative system. 2.Literature ReviewIran’s inclination towards reducing the role of the government in the economy and other vital aspects of the society as well as emphasis on development and the downsizing of the government suggest the influence of global developments on the Iranian bureaucratic system and policymaking. On the other hand, considering rapid environmental changes, the grounds for meeting people’s demands are arranged and the government should modify and update itself accordingly. Therefore, sole reliance on conventional communication mechanisms can no longer meet the needs of today’s society. Organizations such as the World Bank argue that the position of public decision-making should be as close as possible to the citizens under its influence; particularly, the subsidiarity principle should be taken into account according to which, local governance responsibilities ought to occur locally, unless there are reasons not to allocate such powers. Otes believes that all public services should be provided by the authority that controls the minimum geographical region and internalizes the expenses and benefits of these provisions, because local governments have a better understanding of the concerns of local citizens. On the other hand, Miller suggest that local governments and decentralization are closely-connected notions.In traditional definitions, the word “governance” is synonymous with government and implies “the act or the process of governance”. However, Johnson believes that in the new application, governance is defined as the interference of an extensive spectrum of actors in producing policies; additionally, McLolin defines governance as a process that guarantees a coherent system which involve both the government and the society. In Iran, the first local management and city administration act was passed in 1907 as “Baladiyah Law- meaning Urban Law”; it was a pattern intended for decentralization in Iran which was dismissed during the Pahlavi era and its centralization policies. Following the Islamic Revolution, despite the fact that a suitable capacity was foreseen for the management of local affairs and the role-playing of publicly-appointed councils within numerous constitutional principles, it was not realized and national affairs continued to be managed by the central government. Moreover, the discussion on relations between the central and local governments in line with the formation of local governments has resulted in the involvement of constitutional principles regarding national, intergovernmental relations in the subject of central-local coordination. Such a coordination denotes the mutually effective role of the local and central governments to offer better services and democracy improvement; therefore, these elements and relations in local governance require a more comprehensive examination and revision. 3.MethodThe present study was conducted using the Constructing Grounded Theory which follows an interpretive, exploratory approach and places an emphasis on emergent phenomena, the definition of their characteristics, and presentation of participants’ definitions of events and situations whilst attempting to expand its tacit meanings and implied principles (Charms, 2014, 32). The participants in this study included 21 experts with working experience. Data were collected using in-depth interviews, documentation, and continues comparisons. Analysis in the grounded theory was conducted through four coding stages including initial, centralized, axial and theoretical, the results of which provided a demonstration of relations between concepts. The reliability of the study was insured through extensive presence at the location and in-depth interactions. The validity of the study was also guaranteed through transparency of the entire research procedures. 4.Results and DiscussionIn this study, 749 key expressions were obtained at initial coding, 297 concepts identified from centralized coding, and 30 secondary and 8 main concepts were attained using axial and theoretical coding, respectively. Titles including “the element of lawfulness at the local level” and “citizens’ access and familiarity of modern communication tools” were identified as the only institutional and social potential secondary concepts, respectively. The five secondary concepts of institutional limitations included policy-performance conflicts, legal issues, informal influences, inadequate local-central financial and functional relations, and impractical outsourcing. The five secondary concepts of social limitations included negative policymaking, multitude of interests, pessimistic outlooks, seeking personal benefits, and the absence of collective participation and a merit-based sysetm. Four secondary concepts of political factors involved the government’s monopolist spirit, ineffective implementation of democracy, the influence of governance background, and the absence of political parties. The secondary concepts of economic factors were comprised of resource limitations and the issue of corrupted economy. The seven secondary concepts of institutional strategies included the decisive exercise of present laws, revision and modification of laws, gradual and development-oriented decentralization, the resolution of structural paradoxes, presence of a functional local income system, purposeful and transparent improvement of organization, and extensive planning and their operationalization. Finally, the five secondary concepts of social strategies included the enhancement of public trust, collective empowerment, localism, media improvement, and the allocation of local affairs through increasing participatory motivations. 5.ConclusionGiven the global experiences and lack of domestic success in providing adequate services to citizens, the Iranian national government is principally determined to surrender its centralized power and resolve institutional and social limitations against the formation of local governance so as to facilitate service provision. Moreover, considering the time-consuming nature of resolving social issues, the necessity to make urgent decisions accordingly and the participation of all actors in local governance is inevitable. On the other hand, there are a number of underlying political and economic factors in this concept that call for unity, solidarity, and the adoption of legal and inherent responsibilities among the three constitutional powers of the state. While institutional strategies are mostly related to the resolution of legal issues, certain social strategies are recommended as agendas including building trust among citizens, their empowerment, and participations so that the formation of local governance in Iran would not be too far-fetched.

Keywords

Decentralization; local governance; central-local relations; constructing grounded theory method

References

1. استراس، آ و کوربین، ج. (1387). اصول روش تحقیق کیفی: نظریه مبنایی، رویه‌ها و شیوه‌ها. ترجمه‌ی بیوک محمدی. تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.

2. ببی، ا. (1381). روش‌های تحقیق درعلوم اجتماعی، جلد اول. ترجمه‌ی رضا فاضل.تهران: انتشارات سمت.

3. برک‌پور، ن. و اسدی، ا. (1388). مدیریت و حکمروایی شهری، تهران: نشر دانشگاه هنر.

4. پرهیزگار، ا. و کاظمیان، غ.ر. (1384). رویکرد حکمروایی شهری و ضرورت آن در مدیریت منطقه‌ی کلانشهری. فصلنامه‌ی پژوهش‌های اقتصادی، 5 (16)، 55-29.

5. جانستون،ج. (1382). فرهنگ جغرافیای انسانی (حکمروایی)، ترجمه‌ی ناصر برک‌پور، ماهنامه‌ی شهرداری‌ها، (52).

6. دانایی‌فرد، ح.، الوانی، م. و آذر، ع. (1391). روش‌شناسی پژوهش کیفی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع، تهران: انتشارات صفار.

7. ذکایی، م. (1381). نظریه و روش در تحقیقات کیفی. فصلنامه‌ی علوم اجتماعی، 9(17)، 69-41.

8. رهنورد، ف.، علیپور، ح.، دهدار، ف. و خلیلی، ح. (1398). چارچوب رابطـه حکومـت و مـردم در ایـران: رویکـرد نهادی. فصلنامه‌ مدیریت دولتی، 11(1)، 46 – 27.

9. سعیدی رضوانی، ن. و کاظمیان، غ.ر. (1382). امکان‌سنجی واگذاری وظایف جدید به شهرداری‌ها، جلد اول. تهران: انتشارات سازمان شهرداری‌های کشور.

10. شریفیان‌ثانی، م. (1380). مشارکت شهروندی، حکمرانی شهری و مدیریت شهری. فصلنامه‌ی مدیریت شهری، 2(8)، 55-42.

11. شمس، ع. (1377). نظری برمبانی نظام مدیریت منطقه‌ای، فصلنامه‌ی مدیریت دولتی، 12(1)، 40-29.

12. علی‌مرادی، ظ.، شمس، ع. و جهانگیری، ع. (1397). طراحی مدل ارزیابی خودگردانی محلی در سطح استان‌های جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه‌‌ی مدیریت دولتی، 10(4)، 650 -629 .

13. کاظمیان، غ.ر. و همکاران. (1392). مدیریت شهری، جلد اول. تهران: نشرتیسا.

14. محمدپور،ا. (1389). ضدروش: منطق و طرح در روش‌شناسی کیفی، جلد 1. تهران: انتشارات جامعه‌شناسان.

15. محمدزاده سلطانمرادی،ه.، فیضی، ط.، گرامی‌پور، م. و یـداللهی، م. (1398). تبیـین و آسـیب‌شناسـی الگـوی جاری مدیریت دولتی در ایران. فصلنامه‌ی مدیریت دولتی، 11(1)، 26-1.

16. مرتضوی، م. (1392). مدیریت محلی و حکمروایی شهری. تهران: مرکز مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.

17. هومن، ح. (1385). راهنمای عملی پژوهش کیفی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

18. Andrew, C., & Goldsmith, M. (1998). From local government to local governance-and beyond? International Political Science Review, 19(2), 101-117.

19. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London, England: Sage.

20. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.

21. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss. A. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

23. Hendriks, F. (2014). Understanding good urban governance: Essentials, shifts, and values. Urban Affairs Review, 50(4), 553-576.

24. Meza Canales, O. (2015). From local government to local governance. https:// www. researchgate.net/publication/287206816_FROM_LOCAL_GOVERNMENT_TO_LOCAL_GOVERNANCE

25. Miller, K. (2002, June). Advantages and disadvantages of local government decentralization. Paper presented at the Caribbean conference on ‘Local Government and Decentralization’. Ocean International Hotel, Georgetown Guyana.

26. Porumbescu, G .A. (2015). Using transparency to enhance responsiveness and trust in local government: Can it work? State and Local Government Review, 47(3), 205-213.

27. Reid, M. (1999). The Central-Local Government Relationship: The Need for a Framework? Political Science, 50(2), 165–181

28. Shah, A., & Shah, S. (2009). The new vision of local governance and the evolving roles of local governments. Journal of Public Administration, 3(1), 2-15.

29. Slack, N. E. (2004). Models of government structure at the local level. Ontario, Canada: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.

30. Wilson, R. H. (2000). Understanding local governance: an international perspective. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 40(2), 51-63.