Review on reservoir quality of Dariyan formation in South Pars field, based on hydraulic flow units and rock types study and its relation to texture and diagenetic specifications of sedimentary facies

رخساره‌های رسوبی

Article 6, Volume 10, Issue 2, February 2018, Pages 273-290   

Document Type: مقالات پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/sed.facies.v10i2.57407

Authors

Mohammad Reza Rahmani¹; Seyed Reza Mousavi Harami^{* 2}; Mehran Arian¹

¹Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

²Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Dariyan formation which is one of the oil reservoirs in the south pars field, has been studied in wells SPO-1, SPO-2, SPO-3 from this field. Six hydraulic flow units (HFU) were identified by flow zone indicator (FZI) for reservoir facies, including HFU-A, HFU-B, HFU-C, HFU-D, HFU-E and HFU-F. Comparison between these hydraulic flow units indicate HFU-A and HFU-B with very Low reservoir quality, HFU-C with low reservoir quality, HFU-D with medium reservoir quality and HFU-E and HFU-F with high reservoir quality which reveal good correspond with facies texture and diagenetic specifications. Also, based on studies, four rock types were identified. Rock type 1 includes flow unites mostly with very low reservoir quality (B, C), and flow unites with medium (D) and flow unites with high reservoir quality (E, F) are lesser. Rock type 2 is nearly semblable to rock type 1 albeit, flow unites with medium (D) and high (E) reservoir quality are more and flow unites with very low and low reservoir quality are less than rock type 1. Rock type 3 is more liaise to flow unites with high reservoir quality (E, F) and less with medium reservoir quality (D). Rock type 4 is only related with flow unite with high reservoir quality (F).

Keywords

Dariyan formation; South pars field; diagenesis; reservoir quality; Oil field

References

Abbaszadeh, M., Fujii, H., & Fujimoto, F., 1996. Permeability prediction by hydraulic flow units - theory and applications. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Formation Evaluation, 11: 263-271.

Aggoun, R.C., Tiab, T., & Owayed, J.F., 2006. Characterization of flow units in shaly sand reservoirs Hassi R’Mel Oil Rim, Algeria. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 50: 211-226.

Amabeoku, M.O., Kersey, D.G., BinNasser, R.H., Al-Belowi, A.R., 2006. Relative permeability coupled saturation-height models based on hydraulic (flow) units in a gas field. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 11: 1013-1028.

Amaefule, J.O., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Kersey, D.G., & Keelan, D.K., 1993. Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Paper 26436: 1–16.

Archie, G.E., 1950. Introduction to petrophysics of reservoir rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 34: 943 – 961.

Desouky, S.E.M., 2004. Predicting permeability in un-cored intervals/wells using the hydraulic flow unit approach. Nafta, 55: 245-250.

Dunham, R.J., 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham, W.E. (ed.), Classification of carbonate rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Memoir, 1: 108-121.

Flugel, E., 2010. Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks, Analysis, Interpretation and Application. second edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1006 P.

Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi A., & Amini, A., 2009. A fuzzy logic approach to estimating hydraulic flow units from well log data: A case study from the Ahvaz oilfield, south Iran. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 32 (1): 67-78.

Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi, R., Rezaee, M.R., Moussavi-Harami, R., & Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi, A., 2013. Analysis of the reservoir electrofacies in the framework of hydraulic flow units in the Whicher Range Field, Perth Basin, Western Australia. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 111: 106-120.

Perez, H.H., Datta-Gupta, A., & Mishra, S., 2005. The role of electrofacies, lithofacies, and hydraulic flow units in permeability predictions from Well Logs: a comparative analysis using classification trees. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Annual Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Paper 84301: 143–155.

Prasad, M., 2003. Velocity-permeability relations within hydraulic units. Geophysics, 68: 108-117.

Rushing, J.A., Newsham, K.E., & Blasingame, T.A., 2008. Rock Typing-Keys to Understanding Productivity in Tight Gas Sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Annual Conference and Exhibition, Colorado, Paper 114164.

Serra, O., 1986. Fundamentals of Well Log Interpretation: 2. The Interpretation of Logging Data. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1-684.

Tucker, K.E., Harris, P.M., & Nolen- Hoeksema, R.C., 1998. Geologic investigation of cross-well seismic response in a carbonate reservoir, Mcelroy field, west Texas, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 82: 1463-1503.