Heuristic Evaluation of the User Interface of the Islamic world Science Citation Database

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 9, Volume 3, Issue 2 - Serial Number 6, March 2013, Pages 149-164   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/riis.v3i1.15071

Authors

mohsen nowkarzi¹; nosrat fanoodi^{* 2}

¹Asociate Professor, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

²MA of Library and Information Science

Abstract

Abstract:

Purpose: The study was carried out to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the user interface of the Islamic World Science Citation (ISC) in the Iranian Science Citation Index.

Methodology: The method was a qualitative and applied one. To do this heuristic research, a checklist consisting of Nielson's (Pierotti, 2009), Cherry et al (Lancaster, 1997) and Gulliver’s (2002) checklists was developed and used. The sampling was a purposeful and non-probabilistic one. The assessment was carried out by 6 specialists in the fields of library and information science, and computer science.

Findings: The results showed that, in ISC وout of 83 items for the 8 components of the checklist, only 21 items (%25.3) were correct and there were some problems with the other 62 items (%74.69). The components “General Design and Aesthetic Aspects” and “Imposing Restriction”, in which 50 percent of the evaluation criteria were observed, were among the most compatible ones with the checklist criteria. The results also showed that the greatest severity of problems was related to the components “Document Retrieval”, “Search” and “Imposing Restriction” with the mean of 2.6 out of 5. In general, the results confirmed the weakness of the ISC interface related to the assessment criteria.

Keywords

Interface Assessment; Databases; Islamic World Science Citation (ISC); Heuristic Evaluation; Iranian Science Citation index

References

Borälv, E. (2004). Design and evaluation of the CHILI system.Technical report from the Department of Information Technology at University.56 Retrieved September 2, 2011, from http://www.it.uu.se/research/publications/reports

Clark, N., & Frost, D. (2003).User-centered evaluation and design: A subject gateway perception. Retrieved September 2, 2011, from http://www.vala.org.au/ vala2002pdf/38clafro.pdf

Dorner, D. G., & Curtis, A. (2004). A comparative review of common user interface حroducts.Library Hi Tech. 22 (2), 189-197.

Hansen, P.)1998). Evaluation of IR User Interface Implications for User Interface Design.Human IT. 2, 28-41.

Hearst, M. A. (1999). Trends and controversies: mixed–initiative interaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 14 (15), 14-23

Lancaster, F. W., &San Dore, B.(1997).Technology andmanagement in library and information services. London: library Association publishing.

Nielsen, J. (2005). Characteristics of the usability problems found by heuristic evaluation. Retrieved September 10, 2011, from www.useit.com/ paper/ heuristic usability .html 

Pierott, D. Corporation, X. (2009). Heuristic Evaluation- a system check list.In Usability Toolkit. Retrieved September 1, 2011, from www.stcsig.org/ usability/topic/articles/ he-checklist.html

Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing user interface: strategies for effective human – computer interaction (3rd ed.) reading, MA; Addision Wesley longman

Yushiana, M., &Widyawati Abdul, R. (2007). Heuristic evaluation of interface usability for a web-based OPAC. Library Hi Technology, 25 (4), 538-549. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://www.emeraldinsigh.com