The effects of forward speed and depth of conservation tillage on soil bulk density

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 14, Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10, 2015, Pages 368-380   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v5i2.28533

Authors

A. Mahmoudi^{* 1}; A. Jalali¹; M. Valizadeh²; I. Skandari³

¹Department of Biosystem Engineering, University of Tabriz, Iran

²Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tabriz, Iran

³Dry land Agriculture Research Institute, Maragheh, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, production techniques and equipment have been developed for conservation of tillage systems that have been adopted by many farmers. With proper management, overall yield averages for conventional and reduced tillage systems are nearly identical. Sometimes, field operations can be combined by connecting two or more implements. Combined operations reduce both fuel consumption, and time and labor requirements by eliminating at least one individual trip over the field. Light tillage, spraying, or fertilizing operations can be combined with either primary or secondary tillage or planting operations. Tillage helps seed growth and germination through providing appropriate conditions for soil to absorb sufficient temperature and humidity. Moreover, it helps easier development of root through reducing soil penetration resistance. Tillage is a time-consuming and expensive procedure. With the application of agricultural operations, we can save substantial amounts of fuel, time and energy consumption. Conservation tillage loosens the soil without turning, but by remaining the plant left overs, stems and roots. Bulk density reflects the soil’s ability to function for structural support, water and solute movement, and soil aeration. Bulk densities above thresholds indicate impaired function. Bulk density is also used to convert between weight and volume of soil. It is used to express soil physical, chemical and biological measurements on a volumetric basis for soil quality assessment and comparisons between management systems. This increases the validity of comparisons by removing the error associated with differences in soil density at the time of sampling. The aim of conservation tillage is to fix the soil structure. This investigation was carried out considering the advantages of conservation tillage and less scientific research works on imported conservation tillage devices and those which are made inside the country, besides the importance of tillage depth and speed in different tiller performance.
Materials and methods: This investigation was carried out based on random blocks in the form of split plot experimental design. The main factor, tillage depth, (was 10 and 20cm at both levels) and the second factor, tillage speed, (was 6, 8, 10, 12 km h-1 in four levels for Bostan-Abad and 8,10,12,14 km h-1 for Hashtrood) with four repetitions. It was carried out using complex tillage made in Sazeh Keshte Bukan Company, which is mostly used in Eastern Azerbaijanand using Massey Ferguson 285 and 399 tractors in Bostab-Abad and Hashtrood, respectively. In this investigation, the characteristics of soil bulk density were studied in two sampling depths of 7 and 17 centimeters. Bulk density is an indicator of soil compaction. It is calculated as the dry weight of soil divided by its volume. This volume includes the volume of soil particles and the volume of pores among soil particles. Bulk density is typically expressed in g cm-3.
Results and Discussion: In this study, the effect of both factors on the feature of the soil bulk density at the sampling depth of 5-10 and 15-20 cm was examined. In Bostan-Abad, regarding tillage speed effect for studies characteristics at 1% probability level on soil bulk density was effective. The effect of tillage depth on the soil bulk density was significant at 5% probability level . The interaction effect of tillage speed and depth on soil bulk density was significant at probability level of 1%. Regarding sampling depth effect, the soil bulk density was significant at 5% probability level, respectively. In Hashtrood, the effect of tillage speed on soil bulk density at probability level of 1%, and also tillage depth effect on soil bulk density was significant at 5% level of probability. The interaction effect of tillage speed and depth on soil bulk density was significant at 5% level of probability. Regarding the depth of sampling it was significant on soil bulk density at probability level of 1%. Through an increase in tillage speed, soil bulk density reduces at unit level.
Conclusions: In this study, the effect of both factors on the feature of the soil bulk density in the sampling depth of 5-10 and 15-20 cm was examined. In Bostan-Abad and Hashtroud, on the whole, the results indicated that the increase in the speed of tillage, soil bulk density, was reduced and the speed of 10 kilometers per hour was the best for this to implement work. Also, with an increasing depth of tillage, the bulk density increased. Through an increase in tillage speed, soil bulk density reduced at unit level. Moreover, the optimum speed was concluded 10km per hour. Through an increase in tillage depth, bulk density and soil humidity increase accordingly. The best tillage depth using this machine is 10cm.

Keywords

Bulk density; Conservation tillage; Depth; Soil; Speed

References

1. Abbaspour, Y., A. Khalilian, R. Alimardani, A. Kyhani, and H. Sasati. 2006. A comparison of energy requirement of uniformdepth and variable depth tillage as affected by travel speed and soil moisture. Iranian Agricultural Science 37 (4): 573-583.

2. Arshad, M. A., B. Lowery, and B. Grossman. 1996. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Science Society of America.

3. Ahuja, L. R., F. Fiedler, G. H. Dunn, J. G. Benjamin, and A. Garrison. 1998. Changes in soil water retention curves due to tillage and natural reconsolidation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62 (5): 1228-1233.

4. Alvarenga, R. C., B. Fernandes, and T. C. Silva. 1987. Effect of different methods of soil prepration and maize residue management on bulk density, total porosity and pore size distribution in arid latosal revise ceres. Agron Journal 8 (34): 569-577.

5. Boydas, M. G., and N. Turgut. 2007. Effect of tillage implements and operating speeds on soil physical properties and wheat emergence. Turk J Agric For. 31: 399-412.

6. Carter, L. M., and R. F. Colwick. 1971. Evaluation of tillage systems for cotton production systems. Transactions of the ASAE 14: 1116-1121.

7. Cassel, D. K., C. W. Raczkowski, and H. P. Denton. 1995. Tillage effects on corn production and soil physical conditions. Soil Science Society of America 59 (5): 1436-1443.

8. Celik, A., and S. Altikal. 2010. Effects of various strip width and tractor forwards speeds in strip tillage on soil physical properties and yield of silageorn. International Journal of Agricultural Science 169-179.

9. Kral, A., J. Lipiel, M. Tursk, and J. Kus. 2013. Effect of organic and convertional management on physical properties of soil aggregates. International Journal of Agro-Physics 27: 15-21.

10. Lindstrom, M. J., and C. A. Onstad. 1984. Influence of tillage systems on soil physical parameters and infiltration after planting. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39 (2): 149-152.

11. Marshall, T. J., J. W. Holmes, and C. W. Rose. 1999. Soil Physics (3 ed.). Syndicate of University of Combridge.

12. Mohajer- Mazandarani, F., and M. A. Asoudar. 2012. Effect of different tillage systems and pressure wheel on wheat yeild in Izeh city, Khuzestan priviance. Agriculture engineering Institute 11 (1): 1-18.

13. Osunbitan, J. A., D. J. Oyedele, and K. O. Adekalu. 2005. Tillage effects on bulk density hydraulic conductivity and strength of a loam sand soil in southwestern Nigeria. Soil & Tillage Research 82: 57-64.

14. Raper, R. L. 2002. The influence of implement type, tillage depth and tillage timing on residue burial. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 45 (5): 1281-1286.

15. Voorhees, W. B., and M. J. Linstorm. 1984. Long term effects of tillage methods on soil tilth independant of wheel trafic compaction. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48 (1): 152-156.

16. Voorhees, W. B. 1983. Relative effectiveness of tillage and natural forces in alleviating wheel-induced soil compaction. Soil Science Society of America 47 (1): 129-133.