Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and multivariate analysis for prediction of the moisture content and hardness of Pistachio kernels roasted in different conditions

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 6, Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10, 2015, Pages 281-291   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v5i2.28486

Authors

T. Mohammadi Moghaddam^{* 1}; S. M. A. Razavi¹; M. Taghizadeh¹; A. Sazgarnia²; B. Pardhan³

¹Department of Food Science and Technology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad , Mashhad , Iran

²Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

³Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia

Abstract

Introduction: Pistachio nut is one of the most delicious and nutritious nuts in the world and it is being used as a salted and roasted product or as an ingredient in snacks, ice cream, desserts, etc. (Maghsudi, 2010; Kashaninejad et al. 2006). Roasting is one of the most important food processes which provides useful attributes to the product. One of the objectives of nut roasting is to alter and significantly enhance the flavor, texture, color and appearance of the product (Ozdemir, 2001). In recent years, spectral imaging techniques (i.e. hyperspectral and multispectral imaging) have emerged as powerful tools for safequality inspection of various agricultural commodities (Gowen et al., 2007). The objectives of this study were to apply reflectance hyperspectral imaging for non-destructive determination of moisture content and hardness of pistachio kernels roasted in different conditions.
Materials and methods: Dried O’hadi pistachio nuts were supplied from a local market in Mashhad. Pistachio nuts were soaked in 5L of 20% salt solution for 20min (Goktas Seyhan, 2003). For roasting process, three temperatures (90, 120 and 150°C), three times (20, 35 and 50 min) and three air velocities (0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 m s-1) were applied. The moisture content of pistachio kernels was measured in triplicate using oven drying (3 gr samples at 105 °C for 12 hours). Uniaxial compression test by a 35mm diameter plastic cylinder, was made on the pistachio kernels, which were mounted on a platform. Samples were compressed at a depth of 2mm and speed of 30 mm min-1. A hyperspectral imaging system in the Vis-NIR range (400-1000 nm) was employed. The spectral pre-processing techniques: first derivative and second derivative, median filter, Savitzkye-Golay, wavelet, multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) and standard normal variate transformation (SNV) were used. To make models at PLSR and ANN methods, ParLeS software and Matlab R2009a were used, respectively. The coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and the ratio of the standard deviation of the response variable to RMSEP (known as relative performance determinant (RPD)) were calculated.
Results and discussion:
Interpretation of hyperspectral data: The results showed that the spectra of the shell, the whole kernel and the internal part of the kernel have different patterns. The internal part of thekernel had 2 peaks at 630 nm and 690 nm, while the shell and the whole kernel had 1 peak at 670 nm and 720 nm, respectively and the peak of the whole kernel was sharper than that of the shell. The highest and lowest intensities were for the internal part of the kernel and the whole kernel, respectively. The spectral slope of the internal part is higher than that of the shell and the whole kernel at 500-700 nm.
The effect of different pre-processing techniques and analysis on prediction of pistachio kernels properties: In the absence of pre-processing techniques, low correlation coefficients were observed for prediction of moisture content and hardness. However, with the use of pre-processing techniques, in some models, correlation coefficient and RPD increased and the RMSEP decreased. The results revealed that ANN models would predict moisture content and textural characteristics of roasted pistachio kernels better than PLSR models.
Moisture content: ANN models can predict moisture content of roasted pistachio kernels better than PLSR models. In total, PLSR models showed low RPD and R2. For all samples, RPD was lower than 1.5, indicating that the developed models do not give an accurate prediction for moisture content. The best results with ANN method were achieved using a combination of SNV, wavelet and D1 for predicting moisture content with R2 =0.907 and RMSEP=0.179.
Hardness: The results indicated that ANN models can predict the hardness better than PLSR models. The best results with PLSR models were achieved using a combination of SNV, wavelet and D1 with R2= 0.643, RMSEP=10.78, RDP= 1.48 and 2 PLSR factors. However, due to high RMSEP and low R2 and RPD, it can be mentioned that prediction of hardness values with ANN model was not sufficiently desirable. However it was better than the PLSR models. The best results with ANN models were achieved using a combination of SNV, wavelet and D2 with R2=0.876 and RMSEP=5.216.
Conclusions: The results of this study showed that employing pre-processing methods causesa decrease in prediction error and improves the quality of the models. ANN models could predict moisture content and hardness of roasted pistachio kernels better than the PLSR models.

Keywords

Compression test; Hyperspectral images; Pistachio; Roasting

References

1. Cogdill, R. P., Jr. C. R. Hurburgh, and G. R. Rippke. 2004. Single-kernel maize analysis by near-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Transactions of the ASABE 47 (1): 311-320.

2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2013. Available from: http://www.fao.org.

3. Goktas Seyhan, F. 2003. Effect of soaking on salting and moisture uptake of pistachio nuts (Pistachiavera L.) from Turkiye. GIDA 28 (4): 395-400.

4. Gowen, A. A., C. P. O’Donnell, P. J. Cullen, G. Downey, and J. M. Frias. 2007. Hyperspectral imaging – an emerging process analytical tool for food quality and safety control. Trends in Food Science & Technology 18: 590-598.

5. Kashaninejad, M., A. Mortazavi, A. Safekordi, and L. G. Tabil. 2005. Some physical properties of pistachio (Pistachio Vera L.) nut and its kernel. Journal of Food Engineering 72 (1): 30-38.

6. Kim, M. S., Y. R. Chen, and P. M. Mehl. 2000. Hyperspectral reflectance and fluorescence imaging system for food quality and safety. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 44 (3): 721-729.

7. Mahesh, S., A. Manickavasagan, D. S. Jayas, J. Paliwal, and N. D. G. White. 2008. Feasibility of near-infrared hyperspectral imaging to differentiate Canadian wheat classes. Biosystems engineering July: 50-57.

8. Maghsudi, Sh. 2010. Pistachio (agricultural, industry, nutrition and treatment). Iran Agricultural science Publishing Inc., Iran. (In Farsi).

9. Monteiro, S. T., Y. Minekawa, Y. Kosugi, T. Akazawa, and K. Oda. 2007. Prediction of sweetness and amino acid content in soybean crops from hyperspectral imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 62: 2-12.

10. Nakariyakul, S., and D. P. Casasent. 2011. Classification of internally damaged almond nuts using hyperspectral imagery. Journal of Food Engineering 103: 62-67.

11. Nicolaï, B. M., K. Beullens, E. Bobelyn, A. Peirs, W. Saeys, K. Theron, and J. Lammertyn. 2007. Nondestructive measurement of fruit and vegetable quality by means of NIR spectroscopy: a review. Postharvest Biology and Technology 46: 99-118.

12. Ozdemir, M. 2001. Mathematical analysis of color changes and chemical parameters of roasted hazelnuts. Ph.D Thesis.

13. Pangan.Available from: http://pangan12.blogfa.com/post-558.aspx.Visited: 2011.

14. Sun, D.W. 2010. Hyperspectral imaging for food quality analysis and control. Academic press is an imprint of Elsevier.

15. Weinstock, B. A., J. Janni, L. Hagen, and S. Wright. 2006. Prediction of oil and oleic acid concentrations in individual corn (Zea mays L.) kernels using near infrared reflectance hyperspectral imaging and multivariate analysis. Applied Spectroscopy 60 (1): 9-16.

16. William, P. C., and D. G. Sobering. 1996. How do we do it: a brief summary of the method we use in developing near infrared calibrations. In: Davies, A.M.C., Williams, P. (Eds.), Near Infrared Spectroscopy: The Future Waves. The Proceeding of the Seventh International Conference on Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Montreal, pp.185-188.

17. Williams, P., P. Geladi, G. Fox, and M. Manley. 2009. Maize kernel hardness classification by near infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imaging and multivariate data analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 653: 121-130.

18. Yoon, J., B. Lee, and C. Han. 2002. Calibration transfer of near-infrared spectra based on compression of wavelet coefficients. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 64: 1-14.

19. Zhu, B., L. Jiang, F. Jin, L. Qin, A. Vogel, and Y. Tao. 2007. Sens & Instrumen. Food Quality 1: 123-131.