Development of a New Comprehensive Multivariate Aggregate Drought Index (ADI) based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Hydro- Meteorological Droughts Assessment in the Southeast of Iran (Case Study: Pishin Dam Basin)

جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی

Article 4, Volume 4, Issue 3 - Serial Number 15, January 2016, Pages 91-112   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/geo.v4i3.31626

Author

Hamid Nazaripour^*

University of Advanced Technology

Abstract

1. Introduction
A drought is a prolonged period of water deficit and usually occurs when an area does not receive significant precipitation for a sustained period of time, say several months (Chen, Kuo, & Yu, 2009; Linsely, Kohlerm, & Paulhus, 1959). The effects of drought often accumulate slowly over a considerable period of time that may linger for several years even after the termination of drought. Therefore, some authors have called it a creeping phenomenon (Wilhite, 2000). It is difficult to precisely determine the onset and end of a drought event. A drought can be short, lasting for a just a few months, or it may persist for years before climatic conditions return to normal. Drought considered as the most complex, but the least understandable phenomenon of all the natural hazards affecting more people than any other hazards (Mishra & Desai, 2005). Droughts can be classified into four categories as meteorological, hydrological, agricultural and socio-economic (American Meteorological Society, 1997; Palmer, 1965; White & Walcott, 2009). The preparedness and planning for a drought depend on the information about its areal extent, severity and duration (Mishra & Singh, 2011). This information can be obtained through drought monitoring that is usually done with the use of drought indices (DIs) which provide information to decision makers about drought characteristics. Thus, these indices can be used to initiate drought action plans. Prediction of droughts is useful for early warning that may reduce the response time and consequently the impact of a drought. For many regions, especially semi-arid regions, limited knowledge is available about the diurnal and seasonal cycles of land surface interactions. Semi-arid areas pose a challenge due to large contrasts between dry and wet conditions within a temporal cycle (Schuttemeyer, 2005). Meteorological drought is generally an indicator of other drought types with below normal precipitation, and usually occurs first before other drought types do. The seasonality and climatological conditions vary by location. Drought severity may differ from site to site under different climatic conditions, hence, as many as applications of DIs and their comparisons are beneficial for specific regions in the world.
The objective of this study is to develop an aggregate drought index (ADI) based on principal component analysis (PCA) to assess the severity of Hydro-Meteorological drought in the southeast of Iran. Therefore, Stream flow drought index (SDI) and effective drought index (EDI) is determined for several different monthly time steps. The ADI is calculated after a principal component analysis to determine aggregated index value.

2. Study Area
Southeast area of Iran is confined to Sistan and Baluchestan province and located southeast of the intersection of between 29ºN and 57ºE. In this area, precipitation mostly falls in winter and summer seasons. Summer rainfall related to the monsoon mass effect, which comes from Indian Ocean. Climate is arid and semi-arid. Bahouklat is the most important river in area. The origin of this river is the Pir Abad Mountains in the southeastern of Iranshahr city and the passing of Sarbaz, Bahoukalat, Pishin and Dashtyari regions eventually lead to Govare Bay. This river has various names in different regions and called Sarbaz River from Sarbaz to Rask and passes of Pishin dam. Discharge of this river (Sarbaz) is very important in this area.

3. Material and Methods
Hydrological and meteorological drought values are necessary for ADI computation over a long period. Therefore, streamflow drought (SDI) and effective drought (EDI) Indicators were used to estimate the hydrological and meteorological droughts. The input variables include the daily values of stream flow of Sarbaz River in the Pirdan hydrometric station and rainfall during the 21 March 1985 to 20 March 2011 common period. Variables were arranged according to water year (also water year, flow year or discharge year), which begins in October in Iran. Daily timestep of SDI and EDI were estimated respectively according to Nalbantis (2008) and Byun and Wilhite (1999) and then ADI were calculated based on principal component analysis according to Keyantash and Dracup (2004).

4. Results and Discussion
Drought is a very common phenomenon in Iran and particularly in the south east and it has become a recurrent phenomenon in this area in the last few decades .The hydro-meteorological drought index was applied for the identification of drought severity in south east of Iran and drought occurrences were monitored during the experimental years of 1985/86 to 2010/11. Results based on the aggregate drought index (ADI) revealed that a long period of hydro-meteorological drought occurred from 1994/95 to 1998/99. Also, a prolonged wet period has started immediately after the end of drought and has continued to June 2005. In addition, according to drought severity, 1997/98 and 2003/04 water years respectively are extreme drought and extreme wet years. Finally, we have compared the performance of EDI (Meteorological drought index) and SDI (Hydrological drought index) with aggregate drought index. Based on this comparison, aggregate drought index (ADI) could be better highlighting the drought conditions and its characteristics.

5. Conclusion
Aggregate drought index (ADI) is methodology presented for replacing the uni-dimensional analysis of drought phenomena which can assist authorities and stakeholders to take rational decisions for combating droughts. Using this approach, a more effective way for assessing the severity of drought is obtained. On the other hand, ADI shows capability to detect dry and wet years. Moreover, it has capability to detect historical drought. Overall, by considering the results, the ADI is more reliable than EDI and SDI for drought monitoring in the study area. In this study, ADI time series were compared against the EDI and SDI to describe an important and long drought event in south east of Iran, the 2003-2004 event from a hydro-meteorological perspective. The ADI methodology provides a clear, objective approach for describing the intensity of drought and can be readily adapted to characterize drought on each area.

Keywords

Hydro-meteorological drought; Aggregate Drought Index; Principal component analysis; Pishin Dam Basin; Southeast of Iran

References

حجازی زاده، زهرا؛ فتاحی، ابراهیم؛ 1383. تحلیل کمی شدت و تداوم خشک‌سالی‌های روزانه در ایستگاه شهرکرد. نشریه علوم جغرافیایی. 3(3). 161- 147.

خسروی، محمود؛ نظری پور، حمید؛ 1391. مطالعه همدید تیپ‌های هوای غالب منطقه سیستان (ایستگاه زابل). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی.3(81). 62- 39.

زارع‌زاده مهریزی، محبوبه؛ مرید، سعید؛1390. پایش خشک‌سالی با استفاده از تراز مخزن سد و شاخص‌های هواشناسی (مطالعه موردی سیستم آب زاینده‌رود اصفهان). مجله تحقیقات آب‌وخاک ایران. دوره 42. شماره یک: 19-26.

سعیدی، رضا؛ زهرایی، بنفشه؛ 1390. مدل‌سازی فرایند بارش- رواناب در حوضه آبریز سد پیشین برای شبیه‌سازی اثرات تغییر اقلیم. ششمین کنگره ملی مهندسی عمران. دانشگاه سمنان. ایران.

مقدسی، مهنوش؛ مرید، سعید؛ قائمی، هوشنگ؛ محمدولی سامانی، جمال؛ 1384. پایش روزانه خشک‌سالی در استان تهران. مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران. 36(1). 62- 51.

نصرتی، کاظم؛ کاظمی، یونس؛ 1390. پایش روزانه خشک‌سالی و منابع آب در اقلیم‌های مختلف ایران، مرتع و آبخیزداری (منابع طبیعی ایران). 64(1). 94- 79.

نظری پور، حمید؛ بابائی، ندا؛ 1393. ارزیابی سختی خشک‌سالی‌های آب‌شناختی برپایه شاخص رواناب استاندارد شده و پیش‌بینی آن با زنجیره مارکوف در حوضه آبریز کویر لوت. دومین کنگره بین‌المللی علوم کشاورزی و محیط‌زیست. دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. تهران. ایران.

Agha Kouchak, A., Behrangi, A., Sorooshian, S., Hsu, K., & Amitai, E. (2011). Evaluation of satellite‐retrieved extreme precipitation rates across the central United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116(D2), 1984–2012.

Akhtari, R., Morid, S., Mahdian, M. H., & Smakhtin, V. (2009). Assessment of areal interpolation methods for spatial analysis of SPI and EDI drought indices. International Journal of Climatology, 29(1), 135-145.

Barnston, A. G., & Livezey, R. E. (1987). Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Monthly Weather Review, 115(6), 1083-1126.

Bonaccorso, B., Bordi, I., Cancelliere, A., Rossi, G., & Sutera, A. (2003). Spatial variability of drought: An analysis of the SPI in Sicily. Water Resources Management, 17(4), 273-296.

Byun, H. R., & Wilhite, D. A. (1999). Objective quantification of drought severity and duration. Journal of Climate, 12(9), 2747-2756.

Cattell, R. B. (1952). Factor analysis: An introduction and manual for the psychologist and social scientist. Westport, Conn: Greenport Press.

Chen, S. T., Kuo, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2009). Historical trends and variability of meteorological droughts in Taiwan. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54(3), 430-441.

CRDE. (2003). Disasters database. Retrieved from http://www. cred.be/ emdat/intro.htm.

Dogan, S., Berkty, A., & Sing, V. P. (2012). Comparison of multi-monthly rainfall-based drought severity indices, with application to semi-arid Konya closed basin, Turkey. Journal of Hydrology, 470–471, 255–268.

Dracup, J. A., Lee, K. S., & Paulson, E. G. (1980). On the definition of droughts. Water Resources Research, 16(2), 297-302.

Guttman, N. B. (1998). Comparing the palmer drought index and the standardized precipitation index. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34(1), 113–121.

Haan, C. T. (1977). Statistical methods in hydrology. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., & Wilhite, D. A. (2000). Monitoring drought using the standardized precipitation index. In D.A. Wilhite (Ed.), Drought: A global assessment (pp. 168-180). UK: Routledge.

Hidalgo, H. G., Piechota, T. C., & Dracup, J. A. (2000). Alternative principal components regression procedures for dendrohydrologic reconstructions. Water Resources Research, 36(11), 3241-3249.

Hsu, K. L., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, H. V. (1997). Precipitation estimation from remotely sensed information using artificial neural networks. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 36(9), 1176-1190.

Kalamaras, N., Michalopoulou, H., & Byun, H. R. (2010). Detection of drought events in Greece using daily precipitation. Hydrology Research, 41(2), 126-133.

Keyantash, J. A., & Dracup, J. A. (2004). An aggregate drought index: Assessing drought severity based on fluctuations in the hydrologic cycle and surface water storage. Water Resources Research, 40(9), 1-13.

Kim, D. W., Byun, H. R., & Choi, K. S. (2009). Evaluation, modification, and application of the effective drought index to 200-year drought climatology of Seoul, Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 378(1), 1-12.

Lins, H. F. (1997). Regional streamflow regimes and hydroclimatology of the United States. Water Resources Research, 33(7), 1655-1667.

Linsely Jr., R. K., Kohlerm, M. A., & Paulhus, J. L. H. (1959). Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw Hill.

Mehran, A., & Agha Kouchak, A. (2014). Capabilities of satellite precipitation datasets to estimate heavy precipitation rates at different temporal accumulations. Hydrological Processes, 28(4), 2262-2270.

Mishra, A. K., & Desai, V. R. (2005). Drought forecasting using stochastic models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 19(5), 326-339.

Morid, S., Smakhtin, V., & Moghaddasi, M. (2006). Comparison of seven meteorological indices for drought monitoring in Iran. International Journal of Climatology, 26(7), 971-985.

Nalbantis, I. (2008). Evaluation of a hydrological drought index. European Water, 23(24), 67-77.

Nalbantis, I., & Tsakiris, G. (2009). Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resources Management, 23(5), 881-897.

Nicholson, S. E., Davenport, M. L., & Malo, A. R. (1990). A comparison of the vegetation response to rainfall in the Sahel and East Africa, using normalized difference vegetation index from NOAA AVHRR. Climatic Change, 17(2-3), 209-241.

Norouzi, A., Nohegar, A., & Ghorbani, A. (2012). Comparison of the suitability of standardized precipitation index (SPI) and aggregated drought index (ADI) in Minab watershed (Hormozgan province/South of Iran). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(44), 5905-5911.

Obasi, G. O. P. (1994). WMO's role in the international decade for natural disaster reduction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 75(9), 1655-1661.

Pandey, R. P., Dash, B. B., Mishra, S. K., & Singh, R. (2008). Study of indices for drought characterization in KBK districts in Orissa (India). Hydrological Processes, 22(12), 1895-1907.

Paulo, A. A., & Pereira, L. S. (2006). Drought concepts and characterization: Comparing drought indices applied at local and regional scales. Water International, 31(1), 37-49.

Pickup, G. (1998). Desertification and climate change: The Australian perspective. Climate Research, 11(1), 51-63.

Preisendorfer, R. W. (1988). Principal component analysis in meteorology and oceanography (Vol. 17). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Rossi, G. (2000). Drought mitigation measures: A comprehensive framework. In J. V. Vogt & F. Somma (Eds.), Drought and drought mitigation in Europe (pp. 233-246). Netherlands: Springer.

Rossi, G., Benedini, M., Tsakiris, G., & Giakoumakis, S. (1992). On regional drought estimation and analysis. Water Resources Management, 6(4), 249-277.

Saedi, R., & Zahraei, B. (2011, April). Rainfall-runoff modeling to simulate the effects of climate change in the Pishin dam basin. Paper presented at the 6th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Iran.

Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical methods. Iowa: Iowa University Press.

Sorooshian, S., Hsu, K. L., Gao, X., Gupta, H. V., Imam, B., & Braithwaite, D. (2000). Evaluation of PERSIANN system satellite-based estimates of tropical rainfall. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81(9), 2035-2046.

Tigkas, D. (2008). Drought characterization and monitoring in regions of Greece. European Water, 23(24), 29-39.

Tsakiris G., Pangalou D., & Vangelis H. (2007). Regional drought assessment based on the reconnaissance drought index (RDI). Water Resources Management, 21(5), 821-833.

Tsakiris G., Tigkas D., Vangelis, H., Pangalou, D. (2007). Regional drought identification and assessment – Case study in Crete. In G. Rossi, T. Vega, & B. Bonaccorso (Eds.), Methods and tools for drought analysis and management (pp. 169-191). The Netherlands: Springer.

Wilhite, D. A., & Glantz, M. H. (1985). Understanding the drought phenomenon: The role of definitions. Water International, 10(3), 111-120.

Wilhite, D. A., Sivakumar M. V. K., & Wood D. A. (2000, September). Early warning systems for drought preparedness and drought management. Paper presented at an Expert Group Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal.

Wilks, D. S. (2011). Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: An introduction (Vol. 100). USA: Academic Press.

Yarnal, B. (1993). Synoptic climatology in environmental analysis: A primer. London: Belhaven Press.

Zarch, M. A. A., Malekinezhad, H., Mobin, M. H., Dastorani, M. T., & Kousari, M. R. (2011). Drought monitoring by reconnaissance drought index (RDI) in Iran. Water Resources Management, 25(13), 3485-3504.