The Role of Tourism Symbols in Rural Development (Case Study: Neshat Historical Garden in Taqiabad Village)

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

مقاله 5، دوره 6، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 17، شهریور 2017، صفحه 69-80   

نوع مقاله: علمی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v6i1.52120

نویسندگان

Hasan Giyahi¹؛ Aliakbar Shayan Yeganeh^{* 2}

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²Hakim Sabzevari University

چکیده

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Although symbol creation has had a long record in human history, throughout the history, the symbols as a mark bearing visual identity, have been used as a tool for communication. This means humans have used the symbols for thousands of years to describe natural phenomena and express their emotions, feelings and ideas. There are many historical and natural monuments in rural areas that are symbols and brands of those areas. Accordingly, they can have a huge impact on sustainable development of rural areas if they receive due attention. Nowadays in many rural areas, tourism has changed from a passive factor into a dynamic and effective one which may have positive effects on controlling the rural social landscape. The nature and significance of such changes make it necessary to pay special attention to functions of tourism and leisure activities in rural areas, so that in some cases it may prompt one to predict the possible effects.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Since tourism and the use of natural and historical resources has changed into a need, the various uses of space has provided more opportunities for rural people to benefit from natural and historical monuments in their areas. Today, tourism as a phenomenon of the twentieth century plays a vital role in the global economy, and as a social phenomenon play a significant role in dynamic global economy. At the same time, as the world's largest service industry, tourism contributes to cultural exchange between countries. Persian Garden as one of the valuable historical and natural symbols of Iran which has recently been registered in World Heritage list (UNESCO) would remain in the minds of the people of the world.
3. METHODOLOGY
The research was conducted in a descriptive-analytical method. The data were obtained through documentary research and surveys. The population included about 20,000 people, of which 250 people were selected in a random sampling method as the sample of the study. We also used Kendall W Rank test to find which area has more positive tourism driven effects. The data were processed using SPSS software package. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure the reliability of the items.
4. DISCUSSION
The results showed that according to the value of chi-square (15.424), which is a significant at error level of less than 0.01, we may conclude with a confidence level of 0.99 percent that ideas of the participants about the effects of tourism on social, economic and physical aspects are different. According to the results, the physical effects of tourism (2.12) in the study area, have been stronger than social-cultural (1.93) and economic ones (1.94). The largest economic impact of tourism was on the item of “tourism has attracted more funds and state budget” with an average of 4.8. The largest socio-cultural impact of tourism was on the item of “To what extent have advertising and guiding the tourists been adequate in the area?” with an average of 4.42. The largest physical impact of tourism was on the item of “Do you believe your village has essential capabilities for tourism development” with an average of 4.56. The study results show the revival and restoration of the garden as the symbol and brand of regional tourism has positive economic, social and physical effects on development of Taqi Abad village.
5. CONCLUSION
Neshat Garden in Taghiabad Firozeh village, situated 18 km West of Nishabur, similar to other historical gardens in Iran, have a favorable status in tourism of the region and the province. As the study results show the revival and restoration of the monument has had positive economic, social and physical effects on development of Taqiabad village. The statistics of Cultural Heritage Administration of Firozeh County in 2013-2014 show that after restoration of the garden, more than 13,500 people have visited the site. Nevertheless, the number was too small in 2013. This figure well indicates the statues of Neshat Garden among culture lovers, promising its essential role in attracting tourists and eventually in rural development.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Rural tourism؛ Neshat Garden؛ Persian garden؛ symbol؛ Taghiabad village

مراجع

1. Absollahzadeh, Gh., Sharifzadeh, A., & Arabiyon, A. (1392/ 2014). Explores the implications developing tourism in rural areas: Ziyarat village of Golestan Province. Geography and Environmental Planning Journal, 52, 15-32. [In Persian]

2. Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Firoozeh city (1393/2014). Reports and statistics. Firooze: Office of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism in Firooze city. [In Persian]

3. Anabestani, A.A., Bozerjmehri, KH., & Sahebkar, N. (1391/2012). Social and economic consequences of tourism development of second homes in rural areas rural case study: Shirindare Ghochan. Journal of Research and rural planning, (1), 12-42. [In Persian]

4. Roknoddin-e-Eftekhari, R., & Ghaderi, A. (1382/2003). The role of rural tourism in rural development. Journal of Tarbiat Modarres, 6(2), 10-28. [In Persian]

5. Farahmand, Sh. (1390/2011). Tourist face Kalat Naderi. Mashhad: Iran Azad publication. [In Persian]

6. Hooman, c. AS. (1376). Research Methodology (5th ed.). Tehran: SAMT Publications. [In Persian]

7. Jajarmi, K., & Solaymani, H. (1393/2013). Analysis of tourism potentials and capabilities from the perspective of rural residents Bagh bahadoran. Journal of geographical landscape in human studies, 9(26), 28-17. [In Persian]

8. Kuban, D. (1978). Conservation of the historical environment for cultural survival. Conservation as Cultural Survival, 1-8, Istanbul: The Aga Khan Award for Architecture.

9. Lee, J. (1378/ 1999). Tourism and development in the Third World, (A. Rokneddin Eftekhari, & A. Salehi, Trans.). Tehran: Commercial printing & sawing company. [In Persian]

10. Pirnia, M. K. (1373/1993). Persian gardens. Journal of Abadi, (15), 41-25. [In Persian]

11. Saraei, M. H., & Shamshiri, M. (1392/ 2013). Study of Shiraz tourism for sustainable development, using SWOT. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 49, 88-69. [In Persian]

12. Sarokhani, B. (1376/1997). Dictionary of Social Sciences. Tehran: Kayhan Publications. [In Persian]

13. Sarvar, H., Kashayni Asl, A., Eslami, M., & Salahi Sarikhan Biglo, V. (1393/2014). The effects of city symbols and signs in urban development (case study: Tabriz city). Journal tourism planning and development, 3(11), 18-36. [In Persian]

14. Sharpley, R. (2002). Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: the case of Cyprus. Tourism management, 23(3), 233-244. ‏

15. Yosefi, F., Ghobadi, A., & Khoshghadampour, S. (1391/2012). The Role of religious and national symbols in the development of religious tourism in Iran. First National Conference on Geography and tourism in the Third Millennium (pp.40-56), Islamic Azad University, Najaf Abad, Iran. [In Persian]

16. Zangiabadi, A., & Solaymani, H. (1391/2012). Analysis of the spatial development of tourism in the city of Isfahan Province Using Topsis. Journal of Geography and Urban Development, 1(1), 51-73. [In Persian]